How """charitable""" are you, Sup Forums?

How """charitable""" are you, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=hmJLh3QCNgM
amigosdelosromeritos.org
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>When leftists lack so much self awareness they can't see their own racism
Fuckin hell

How did this happen? What were we thinking of when we took our medical science to Africa and Asia and the jungles of Central and South America and reduced the death rates in those places so that their non-White populations could explode?

If we had just left them swinging through the trees and sacrificing each other wholesale to their various gods, instead of trying to get them to wear clothes and learn English or Spanish or French and wash their hands after going to the bathroom, they still would be happily making mud pies with their own filth and dying like flies, and their population density still would be what it was ten thousand years ago; the tropical rain forests still would be thriving, and the lions still would be eating as many of them as vice versa. Most important, we wouldn’t be carrying them on our backs now whenever we go to a hospital; we wouldn’t be subjecting our kids to them in our schools; we wouldn’t have them shoved in our faces whenever we turn on a television receiver; we wouldn’t be looking for parts of the country to which we can flee where there are fewer of them; we wouldn’t be watching our whole civilization being pulled back down into barbarism by their dead weight. We could be masters in our own world, a cleaner and greener and healthier world.

I used to be against charity because it fucks up local business in nigger countries, but lately I became much more charitable because I just like to watch them starve needlessly.

Completely aside from Christianity, we let the altruism which seems to be unique to our people run wild. It is wonderful that we care about one another, that more than in any other race there are among us individuals who really do feel the pain of others. It is wonderful that many of us want to preserve the rain forests of South America and the great wild beasts of Africa for their own sake. Whenever one of these United Nations commissions is organized to protect some part of our natural environment on this planet, I have a strong suspicion that all of the non-White members on the commission are there strictly for window dressing and for the stipend they receive for lending their non-White faces to the commission. Certainly, were it not for specifically White sensibilities, there would be no one combating the fur trade or trying to save the whales or the redwoods or anything else.

All of that is wonderful, but it is not wonderful that so many of us who are able to feel the pain of others do not seem to have the farsighted understanding which should go along with that empathy. We seem to have achieved that understanding when it comes to things such as forest and wildlife management. We understand that it often is good to permit Nature to take its course in the case of forest fires, or in maintaining the natural balance between predator and prey, and so on. But we need to apply the same considerations to the non-White races. We never should have permitted medical intervention in the non-White world. We should not be trying now to halt the spread of AIDS in Africa. We should not even consider famine relief for Ethiopia. We should not interfere in the mutual genocide between Hutus and Tutsis. Unless we temper our altruism with intelligence — and especially, unless we limit it to our own race — it will destroy us rather than help us achieve a higher civilization and a higher grade of humanity on this planet.

What rules us now is a soft-headed, mushy, egalitarian, feminine sort of altruism, where we are more inclined to feed the starving picaninnies of Africa than to take account of the fact that every picaninny who doesn’t starve to death now will grow up to breed more picaninnies. We feel sorry for the disease-ridden Blacks and Browns of the world, and instead of keeping them and their diseases strictly confined to their part of the world, we bring them into our part of the world so that we can share their diseases — as in the case of New York’s current outbreak of West Nile encephalitis imported from Africa.

What we need is a hard-headed, masculine sort of altruism, which makes us as concerned for the preservation of our own racial quality as for the stamping out of the fur trade, the sort of altruism which leads us to sterilize our own defectives rather than permitting them to breed a White welfare class, just as it leads us to thin out the two-legged population of Africa rather than permitting it to continue encroaching on the four-legged populations.

And you know, whenever I say something like that I can hear the screams of protest in the background. I can hear the softheaded altruists screaming that I am advocating genocide, and oh, isn’t that awful. But as a matter of fact, it is their policies which are leading to a far more terrible genocide, with our race as the victim.

When one has a world overcrowded with races competing for a limited living area and limited resources, there will be genocide. The feminine altruists cannot face that hard fact, and their activities simply guarantee a bloodier and more destructive genocide in the end. The masculine altruists, on the other hand, should be capable of imposing a necessary discipline in order to preserve the health of a beleaguered planet and permit its most valuable life forms to continue developing, instead of being dragged down by the least valuable.

And what we are trying to do with helping them will all be in vain because once we are gone, they are fucked.

Leftist """charity""" is actually a more cruel and horrific practice than a full blown boots-on-the-ground genocide.

A genocide is over quickly, but what the champagne-socialist left does is so, so much more brilliantly evil.
Essentially what they do is use their investing knowledge to 'pump and dump' African countries - doing exactly what you said; artificially inflating their populations via our """charity""" and medical science - then when their population invariably grows to tower-of-babel-sized levels it collapses under its own weight, like a financial bubble collapsing.

Only with a pump-n-dumped population, the crash comes in human lives lost - disease, death, starvation, misery the likes of which simply could or would not have been possible had they left well alone.

The rich use their charities as tax write-offs; it's a tax-avoidance death machine straight from hell.

>157041978
Stop granting their moral premises by calling it racism, normie.

lmao rothschild's

When African countries populations are artificially pumped up higher than their tangible infrastructure can actually support, the subsequent crash will be worse than the black plague.

When I was supervisor at a fast food place and homeless nogs would come in to harass paying customers having their lunch for money, I would always offer them free job applications. None of them took the offer so they must not have been doing too badly.

Only charities I actively donate to are those supporting Christians in the Middle-East.

Not at all anymore. It's impossible to find a charity that doesn't give most of or all it's resources to "refugees".

Interesting video about the downfall of Haiti, with clips from a speech by William Pierce:

youtube.com/watch?v=hmJLh3QCNgM

>be richest island in the Caribbean, controlled by France
>French Revolution happens
>French libcucks let the niggers run free
>the niggers genocide all the white people, liberals included
>murdered whites in ways too gruesome to describe
>Haiti now belongs to niggers
>Haiti turns into a shithole
>US government makes 3 huge attempts to modernize Haiti
>Haiti is still a shithole

Really makes you think. Maybe niggers are naturally retarded.

I give about $1-10 a year to salvation army bell ringers

I took all the food in my pantry from the hands of begging niggers.

here's the thing.

There was no economy for us to ruin with our donations.

There was no local farmer who saw truckloads of AID and thought, "Fuck, my livelihood is ruined!"

These sub-humans can't feed themselves in large numbers. It's nature's way. By refusing to give AID we will simply be giving Starvation-chan a chance to cull the herd.

Just like in America, government provides free money hand-outs and the nigger population exploded.

FUCK charity!
We should just let them die and have Social Darwinism instead.

This much.

>>be richest island in the Caribbean
yeah, yeah, the colonial owners were rich. that doesnt do anything for their slaves who live in huts.

nice try.

those export goods were still on the island after the colonialists got kicked out, yknow

By not donating, I give the unfortunate people living in shitholes the mercyful death they deserve.

My wife and I with help from a few others
do work for a American charity that funds a day school in Guatemala. Basically we sell Guatemalan crafts in portland then send the money back.

amigosdelosromeritos.org

They had 200 years to become better they stayed the same, tells a lot about black people and the way they think

david cameron pls