Why do liberals keep lying about danger of guns?
>Five times more likely to burn to death
>Five times more likely to drown
>17 times more likely to be poisoned
>17 times more likely to fall to your death
>68 times more likely to die in an automobile accident
Other urls found in this thread:
cdc.gov
m.youtube.com
twitter.com
bump
>68 times more likely to die in an automobile accident
And keep in mind: Most gun violence victims are gang nignogs and spics. It's not like they tried to avoid the risk of getting capped.
what I'm trying to say is: the threat for the average normal (non-drug-dealing non-gangmember) person is even way lower.
is this a graph of the clinton bodycounts
And if you control for suicide and gangs, gun crime is practically a rounding error
>It's only a few people dying!
>Guns don't kill people, people do!
Just shut up and leave this topic alone. Guns being heavily restricted prevents deaths, this is proven in countries that have strict gun laws/bans on guns.
That's all there is to it. There's no lying there.
Where it gets tricky is when you get into rights and the "idea" of being allowed to own a fire arm which is a big part of US culture, but the proof is all out there concerning how useful it actually is to own guns, and how many deaths they cause that could be easily avoided.
Because guns allow for defense against a tyrannical government.
you mean how niggers and white trash kill each other over drug deals or small robberies gone bad?
Yeah. Ban guns and that shit gets minimized big time.
It'll also prevent little kids from blowing their brains out with their dads handgun that was left out.
There's lots of things.
What I'm arguing is this: life is valuable, any amount of deaths prevented is good. and despite what OP is trying to imply, we aren't talking about just a handful of people a year.
If you're stupid enough to shoot yourself you deserve death.
How are those acid attacks Ahmed?
>Guns being heavily restricted prevents deaths
Wrong, guns being heavily restricted has not shown to have a Statistical effect on overall deaths, which is what matters. Less gun deaths? Yes. Less overall deaths? No. Perhaps other than accidental.
Maybe dumb democrats think those kind of people represent average american person. But hey, not a big surprise that leftists are lying.
Dems can't fathom the idea of responsible gun owners because their base is thugs and mentally ill
Accidents happen.
The thing that no one ever mentions is gun death statistics is intentional justified shootings.
Let's throw every child off a cliff then
Nice man, attack me and not my argument
You know that's horse shit. I don't care what hypothesis you try to form, taking guns away from the public will prevent deaths. There isn't going to be a rise in stabbings enough to add a surplus...
And most of it are nigs and spics killing themselves.
The petty crimes committed by an armed populace pale in comparison to the atrocities that a totalitarian state can commit.
Ok real question here.
Is a black person more likely to be shot or drown?
cdc.gov
Go to page 44. You have a .00014% chance of dying due to NDing in the United States. That isn't a reasonable thing to suspend the Second Amendment for.
Faggot
What does retards shooting themselves have to do with kids being thrown off cliffs?
If a parent leaves a loaded gun out where a kid has access to it, they also deserved death because they're doomed to the same retardation as their parents.
Keyword is "accidental", accidental deaths from guns are very rare unless your 3 years old or disabled. But something like mass shootings or a school shooting is deliberate.
If that's true how come shitholes like California with strict gun laws are way more dangerous than peaceful places like New Hampshire and Vermont which both have loose gun laws.
It's not an attack on you
Concealed carry would prevent acid attacks
>Why do liberals keep lying about danger of guns?
Because they are demonic pieces of shit.
And still very statistically rare
ok. do you think your guns would help you there? do you think if the government wanted more power it would give a shit whether you have a pistol? do you really believe they would be so stupid as to incite a rebellion? there are many more subtle methods and tactics for people in power. your point is schizo tier.
kids are stupid enough to shoot themselves. you said anyone that fits that criteria should be killed, moron
there are many more variables to a place being more dangerous, my point still stands
Kids can't shoot themselves if their parents don't leave loaded guns lying around.
>If you're stupid enough to shoot yourself you deserve death.
We had an armed standoff out west a few years back that had the government agents trying to confiscate a man's cattle running scared, so yeah I do think my guns would help me out.
The number of armed civilians outnumber all the police officers, soldiers and government agents combined by an order of magnitude, and are the ultimate check on tyranny.
>you said anyone that fits that criteria should be killed
That's how evolution works, faggot. You and your pearl clutching cuckolds are toxifying the human race by protecting the weak from extinction.
Lol I think they're more worried about gun violence, murders & terrorist attacks etc, I'm not anti gun but this is a fucking dumb thread
>If you're stupid enough to shoot yourself you deserve death.
Yes.
And without fail, here comes the bong to cry about the evil of guns and why his socialist shithole is better for banning them.
80% of burglaries in bongistan are while the owner is at home
It's 15% in the US
Bongs are cucked into submission and will be extinct in 10 years
Yeah. Their parents are retarded for leaving it lying around. Since intelligence is genetic, nothing of value is lost.
awesome. thousands of deaths so a man could tell some dumb cops to fuck off
compassion is toxic? cool man.
children deserve death then
i'm trying to help you out, guns cause a lot of deaths for you fellas
you're retarded
Why do conservatives keep lying about the danger of muslims
>a jillion times more likely to get shot than get killed by a terrorist
This just isn't an argument. Especially as the auto thing is a severe problem which we will solve with self driving cars.
There is a valid argument for keeping your guns. Only one, and you don't need more. You need your guns to prevent a police state. That's it. No more justification required, it's in the goddamn constitution, it's your god given right as a murican to have a gun. You don't need to pretend like the murder rates aren't a problem - it's liberal doublethink.
>thousands of dead niggers and suicides
Those are the two reasons our gun death rate is inflated.
And we don't even have nearly the highest suicide rate out there.
They are machines who follow this algorithm.
I'm retarded for not wanting the offspring of retards to be roaming around? K.
you could have a lower one.
one of those dead niggers could have been a future president, like your last one that was well liked amongst your countrymen
nah, you said intelligence is genetic. with a lot of conviction for a clueless mutt!
Our last president wasn't a gangbanger shooting up his local pre school, he was in law school
>i'm trying to help you out, guns cause a lot of deaths for you fellas
How? By turning us into a defenseless population?
Obama was an Indonesian Muslim, Hillary even revealed it, but as Sup Forums is proof enough, people in America are literally too retarded to see anything as other than black or white.
I have absolutely zero problems with nigs shooting eachother to extinction while we gentrify the inner cities. It's almost like a self correcting problem.
he grew up around them though
defense against what?
The graph shows accidents, not shootings (for example school) or planned murders w/ guns
>defense against what?
1: Criminals
2: Statist cowards like you
Why do you think they would simultaneously import tons of migrants en masse from third world shitholes in addition to lying about danger of guns?
m.youtube.com
>because these 'people' have never left a culture that stopped fighting with knives. They don't want you to quickly and easily defend yourself by pulling a gun when mahamoud charges you with a knife/axe/saber. You win knife fights by having a gun.
a disarmed citizenry is easier to push around
um see that 'Unspecified' bar sweetie? that's all guns
...
The government. Remember how we rebelled against you violently then had a civil war to determine the functioning of our society? Better yet, how did a bunch of dirty poor SEA-monkeys fend off our military?
no, i don't. it was hundreds of years ago lmao
No it doesn't there is zero correlation between gun laws and homicide rate. It has never been shown.
KEK, DEAD
Fag
why do so many things have a power law distribution
>defense against what?
Well for one: Niggers. Even the most diehard leftist scum will want a gun when push comes to shove, take a look at the LA Riots when the liberals were begging gun shop owners to sell them a gun.
And the most important reason is to keep lawmakers, politicians, the state and government in line and in fear of the people.
it helps in preventing gun deaths to a degree. it doesnt help anything else, other forms or crime and murder statistically tend to spike in wake of no guns.
5 gun incidents and one knife attack turn into 10 knife attacks and 5 acid throwings. there may or may not be less death involved, but things sure as shit dont get better.
>be american
>get run over
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>ban assault vehicles
memes are real
bump