Why do liberals keep lying about danger of guns?

Why do liberals keep lying about danger of guns?

>Five times more likely to burn to death
>Five times more likely to drown
>17 times more likely to be poisoned
>17 times more likely to fall to your death
>68 times more likely to die in an automobile accident

Other urls found in this thread:

cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr65/nvsr65_04.pdf
m.youtube.com/watch?v=F1VzOeGetkI
twitter.com/AnonBabble

bump

>68 times more likely to die in an automobile accident
And keep in mind: Most gun violence victims are gang nignogs and spics. It's not like they tried to avoid the risk of getting capped.

what I'm trying to say is: the threat for the average normal (non-drug-dealing non-gangmember) person is even way lower.

is this a graph of the clinton bodycounts

And if you control for suicide and gangs, gun crime is practically a rounding error

>It's only a few people dying!
>Guns don't kill people, people do!

Just shut up and leave this topic alone. Guns being heavily restricted prevents deaths, this is proven in countries that have strict gun laws/bans on guns.

That's all there is to it. There's no lying there.

Where it gets tricky is when you get into rights and the "idea" of being allowed to own a fire arm which is a big part of US culture, but the proof is all out there concerning how useful it actually is to own guns, and how many deaths they cause that could be easily avoided.

Because guns allow for defense against a tyrannical government.

you mean how niggers and white trash kill each other over drug deals or small robberies gone bad?

Yeah. Ban guns and that shit gets minimized big time.

It'll also prevent little kids from blowing their brains out with their dads handgun that was left out.

There's lots of things.

What I'm arguing is this: life is valuable, any amount of deaths prevented is good. and despite what OP is trying to imply, we aren't talking about just a handful of people a year.