>Five times more likely to burn to death >Five times more likely to drown >17 times more likely to be poisoned >17 times more likely to fall to your death >68 times more likely to die in an automobile accident
>68 times more likely to die in an automobile accident And keep in mind: Most gun violence victims are gang nignogs and spics. It's not like they tried to avoid the risk of getting capped.
Julian Thompson
what I'm trying to say is: the threat for the average normal (non-drug-dealing non-gangmember) person is even way lower.
Brayden Thomas
is this a graph of the clinton bodycounts
Jonathan Baker
And if you control for suicide and gangs, gun crime is practically a rounding error
Luke Brown
>It's only a few people dying! >Guns don't kill people, people do!
Just shut up and leave this topic alone. Guns being heavily restricted prevents deaths, this is proven in countries that have strict gun laws/bans on guns.
That's all there is to it. There's no lying there.
Where it gets tricky is when you get into rights and the "idea" of being allowed to own a fire arm which is a big part of US culture, but the proof is all out there concerning how useful it actually is to own guns, and how many deaths they cause that could be easily avoided.
Brody Price
Because guns allow for defense against a tyrannical government.
Tyler Sanchez
you mean how niggers and white trash kill each other over drug deals or small robberies gone bad?
Austin Wilson
Yeah. Ban guns and that shit gets minimized big time.
It'll also prevent little kids from blowing their brains out with their dads handgun that was left out.
There's lots of things.
What I'm arguing is this: life is valuable, any amount of deaths prevented is good. and despite what OP is trying to imply, we aren't talking about just a handful of people a year.