Why were Europeans so good at fighting compared to other races?

Why were Europeans so good at fighting compared to other races?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=v_0-Vc7uA4g&t=373s
youtube.com/watch?v=txyqS5yuw30&t=496s
youtube.com/watch?v=5Ct4OSmdZ3M
youtube.com/watch?v=IUlp9U2p5_c
youtu.be/ssXQO-l5c7U
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vienna
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tours
infogalactic.com/info/Battle_of_Covadonga
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Lepanto
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Europe has been effectively a fuckhuge battleground. Since only the best could emerge to bring the fight to somewhere else, they were obviously quite successful in comparison.

Also, tons of dumb luck and niggery, like being so downtrodden the opposition couldn't bother (Mongols) or spreading disease like rats (Aztecs/Mayans).

Otherwise, European military adventures do have a history of failing miserably if none of the conditions above apply (Vikings vs Eskimos, the various Crusades, Russians vs Mongols).

read about the persian wars

the greeks always send their best man from age 30-50 while having alot of people going with them to do their laundry and stuff ( not kidding )
while the persians just send all their slaves ( age 13-25) who ofcourse are slaughtered

Because Europe has always been the most technologically advanced continent therefore has always had the most advanced weaponry.

>stuck in the crusades with mudslimes for ages
>mongols sweep in and effortlessly wipe both out
Sure.

beats me

>*stops you in Asian horse people*

If you had not committed such great sins, then God would have not sent such a punishment as me upon you.

They have to fight for their culture. They do not reproduce as quickly as other cultures. They have high expectations and tend to build and acquire. Making them more susceptible to being attacked and in some cases most of the ones you will find in bias history books the urgency to spread and expansion of exceptionality. These factors and more would cause them to hone fighting skills. Superior and seasoned on battle fields across the world all throughout history.

all we fucking do is fight, all our advancements are a direct consequence of our fighting, we try to invent new ways to kill eachother and not get killed ourselves, and along the way we apply the new inventions to other things.

They weren't really. Not until guns hit the scene. Look up 'guns and horses dan carlin' on YouTube

[empire disintegrates]

Because yuropeans had easy acess to iron, copper, zinc, coal etc. In Ancient Greece you could found copper right on the surface.

It's been technologically advanced only the last 400 years. It had the best armies briefly under Rome and Alexander but for most of human history until 1600's the most advanced places in the world were in Asia and Asia had the best armies.

That's Attila, not Genghis
My point is that Asian horse people, for some reason, are always the biggest threat for a while. It goes in cycles.

Even our ancestors were Asian horse people once before they conquered all of Europe and replaced whoever lived there before

4 centuries of kindgoms warring against each other for supremacy. We are no longer like that. We are soft and materialistic/atheistic now

>Why were Europeans so good at fighting compared to other races?
t.

>lel we yuropeens so gud at killing each other
Yeah keep tootin your own horn for some bullshit like that. Retards.

they weren't. they just like to inflate their "glory", because they have a small dick complex. the english army had cannons and muskets, but got steamrolled by a few zulu warriors with spears and hide shields. all they have are their lies, which is why in the grand scheme of things, europeans will eventually fail to compete against the forces of nature (higher testosterone males will inevitably replace europeans).

This is a meme. Greece won at marathon and plateau but they lost a hundred battles against the Persians before this. Persia had an excellent army that was ideal to fight against a force like the Greeks. They had 75% archers with a row of wicker shields at the front which held back opposition melee. They also had excellent skirmisher cavalry that would harass logistics. Most of the soldiers on the Persian side in this campaign were Greeks or anatolians themselves.

Persia lost at marathon when they were surprise attacked on the beach and they lost at marathon because they gave up a superior position to assault the Greek position on a hill.

Greeks in this period were backwards and were all farmers. It was Persia and Sparta only who had professional soldiers who were trained and drilled. After the occupation of Persia other Greek city states began using professional soldiers.

>Meds
>White

It originated on the Russian steppes in the PIE urheimat when we domesticate the horse and cow, and spent thousands of years raiding each other for them.

because europeans were fighting each others. you only become the best when you train with the best

*jesu dod plays faintly in background*

>Attila
Yikes, even worse, at least the mongols had a few great khans after genghis

addendum: the quote you used was by genghis

That's incorrect, my Basque non-PIE friend.
Attila was the Scourge of God

>europe
>good at fighting
Kek.

You guys had your asses handed to you by the Arabs, the turks and the mongols before the advent of guns. What propelled you to great heights was the introduction of gun warfare. You centered your tactics and strategies around it and the rest is history. Before that, you were nothing but a backwater continent that couldn't hold a candle to Eastern civilization, even in warfare.

constant warfare against each other. to some extent i think different races of whites hate each other more than nigs

absolute nonsense, europeans always won plenty of battles against non whites during the middle ages where we were outnumbered. when did we lose against non whites? crusades? only because of logistics even tho we kept raping non whites while being outnumbered.

open you eyes you dumb non white.

To be fair, Persians lost to Alexander the Great not because of superior tactics, training or force of arms but rather the stupidity and arrogance on the Persian part. Persians instead of utilizing their greatest strength (which their armor and weapons were suited in their environment) - hit and run tactics - didn't use that instead but gave what Alexander what he wanted, pitched battles.

Even the Persians had naval superiority and could've cut off supplies to Alexander's army and beat Alexander had the Persians used scorched earth policies as well as hit and run with a combination of archers on horseback but Persians and MIddle Easterners are known for their pride, arrogance and hubris even until now.

Because we have been at war with each other since forever

industrial revolution

and no... it wasn't a guarantee white nations would develop that, just look at Britain's unlikely history that led to that particular path

also, Song China was quite close to an industrial revolution in the 12th century, but the Mongols had to wreck their crap up

>be the smartest race on earth
>compete with tons of great powers literally on your front door
>have arms race to see how can develop the greatest arms and armour
>slaughter each other till the opposition has been killed or assimilated
>only the strongest survive
>???
>profit

Attila was called so, but the quote you used was said by Genghis to some muslims he was tormenting

>battle of Manzikert
>Losing most of the Levant and northern Africa to Arabs
>Spain gets handed to the Muslims forming Al-Andalus for almost 1000 years
>Mongols ravage Eastern Europe just with a scouting force
>Serbian-Ottoman wars ending with the defeat of the Serbs and getting annexed by the Turks
>battle of Nicopolis
And those are just on the top of my mind. Face it, Europe was NOTHING during the middle ages. Despite your euro-centric history, the middle ages were the age of the Mongols and steppe nomads, not Europeans. Again, you only got catapulted to prominence during the age of exploration and the Renaissance. What propelled you to center stage were the advent of guns and expanding to the new world battling a bunch of stone age tribes, giving you plenty of breathing room and resources, without which you would still be a backwater continent.

Practice makes perfect.

Oh yeah, can't stress the Battle of Nicopolis enough
>youtube.com/watch?v=v_0-Vc7uA4g&t=373s

French were absolutely devastated because of their arrogance and hubris. Top kek. So much for European superiority in warfare eh?

>Europe was NOTHING during the middle ages
Wow that's pretty harsh but then I can't imagine what this moor's severed head must be in that case

Europeans use a lot of Jewish tactics, divide and conquer shit.

Christ... Larpflagging should be a bannable offense.

those are very few occurances but yet again you won't say anything when confronted at the countless battles where whites beat non whites while being outnumbered before the renaissance.

how do you explain it you inferior rat?
and stop using that meme flag.

non whites can't beat whites unless they have huge logistic advantages or when the entity they are attacking were weakened way before any conflicts.

agreed, what a fucking disaster for Sup Forums memeflags have been

>battle of nicopolis

of course whites were fighting for non whites there. non whites can't do shit without whites

>cucked then, cucked now
You're one to talk Sweden. Here's another one:
youtube.com/watch?v=txyqS5yuw30&t=496s
LMAO

Baw, did history hurt the little Frenchies feefees? Here's more:
youtube.com/watch?v=5Ct4OSmdZ3M

Seems you Europeans being humiliated and defeated by the Turks, Muslims and Arabs was a constant theme before the advent of guns. So much for European superiority eh?

>you Europeans

Sure Frenchie
>be French
>ignore the Hungarian advice and instead go straight for a charge thinking they will win because they are the "superior race"
>get baited by "inferior race" into attacking further and further into enemy lines by doing a feint retreat
>get surrounded
>Hungarian "non-whites" try to help but can't do anything anymore because French are too stupid, arrogant and full of hubris
>Hungarians has had enough of your shit and decide to retreat instead to teach you a lesson
Yeah bro, top notch white quality warfare there.

Why is this thread not on /his/?

yet again minor occurances, you still ignore the amount of times whites defeated non whites while being outnumbered.

show your flag

Because its about racial politics, and how race affected warfare.

European are bad at fighting, shitskins are just way worse at it.

What a fucking retarded post. Europe has had wars just like every other region in the world no more no less. You must be american.

>minor occurrence
Here's another one:
youtube.com/watch?v=IUlp9U2p5_c

Battle of Varna ends with the combined European contingent defeated during the Middle Ages. Your vaunted "superior" European way of warfare sure is enlightening to see. It seems being defeated by a bunch of steppe nomads and Muslims during the middle ages was a recurring theme during the Middle Ages by displaying and employing your famed "European superiority" in warfare.

???I doubt that user,horse riding didn't start until 3000bc and europe back then was already full of our niggas,plus horse riding as cavalry man didn't start until probably later due to chariot warfare being how the niggs fought till horses were big enough to be ridden by themselves.
Even before that we were pushing their shit waaay in.
Our first and foremost advantage was shipping.
We basically had our homeland secure and unapproachable while we could pester and fuck anyone,our ships were faster so we could always flee,more seaworthy so we could venture the oceans,bigger so we could load more guns and with bytes guns so we could out shoot and out range anyone.
We did drive by port shootings lie them real niggas.

meant for the "superior" french faggot.

Because we fight with the will and the might of the Lord.

>Your ... European way

It's not even particularly arrogant or stupid to expect your opponent not to be Alexander the Great himself

>europeans
>good at fighting

>>Spain gets handed to the Muslims forming Al-Andalus for almost 1000 years


>moors invade kingdom with a fuckton of troops all unified under one banner
>visigothic kingdom disjointed and composed of many nobles with not much power
it was literally divide and conquer but we were already divided so you didn't have to do anything. After the first few years you were consistently btfo against all odds and little by little we took our land back

more like your smell, small stature, inbreeding and general incompetence

Yes. Why?

Why indeed?

Every time.

>gets ruled for 900+ years by a bunch of "inferior" non-whites
>whitey somehow thinks this is okay
Laughing my fucking ass off. Yeah, good job displaying the famed "white superiority in warfare" bro. Sure showed me.

>you
But I'm not Arab nor muslim.

It is a mystery.

Because christians had god on their side somewhat

...

You never heard of Polish winged Hussar's,
They brought fear in to ottomans, Russians and Germans
Totally BTFO
youtu.be/ssXQO-l5c7U

Lapu lapu

pic related are the European plains with almost no natural borders which made it the highway for invasions in europe for enemy invaders from asia but also for wars between europeans. Europe isnt a large continent so war a usually thing, often for little disputes or little areas of land.

Technological advantage.

Go back to sleep

It's not like we had a choice (pic related).

This era basically transformed the European aristocracy into a killing machine. When the Mongols showed up ~1240, Europe was the most fortified place on the planet. In Germany alone there were 20,000 fortresses; basically every molehill had some kind of fortification, to serve as a base for some nobleman and his knighted entourage ... with the exception of Poland, Hungary, and the new colonization area of Silesia, who all got fucked by the Mongols.

The Hungarian kings had not allowed for the building of fortifications by the noblemen: for political considerations, plus, traditionally, the Hungarians had been the ones doing the raiding. But the Mongols knew to skirt the fortified German core lands (when they did not, the heavy knights inflicted a murderous kill ratio on them), and whenever they directly attacked a European castle they had enormous losses (like vs. Klis Fortress in Croatia).

The only reason the Mongols managed to beat Central European armies in two open battles was because they resorted to tactics which had been considered dishonorable and "unchristian" by the knights. A one-trick pony, with the battles of Liegnitz and Mohi unfortunately being only 2 days apart. But Europeans learned their lessons; Rudolf of Habsburg won the German crown by killing Ottokar of Bohemia with an outflanking maneuver and horsed archers. Very shameful display, but he won.

And the next time the Mongols showed up in Hungary they were annihilated.

>900
it was still a long time lol I don't know why you feel the ned to exaggerate

the southeasternmost tip of spain was ruled for 711 years, the bit I live in for less than 100
it was a gradual process from north to south you know it? we never stopped fighting you from the moment you finished the conquest

>whitey lying to stroke his insecure ego
Why lie? Post the real source.

>We basically had our homeland secure and unapproachable

yeah except for much of our history we've been covering in fear from Arabs and Turks even though with an entire sea between us

stop this try-hard white superiority nonsense... white people are smarter and more hard working than any other ethnic group gooks aside and we two are the only people capable of functioning in a modern environment but world history isn't only about IQ and conscientiousness

It’s still a white underdog winning against large Arab numbers you nigger.

Because of Greco-Roman culture
With a respectful nod to Norse and Anglos

there was black male warriors throughout history with huge tall bodies who fought the white europeans and beat them with ease.

hatians (african descent) defeated france to free the entire hati from slavery.

south africa came close to defeating the british in a war. they won the battle of isandlwana and that became the british worst loss in history.

here is what i dont understand if you have guns, artillery, and fighter jets then how in the world do you still lose wars and battles against people who are only using swords spears, and rarely used fire arms?

...

Their descendants are the shittest fighters in the world. Ask anybody.

d

a

All my compilations

ffdf

last dump

citation on first mentioned piece?

Also, just like the chinese fucked up everybody who came at them for a long time, white people dominated war because of technology.

We invented the gun, and with it were able to take over the world.

Most of europe was secure thanks to superior shipping and that was our main advantage,of course spain and bulgaria and such places it wasn't so easy and we didn't have a sea in between us or the distance was so close it wasn't feasible to intercept small raids,but thanks to us in the border and our naval superiority we reached america and our northern brothers were safe,it's not like they appreciate our sacrifices and sometimes the fuckers would ally with the sandniggers but such is the life at the border of europe

>We invented the gun
What the fuck are they teaching you? The first firearms were in China to start with, and the Ottomans included firearms in their infantry long before they were a staple of European armies.

kek pic related is the peak borders of two different islamic empires west in 700s AD east in 1600s AD now in 2000s AD another one is coming

The Eskimos are in Alaska user. Vikings didn't go to Alaska.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vienna

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tours

A thousand men versus a couple of thousand with the support of nobles, aided by terrain favorable for ambush and defense isn't an "underdog" battle by any stretch of the imagination you insecure white retard.

It's the spread of the Germanic genes. Either in the fighting abilities of the wider population or the leadership of the leading elites.

Look at it this way: who have been the great nations to conquer wide lands in the colonial times? Britain (guess the Angels and the Saxons in the 5th century), France (Charlemange was a Germanic tribe leader and the Francs actually a Germanic tribe), Spanish (Habsburg kings for centuries), Portuguese (Suebian German tribe which moved there during the great migration period),...

Germanic genes, they work! Bitches!

>real source
>wikipedia has never been altered by anti-christian leftists
infogalactic.com/info/Battle_of_Covadonga

Dipshit.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Lepanto

Don't show that to whites, it might trigger them. Contrary to Euro-centric history, the middle ages before was actually the age of the Mongols and the steppe nomads. Mongols, Ottomans and Arabs conquered most of the world until gun warfare became a staple of European armies and making it the backbone of their strategies and tactics.

>wikipedia is anti-christian
Whitey superior intelligence ladies and gentlemen!

yes but they were dogshit
we invented good guns

sorry to piss on your parade but I don't particularly care about what brand of subhuman you are