Stop being a faggot

Why is everyone a nazi authoritarian these days?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=JTkxsb4GB6M
youtube.com/watch?v=NjJqpig4yGA
aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-anarchism/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I'll stop when you do OP.

I'm not a fascist

You should be. You think the leftists/progressives/commies are your friends? If they win, your ancap ideology dies.

I'm with you OP. People can't help it. They have brains that are susceptible to programming. We all do. The best defense is to be aware of it. First order of business is to turn OFF your cell phone except in emergency situations. Avoid youtube except in very specific cases. Try your best to avoid browser trackers (almost impossible). AI is going to make things much worse exponentially as we go forward. Good luck.

>if they win
they won't
Common sense is what's missing, ideology just fills in the gaps intellectually, we need more education.

>everyone
i wish
>nazi
ahem, the ackshual term is National Socialist, short for National Socialist German Workers' Party, or as I've recently taken to calling it, the NSDAP.
>authoritarian
There is literally nothing wrong with authoritarianism that works to the benefit of all citizens within a nation. Democracy is shit, you should know this ancap-kun if you read Hippity Hoppe

you dont understand anarchism, it just decentralises the power of the public to allow for a more perfect democracy, or not, up to the native population. The power is literally in the hands of the public, I think that's more empowering than an aristocracy.

>decentralises the power of the state

>we need more education
The leftists already control the educational institutions and have turned them into indoctrination camps. People don't educate themselves nowadays, they turn to these institutions.
Your ancap society is idyllic but impossible as the left has grouped together to push their agenda. The right, on the other hand, is fractured and full of infighting.

This won't work because minorities inevitably group up into collectives.

So?

Tell me, was Libya better under Gaddafi or is it better now?
In most nonwhite countries a strong ruler that brings order but restricts freedoms is often preferable to a disordered nation where everyone is left to their own devices.
Western nations created democracy - its built into our culture - we can handle it. Most other peoples cant without devolving into voting their skin color or voting for gibs.

It undermines the individualistic state as the collectives gain power and force their will on individuals who have not collectivised.

we found that society had become more degenerate than Sup Forums. That shouldent be allowed.

That's when a population would protect itself with a military

I didn't want this, it was forced upon me

>you don't understand anarchism
how do you know what I do and don't understand? I've made one post within this thread. Are you a mind reader ancap-kun? Or do you believe that if someone understands anarchism they MUST be an anarchist?
>it just decentralises the power of the public to allow for a more perfect democracy
A perfect democracy is tyranny of the majority, and it is THIS aspect I cannot stand, because the majority is often brutish, ignorant, irrational, and easily fooled. However, I will say that I approve of voluntary association, and I have many sympathies with anarcho-fascists, in so far as every citizen of a nation should voluntarily be part of the nation, not coerced.
>The power is literally in the hands of the public, I think that's more empowering than an aristocracy.
A democracy in a society where people choose to create a democracy out of necessity due to corrupt politicians or the ineptitude of a government works great, Nietzsche recognized as much. The issue occurs when democracy becomes a protected institution and people become divided over various issues, at which point democracy becomes divisive, and those with money can rule over it. It's at that point when National Socialism or similar systems become preferable. As to an "aristocracy" the goal of a National Socialist state is to reduce class differences, not to entrench them.

It is primarily due to serotonin regulation in the brain. People falsely believe that an extreme authoritarian society will protect them, and keep their feelings of comfort, serotonin, stable. But this is not true.

youtube.com/watch?v=JTkxsb4GB6M
Fashy goys will rebuild western civilation

>A perfect democracy is tyranny of the majority, and it is THIS aspect I cannot stand, because the majority is often brutish, ignorant, irrational, and easily fooled.
This is why you need an eductaed and transparent society

>The power is literally in the hands of the public

Democracy without the restraining aristocratic element of a limited franchise or strong protection of individual rights is just a tyranny of the majority. Fuck what "the public" has to say about my right to voice unpopular opinions.

That's why you have a constitution

based

...

>Truth is more important than freedom
This doesn't mean anything, just propaganda.

Sure, and the easiest way to do that is to have state control over reproduction to promote the best aspects of your population and forbid the worst from breeding. But something tells me a lot of anarchists wouldn't want to subject their breeding to the state, can't quite tell what it is though... or did you think everyone would just get 130 IQ's through education?

Once we rise up, we can't afford to be disorganized on the world stage, we'll need a militarist authoritarian government to ensure our survival, once we've reclaimed Europe and established a handful of stable North American ethno-states, we can ease back into Libertarianism. Believe me, I'm a Libertarian at heart, but until we've expelled the Jews, it cannot function free of corruption long-term.

This desu. these autistic spergs are ruining the board. no one wants to continue the white race with retards

>Sure, and the easiest way to do that is to have state control over reproduction to promote the best aspects of your population and forbid the worst from breeding.
stupid
>or did you think everyone would just get 130 IQ's through education?
IQ has nothing to do with being infromed, it just measures your capacity for academic ability.

...

>IQ has nothing to do with being infromed, it just measures your capacity for academic ability.
It's clear you lack 130 IQ then

How are you in your perfect AnCap society going to prevent people from forming collectives/states without killing them all?

This is not a legitimate respnse to my comment.
Being informed is not the same as being able to learn mathematics.

No other options. They consider white replacement and suppression to be a virtue. Will you hold back your children so a strangers children can succeed? Will you put in the work to live in an egalitarian society, if that society decides youre the whipping boy whose descendants must be punished? In effect, they expect you to be egalitarian colorblind fag meanwhile they play hardball identity politics?

This board is full of Kremlin bots and retards.

The only option for making libertarian a thing is literally forcing people to become libertarians at gun point

Most people aren't antisocial, that's all that requires a libertarian society.

Are you going to allow any other ideologies besides capitalist market anarchism be present?
What if a group of people wish to voluntarily join together into a National Socialist State?

...

I don't see why they're not allowed? But forcing people to join would justify retaliation from them and their community.

Well thats fine. A NatSoc state will respect the sovereignty of a Voluntarily AnCap community as long as we leave each other alone

It's agreed then.

Being able to understand WHY something is occurring and WHY something should be a certain way requires pattern recognition skills, which is correlated closely with IQ. One can be informed by the news, but might lack the ability to make inferences and connections based on the limited information given regarding what the optimal worldview might be based on the information given. The goal is not to educate people to say "This is the right answer to 'Should we build more roads and who should pay for it'" and provide them with the information necessary to make an informed choice, the goal is to increase the reasoning capability of the population itself to make them behave in a more rational way (However, often people behave in a rational way but they don't value the same things as, say, an ancap, which causes the autists to freak out).
>This is not a legitimate response to my comment.
You've been ignoring major parts of my comments, I did not feel like you deserved a dignified response.

This.
For all intents and purposes Sup Forums is basically the fringe media arm of the Conservatives.

I don't think that given the facts, any healthy human would fail to comprehend reality therefrom. Are you trying to say that some people can't reason or be rational?
>You've been ignoring major parts of my comments
all i got from the picture was bla bla SJWs
I got it.

...

>I don't think that given the facts, any healthy human would fail to comprehend reality therefrom. Are you trying to say that some people can't reason or be rational?
Some people will not behave "rationally" due to ignorance, and some people will not be "rational" (according to you) because they value different things than you. But if you have these "facts" that can convince any rational person to become an anarcho-capitalist or whatever I'd gladly look at them. Just know that there are many critiques of capitalism, and a few crushing critiques of anarchism as well.
>all i got from the picture was bla bla SJWs
Which picture? The walruse? Or the epicruse? I was referring to my posts, not to any picture.

>a system that works that is fair for all those in the state
>SHUT IT DOWN
youtube.com/watch?v=NjJqpig4yGA

So what do you feel causes ignorance?

>Which picture?
I guess I mistook u for someone else.

Socialist 1 step away from communist thats one step away from winning a free helicopter ride my friend

So you only kill communists, socialists are fine?

As long as they keep it localized i dont see a problem but national or state is too big

That's fine.
>what do you feel causes ignorance?
Not being indoctrinated into the optimal belief system of course.
For the others, it's the inability to reason, or having a morality that extends beyond the self, or envy, or various emotions in general.
However, it's not necessarily that I think anarcho-capitalism is irrational, because it certainly is rational for an individual. I just care about more than just myself. I'm opposed to capitalism because I do not view production or consumption as good in themselves. The point of production is to satisfy demand, and the optimal environmental solution is for the state to reduce demand rather than allowing it to be stimulated. I'm opposed to democracy for the reasons I mentioned before, especially that it's tyranny of the majority and becomes a plutocracy. The majority of people will tend to be hedonists, or inactive, or ignoble, which is why they need to be lead by someone who is noble, active, and has a purpose, to advance the people he rules.
"The anarchist believes in villains who will surely do great evil if given state power, but disbelieves in heroes who will do great good if given state power." - aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-anarchism/

real answer
because compromise has failed. everyone is tired of the billianrires running both partys, nothing getting done, everything being a court case, they daydream about a strong hand to set things right. of course that always ends in disaster.

which are you?
>inb4 everyone is dumb except me

I'm not opposed to extending my power and influence beyond myself, I mean welfare for the unfortunate could be sorted out as a charity, and other services can become publicised and promoted, the only thing which is required is the conscience to provide for your community, I think most people would honestly pay taxes for more directly democratic causes, it's just that no one wants or needs war, politicans or anything else wasteful.

well (((they))) are trying so hard to breed nazism and hatred by reaction, arent they? I was a libertarian like you, but economic crisis and excess degeneracy are making me flirt with fascism

Humans are a group animal not some solo asshole. The problem is the jew and their niggers.

>no one wants war.
youll want it well enough when your naighbor decides they want it, on you

No one wants war

Damn ..me too

#TimesUp for refugees
#TimesUp for kikes
#TimesUp for feminists and niggers stealing bikes!

#TimesUp for pedos
#TimesUp for fags
#TimesUp for fake news, their coverage is SAD!

#TimesUp for "pride"
#TimesUp for subversion
#TimesUp for porn's role in sexual perversion

#TimesUp for false flags, mossad, and hajis
#TimesUp politicians and blackmail lobbies
#TimesUp for trannies and race-switching jews

And if you subvert facts, then #TimesUp for you!

start tweeting

Foolish jew you and your blood sucking race have been asking for war.

pathetic

Delusional

how am i delusional?

The corporate powers and bankers have made it so the free market you love so much is gone dood....we all love the power of the free market but it is fucking menopolized ....strangled

>I'm not opposed to extending my power and influence beyond myself
Ask yourself why you would want to gain such power. What would you do with it? Would you leave everyone alone? Would you destroy try to destroy all governments, or prevent them from destroying you?
>I mean welfare for the unfortunate could be sorted out as a charity
Why not create a private organization that gives people jobs rather than welfare or charity? Just don't call it the government, should be fine, right?
>the only thing which is required is the conscience to provide for your community
Why not create a private organization that helps organize people that want to help provide for the community? Just don't call it the government, should be fine, right?
>I think most people would honestly pay taxes for more directly democratic causes
And people who disagree with the "democratic causes" would want to pay less, would you force them if you lacked the funding?
>it's just that no one wants or needs war
let's say I live in a small land area, say an island, and I can't supply the food to support the next generation. My neighbor is underpopulated and is not using a large portion of his land. What is the rational response? Now when you realize people care about more than food, you'll see why war can be rational.

Yeah, there ought to be public reparations before decentralisation.

Because your system is retarded and the smart ones realized it.

It's already camoed fascism...sux man....capitalism was awesome

I am not some meme
I want a government, just regional and libertarian.
I want full public utility and freedom, more public land, more public jobs and voluntary charity.
Most people would probably work for the community and be endorsed for it.
The whole corporation domination thing isn't exactly my ideal, and there will be a high tax on anything which arent direct assets to the community.
The internet is enough of a free market for ideas and goods anyway, that would dominate as a service without external influence.

Because the National Socialists were right about everything from the global Semitic hegemony to the need for a return to the pre-Christian traditions of Europe. In fact, you could say that the only issue with the NatSoc ideology is that their distaste for Christian aristocrats and monarchs led them to spurn the true hierarchy of a noble civilization. Granted, we never did get to see the final form of their efforts.

Libertarianism is an entry-level drug. Don't be that faggot who never gets past entry-level drugs. Be like Hitler. Be a winner. Do pervitin today. Faggot

Because the left. It's the simplest and truest answer.

werent the nazis leftist?

>Rosenberg.

No.

...

Not even close. Hitler was always right

Some were leftish. Strasserism actually got me into NatSoc/fascism. It is a great way to entice those who dislike capitalism (I just dislike materialism) but still value heritage and tradition.

Because I'm bored and I seek comedy, not tragedy. The left cannot humor me as they view my humor "offensive."

I bet u voted for trump 4 the lulz

Wanting everyone to have a role...a job...security ...insurance ...is not just a leftist idea

So you literally just want socialism and nationalism?

>I am not some meme
I apologize if you came off that way, your meme flag gives off that impression
>I want a government, just regional and libertarian
Perhaps you should use the libertarian flag instead of the ancap flag? Or maybe not use meme flags at all?
>I want full public utility
Sure, sounds good to me
>and freedom
pretty broad, but it sounds nice
>more public land
so you want the government to buy land, or seize it via eminent domain? Interdastign for a libertarian but I'm cool with it
>more public jobs
I'd prefer just to have zero unemployment, but I guess more public jobs is a start
>voluntary charity
"We do not say to the rich, "Please, give something to these poor people." Instead we say: "German people, help yourselves!" Everyone must help, whether you are rich or poor!
Everyone must think that there's always someone in a much worse situation than me, and this person I shall help, as a comrade in Volk!" - Adolf Hitler
>Most people would probably work for the community and be endorsed for it.
Most people would probably work for a National Socialist state and be endorsed for it, sell me on why what you believe is better or what I believe is worse.
>The whole corporation domination thing isn't exactly my ideal, and there will be a high tax on anything which arent direct assets to the community.
I thought the standard ancap/libertarian line wasn't to raise taxes but to say "decrease regulations and other companies can compete with these multinationals" or something similarly inane. Are you sure you're a libertarian?

Because they got triggered by my wearing of skirts and girly shit. By their ex GF getting power rammed by niggers chained together. By their corrupt politicians just bending over to jews. By commies thinking a meritocracy is impossible for them to compete in.
So now everyone must be gassed.

because it's the only solution to the jew problem

See I think socialism in certain doses is a good thing in a homogeneous society.

I stopped being nazi after I understood, that it is the roman-law based government and society is keeping me down.

Nap is dildos
Kikes and niggers exist
We need a white iron fist to put our interests and civilization first in all cases
You will come around

National Socialism is third position, in opposition to capitalism to communism, but within that spurious dichotomy of left and right it fit better within the left. They fought the Bolsheviks and reactionaries and used a red flag in part because it was part of the traditional imperial german flag and in part because they wanted to attract the "reds" to their meetings, they were challenging the bolsheviks as to who the true revolutionary party was.
“Wasn't my party, at the time of which I'm speaking, composed of 90 per cent of left-wing elements?” – Adolf Hitler from Hitler's Table Talk

I want to eliminate the platforms of power that others could have over the public, I'm postmodern in my thinking that way, in which the quest for domination ends and we learn to live passively and in peace, you can't conquest anything apart from the capital you accumulate, which only is a platform of employment and consumerism, but these things aren't evil nor unfair.

The internet can be used for goods and services otherwise from a local supermarket or something like that, if a corporation wants to buy public land, it will have to pay a lot, and taxes will be high, because they're unnecessary to my region, but if they pay they can stay. You call this regulation, I just call it preservation, I'm not an ideologue.

National socialism discriminates against minorities institutionally, it's evil.
>but i just want a fiscal operation
then dont call yourself a nazi

Your a lying piece of shit kike
You don't stop being Natsoc

You don't like your natinal parks?
Once they are sold/bought people don't sell them back for public use

I would have national parks
I wouldn't be willing to sell important landmarks.

Kek

>I want to eliminate the platforms of power that others could have over the public, I'm postmodern in my thinking that way
So you want to destroy the power structure, and yet you don't expect something else, potentially worse, to fill in the vacuum?
>in which the quest for domination ends and we learn to live passively and in peace
As long as poverty persists, as long as one person oppresses another, as long as people persist in caring about themselves more than others, there will be no peace, and passivity is what is meant by the phrase "Evil exists when Good men do nothing." See pic related for more on that.
>you can't conquest anything apart from the capital you accumulate
And why should the people who have it now keep it? I could direct you to every Marxist critique of the bourgeoisie ever on that. There are other battlefields besides capital this war is being fought on anyway.
>which only is a platform of employment and consumerism, but these things aren't evil nor unfair.
So you want to destroy one platform of power, but leave another? Honestly, have you sat down and seriously thought about what you believe?
>National socialism discriminates against minorities institutionally, it's evil.
Why is discrimination against racists and tribalists evil in a society that values universalist morality? If somebody within a nation is a nepotist, the state has to step in or a single group will maintain power in a country.
>>but I just want a fiscal operation
No, I legitimately want to discriminate against racists, tribalists, and nepotists, because they discriminate against others. In your terminology, they are the ones who violated the NAP.

>National socialism discriminates against minorities institutionally, it's evil.
Get a load of this cuck