Try to redpill wife over the course of 3 years

>Try to redpill wife over the course of 3 years
>Continues to worship equality and diversity

Why are women so dense Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9a0U5_UulsE
youtube.com/watch?v=KpfGj_rlc8g
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Get better at red pilling cuck

Pay for a nigger to rape her that will teach her

You married a stupid woman. What did you expect? Chain her to the radiator on election days to solve your problem.

I don't know man, worked fine for me and my wife.

She was a normy when I met her. I didn't tell her what to think, I showed her. The way I did that was by often pointed out the stupidity of the left while keeping a positive attitude and doing the right thing. She eventually redpilled herself because of that.

women cannot be red pilled
period

>paying

find one to do it for free

>worked fine for my wife.
no it didn't
women, especially when they love you, will PRETEND to like something or go along with what you're saying

Acid attack her

Simply show her a webm compilation of niggers chimping out

Shes fucking a nigger, user

Because people favor what they are. Women are naturally weak and nurturing so they favor the weak by nurturing them.

I agree.. Acid to the face will change her attitude

I assume you two live in a good neighborhood.

Leftist ideology will support her when she is bored with you. She is looking out for her own self interests. If you were loaded and she saw a lot of your income ( her money ) lost to the tax burden, she might, might, change her tune.

*financially support her

Women are lemmings. They follow the dominant social order. When it becomes popular she will become redpilled.

Don’t worry. Once Hillary is exposed and prosecuted you can probably convince her it’s best that she never votes again.

This

Yet you still have no gf

nah man, thats a defeatist attitude. lots of women are redpilled (even though not nearly as much as men)

i dont really look at it as youre either redpilled or not because technically, none of us are fully redpilled. its a lifelong experiment and you take it slowly, one day at a time

Media.
Redpilling her is like trying to train a parrot with the TV on. You have to switch it off first or you'll get nowhere.

Fucking destroyed

Worshiping the connection to Source she has and sees in others is her greatest gift. This is what fuels what you perceive to be an error in judgment. She sees herself in other as she sees other in herself. Perhaps it is you who needs to learn.
I've eaten all the red pills and it led me to the same place your wife stands. I'm even more solid in my resolve than ever. The battle isnt against everyone on the outside user. It is within.

Jesus Christ, the two of you would have a blast sharing Rumi quotes with each other

We ditched the TV a while back, unfortunately her family and friends are all shit libs

I pray you're right user

Doing my best to build myself up, perhaps that will help

I fear you're right user, women are politically retarded, I don't know why I didn't see it sooner

Diversity is our strength though.

>Diversity is our strength though.

this actually isnt a lie if only people took diversity of thought into consideration

You're only one man trying to redpill her, every single piece of media your wife looks at is bombarding her with sjw bullshit. You simply can't keep up.

She's a woman. She doesn't know shit about politics. She just goes with whatever the rest of the world says is "trendy"

Does your wife know you browse Sup Forums?

There's going to be a time when I have to move in with my gf and I spend most my evenings on Sup Forums. Do I hide away my Sup Forums browsing or just tell her?

She wouldn't marry a Larping boomer faggot if she had any brains.

>Spending money on an online Mongolian basket weaving forum
What the actual fuck man

I think you've quoted the wrong guy

You should never love a woman that caves to your ideologies and gives up her own. You want a strong independent partner that accepts you for who you are and nothing more. My gf is a bisexual latina thats centre left, but she's fine with my beliefs, and we have fun debating sometimes

this is the type of faggot who unironically has to "redpill" his wife to give him head
or an amerimutt permavirgin

Women aren't made to be redpilled, they're made to breed white children for the fucking RACE WAR

Do it fast and hard OP. Slow redpilling just shows your trepidation to females, they need to be quickly put in place otherwise she won't respect you.

You could take her to the worst neighborhood, show her all the chimpout threads in the world, it won't be untill the brown hoardes are kicking in her door, putting a boot to her skull, and gang raping her, that she will consider taking the redpill.

You are not fucking her right then

Kek

Better yourself so you can assert more. She'll listen to a strong horse, they always do.

Yea. Your persuasion skill just sucks. Don't blame her.

Who cares what her political opinions are as long as she's pumping out white kids?

You can't use logic with women. You need to make her feel the emotion.

Yes, I do it out in the open. I have even started listening to Radical Agenda and The Daily Shoah without earphones, just don't care to hide it anymore

kys degenerate leaf

How can you have children with someone you don't fully trust?
If they believe in diversity that much they'll fall victim to every manner of jewish brainwashing.

Oops, you made a mistake. Ive been with the same woman for 15 years and married for 3. I guess maybe because of your outlook on life you think everyone is like you.

>Do it fast and hard
This is good advice

You're not the dominant man in her life it seems. I guarantee she's cheating on you.

If you're worried about it I would play it safe at the start and only openly browse things like /gif/, Sup Forums, other normie boards, sharing the content so she won't really question Sup Forums when you openly browse it later.

I think she's seen glimpses of the webpage open when I've been on Sup Forums but I don't think she knows I spend the majority of my free time on this jewish shekel making forum.

>only openly browse things like /gif/

>"user, why are you look at so much porn? Am I not sexy enough for you?"

I haven't been there in awhile, forgot about that. /wsg/ then.

Try knocking her up. Once she has children to consider they can't ignore the risks anymore.

Also of you're not lifting or forging a career you'll struggle.

Women listen to alphas, you must be a beta cuck if she doesn’t listen to you.

having children usually turns most women into conservatives because they focus their maternal nature on their own children instead of the whole world.

this doesn't always work though; some liberal women are so indoctrinated that they would actually apologize to a minority that killed and raped their daughter (has actually happened btw)

Wtf do people actually bother trying to redpill women?

did you have children?

if no make some
if yes kill her

this is the only red pilled way to pass your genetics and not get a divorced raped by a retarded bitch

You nailed it. I'm sitting on the couch cuz I worked all week while the wife moves her Mom. She also sold me on Trump after Rand Paul go knocked out of the race and she doesn't follow politics just listens to me rant. You have to establish early on who the boss is. Been with her for 30 years so obviously what I'm doing is working.

>Also of you're not lifting or forging a career you'll struggle.
this bong gets it

Show her more rekt webms

IQ 80-90 arabs won't do anything for that though

white guy with white wife and two white kids

my wife is probably more redpilled than I am, laughs about being openly "racist" (i.e. keeping white genes pure and keeping Jose and Ahmed out of white countries), says black guys are disgusting and their dicks look like literal shit, is triggered by feminist bullshit, doesn't like anal just wants to be fucked hard and proper

>mfw just started internship at aerospace company and not a single person in my building is a woman

Your wife wouldn’t happen to be an anime pillow, would she? Sounds ideal.

Do you think Rand would have caved on DACA? I dont know enough about him but Liberterians always seem to be for open borders cause of "muh better economics"

Diversity is fine for people who want it but forcing it on people who don't want it just creates conflict. Does she want more conflict in the world? Is she some kind of sadist?

What does her boyfriend think?

Ive red pilled women before... but it only lasted until the next emotion took over their minds...

Why does she want minorities to have to suffer the presence of racist white people? It would be so much better for them if racists could go live in some Racistville somewhere.

Because a woman arrives at her beliefs not based on objective analytical reasoning, like you, but by her perception of the prevailing belief in broader society. I’ve thought about this a lot recently. If you’ve got time to waste, what follows is my basic (10 paragraph) conclusion.

1. EARLY FAMILIES. Early human societies were not “democratic,” for valid evolutionary reasons. The leadership model of these tightly-knit societies was a natural extension of the family unit. Humans evolved such that each family unit was led by its strongest and wisest member—the father. Not only was the father the most capable of navigating the state of nature, but he actually prioritized the survival of his wife and children above even his own, this being the result of his evolutionary need to pass on his DNA. When one member of the group (i.e., the father) can and does advance each of its members’ interests (i.e., that of the wife and children) more effectively than they could themselves, than evolutionary pressures will eventually craft a family unit that is not guided by principles that are “democratic” in nature.

2. EARLY SOCITIES. This same evolutionary principle guided the formation of early human societies. Humans evolved in small, tightly-knit groups that were led by a faction of the group’s most capable men, whose own interests were inextricably intertwined with the survival of the tribe as a whole. Since these tribes faced problems that were larger and more complex than those facing individual families, it became partly necessary for a small group of highly-capable men—rather than a single individual—to guide the direction of the tribe. In any case, evolutionary pressures would necessarily produce a hierarchical system where control resided only within the hands of the strongest, wisest, and most protective members of the tribe. What a father was to the women and children of his family, the tribal leaders were to the families of the tribe.

3. SUCCESS OF EARLY SOCIEITES. The survival of such a tribe is best ensured if most of its members are ultimately driven to seek conformity with the apparent consensus. While it was beneficial for a small group of tribal leaders to engage in critical evaluation of alternative viewpoints, the tribe is best served if the rest of the group would be inclined towards conflict minimization, active suppression of dissenting viewpoints, and isolation from outside influences. From an evolutionary standpoint, it became a tremendous disadvantage for most individuals to develop the capacity to conceive of, let alone advocate for, ideas that related broadly to the overall direction of the group.

4. EVOLUTIONARY MISMATCH. The processes and institutions used by modern Western democracies to make decisions and disseminate culture have resulted in a state of disequilibrium known as an “evolutionary mismatch.” In other words, humans evolved traits that were highly advantageous to one environment, but these same traits have become maladaptive and are be leveraged against them in the new environment. Evolutionary history did not condition the members of the tribe to live in a society where those who don’t actually have the tribe’s interests in mind could ascend to power. Evolutionary history simply did not condition the rank-and-file member of Western society to entertain the idea that formal and informal “leaders” in their society—the politicians, the media, and so on—could effectively be working against their interests. Evolutionary history simply did not condition the members of the tribe to entertain the idea that leadership of their own tribe could be taken up by people who discretely hold loyalties to a different tribe, and who may not consider their interests to be the same. No matter how directly this occurs in front of their face, they will never be able to perceive it unless the majority perceives it.

5. EFFECTS OF THAT MISMATCH. Normies do not have “beliefs” in the sense that you do. Often, the easiest way to observe this phenomenon is by speaking not to the younger millennial crowd (who are undoubtedly suggestible), but rather to those who have already lived long enough to have witnessed broad directional changes in society’s norms. Consider one of the millions of middle-aged suburban women who, quite fashionably, believe that her nation should cease glorifying some of its historical figures, as the U.S. does with Christopher Columbus on Columbus Day. When she shows complete conviction about her viewpoint, and when she finds your advocacy for the maintenance of Columbus Day to be utterly incomprehensible, she is not being deceitful. She is genuinely unable to comprehend how you (or anyone) could believe such a proposition, even though she in fact believed the same proposition herself for the majority of her life, at least implicitly. When you inquire whether she feels guilty for unabashedly celebrating Columbus Day for decades, expect no more than platitudes (“I’ve grown to see the evil.”). When you demand she provide her specific reasoning she relied on to change her views, expect her memory on that point is grey. It’s as though the first time she was ever even consciously aware that her views had taken a 180° turn are is in this moment. She doesn’t feel guilty for having celebrated Columbus Day, because subconsciously, the “evil” she perceives lay not in any objective theory of morality, but rather in the idea that you are departing from what is apparently the direction the group is heading. In reality, her beliefs in this realm never were, and are still not, grounded in the merits, even if that’s how she envisions them in her mind or presents them to you in discussion.

6. PARADOX OF SOCIETAL CHANGE. In the modern Western democracy, most people simply set their beliefs somewhere within a small box in either direction of what the majority of people believe. But if the majority of people simply believe what the majority of people believe, how can it be that the positions believed by the majority can shift radically within even a generation? It must logically follow that, even though we conceive of our Western Democracies as being “egalitarian” systems in which everyone has equal sway in the country’s direction, in reality, below the surface there is really just a small group of people pushing the crowd—oftentimes in opposing directions.

7. IMPLICATIONS. In reality, there is only a battle for the hearts and minds of a small segment of the population—say 10-15%. On the one hand, you can take this a blackpill: in all likelihood, it will be essentially impossible to convince your wife or other women like her. On the other hand, it’s a whitepill: you don’t actually need to convince your wife or the large swath of people in society (including many men) who have seem utterly inconvincible.

8. HOW TO PROCEED. The focus should be put almost entirely on those with the ability, desire, and biological predisposition to break from the crowd; exhausting your efforts on members of the great mushy majority is an almost-futile task. You should still try to convince them periodically, but mostly just to keep them abreast of where they might see things going in the future—i.e., to condition them for what’s to come. Who should you should instead focus almost all of your efforts on? Essentially, even in our “modern Western Democracies,” you should still focus on swaying those who you would seek to sway in early human society. Once enough of them on board, it will simply run too counter to the rest of society’s basic nature to push back.

Women are natural leftists.

youtube.com/watch?v=9a0U5_UulsE

9. The RIGHT PEOPLE. The “right people” are those who tend to be male, tend to be younger, tend to be stubborn, and tend to be least susceptible to "peer influences” (i.e., are willing to openly believe something contrary to the majority). A news story this year reported on the “dangerous pipeline” from the libertarian party to the alt-right. Why would there be a "pipeline" from [small-government and laissez faire social/economic views] to [authoritarian government and protectionist economics], two ideologies that seem to be diametrically opposed? This makes less sense when you focus exclusively on what the ideologies are, rather than on who holds those ideologies. Both the “alt-right” and “libertarians” are comprised almost entirely of young, white males who have no qualms with choosing a set of beliefs beyond the pale. While the rest of tribe sits inside the camp, bickering over their opposing views (views that in the grand scheme of things, are effectively indistinguishable from one another), those who would have once led the tribe are gathering outside the camp to hash out the real direction in which the group should go. It will take some time and conditioning, but if you have enough men gathered, then ultimately the rest of the group’s biological instincts will steer them to this new consensus viewpoint as though no other alternative could be conceivable. The concept of a society having “open borders” will seem dangerous and suicidal to them, and the fact that they once thought the exact opposite will somehow seem grey in their memory.

you married her you stupid fuck

KEK

10. CONCLUSION. Focus on younger people, particularly younger men. Focus on those who have already shown a propensity to form views independent from the majority—libertarians, skeptics, and so on (even the communists; converting a fanatical left-winger to carry your banner is far more valuable than convincing a normie to march under it). Focus on those with the most intellectual drive and those who, when it comes to their beliefs, are generally the most stubborn and uncompromising. People are conditioned to live under uncompromising tribal leaders, and when most of the group seeks compromise, it’s those who refused to compromise that gain the most ground. Focus on those with the least to lose should the current order in society change. Finally, focus on those who are physically attractive, those who are physically fit, and those who are sociable. For obvious reasons, evolutionary history reaches back—far beyond the emergence of modern man—
has conditioned people to follow these members of society based on those qualities alone (as opposed to the merits of their argument). A middle-aged, politically-mainstream suburban woman named Karen will never be the lone individual staring down tanks in Tiananmen Square; nor will she be the one to march among a few hundred in Charlottesville. And just as she won’t be among those sparking a movement at its ground-level, she won’t be among those providing meaningful resistance, either, should it really start to take hold. Just gather enough of the people I described above, and the rest will fall in line, including Karen.

Trying to get a woman to think with anything other than middle school emotions is like trying to get a shark to do geometry

You married a dumb-dumb. I'm a woman, I was raised by redpilled parents and I redpilled my husband.

who the fuck hides his Sup Forums browsing? what the fuck cuck

You have to ridicule her beliefs while championing yours.

how does a guy find one of you in the wild and date/court a redpill grill? pls respond

checked, it's a nice feeling isn't it
checked again, must be hard being a single NEET who can only manage to get his dick sucked by a roastie/fatass now and then

I'm an outlier because my parents are outliers. But I know there are enough normie women who could be swayed in the right direction. Just avoid prestigious universities and major metro areas. I'm sure you could find plenty of impressionable, kind women at various churches. Religious women are more likely to be moderate or independent at least, as a starting point.

As for courtship, just be a good guy. Moral, smart, reliable, principled. My husband was bluepilled but he's an excellent person and open-minded in general, so I didn't care, and it was easy to show him the logic in my POV.

Can you make such a compilation?

It's kinda true what they say, a girl will adopt whatever political beliefs her boyfriend/husband has. Mine was raised by liberal parents, and now firmly believes feminism is the cancer of society and the Jews should be gassed.

This won't work with most feminist liberals because they'll just say that they're acting like that because they had traumatic upbringings because they were born into under-served communities.

She's just trying to make the World an easier place for Betas like you who can't tell their wives what to do. You should cherish her.

A woman will always believe her friends over her husband. And when she has 2000 friends on facebook and twitter, there's really no point in even trying. it will just cause fights and you will never win.

She's testing you to see if you actually believe what you're saying. Stand up straight with your shoulders back and say it like you mean it.

None of this "hmmm, sure looks like this whole diversity-is-our-strength business is a bit questionable..." [wink[
Say what you mean and mean what you say.

pic unrelated

only if her husband is useless and weak

not sure about your situation user but we dated for 8 years, she's born in the south, smart, and we clicked. never really talk much about politics in depth despite how fucking ridiculously stupid leftists are. i think it worked with us because she wasnt interested in politics but thinks most people are retarded.
so, high iq helps on mate selection. if you just want a vagina you have to pay the price that shes contributing towards your kids being part of the problem.

Can we have examples of the specific pills and the process you implemented?

You've gotta understand propaganda way better

Keep telling yourself that.

Post this more often. Good work.

People , especially women tend to support the view of the majority , unless , someone whom they consider a leader , happens to have a different opinion.

This video is more about pickup , but I believe it would help you to understand why is she like she is , and how can you change it

youtube.com/watch?v=KpfGj_rlc8g

What’s the difference?