At what point will we finally realize that western democracy is a failed experiment? How much longer do we have to let this shit show continue before we come to the consensus that we made a mistake and take steps to establish an effective and lasting form of governance? It is my proposition that we abolish the obviously flawed structure of the Democratic Republic and institute a Monarchy of the New World. The following glaring setbacks of democracy can all be rectified with such a change as I will demonstrate:
1) Income disparity American income disparity is the worst of any developed nation. At this point in time, it is actually worse that the wealth gap of Tsarist Russia. Under a monarchy, leaders were judged by their ability to use their wealth for the betterment of the state and the people. Kings recognized that hoarding their wealth did little to consolidate their power and in most cases, subverted support for their claim to legitimacy
2) Overly convoluted political structure The unwieldy bureaucracy of American democracy has obliterated any ability by the people to understand the system supposedly under their own rule. This intentional obfuscation of the political body allows for career politicians to manipulate legislature without detection or accountability for personal gain and the detriment of the state and its people. The lack of understanding of the citizen rulers allows the spawning of a near anarchic kleptocracy in the midst of the confusion. In a monarchy, this kind of challenge to the monarch’s power is met with swift and often violent opposition. This protects both the authority of the monarch and the unity of the state
3) In a democratic republic, there is no benefit for the elected representatives to maintain or improve upon the existing infrastructure nor political structure of the state. The status quo of decay and degradation of both the physical and “spiritual” manifestations of the state are in no way a hindrance to the governing elect. The use of resources to such causes detract from their own crusades of personal gain. Conversely, a well maintained state immediately benefits a ruling monarch through direct ownership allowing both for the staying of foreign invaders and the generation of wealth
4) Political instability and personal responsibility The constant overturning of elected leaders erodes any sense of personal responsibility to the state and its people. To further this, constant in fighting of opposing political parties is a stark hindrance to the progress of the state wherein denunciation and undoing are the hallmarks of a ruling faction. Upon termination of office, there is no call to accountability and judgment of the political body that would act as a deterrent to poor and self-serving leadership. In a monarchy, absolute responsibility of leadership is held by the monarch for life and poor leadership is met with civil unrest by the populace waning the ruler’s power and allowing for usurpation and even execution The evidence is clear. Western democracy has failed us and it’s time that we look to a tried form of governance that is more in line with human nature.
Cameron Harris
Absolute monarchies lasted longer than any other form of government on Earth. Why, you ask? Because they are the most superior.
With one Golden Citizen with supreme, executive power representing the interests and well-being of the nation state, miracles can happen. An entire continent can fall under the reign of ONE dynasty and the largest empire on the planet can be formed and kept on a tight leash with the help of the crushing hell of the three pillars: The Crown, the Church, and the Coin.
Long live absolute rulers! Long live the Divine Right of Kings!
Benjamin Brooks
*crushing heel
Though I guess it works both ways.
Mason Lee
we didn't crown george washington when he had the chance. america will never never have a monarchy
Jackson Brooks
>American Monarchy Just one question.
Literally who?
Isaiah Murphy
Which has clearly been to our own detriment. The mistakes of the past can still be rectified
Eli Phillips
If you want to have an inbred to worship there's plenty of monarchist shitholes in the world. Why don't you go to one of them? We don't want you shitting up this country. >Under a monarchy, leaders were judged by their ability to use their wealth for the betterment of the state and the people Holy fuck, how can think something so retarded?
Adrian Evans
A self-made billionaire white male with strong religious and traditionalist leanings.
I am, of course, referring to Sam Walton. Unfortunately, he's dead, so we'll have to give the crown to one of his spoiled brats.
Gavin Reyes
As long as catholicism isn't made the state religion as it is un-American, and non-traditional in American history.
Owen Thompson
While income distribution was by no means equal, it is a far worse affair under American democracy than nearly any successful Old World monarchy. This is an objective fact
Jaxon Taylor
I nominate Islam, as it is currently the strongest and most sensible religion.
Adam Green
Constitutional Parliamentary Monarchy is God-Tier. It has the balance of powers our Founding Fathers should have actually subscribed to. >Executive : Monarch >Legislative : Parliament >Judicial : Constitutionally Appointed It's a perfect balance wherein the monarch does not become czaristic and decadent via pressure from parliament, and fundamental rights are guaranteed to citizens via a constitution.
Logan Collins
I nominate Richard Spencer
Ryan Collins
Did the Roman and British empires take votes? No, because the masses are blind fools and allowing them to chart the course of the government is a disaster waiting to happen.
A non-absolute monarchy is no monarchy at all, you knave.
Jonathan Miller
...
Charles Wood
LARPing faggot.
Carson Mitchell
You are a weak, stupid cow. You will be culled from the herd first.
Xavier Roberts
The Birtish Empire was a Parliamentary Monarchy at its territorial zenith. The Byzantines were a very well-ruled (via bureaucracy) and grace-guided empire, but they simply could not have been a parliamentary monarchy due to the illiteratacy of the public.
John Butler
This kind of monarchy allows for too much variance in power sway. The more complex and distributed the power, the easier the subversion of the state as a whole. I will concede it is a step closer, but a small one at best
Carter Cox
Moldbug plz go
Xavier Wilson
You have no idea what you're saying. Your mind is filled with many confusions, probably as a result of your cheeseburger-based diet.
Jeremiah Fisher
>illiteratacy of the public
This is essentially as true now as it ever was. The public is virtually illiterate on issues of domestic and foreign affairs as laid out in point 2.
Also, please don't spell illiteracy wrong
Adam Davis
Kingdom of the United States of America sounds so stupid,here,this is what a real monarchy looks like.
Jason Clark
Obviously, the name of the nation would need to be changed to reflect the restructuring of power
James Ross
>Byzantine
>"very well ruled" "grace" guided
Do you even history my dude?
Jackson Jackson
>The more complex and distributed the power, the easier the subversion of the state as a whole I would actually contend that having many elected representatives based on population instead of senatators and congressmen over representing groups would be less easy to subvert. You would only be able to vote for your micro-county representative. This would be very difficult to subvert because the Marxists would have to shell out a lot of money and research every single election in order to be subversive.
Jeremiah Gomez
United Kingdom of America
Nicholas Stewart
Thanks for not touching my argument
Jonathan Bailey
...
Jonathan Thompson
Amerikkka is fine with me
Angel Walker
>ur spelling I'm phone posting in my lecture, give me a break. >public is illiterate That's why we go back to having property requirements for voting. White males vote overwhelmingly Republican.
Kevin Rodriguez
This is true if assuming a concerted effort of subversion but not at all true when considering the efforts of splinter groups. The resilience of the state drops to nearly zero as large scale group cohesion becomes nearly impossible
Adam Baker
They were the longest lasting empire in history. Lincoln was right when he said "even this will not last".
James Peterson
>a real monarchy >socialists forced an abdication within the last decade When parliamentarians hold that kind of influence over the crown, you don't have a real monarchy. The only real monarchy in Europe is the UK. And KUSoA doesn't sound any dumber than "The German Realm" did.
Brayden Miller
Please use a different flag. I am using that flag for this thread. Parliamentary Britain was a sham; it only became a true parliament well into the 1800's. Learn history, you blockhead.
Colton Morris
The nature of parliament is purely to represent your regional interests, we wouldn't see what we do in republics, where elected officials work in concerted effort to achieve some unitary goal (that is the duty of the monarch).
Ayden Taylor
> give me a break. Just a little tongue and cheek humor. It was too obvious not to point out
>That's why we go back to having property requirements for voting.
The current system is not easily navigated even by the educated citizenry. Understanding of the system requires a full time dedication to its decryption and as such, is even more of a burden on the employed and successful who have there own enterprises to look after
William Wood
Anti american bullshit.
just kys already you cuck
Elijah Harris
So? The empire was constantly collapsing it was not ruled particularly well or else we wouldn't call bad bureaucracy like the US's Byzantine.
Jonathan Gomez
Make me nignog.
Jose Powell
>The current system is not easily navigated even by the educated citizenry. Understanding of the system requires a full time dedication to its decryption and as such, is even more of a burden on the employed and successful who have there own enterprises to look after As I said before, the nature of parliament is regional, there isn't some vast effort to make national decisions. It's basically a way for people to say "hey we need some help over here" or "we're fine!"
Brody Rogers
charlemagne the guy who allowed ursury for chosen, america why do you always enable them?
Logan Rogers
I can tell that you are a low class American who consumes a steady intake of highly processed fats and antibiotic-packed red meats. Use a different flag.
Benjamin Fisher
Only in service to the future King
Samuel Collins
Don't you need to stupid somewhere else?
Aiden Martinez
So I'm assuming you think Czarist Russia was the world's best empire?
Robert Parker
You are a slobbering ignoramus.
Jonathan Howard
This is only a problem in the context of modern society. You show a profound lack of perspective
Camden Cook
>American Monarchy Party Let's just form a Reunionist Party and bring the Anglosphere back together under the British monarchy. Anglo Galactic Empire soon, brethren.
Kayden Robinson
No need to project.
Isaiah Richardson
so burger bro give me perspective, whats your plan?
Christopher Long
I'm not disagreeing with the purpose of a parliament not it's efficacy towards specific ends but I feel that I've already point out the flaws and how they outweigh any perceived benefit in my original post
Brayden Ward
Stop using MY flag. Now. I'm warning you.
Samuel Russell
No it wasn't particularly great.
Jack Perez
A jew of course. who else? maybe a nigger
Josiah Reed
To implement an American monarchy.
are you intentionally being slow?
Nathaniel Jenkins
Well if it means that much to you sweetie. Kiss?
Blake Smith
you need a king though, do you even have an aristocracy? does the Clinton family count?
Lucas Williams
I nominate Donald Jr Trump. All hail the future royal family of the Trump Dynasty! His sons will be groomed for leadership and daughters will be married off to other royal families to strengthen alliances. His youngest daughter Chloe shall be betrothed to Prince George of Cambridge, future king of England.
Zachary Thomas
But it was an absolute monarchy!
Angel Barnes
Constitutional Monarchies marked the beggining of Jewish rule. Do not fall on this trick, folks
Benjamin Watson
>real monarch is the UK wew lad
Adrian Jenkins
Thank you.
Ryan Nguyen
>things are getting out of control >better lose all control and give IT to a daddy-figure
Authoritarians every fucking time
Aiden Rivera
Shit, you are one triggered newfag. How? Jusr choose some dumbass off the street and say "hey, youre king now"? >do you even have an aristocracy? Of course not because its a ridiculous concept like royalty.
Nicholas Howard
I never praised an absolute monarchy I was just responding to your claims that the Byzantine Empire was somehow admirable.
Monarchy is not the answer in the modern era as the ethos of our society would no longer maintain anything beyond a dictatorship at best.
Zachary Smith
I'm down for a monarchy. Then it will be obvious who to behead.
Aaron Jenkins
an aristocracy will naturally develop through meritocracy. Once established, it will carry on through lineage that is proven to be strong.
President Trump's rule is too contentious for a smooth transition into the new political structure
Blake Smith
I nominate myself for the title of King.
Adam Wright
>Wanting a Washington monarchy >Not wanting an Andrew Jackson monarchy
Logan Wilson
>an aristocracy will naturally develop through meritocracy. you need a field of battle to prove that, capitalism doesn't count, like different warlords fighting for land until one reaches the top
Jayden Gray
STOP USING MY FLAG.
I'll email the mods. I'm dead serious.
Oliver Stewart
This is something I have pointed out. There is a burden of responsibility placed on the crown and monarchs are held accountable for any misdeeds
Yes, that's obviously what I'm implying
Rule by the people is at worst an illusion and at best an inefficient mess. Human nature dictates leadership of the many by the few as has been observed time and time again. You visceral disdain for the truth means nothing other than your inability to see reason
Lincoln Edwards
In a world of finite resources, this is not an issue as battlefields abound. Beyond that, any selfless service to the nation can also be seen as a measuring stick for aristocratic nomination
Luke Barnes
but modern societies are too divided, there's no 1 field where the country can unite around and have a definitive supreme leader
unless we get into a big war and some guy organically raises to the top and becomes the soul of the country somehow
Julian Reyes
We already have an aristocracy. The Clintons, the Bushes, the Gates, et cetera.
Ayden Gutierrez
>being this autistic This guy gets it. Pic related (2 parents before). When this many people are this stupid, something’s going to give and it’s going to crack. This country is a pressure cooker, however, the US (Corp & Mil sectors) thrives on chaos. The reason, common sense, has been bred into the hard working people of this country through the need to survive the frontier. The ingenuity and ability to improvise has been replaced by groupthink and idealistic cattle lines people willingly put themselves in. Personal quality and worth has been redefined by the media and academia to reflect qualities of the very best sheep. Without hard labor and challenge, people are lost and confused. Now, our ability to master chaos, our national safety net, is being eroded by narcissism and degenerates. Organized religion has been compromised since it’s inception, but it used to serve good, however misguided. With science replacing God, the forest in which the people are lost grows darker. We make the light. Fight by seeking excellence, testing yourself and improving every day. Look past the material, past the cheap thrills and you will find peace in knowing you are doing all you can by being the light that will nourish all around you. Our family is wide and this truth is in all of our blood.
Liam Gomez
Initially, no. You are correct. Although with the level of division at present, any uniting figure would be met with unprecedented support that would make this possible. Manufacture of the necessary environment is feasible assuming that action is taken immediately
Caleb Gutierrez
The reason why monarchies fail is because you can not guarantee good capable and competent off spring
The only valid form of government logically is A Theocratic Caste System people are tested into and that through effort they can advance through, with training and education if they are capable. As well as need retesting for upper most caste periodically. Every son is drafted into military training and mandated to own a firearm after. This disables tyranny permanently. Women are unable to operate in the workforce until age 35 to force motherhood and family efforts as the best use of their time until their looks fade and they grow up. Children will be married off by their parents girls at 15 or so to boys after military training enabling genetically program mating desires. Everyone must have children to force people into having a long term stake in society. Everything is done on blockchain technology to disable corruption
Bentley Ramirez
>geta offended when somebody calls him a LARPING faggot >responds like a LARPING faggot
Benjamin Harris
Empire of America, obviously.
Logan Williams
>The reason, common sense, has been bred into the hard working people of this country through the need to survive the frontier. The ingenuity and ability to improvise has been replaced by groupthink and idealistic cattle lines people willingly put themselves in. Personal quality and worth has been redefined by the media and academia to reflect qualities of the very best sheep. Without hard labor and challenge, people are lost and confused
This is an excellent point that goes beyond the scope of my initial post but is nonetheless valid
you arrogant littl burger, to implement a monarchy you need monarchs where do you conjure them from? didn't america specifically fight to be free from monarchy?
Angel Evans
The problem with this is the decentralization of power and the complete lack of adaptability to external changes and pressures.
Also, on a side note, this is basically fascism with a supernatural belief system at its core which would first have to be established
Julian Hall
roman emperors used a system where they chose a fit successor
until Marcus Aurelius fucked up and passed the title to his son
many of the emperors got their place by taking it through civil war though, not succession
Sebastian Evans
>being this slow
Hunter Johnson
This looks exciting. Who would you put on the throne? a Windsor?
Jason Price
Another fair point. To even further the point, blood succession of strong lines can be complemented with a succession of merit when the line is shown to be weak assume a cultural frame of reference for the process
Jackson Anderson
>Bashes tzarist Russia the Jews most hated place Fuck off kike
Natsoc has the benefits of monarchy without the obvious avenue for kike subversion. >1st King is good >2nd king is good we are dieing off >3rd king has kikes flattering him and giving him vice >4th king is raised with Jews and he gets more vice >5th king gets videotaped raping a smalls and eating it zog is back >6th king marries a kike their baby is a Jew See the English Royal family and that half nigger half kike
Joseph Harris
Wait if a woman manages to get on the throne?!?!?!
Lincoln Hall
Just do what every country has historically done when they needed a monarch: invite a random german noble
Xavier Baker
>Bashes tzarist Russia the Jews most hated place I did no such thing. Your inability to read is astounding. In modern American perspective, Tzarist Russia is understood to be the epitome of wealth inequality. I did nothing except point out that current American disparity is far worse.
As for the rest of your nonsense, see You are the reason democracy has failed
Matthew Kelly
kys tory scum
Isaiah Thomas
...
Ethan Diaz
>wut? what is your plan?
Adrian Barnes
To implement an American Monarchy.
You know you can scroll back through the previous posts, yes?