How did nazi germany make germany a better place to live in?

I see the "Nazi Economic Miracle" memed a lot but did it actually happen as people would have you believe?

Other urls found in this thread:

pastebin.com/BUU4tbiw
speaker.gov/contact
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Nathaniel_de_Rothschild
thegreateststorynevertold.tv/
jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/David Hoggan-The Forced War.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=ECS3-xdohFk
cesifo-group.de/DocDL/cesifo_wp800.pdf
siraaronrichards.imgur.com/
pastebin.com/Uzm91v7z
youtu.be/qTYSv_YQOVo
youtube.com/watch?v=eFVHqp4CdHQ&t=2s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>How did nazi germany make germany a better place to live in?
Pic related.

>I see the "Nazi Economic Miracle" memed a lot but did it actually happen as people would have you believe?
Whoops. Missed that part.

Here, Section 7 answers that question.
pastebin.com/BUU4tbiw

Office of the Speaker
Phone: (202) 225-0600
speaker.gov/contact

>CALL NOW and DEMAND Speaker Ryan declassify the "FISA ABUSE" memo to the public

>This is a matter of VITAL PUBLIC INTEREST
CALL RIGHT NOW!
Congressional & District Offices
Washington D.C. Office

1233 Longworth HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-3031
Fax: (202) 225-3393
Janesville Office

20 South Main Street, Suite 10
Janesville, WI 53545
Phone: (608) 752-4050
Fax: (608) 752-4711
Kenosha Office

5031 7th Avenue
Kenosha, WI 53140
Phone: (262) 654-1901
Fax: (262) 654-2156
Racine Office

216 6th Street
Racine, WI 53403
Phone: (262) 637-0510
Fax: (262) 637-5689

>I see the "Nazi Economic Miracle" memed a lot but did it actually happen as people would have you believe?

The economy was fine, their main problem was not spending enough money on war equipment.
They rolled into WW2 extremely underprepared, and didn't achieve a full war economy until 1942.

They didn't have enough ammo, updated equipment, the right weapons, etc. All big innovations happened during the war, and most of the impressive ones near the end of it.

It was pretty obvious that they were going to be attacked by the democracies, so it really was irresponsible not to have a full war economy before the war started.

...

>their main problem was not spending enough money on war equipment

But the vast majority of loans and debt in the Reich was spent on rearmament.

>It was pretty obvious that they were going to be attacked by the democracies

Germany attacked Poland first

>Germany attacked Poland first
Section 11 of this pastebin addresses that: pastebin.com/BUU4tbiw

Hahahaha, fucking burgers man

wow

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Nathaniel_de_Rothschild

>wow
Yes, it's amazing to see what life was really like there without looking through the Jewish media's lens.

well, they did create 6,000,000 Jobs

Nice argument

>Section 11 of this pastebin addresses that: pastebin.com/BUU4tbiw

Your link is spouting literal Nazi Propaganda. The Danzig Massacres never happened as described by the Nazis. Yes there was violence towards ethnic Germans AFTER the invasion but the Danzig Massacres as justification to invade Poland is complete rubbish

...

They borrowed tons of money.

lmao cuz Hitler was such a humanitarian right?

>Your link is spouting literal Nazi Propaganda.
Pic related.

>The Danzig Massacres never happened as described by the Nazis.
Correct.

>Yes there was violence towards ethnic Germans AFTER the invasion but the Danzig Massacres as justification to invade Poland is complete rubbish
Says the people who hate the NSDAP, hates Hitler and hates National Socialism.

You act as if "literal Nazi propaganda" is a bad thing. Why should I believe literal Jewish propaganda?

They invented their way out of the great depression. Synthetic fuels, nylon, missle tech, microwave oven, etc etc

Yes it did happen but Jalmar Schacht made it happen, not Hitler. Hitler ruined it with war.

>You act as if "literal Nazi propaganda" is a bad thing. Why should I believe literal Jewish propaganda?

You don't have to believe anything but at least try to find evidence for what you do believe. There is zero evidence for the Danzig massacres outside of literal German propaganda.

>Hitler ruined it with war.
Section 13 proves the NatSoc's did not want war.
Section 14 proves the Allies wanted war.
pastebin.com/BUU4tbiw

>The economy was fine, their main problem was not spending enough money on war equipment.

That was actually a result of their main problem- a labor shortage.

>They invented their way out of the great depression

Incorrect, they borrowed their way out of the depression. Also mass rearmament played a huge role in this which resulted in an economy built for war.

>You don't have to believe anything but at least try to find evidence for what you do believe.
But I did and you dismissed it as "literal Nazi propaganda"

We can't rely on the mainstream to tell us the truth after all...

>There is zero evidence for the Danzig massacres outside of literal German propaganda.
...According to those who hate the National Socialists.

>Section 13 proves the NatSoc's did not want war

lmao that is absolutely incorrect. If Hitler did not want war he wouldn't have broken nearly every treaty Germany signed

You dont think the things they invented had anything to do with their economy?

>Your link is spouting literal Nazi Propaganda.

Nice!

Poland was in possession of German territories annexed after WW1. No further provocation by the Poles was needed to justify war by Hitler

>lmao that is absolutely incorrect.
No, it's not.

>If Hitler did not want war he wouldn't have broken nearly every treaty Germany signed
Again, according to those that wanted to go to war with Hitler and Germany.


Do you believe the Holocaust happened too? The mainstream says it did and if anyone in the mainstream dissents, they lose their position and their freedom.

>They invented their way out of the great depression.


Hitler created the Reichsmark and drove the jews out of banking.

>You dont think the things they invented had anything to do with their economy?

Certainly did but I don't think it played a big a role as you believe

>Poland was in possession of German territories annexed after WW1

And Germany was in possession of annexed formerly Polish lands before WW1. If you wanna play the historical blame game Germans are still in the wrong

Germany was a fucking shitshow before the Nazis, due to the Treaty of Versailles and hyperinflation. The authoritarian rule put order back into the chaos, eliminated the pervasive Jewish hedonism in Berlin, and eventually made them wealthy and powerful enough to conquer half of their neighbors in a matter of weeks, and subdue the British until the Soviets stopped them at Stalingrad and America got (((their))) orders to gimp in and deal the killing blow. If anyone can correct me on this timeline, please do, I want to have it straight.

why did he invade Czechoslovakia and Poland?

>why did he invade Czechoslovakia and Poland?
Section 11 explains: pastebin.com/BUU4tbiw

>Again, according to those that wanted to go to war with Hitler and Germany.

According to objective fact, Hitler signed treaties which he broke at a pretty staggering rate. It seems dishonest to dismiss any potential critiques as just Jewish Propaganda

>Germany was a fucking shitshow before the Nazis


It didn't really improve, the economy stabilized due to Hitler's mad dash for war and mass conscription.

Luxury food items went down in the nazi period from the weimar period, pic related

For starters almost all industry was privatized, including banks. International stock markets were banned, and replaced by national markets, so banks had to reinvest in stocks of their own national companies.

Tax rates in the Weimar republic ranged from 80% at the highest, to 20% at its lowest. Under the new Germany tax rates went down to 35% at the highest bracket and 4.7% at the lowest.

yes

With classic socialist tactics:
We can make the next 5, 10 at best, years the best years ever! After that we are bankrupt and our country is ruined.

>According to objective fact, Hitler signed treaties which he broke at a pretty staggering rate.
Thus sayeth the Jews.

>It seems dishonest to dismiss any potential critiques as just Jewish Propaganda
But you're allowed to dismiss any potential critiques as "Nazi propaganda?"

Rather disingenuous if you ask me.

>And Germany was in possession of annexed formerly Polish lands before WW1. If you wanna play the historical blame game Germans are still in the wrong
Those annexed German territories were populated by 95% ethnically German, German-speaking peoples, who overwhelmingly wished to rejoin Germany, but were prevented from doing so. When Hitler invaded, after repeated diplomatic requests were denied, the Poles executed a bunch of those Germans in those cities as punishment. But keep pretending like the Poles were the good guys goy.

so he invaded Poland because of fake massacares and persecution meme and because of attack on some shitty radio tower.
now, why did he attack Czechoslovakia? why he shit all over by Mussolini while doing it?

>But you're allowed to dismiss any potential critiques as "Nazi propaganda?"

I'm only talking about the Danzig Massacres in particular, there's zero evidence to corroborate the Nazis justification for invading Poland

>I'm only talking about the Danzig Massacres in particular, there's zero evidence to corroborate the Nazis justification for invading Poland
Except the evidence I posted that you dismissed out of hand as "Nazi propaganda"

>Those annexed German territories were populated by 95% ethnically German

Citation required

>But keep pretending like the Poles were the good guys goy.

Literally no one said that.

>cuz Hitler was such a humanitarian right?
Correct. that was why he invaded poland and saved countless Germans, and even executed Bolsheviks in the area.

>Czechoslovakia and Poland?
Former was a mistake, the latter was because of on-going genocide of ethnic German people.

>so he invaded Poland because of fake massacares
But they weren't fake as the links prove.

>and persecution meme and because of attack on some shitty radio tower
oh and of course the radio tower was "shitty" therefore the Germans should've just accepted the attack and moved on.

All your links in regards to Poland only talk about the massacres of Germans AFTER the invasion. It does not corroborate the idea that the Danzig massacres happened before said invasion

Well actually
He apparently invaded Czechoslovakia because it was the only source of uranium in Europe and he need it to build an a-bomb

>Correct. that was why he invaded poland and saved countless Germans

Danzig massacres are propaganda. Germans were killed only AFTER the invasion

By 1939, 17 million people were on state welfare even as the official unemployment rate was at 0% - people were more dependent on the state than ever as the vast-majority of jobs were so lowpaying they had to seek governmental assistance to maintain their basic living standards - a fact often conveniently forgotten by 'economic miracle' mythologisers.
This is all of course, without even getting into the ethical and moral issues surrounding forced work-camps, rampant nationalisation and the suppression of personal economic freedom that accompanies a state-controlled economy like that of Nazi Germany.
You want to talk about economic miracles? Look at Konrad Adenauer. He was able to do far more than Hitler could possibly dream of while having a fraction of the resources (and country) Hitler did and most importantly, Adenauer DID NOT BRING UNTOLD SUFFERING TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.

>All your links in regards to Poland only talk about the massacres of Germans AFTER the invasion. It does not corroborate the idea that the Danzig massacres happened before said invasion
How would you know? You dismissed them all out of hand.

>DID NOT BRING UNTOLD SUFFERING TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.
The Holocaust literally did not happen.

Aka everyone who’s not a fucking idiot

.t someone who has never watched:
Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told ~ Dennis Wise
thegreateststorynevertold.tv/

Because I read them as we were debating. I personally can't find any evidence of the Danzig Massacres before a German invasion. If I missed them feel free to post the evidence

I reject your assertion and the soy based delusion from which it sprung.

You know you'd dig up Hitlers rotting corpse just for the honor of giving it a blow job, and so do we.

...

Holocaust aside the still brought suffering to millions. Take a look at their treatment of Soviet Civilians or their Euthanasia program that targeted ethnic Germans

>Because I read them as we were debating.
You read the book?

The Forced War ~ David Hoggan
jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/David Hoggan-The Forced War.pdf

>I reject your assertion and the soy based delusion from which it sprung.

Nice argument. Try forming coherent talking points instead of spouting buzz words

I have already checked the polish massacres meme everywhere and It's pretty obvious that it's not true. stop being biased, there is no physical or documental proof for it. massacares only happens after invasion.


do you really think someone attacking a radio tower is justified reason to bomb the hit out of a country and kill thousands of people?

>Holocaust aside
So you do believe the Holocaust happened?

>the still brought suffering to millions.
Maybe the allies shouldn't have started a war then?

> Take a look at their treatment of Soviet Civilians or their Euthanasia program that targeted ethnic Germans
But the treatment of Germans by the allies and the commies was perfectly acceptable, wasn't it?

...

Not the entirety of it but the section in regards to the massacre of ethnic Germans by Poles before invasion has zero citations or evidence to back it up. You can read it for yourself, it's almost all based on conjecture by German generals

>stabilized due to Hitler's mad dash for war and mass conscription.
The economy improved before war ever started. Did you research this shit?
youtube.com/watch?v=ECS3-xdohFk

...

>I have already checked the polish massacres meme everywhere and It's pretty obvious that it's not true.
Again, according to the anti-German, Jewish narrative of history.

>stop being biased,
You're biased. Why is that acceptable?

>there is no physical or documental proof for it. massacares only happens after invasion.

>do you really think someone attacking a radio tower is justified reason to bomb the hit out of a country and kill thousands of people?
If I don't believe your narrative of history, why would I believe your interpretation of it?

1933

stages of Sup Forumsack:

1. Haha this board is hilarious, ironic hitler worship right? fuck me
2. oh wait these guys are serious what the fuck
3. hmmm... maybe hitler wasnt such a bad guy after all
4. fucking JUDEN!
5. wait a minute, the sources on this infographics are written by retards and drug addicts
6. oh... turns out the nazi leadership was full of drug addicts, homosexuals and degenerates. Its impressive they managed to hold it all together as long as they did with all the retards in charge
7. *realizing the nazis did more to hurt ethnocentrism, eugenics and nationalism than any amount of jewish tricks ever could*
8. laughing at the newfags who are at stage 3

This is of course a simplified summary, but you know its true.

>Not the entirety of it
didn't think so. Why don't you actually read the pastebin (with an open mind of course) before you dismiss it all out of hand.

you just might realize you've been lied to your entire life.

...

>Maybe the allies shouldn't have started a war then?

Maybe Hitler shouldn't have invaded Poland and broke so many treaties then? Don't act as if the Nazis dindu nuffin

>But the treatment of Germans by the allies and the commies was perfectly acceptable, wasn't it?

Never said that or even implied it

>7. *realizing the nazis did more to hurt ethnocentrism, eugenics and nationalism than any amount of jewish tricks ever could*

>Maybe Hitler shouldn't have invaded Poland and broke so many treaties then?
Section 14 proves that the allies wanted war no matter what. They used poland as an excuse to start ww2.

pastebin.com/BUU4tbiw

Also pic related.

>Never said that or even implied it
Funny though how you anti-Nazis never ever condemn what the allies did to Germans, huh?

>The economy improved before war ever started

It's easy to improve when you're starting from nothing as the Germans were due to the Great Depression. However, when you compare the height of Nazi Germany and that of the Weimer republic you'll find Nazi Germany never reached the standard of living of the Weimar population ca 1928. Based on what I read, I think it is unlikely.

cesifo-group.de/DocDL/cesifo_wp800.pdf
Death rates increased, and the trend of rapidly increasing childrens' height during Weimar halted.

yes, I'm biased too, I like nazis too. so the truth might be even worse.

It's not Jewish narrative of history, there is just no evidence of it. sorry but Hitler wasn't 100% right, he was only 98% right.

Most accurate post I've ever read. If you're still on stage 3 past the age of 20 you are a brainlet

I'd recommend you'd do the same with this:

siraaronrichards.imgur.com/

>I'd recommend you'd do the same with this:
Nah, it's okay I've already seen this:

Holocaust Handbooks and Holocaust Documentaries
pastebin.com/Uzm91v7z

There is literally no evidence for the Holocaust.

Pic related. You want me to believe that happened.

>Section 14 proves that the allies wanted war no matter what

Then why did they have a policy of appeasement in regards to Hitler?

>Funny though how you anti-Nazis never ever condemn what the allies did to Germans, huh?

I can say the same of NatSoc who never condemn what Germans did to the Russians

I think it's healthy to engage both points of view. Otherwise you end up with a confirmation bias that won't let you objectively look at facts

The Bolsheviks did unforgivable things if you chose to believe the sources

>Then why did they have a policy of appeasement in regards to Hitler?
lol starting ww2 is hardly appeasement.

>I can say the same of NatSoc who never condemn what Germans did to the Russians
Germans did nothing wrong to Russians.

yeah sure retard, policies i agree with:
ethnocentrism
nationalism
eugenics

policies you think i should agree with as a logical extension of those:
aggressive expansion
wholesale slaughter of millions of innocents poverty stricken people simply because they identify as jewish
sending the creme de la creme of your youth to die in pointless land grabs.

your brain on stage 4 Sup Forums

inb4 retarded revisionism about how the nazis "had" to do x and y before they got destroyed by the international cabal

Why would I trust or believe anything you say?

...

Soviets are just as bad as Nazis my man

>lol starting ww2 is hardly appeasement.

Don't act as if Hitler was blameless in escalating tensions which resulted to war. If the Allies were so war hungry they had by all rights the justification to declare war on Germany after the Austrian invasion but they didn't

>Germans did nothing wrong to Russians.

The civilian causality figures says otherwise

Stop being so humorless, you'd be lying to yourself if you believed there weren't a substantial number of brainlets who subscribe to NatSoc

youtu.be/qTYSv_YQOVo

you've prob seen this around

after looking at all the inventions the nazis had and all the intellectuals that were killed in russia i tend to believe it

you're the kind of guy who thinks darwin said pic related, nobody gives a shit what you trust or believe. You're an early 20 something brainlet, and you'll grow out of this and look back on this period with embarrassment. Actually like most people you'll just pretend this period of your life never happened.

youtube.com/watch?v=eFVHqp4CdHQ&t=2s

If oprah runs can guarantee this will come back to haunt her

forgot pic, example of what young Sup Forumsacks believe without ever verifying

>after looking at all the inventions the nazis had and all the intellectuals that were killed in russia i tend to believe it

To suggest the Germans did absolutely nothing wrong to the Russians is pure delusion. The treatment of civilians alone was abhorrent

>I see the "Nazi Economic Miracle" memed a lot but did it actually happen as people would have you believe?
yes, it did happen. because it was based on slave labor. you can achieve a lot with a disposable work force that works for free

The real repill is that Sup Forums is full of shit most of the time. All the real niggas have migrated to /his/

never said they didnt do anything wrong

but i do think the system of government nazis were advancing would have been better than communism

communist had slave labor but didnt have an economic miricle

>but i do think the system of government nazis were advancing would have been better than communism

For the Russian people? I think not. There were no indications that the Germans had any good intentions for the native populations of Russia