Sup Forums locked my Eugenics thread Anons. This is the truth they don't want you to see

99% of the population needs to be euthanized. Only the most innovative, intelligent, physically strong/healthy, and financially independent people should survive. What say you Anons?

hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhah
how would you even go about doing this?
do you even know you would be one of the ones killed?

99 is to high
Just do everyone under 100 iq

Takes all kinds of kinds OP. Someone has to clean toilets and dig ditches.

I would rather all of the lazy get rekt. I can handle stupid and poor if they are at least hard working, honest, and peaceful.

Ok OP, start us off by killing yourself then

this is a much better idea
of course people would call you racist because almost no blacks would be left.

>99%

So............. basically everyone without green or blue eyes?

What are you saying we don't know?

I would be the first to put my head on the chopping block for the future of mankind user. And as for how it would be done? There are these people called doctors who work at places called hospitals. There are people called soldiers and police officers who can escort any dissenters. I don't see how this would be hard?

With the rise of automation and robots they will no longer be necessary.

The 1% I'm refereing to is the richest most powerful people in yhe world. To be more accurate more like .01%

you dont see how killing 99% of the population would be hard? ya get in that wood chipper

is eugenigs where we kill all the blacks?

It can be done. We have the technology.

Some would survive. Anyone that meets the prerequisites.

Fair enough.

why dont we just start with the easy stuff and stop sending food clothing and vaccines to Africa

Absolutely. Helping them is actually deugenics. We have to stop fighting evolution.

>deugenics

i prefer malgenics

also every person who has ever used this website would be killed

This is a good place to start. We also need to sterilize those who are struggling to get by and have no clear path to a productive future.

>sterilize other humans
people like you make me sick , we just stop helping them and they die off you dont have to be a sadistic fuck.

Oh for sure. Anons are pathetic. But at least were honest.

Go virtue signal somewhere else user. The grown ups are talking.

im not even virtue signaling , dont fuck with other peoples junk thats fucked up

What you do is instill real competition at every level and let the best sort it out if that's the plan, the problem I see is that the intelligent top percent have a use for the herd as well... The top people not only work hard but have people working hard for them, a few "top specimens" will get wrecked by the king's army of devotees.

You don't shoot a guy in the dick,that's not cool Butters!

Competition is an excellent part of the solution but not the only solution.

So, the Jews?

Sterilization is the most humane way. We're not killing them we're just making sure they can't breed more of their degenerate ilk.

Not all of them are jews but yes some jews will definitely survive.

killing them is fine , its also much quicker
sterilization is a dirty jew strategy

Make it 100% and you got a deal

id be fine with this.

I don't care if their jewish I care about their family history of health, their family's average IQ, their financial worth, have they been innovative, etc.

they sterilised retarded people in sweden and look what's happened tot them

Lol. It will be if we don't kill and/or euthanize all degenerates

>he doesnt know 75% was infected with a progressive sterility virus by zika mosquitos 2 years ago

Lol "why are all these people sterile all of a sudden!?"- you in ~10 years

>I would be the first to put my head on the chopping block for the future of mankind user

cuck

Sweden would be fine if they stopped letting Muslims in. People feign compassion to their own detriment.

>calls someone a cuck while having a cuck flag
good job

The bad thing is with just stopping food and stuff in africa is that they will probably kill every last animal left there.
So since I am pro enviornment I would suggest a mass sterilization instead

Ahh a communist. Explain to me how all lives matter? The very idea of eugenics goes against your beliefs and you want to kill me for it, no? This is the same reason I want most dead, including myself. Because my very existence goes against my own beliefs.

What about FASbol members?

True. Can't let the degenerates destroy the resources and the means of production.

All dead. Their degenerate alcholic mothers shouldn't of had children in the first place.

yet again how does killing them all not solve this problem?

It absolutely does. But who's going to have the balls to advocate for it?

you would have the same chance getting people to advocate for sterilization.

True. It's almost like Fascism is yhe only way to make eugenics possible. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm????

to be completely honest i dont know enough about fascism to give an educated answer.

Education doesn't exist for you pleb. For us normies the best we can hope for is indoctrination. Only intelligent people can be educated. And they usually find that knowledge for themselves or from their families.

hahahahahahaha im not a normie first of all , second i know im tooting my own horn but id say im fairly intelligent (god this was cringy to type).

Save it for evaluation user.

oh i wont make it to the 1% im not a genius but i dont care.

Without shedding any blood, a better outcome can be accomplished through sterilization, genetic engineering, and artificial insemination (i.e. automated cuckolding on a mass scale), it can accomplish all your long-term goals, but you won't do it because it goes against your supposed values.

you would know a lot about cuckolding huh UN? being the USAs bitch and all?

99% is too much. It would artificially narrow the gene pool with ramifications which we don't understand yet.
But no doubt about it: culling the lowest 5 to 10% per generation and making the top-tier breed like rabbits would improve our gene pool in just 200 years significantly.

>Only the most innovative, intelligent, physically strong/healthy, and financially independent people should survive.
Some of these are mutually exclusive. Innovative people often don't have financial success but are driven to be make new things. You'd like to keep some of those people around even if they show some other less desirable traits.

>do you even know you would be one of the ones killed?
>implying individualist reasons

to answer your question yes i do know id be one of the ones i think me being on Sup Forums would be answer enough to this question.

Nah, we need her in office.

>mfw I get to live

This made me genuinely laugh.

Agreed. See smarter people are coming in my thread and debating how this can be achieved. Society needs this.

All Anons are fucked if we only pick the top 50%

and who would those financially independent steal money from?

that's not a good idea since the top 1 percent relies on those who are stupid and weak. If you mess with their target demographic they'll tear you to shreds.

This is the ONLY redpilled answer itt.

>99% of the population needs to be euthanized
We dont need to cull that far, i think only around 30-40% should be euthanized, otherwise we will create a genetic bottleneck and make the species more vulnerable for diseases.

Eugenics unironically is the future. Be it through pre-natal diagnostics and abortions or through genetic engineering and embryo screening.
The word "eugenics" has the taint of evil right now because we live in a egalitarian hell where every fucking low-life can cite some humanitarian reasons why he shouldn't be removed. But this is changing and eventually we will go full nigger culling to engineer the societies that we want.

>most innovative, intelligent, physically strong/healthy, and financially independent people
>There are people called soldiers and police officers who can escort
You can't expect people you want to euthanize to help you enforce it.
Or do you honestly think soldiers are intelligent and financially independent?

ITT: kill niggers

who are all these smart poeple going to exploit for gains if the dumb people are gone?

why even kill someone when you can just snip their cords and use them for labour. even low bro mental labour needs doing. why waste one of the big minds of the ubermen on stupid shit and manual labour when you can exploit the masses for that.

killing everyone is such a waste, billions of quantum supercomputers rotting in the dirt. not smart

You'd be amazed what people are willing to do for a paycheck.

No need with robots.

Right now, women who have deformed babies give birth to them anyway because they think that they will be sainted or something. It's virtue signalling of the highest order. Nobody in their right mind would knowingly give birth to a hideous birth defect.

I think some of the hormones have something to do with that too though, like how women carry around stillborn babies O_O that's creepy.

Anyway women are mostly to blame for this trend.

>Right now, women who have deformed babies give birth to them anyway because they think that they will be sainted or something.
Really? That's disgusting.
You're American or just memeflagging? Because in most of Europe we kill of sick babies in record numbers. Unfortunately we also kill healthy ones and keep our demographics in the shitter that way.

>like how women carry around stillborn babies O_O that's creepy.
Yeah. Shudders me too.