>Macron: pay 2 play with EU
unv.is
>NHS swallows up £18 'transformation fund' in crisis
unv.is
>Bojo floats idea of new France link
unv.is
>May vs. Lords on Brexit Bill
unv.is
>Bolton blames left wing media for death threats to gf
unv.is
>Quiet Labour turmoil continues
unv.is
Other urls found in this thread:
petition.parliament.uk
youtube.com
twitter.com
Legalise guns
petition.parliament.uk
Sign and spread it around.
why do drugs feel so good lads
I would love to fuck qt twink Owen.
There is 0 chance of that working. At least claim its symbolic or something. I think the only strategy that could have any long term success is either an all out re-shuffle of the firearms system, which has been spoke about and is very much needed, since mostly all are reactionary laws scattered across the entire 20th century with no single firearm policy or by slowly altering laws that provide more leeway.
Make all firearms permitted by law available under one certificate similar to a co-terminous one, or legalising handguns, permitting fully automatics, dropping calibre restrictions, etc.
>Lift the ban on hand guns and allow everyone to own any firearm.
This is an extremely bad selling point though.
It's literally the point of them
Which would that be?
Quite funny, I made an OP with a shitting dog the other day. Jason Reese Dogg Edition. I had started posting pictures of actual turds to represtent my disgust at the state of brit/pol/.
Now, it seems, other anons are following suit. Strange how memes catch on, eh? Whether it was picked up by something you saw or you were just on that same wavelength at the same time and created something similar. Morphic resonance, I think it may be called.
We (yes we) should start making more memes again, feels like the enemy is winning the meme war here. Whenever you are attacked, you must hit back harder, it is the only way to survive.
REMEMBER: ANYONE WHO DOESNT SUPPORT A CODIFIED CONSTITUTION AND A BoR IS A CUNT
Also probably ex-military and a fat fuck.
your overthinking perro caca is just a spic meme from sp
>the bankers that profit from the exploitation of cheap imported labour
Christ on a bike Owen is a thick cunt
Yes, but the implication is that the thread is likened to dog shit. It tells you what to expect.
Nah.
What are your reasons for wanting one?
To piss off Eddie.
Fair enough. Please continue.
Repeal the hangun ban
Simplify gun ownership process (eg FAC becomes like SGC)
Push for stronger self defence rights
But he's cute, probably has a nice hole and a decent uncut willy.
The BoR was a collection of common law precedents
I imagine myself in Europe, leading my Platoon. Our mission is to stop An*Lo dogs from advancing. We mow down An*Lo dogs but they keep coming. I shoot An*Lo dogs but I run out of ammo so I draw my sword and begin slaughtering An*Los since An*Los are way more psychially inferior to me, I slay them by dozens. Then I get shot, but I didn’t fall, I kept fighting. Then shot again and again. An*Los were shooting me from a distance like the cowards they are. I lie down, facing up to sky and I see EUROPA UNITED smiling at me, I smile back… Then I woke up, in Brussels, my homeland. My EUROPEAN brethen gave me a warm welcome to heaven. I finally made it, I finally made it into heaven..
Your joke was maybe slightly funny the first time I read it, but that was several days ago. You've had plenty of time to think up something humurous but you post the same fucking joke every time. Fuck you and your tripfag obession. If it wasn't for shits like you giving them attention, they'd be gone by now. you are the cancer of brit/pol/, meanwhile trips are the AIDS and the spammers are the COPD
The last one probably has more potential than the first or second, though I think the second is probable in the near future. Whether or not it works in favour of those on the side of pro-firearm ownership I can't say. It's just as likely it could end up being a simpler and more restrictive form of what we have now but all under one certificate.
Self defence laws could also be changed likely in the near future if there was enough pressure is another thing though. I think that's possible. We had that guy who shot a burglar with an unlicensed license shotgun posted the other week who was only charged for the shotgun and not the murder yet also a man who was told he couldn't use barbed wire to protect his allotment because it harmed a burglar so it really depends on the judge which is probably the greatest argument for why self defence should be more plain in law.
I wasn't the one who made the original comment you absolute fucking brainlet. Check the IDs.
>decent uncut willy.
um sweetie
So the UK wins in the end? Sweet.
Is it the EU, is that why brit/pol/ is hit so hard? We had Hungarians the other day. The EU, of course. It's almost too obvious. Well, if it's war they want....
Wasn't me lad. But that's the reason people suddenly have an interest in constitutional law.
Not talking about 1689, a new one, guaranteeing inalienable rights.
>inb4 glorious tradition etc,
Rights that can be changed or removed so easily at the whim of the redtop press or for temporary political advantage are no rights at all, merely revokable privilege.
My mistake, I should have called
a prick as well. This is for both of you.
BASED NORKS
SOY COP DID NOTHING WRONG
HITLER CAN'T INTO ECONOMICS
MOSLEY WAS A DEGENERATE
VOTING IS USELESS
REFERENDUM IS ALWAYS A MISTAKE
BRITAIN ISN'T LEAVING THE EU
AMERICANISM KILLED ENGLAND LONG BEFORE ISLAMIFICATION
CATHOLICISM IS ANTI-ENGLISH
YOU'RE ALL FUCKING RETARDED
>he doesn't realise we already have codified rights
Fucking retard
Yeah, reading through this makes sense. A slow start with being able to buy handguns with a license could get the ball rolling though.
There are only 3 rights. The rights to Life, Liberty and Property.
A constitution is extremely useful in law though. What articles do you want in?
Then what you mean is you want a Bill of Rights that is central to a Constitution. In fact, all you really want is the Second Amendment if I'm not mistaken. Somalia has a Constitution. A Constitution is just the framework in which a state operates.
What is your opinion of a labour-based currency and international barter system?
>artificially manipulating supply and demand
Retarded
HABBEDING ALERT
>BASED NORKS
meme
>SOY COP DID NOTHING WRONG
false
>HITLER CAN'T INTO ECONOMICS
true
>MOSLEY WAS A DEGENERATE VOTING
true but doesnt unvalidate his other belieif
>VOTING IS USELESS
true
>REFERENDUM IS ALWAYS A MISTAKE
false
>BRITAIN ISN'T LEAVING THE EU
probally true but dont know yet >AMERICANISM KILLED ENGLAND LONG BEFORE ISLAMIFICATION
true
> CATHOLICISM IS ANTI-ENGLISH
false
>YOU'RE ALL FUCKING RETARDED
true
Where?
>what are IDs
What fucking joke? Im serious. I believe our system of common law and statute is self evidently being subverted and is failing us. We have lost gun rights, free assembly, right to not self incriminate, free speech etc etc. We are now looking at net censorship - right to freedom of information access.
I said the other day imagine if the burgers tried the gut the 1st, 2nd, and 5th amendments, there would be blood on the streets. Here it happens without a whimper, often driven by unelected and largely unaccountable groups.
They came to a land down under
But you don't honestly think that security in the U.S., and it's by no means a paradise, comes from a piece of paper?
>strawman
Think about the question a little tiny bit and then respond. Perhaps espouse your own preferred currency base, as it might make a suitable counter-argument.
I don't mean to be rude, but thank fuck that paki poster isn't in here.
Convinced he's not gay and it's all an act.
>>BASED NORKS
>meme
Defending sovereignty is not a meme
>>SOY COP DID NOTHING WRONG
>false
He did nothing wrong, even more so now it has come to light that he wasn't issuing the commands
>>HITLER CAN'T INTO ECONOMICS
>true
:^)
>>MOSLEY WAS A DEGENERATE VOTING
>true but doesnt unvalidate his other belieif
Yes it does, even more so in a fascist regime
>>VOTING IS USELESS
>true
:^)
>>REFERENDUM IS ALWAYS A MISTAKE
>false
True, the representation of the electorate must be changed, not a retarded instant gratification knee jerk that send the entire operation of state into crisis
>>BRITAIN ISN'T LEAVING THE EU
>probally true but dont know yet >AMERICANISM KILLED ENGLAND LONG BEFORE ISLAMIFICATION
>true
:^)
>> CATHOLICISM IS ANTI-ENGLISH
>false
True, Catholic Church has erred and attempted to destroy England in the process
>>YOU'RE ALL FUCKING RETARDED
>true
:^)
I agree with you, actually. You make a very good point. I normally back up the argument, but it feels like it's been going round and round these last few days and is just bait for the tripfag who never makes any assertions beyond surface level and resorts to ad hominem as a default.
The time has come to re-codify the foundations of our nation and its laws, that is without question. But first, I feel, we must recodify what it means to be a Briton.
>if I can't debate his point, I can just arbitrarily label it a strawman and I win
Where penis flows and men plunder
>The time has come to re-codify
You just leave yourself open to attacks when you say things like this.
Must be something in their blood that makes them such utter socialist cunts - except for their own people in jewland that is
>BASED NORKS
I don't think so sunshine.
>SOY COP DID NOTHING WRONG
I don't think so sunshine.
>HITLER CAN'T INTO ECONOMICS
I don't think so sunshine.
>MOSLEY WAS A DEGENERATE
True, but he did have to be the MP for Smethwick
>VOTING IS USELESS
I don't think so sunshine.
>REFERENDUM IS ALWAYS A MISTAKE
I don't think so sunshine.
>BRITAIN ISN'T LEAVING THE EU
I don't think so sunshine.
>AMERICANISM KILLED ENGLAND LONG BEFORE ISLAMIFICATION
Yes.
>CATHOLICISM IS ANTI-ENGLISH
Define Anti-English
YOU'RE ALL FUCKING RETARDED
I don't think so sunshine.
>>>BASED NORKS
>>meme
>Defending sovereignty is not a meme
AM I BEING DETAINED?
>>>SOY COP DID NOTHING WRONG
>>false
>He did nothing wrong, even more so now it has come to light that he wasn't issuing the commands
What the fuck's a soy cop
>>>HITLER CAN'T INTO ECONOMICS
>>true
>:^)
using the smiley with a carot nose
>>>MOSLEY WAS A DEGENERATE VOTING
>>true but doesnt unvalidate his other belieif
>Yes it does, even more so in a fascist regime
True
>>>VOTING IS USELESS
>>true
>:^)
using the smiley with a carot nose
>>>REFERENDUM IS ALWAYS A MISTAKE
>>false
>True, the representation of the electorate must be changed, not a retarded instant gratification knee jerk that send the entire operation of state into crisis
True
>>>BRITAIN ISN'T LEAVING THE EU
>>probally true but dont know yet >AMERICANISM KILLED ENGLAND LONG BEFORE ISLAMIFICATION
>>true
>:^)
using the smiley with a carot nose
>>> CATHOLICISM IS ANTI-ENGLISH
>>false
>True, Catholic Church has erred and attempted to destroy England in the process
False. The Catholic church was only removed from England so Henry the 8th could get his degenerate harem on.
>>>YOU'RE ALL FUCKING RETARDED
>>true
>:^)
using the smiley with a carot nose
But I can debate your point:
Artificial or arbitrary changes in factors such as supply and demand, interest, inflation and recession can and does happen in every single currency or economic system to some degree. Arbitration is inherent in any currency. The question is WHO arbitrates and for what ends? You have constructed a strawman (the decision making of individuals) and diverted the argument away from the question that defined it (your opinion on a given concept)
Now please, if you will, answer the original question and perhaps offer an alternative that would be an improvement.
Socialists=More Tax= More aid money to Israel.
Owen Jones can't be a jew though, I'm sure that he supports palesting
what is going on in this picture
Big Narstie taking a wash
It isnt, but at the same time copare the changes in the two countries over the last hundred years around protection of fundamental rights - who has faired better?
This is a good point. The press and polis commonly bleat about thing being against 'British values'. I have no idea what they mean, they are nothing I recognise.
I would like to see the fundamsntals for startes
Free speech
Freedom of the press
Right to self defence of person and property incorporating something akin to castle doctrine
Property rights (ie right to deny access)
Right to free assembly
Only be tried once for crime (no double jeopardy)
Right to a trial by jury of your peers (no fast tracking bullshit)
Right to not self incriminate
Right to own arms, inc for self defence
Etc
But you're talking as though you could insert the U.S. Bill of Rights into France and have the same results. The reason for over who has fared better, by your criteria, might have something to do with both embedded culture in parts of the U.S. and the fact there was nothing comparable to the U.S. Bill of Rights in English law. Also the differences in American Republicanism and early English liberalism which was more focused on parliament over monarchy than state tyranny in general.
>He thinks a codified constitution in the current year wouldn't be anything but taking all our remaining rights away
I know what you mean, but I feel it must be done. Let them try and attack, they will be hit harder in return. We will beat them at their own game. JBP on Channel 4 showed that it is easily done.
Precisely. Until we define those values and who we are, where we're going and why we're here in the first place then any solution that is brought forward has no foundation beyond perhaps humanism in the globalist sense.
You cannot build the walls or roof to your house before the foundation. Through the ages, architecture has undergone a degree of change and our building methods and materials reflect that. Our society endures the same effect, but with the disadvantage that it can't just go to another plot of land and rebuild from the start; it needs some serious demolition work doing first. The building of St Paul's Cathedral comes to mind.
Rights without duty and obligations rapidly end up with the dependant Untermensch that fill our nation today.
>calls themselves british nationalists and patriots
>want to do away with everything that made britain unique and special
So this is the power of Brit/pol/... Woah....
I tend to use the US as an example because in terms of constitution, they started from a similar place (common law, locke, blackstone etc) and just because its what people are most familiar with. Also, I think its important that all oaths of office in the states are to the constitution, and most yanks I know who swore those oaths took them damn seriously.
This is, of couse, the sticking point - who frames your constitution...
Correct, although you phrase it in a strange way. There is no such thing as a right without the obligation and duty to back it up. It would be more accurate to say that the population of a growing society defines itself in terms of its duties and obligations, whereas the population in a declining society define themselves in terms of their "rights", which translates fundamentally as "entitlements" or what you are owed by the world for absolutely nothing on your part, which is what leads to the formation of untermensch and societal decline.
shit bait
Should the UK be an absolute monarchy?
But it's a completely different country and is one of, if not the only, example of a Bill of Rights where what you're describing exists outside of failed South American states. Our law its self is not comparable, let alone the cultures which uphold it.
No
VAST
INTERCONTINENTAL
CAR-PARK
I would only support that under a benevolent and wise king whom I had the greatest respect for. This set of reality TV stars and stealth brokers would be noosed if we had absolute monarchy, and they know it.
Indeed, you put it much more eloquently than I.
Modern society has polarised into chavy materialism watched over by an entrenched effete ruling elite.
Yeah, like King Gordon the first lol.
No
Although in a sense it already is. Once a plan has been agreed upon - female rights, niggers etc - there is no opposition allowed on pain of death.
>What are you?
>>Sir Idiot of Locksley
You also get into the realm of negative and positive rights, a minefield in an IDpol ridden society. Eg rights granted to trannies imposing obligations on the rest of us, as with the misgendering laws in Canada that JBP was kicking off about.
I was just joking, Edward.
The empire is gone, that was what made Britain, let alone what made it special.
The only things left to preserve are the constituent nations of the Union. British nationalism is an oxymoron, the most 'British' people on the island are pak men and mutts.
Test
>TFW YOU'RE BRITISH AND PROUD BUT THEN YOU SEE A BLACK GUY AT THE OLYMPICS HOLDING THE BRITISH FLAG SO YOU ABANDON 300 YEARS OF YOUR HISTORY AND DECLARE YOURSELF ENGLISH AND PROUD BUT THEN YOU SEE THE ENTIRE ENGLISH YOUTH FOOTBALL TEAM ARE WOGS SO YOU DECLARE YOURSELF BLACK COUNTRY AND PROUD BUT THEN YOU REALISE THAT YOU HAVE BLACK IN THE NAME SO YOU DECLARE YOURSELF MOGADISHU STREET AND PROUD BUT THEN YOU REALISE A FAMILY OF NIGGERS LIVE AT THE TOP OF THE STREET SO YOU DECLARE YOURSELF HOUSE 17 AND PROUD BUT THEN YOUR REALISE YOUR MOTHER RENTS HERSELF OUT TO NIGGERS SO YOU DECLARE YOURSELF BASEMENT DWELLER AND PROUD BUT THEN YOU REALISE YOU MASTURBATE EXCLUSIVELY TO CU CK PORN SO YOU KILL YOURSELF
test
And there I was thinking that manners had died here. You're not Kentish, are you?
If I had to elect a King, I would go for myself or JRM.
>May I present the royal bride: Maid M'bubwe
Yes. And as I said: without the duties and obligations behind them, the rights do not exist. If we were to believe that the arbitrary personal security and wellbeing of a mentally irregular minority is our obligation, then it would be so. Although, in a healthy society we would see their wellbeing as our duty to society, but without the arbitration. Their wellbeing should translate into them becoming mentally balanced and being able to contribute to a healthy society, and that should be our duty.
Our sense of duty has been shadowed by our consideration of arbitrary factors. My brief reparte with the tripfag earlier was a nice little microcosm of this very effect. We no longer wish to obligate ourselves because we are well aware of the arbitrary factors which dictate the status quo socially, politically, artistically, etc etc. Divine Truth has been labelled a myth by humanists and minority activists, for we can not cement any truths if we are only to outgrow them with our next scientific or cultural advancement. So again, we shirk the duty of cementing the very truths to which we should be obligating ourselves to.
And the foundation crumbles because of this. If you want to guarantee certain collapse, attack the foundation.
Bankers and Bourgeoisie is lefty speak for the Jews
>GET IN THERE KING MUMBOJUMBOGWAMBABEGHANDI THE THIRD
test
youtube.com
Reminder that you have to wait for Abdul to finish his prayers before you slot some jihadis
THIS IS A TEST.
I don't like where this is going.
>And... and... AND IT'S OUT AND OH MY GOODNESS! THE DUCHESS OF CAMBRIDGE'S LATEST CHILD DEFINITELY HAS A DARKER SKIN TONE THAN THE LAST TWO, THERE ARE MURMURS OF EXCITEMENT IN THE CROWD!!!
>They're presenting it now, they're taking it to the balcony... lifting the blanket.... holding it aloftOH MY GOODNESS, IN THE SUNLIGHT YOU CAN DEFINITELY SEE IT HAS VERY DARK SKIN AND THE CROWD IS GOING ABSOLUTELY WILD!!! ANOTHER ABSOLUTE BLINDER FOR THE ROYAL FAMILY, ANOTHER BLACK MEMBER! AND THIS ONE FROM AN ADULTEROUS RELATIONSHIP
>footage of jubilent crowd waving union jacks
>JRM
Neck yourself faggot
Not so long ago we used to erase countries from history books for nothing more than better market share.
But why? He is very intelligent and succinct in everything he says. He has the acumen and discipline to lead a nation. I'm not even a Tory. He would just make the best figurehead out of everyone I could think of. Who would be your suggestion?
And so it was our God-given right and responsibility that we should be hegemon of the global order.
>the Moggtards are seeping back in
they're not as persistent as wehraboos though
BACK OFF, TRIPFAG. YOU ARE NOT WORTHY
Greetings Brit/pol/, tomorrow night we send a message too loud to ignore:
Will you join in?
>tfw nigel is going to save Britain and restore the empire but he quits and sells out but it's okay because Boris is going to restore the empire but he quits but it's okay because leadsom is going to restore the empire but she quits but it's okay because mummy may is going to restore the empire but she's awful but it's okay because nuttall is going to restore the empire but he has PTSD and can't walk properly but it's okay because AMW is going to restore the empire but she is a lesbian failure but it's okay because a lion with downs is going to restore the empire but it's ran by a civic nobody but it's okay because mogg is going to restore the empire but he's powered purely by memes and papism but it's okay because Williamson is going to restore the empire but...
>Who would be your suggestion?
Literally anyone else
My suggestion would personally be Paddy Ashdown/Ian Paisley Jr if you want MP's
I think you've linked the wrong general mate
Boring. Ancap is where it's at, faggots.
What in all of fucking hell is going on with my pic? Anyone else seeing a laughing hyena that's replaced by my actual image?
Eddie darling, I fucking BTFO you so hard and you creep away without a peep, then you come back and make even more of an arse out of yourself. Your comprehension really is poor; I don't think you make yourself very credible for ANYBODY to regard your opinions with any respect. Perhaps this is why you are such a loser in life that even Sup Forums dislikes you?
The question was "should Britain become an absolute monarchy" and, by extension, I offered a name for King as someone who represents best what I would want to see in a King. Who would you have to be monarch if you had the choice? And can you please answer the question I asked you earlier, poppet?
Unfortunately for you, I like JRM and I believe National Socialism offers some very apt solutions to some of our curent problems. How do you define yourself? What systems do you think we should borrow from to work through our problems?
What qualities would your selection display that would make you want them as monarch?
Try having ancap without cleaning society up harshly beforehand! It would be the death of civil society!!! And yes, your pic is doing that.
You'd be better off quoting Orwell.