How come when evolution was happening one worm became bug/spiders/crabs and the other went on to become fish and...

How come when evolution was happening one worm became bug/spiders/crabs and the other went on to become fish and mammals?
Is there a possibility of crabs becoming the super smart species of their evolution line?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ykWPyaqbebo
youtube.com/watch?v=4tAjgEbazEw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

frankly we don't know, the ones that do are not sharing that information.
Humanity's history was stolen from them when the Romans burned the great library of Alexandria, and the scrolls are most likely in the Vatican vaults

>How come when evolution was happening one worm became bug/spiders/crabs and the other went on to become fish and mammals?
Do you know how natural selection works?
Every time organisms reproduce, they have to make more copies of the DNA for the new cells.
DNA replication/recombination is not perfect, and small mistakes (mutations) are made.
Mutations affect the way the mutated gene is expressed, changing the protein slightly.
This different protein may give the organism an advantage or disadvantage, making it easier or harder to have offspring.
Over generations, mutations that give more competitive organisms pile up because they can keep having kids.
So one population of those worms got the mutations that set them towards arthropods, another population got mutations that set them towards chordates, etc.
Multiply by billions of years and much geographical interference & chance.

Yeah but the question is about the initial split between insects and fish. They created two different evolutionary line. Would there be a chance of the insect side creating a super smart species?

Tardo this is NOT EVOLUTION.
Evolution, or macro evolution, is one species becoming more complex over time which is impossible.
What happens, tardo, is things get more dysfunctional and sick as time goes on. Happen to everything with a DNA inccluding bacteria that go extinct due to the accumulation of mutations.

Mutations also do not change GENE EXPRESSION tardo but it changes protein structure

You are so ignorant.

>Is there a possibility of crabs becoming the super smart species of their evolution line?
They've had pretty stable body plan for a long time, but crab populations could continue to develop mutations that improve their hardiness, life span, speed, intelligence, etc.
Perhaps certain species will become more dominant over others in terms of being able to capture & use the most resources. Maybe one part of the world will be become a genetic crucible for producing supercrabs. Mantis shrimp are pretty sick.

Naa lobsters got them beat. Crabs are the niggers of the sea.

I think octopi are far more likely to evolve into an intelligent species in 100,000+ years.

Yeah once they learn to communicate with each other better they're gonna start their own civilization under the sea

Fuck no they are stuck like that forever thats why they are virtually unchanged since the Ordovician period.

evolution didn't happen stop falling for Jewish lies

...

Because they were separate populations with separate environmental pressures. I refuse to accept that the North American education systems are this bad.

They're not only this bad, they're this bad on purpose.

>macro evolution
stopped reading

No Octos are screwed because they are underwater, being a hunter gatherer makes no sense underwater they will always be smart predators and the dolphies got them beat in smarts anyway.

Obviously what I said was that mutations effect POPULATIONS.
A mutation affects that gene, ergo that organism that expresses it. But only because it was originally created in that organism (mutation in S phase of dividing bacteria or in gamete from parent). After many generations, advantageous mutations add up. You keep whatever your parents gave you, plus if you create mutations in your gametes, that's what your kids will get.
>Evolution, or macro evolution, is one species becoming more complex over time which is impossible.
How is it impossible for one species to slowly change? Mutations in genotypes add up, slowly changing the phenotypes of the population?
>Mutations also do not change GENE EXPRESSION tardo but it changes protein structure
Ok usually they change the resulting protein structure, but if they're in the regulatory elements they could change (up/down regulate or silence) a gene

Why change a winning concepts. Crabs are wise

Beware of the crap people!
youtube.com/watch?v=ykWPyaqbebo

lol if crabs are so msart tthen why do they infest the crotches of nasty bitches lol

what kind of intllegence involves from a roasties ass tyain

Ant hive minds can have quite some brainpower

If the west falls and so does asia,niggers and sandniggers will drop the global iq so much crabs might get a shot at surpassing our civilization

crabs are kinda neat, but i don't think they are applying for a license anytime soon. neat creature though. they eat there dead. savages!

>Would there be a chance of the insect side creating a super smart species?
You could have a series of mutations over time in some insect population that increase its intelligence. I don't know all the elements of sensory/neuron cells in arthropods that would need to change, but you could have an accumulation of effects that result in increased number of neurons, or sensitivity to nuerotransmitters or something. They're pretty stable already so it's hard to predict what would happen to push them to a new level of intelligence

even crabs think crabs are delicious.

>DNA is code
>DNA randomly mutates

Fuck off retard.

They are pretty stable R-selecting populations. They have a good thing going where they're at, for the most part. Don't need to be smart when you have ample resources and churn out kids.

But but Jews

Lol (sarcasm)

We had predators, too. It didn't stop us.

Ants aren’t hive minds
It’s more like a mass of retards who can do a few things well. So they all go around and when one finds food she lets the others know. The queen only holds influence over the colony as long as she pumps out babies. As soon as the queen becomes infertile the ants will hopefully have many more baby makers. The same can be found in bees.

Predators like the Royal families?

>Is there a possibility of crabs becoming the super smart species of their evolution line?
without competition from other animals, it is definitely possible.

No, those are pan-dimensional reptillian overlords. It's like a step above predator.

Are you saying ants are like niggers?

Lol do you know what DNA Polymerase is? The environment of the cell is not perfect. Sometimes the wrong base pair is added to the new strand of DNA. If you have ever done gene sequencing, you will know this.
How the fuck do you think we get crazy mutant pathogen strains all the time? New Flu shot every year? Constant updating antibiotics and vaccines? Bacteria and viruses reproduce super fast, if DNA mutations never happened then we wouldn't get slightly different strains and thus new organisms.

Macro evolution (one species turning into another) has never been proven and will never be proven because it doesn't exist. Prove me wrong science fags

so you're saying we should structure our society like the crabs

What if DNA mutations are not random at all?

Already researched this about the dinosaurs.
They don't have to develop intelligence because they don't need to.

*In Snake voice* Crab Battle!

>Is there a possibility of crabs becoming the super smart species of their evolution line?
Probably not. Crabs are the niggers of their line.
Put a bunch of them in a bucket and you'll see.

love the bait but shouldnt it be

"Troll Weekly"?

If it isn't random, whatever is deciding on the changes makes a pretty good job of making it look random.

Stupid leaf

>crab peopel, crab people
>look like crab, taste like people

>becoming more complex over time which is impossible

That isn't what "macro" evolution is, though. It's just one species changing depending on the environmental and genetic pressures put on it, until you get to a point where you can say this generation is different to another hundreds of generations ago.

Are you suggesting that there is an overarching force that determines when each nitrogenous base is paired with the wrong A, T, G, or C and thus gives rise to a slightly different gene/chromosome/genome resulting in a slightly different offspring?

What would control such a thing?

Ants are the spics, they clean up after other animals and tear apart anything that comes near them. However they’re useful to the world, unlike niggers.
Bees are the whites of the insect world.

I know right? Look, if you build 100 billion computers and let them run for 100 billion years they alkl break down right? WRONG! Some of them will break down in such a way as to become a Gundamn. That's evolution and if you deny it you're a retard.

>how do New flus start every year

Because you didn't read books so you ask stupid questions based on assumptions.

can confirm :'(

Nah ants are way too organised

The point is to suggest that the trolling efforts are weak, thus the baited user is aware that the post was bait and responded to it anyway

If evolution is a Jewish lie, then how come the greatest victory of the Jewish people in the 20th century was purging all evolutionary thought from the social sciences?

get smart brainlet

>I think octopi are far more likely to evolve into an intelligent species in 100,000+ years.
They already are highly intelligent

>Would there be a chance of the insect side creating a super smart species?
Yes. All eumetazoans share the same basic neural architecture, except in lines that have lost it. youtube.com/watch?v=4tAjgEbazEw
Many of them are already "super smart". For them to be smarter, would require selective pressures that favor even smarter individuals. No selective pressure promoting increased smartness = no increase in smartness. In humans and dolphins, that pressure is mostly social. Sad to say, but a good chunk of our smarts up to the normie level are all about gossip and mapping out social networks. Smarts above normie level, the stuff we call genius, is mostly an accident and actually is less sexually successful, which is why normies aren't like Einsteins and Einsteins aren't like ultra-Einsteins

Are you retarded? “Macro evolution” does doesn’t fucking mean anything, it’s just little changes over time

Do you understand that DNA is the coded function of every cellular and enzymatic process in your body? Why would it be far fetched to presume that DNA has memory function imbedded in the junk DNA?

No not really.
They have no drive to become more intelligent.

The problem is you can't smelt metal underwater so they are pretty much hopeless for advanced civ.

>Many of them are already "super smart".
forgot pic

getting away from insects, some spiders are pretty smart too, mostly the ones that have to hunt actively instead of sitting in a web

>Ants aren’t hive minds
Sure about that?

Isn’t it kind of dumb to hold a potential aquatic civilization to the standards of a land based one? If they became social and formed societies, I see their technological development being very different.

I really hope you fuckers are watching this youtube.com/watch?v=4tAjgEbazEw

I am sure about that. Ants do communicate through smells, they work together to make these things. Each ant simply has the knowledge on how to dig tunnels, find food, and care for each other. That’s all they need and ants with information communicate that information to other ants through pheromones. There is no central intelligence to ants, just a shared struggle to survive and a mutual trust in the others within the colony.

fat of the land

>What happens, tardo, is things get more dysfunctional and sick as time goes on. Happen to everything with a DNA inccluding bacteria that go extinct due to the accumulation of mutations.
Mutations can be advantageous or disadvantageous. Some INDIVIDUALS die because of the mutated genes they inherited. Some populations go extinct as a result of being not competitive enough in their environment (out competed or couldn't survive changes in environment).
Multicellular organisms do experience an accumulation of cells that contain mutations as their bodies are making new cells over their lifetime (ergo cancer). But if these mutations are not present in their gametes, they won't get passed on to offspring.

>DNA is the coded function of every cellular and enzymatic process
No, it is the coded process of building these protein structures.
But your DNA cannot control the environment in which these proteins react. If your environment (including what you eat/drink/smoke) involves taking in molecules that intercalate, denature, inhibit, or otherwise bind to DNA/enzymes or change the surrounding cytosol such that it affects enzymatic action, you could suffer failures of the cellular machinery to complete it's function and properly replicate your DNA. But you don't know where all of these obstructive molecules will be at any time.

Do you understand how outdated your understanding is of DNA?

oy vey, painful memories of the 6 gorillion course through my blood goy, quick, pay reparations

It’s nof pertaining to one event, If DNA mutations are not random is destroys the whole concept of evolution is a set of random mutations over time.

i always thought adaptations would have more sense if they evolved in real-time, you do a thing all your life, the dna you pass should reflect that.

>Why would it be far fetched to presume that DNA has memory function imbedded in the junk DNA?
DNA is memory, and the non-coding DNA does have many regulatory functions of when what genes are expressed throughout your development and lifetime.
But you can't possibly control all the factors during replication, transcription, translation, and all the molecules that will make it into your cells.

Not an argument. Epigenetics are another story. Sure, we have an incomplete understanding of brain function and neurology and it's possible that behaviors are affected through genetic means. But my explanation of the integration of foreign molecules into the cells (we're not a closed system) is still pertinent, in that there are too many effects and times that the created protein structures or DNA may interact with objects that impair their original function.
You have yet to provide an example of any possible force that could control all possible interactions that cause a DNA Polymerase to put 1 wrong nitrogenous base into a new DNA strand.

The genome is self aware and constantly editing itself.