Okay, can someone explain what exactly is wrong with being gay...

Okay, can someone explain what exactly is wrong with being gay? I just don't see why we should hate people just for loving somebody. Is there something I'm missing? Or are nazis just devoid of reasoning, logic and basic human sense like always?

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22293319
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Logic would imply that being gay is mental illness.
If men become gay,they wont be attracted to women,therefore humanity dies.
Also troll ,get out of here.

go away homosex

Nothings wrong with it. The only problem is some folks here still think Gays are 'The Spawn Of Lucifer' and other equally terrible reasons. I blame the fact that a ton of people on Sup Forums are still religious for some reason

It shows a man is submissive and weak. If you had a nation full of fags it would be invaded and destroyed within a week.

>If men become gay,they wont be attracted to women,therefore humanity dies.
That's a bad thing?

If you had a nation of fags ,the men on the other country wouldnt neet to invade shit.
The women of the fag country will just go to the other men who like em.

...

Nothing wrong with being gay, just as long as NOT a filthy lesbian.

It is a curse that is trying to kill the person who bears it. So it should be removed, especially since it is a curse that in humans is caused from impiety. Meaning that the person is suicidal, meaning that it should be prevented because suicide is bad.

shear hatred...
Aslo if they can't defend their anti-gay statement there's always the bibles way

>Lev. 18,22 : You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.

...

...

...

>we just want to love each other
Bullshit considering faggots are incredibly promiscuous.

...

Lesbians don't exist. Only thing that does exist is gays and that's a mental disorder

You know what, forget what I said. Here's the real truth: There is nothing wrong with being a homosexual as long as you have the typical traits of a man and plan on having kids. I would much rather have my son be a dominant, masculine queer who will have children than have him be some permavirgin soyboy neckbeard faggot

Nothing is wrong with being gay.
I can't speak for Sup Forums, but I just dislike it when gays or any other sexual/gender group push their beliefs on normal people or even worse try to raise children to be like that as if it is normal.
I know some gay (male and female) people and they are fine, it's just those degenerate vocal few who give the whole lifestyle a bad name.

OP is an admitted faggot, pay your respects.

Well, you see, animals sometimes fuck for pleasure. You don't see, perhaps, a male spider fuck another male spider. Animals that can derive pleasure from sex are the only ones that become gay. Lesbian gorillas for example.

lol fucking a baby

So a homosexual to you is a man who is bisexual?

>There is no such this as a normal Gay couple
How fucking detached from reality are you? Do you honestly believe that literally every single Gay couple on the planet are sex-crazed freaks? Most of them just want to live their lives without all that shit. In fact, a lot of them (me included) fucking hate those 'Pride Parade' things. They completely misrepresent how Gays actually act in real life.

No? Gays can have children through surrogates

they're useless to society and its future.

Can they naturally achive erection in the sight of a woman and impregnate her through actual sex?

They also have to bring it up in alot of conversations
All they talk about is being gay

>rapes little kid
>little kid turns gay
>little kid rapes another little kid once hes old enough
>all the little kids end up having 1000 sex and even more aids

yeah whats wrong with it really?

It's just disgusting in an instinctual level. All normies know it, whether they want to accept it or not.

Yeah, those type of people.
I once met this gay guy at a party who I would never guess was gay from his personality, but he was there with a female friend who kept making a point about him being gay, that is just as bad if not worse.

>believe that literally every single Gay couple on the planet are sex-crazed freaks
That's a strawman.
However, you don't get such a high incidence of STD infections without being sex crazed freaks and there are very many sex crazed faggots.

Spreads aids, also moral degeneracy

They did a study of this and found that ”homophobia” is largely genetic.

>I just don't see why we should hate people just for loving somebody.

Homosexuals are incapable of love, you see. This is particularly obvious in males, because their choice of partner is sex-driven and they typically have a hedonistic lifestyle with no ties attached.

In females, it is less obvious, because lesbians need to compensate for a lack of affection in their lives. Contrary to male homosexuals, female homosexuals try to create a steady couple environment all while being emotionally incapable of that. They do not fall in love, they latch onto the first woman who gives them what they crave, and they persuade themselves that it's love.


By and large, male homosexuals do not know couple life and almost never marry. Female homosexuals can't keep a partner for very long. The rate of divorce/break-up is 60% in homosexual females, while heterosexual couples have a 40% break-up rate.

Homosexuality is more often than not linked with psychological issues and pathologies. Typically, trans people have a 90% suicide rate because of self-esteem issues, for example, and most female homosexuals suffer from some severe psychological trauma. Male homosexuals, on the other hand, tend to have issues with commitment, which is a common phenomenon with men, but is most prevalent with homosexuals.


Furthermore, homosexuals contribute little, if anything, to the global demography of a nation, which is an issue in an era where heterosexuals do the same thing. They are not the most important factor in demographic decline for a nation, but they do contribute to it, and that is a problem indeed.

>It's just disgusting in an instinctual level.
It's not.
It's the best solution to an overabundance of men.
The Greeks and Romans understood this perfectly.

Telling men just not to have sex if you can't find a women or don't like women never ever works.

can't procreate, lowers the white replace rate to under 2.2

not a problem behind close doors but constantly try to undermine things like traditional marriages that lead to children. It isn't enough to be tolerated, want to throw naked pride rallies down the streets and force catholics to allow you to have a wedding ceremony in a church, which is very clearly against the religion.

don't have children so have absolutely no stake in the future. Feel oppressed so they hate their own nation. This creates traitors who do not vote for what's good for country and family, but overwhelmingly vote for left wing policies that favour the individual, want to deconstruct our culture and flood our economy with immigrants for a temporary raise in GDP. Care infinitely more about the economy than sovereignty.

Frequently resentful to white people, extremely loud and over the top flamboyant almost as if to see if they can annoy people, insufferable to listen to in this case.

Spread STDs.

stop doing these types of posts if you really are a gay.
I understand you're being sarcastic, but there are people who actually think like this.

>smashing your dick into feces
>not disgusting

ok

A you cannot reproduce in a natural setting.
B. You interefer in the natural mating process of straight couples.
C. You have the highest rate of molesting to recriut.
D. You are abominations.
E. You spread disease.

F. You hate jesus.

It's simple. It falls under "good" or "bad". The way you judge whether something is good or bad is by speculating the outcome of 100% of our population doing that thing.
If 100% of people turned gay, society would collapse, so it's bad. As bad as murder? Nah. But because you steer towards something where, if you were the majority, you kill our society, well.. You shouldn't be proud of it. You shouldn't see yourself as a first class citizen even. You should see your fetish as a burden, and try to be a good person by making up for it in other ways instead of going full degenerate and thinking everything is just fucking dandy.
It's okay to be gay, but it's not okay to promote something harms a society.

>left wing policies
>favour the individual
Try again.

>
And Jesus hates them too.

G. You hate yourselves.

>what exactly is wrong with being gay
Nothing. Buggery, otoh...

AND LOOK, JUST LIKE I SAID
>so have absolutely no stake in the future. Feel oppressed so they hate their own nation. This creates traitors who do not vote for what's good for country and family
()

Here we have an exact example:
>HUR GUYS WHY DOES IT MATTER IF HUMANS DIE OR NOT

H. No.

A dude can love another dude. Totally fine.

When a dude wants to fuck another dude, that's sexual perversion. This whole "Love is love" bullshit is getting out of hand.

You're not arguing in the name of love, you're arguing in the name of sexual desire, and are willing to tread on the deeply held beliefs and traditions of kind, reasonable people, because you want them to recognise you're desire to fuck as moral.

This is what is wrong with you. In a word: "Degeneracy"

Nothing wrong with being gay. It has most likely always been adaptive for a small portion of the population to be gay

>if you really are a gay.
I'm not. But I can understand why someone would be.
>but there are people who actually think like this.
Because it's logical.
Christians will tell you not to have sex until marriage and never cheat on your wife.
For this to work you need a 1:1 ratio of men to women and this is never the case.

You can't just men not to have sex. Sailors/Prisoners do this shit all the time. I can't blame them for being horny.

>Smashing your dick into piss and blood
>not disgusting

Sex is dirty business.

Normosexuals
>parade to celebrate heroic acts, holidays, etc.

Buggerers
>parade to celebrate sucking dicks

Thats what fags are dude neckbeard chimo faggots.

You're talking about right wing ECONOMICS. The political spectrum has 6 categories.

MOST EXAMPLES, LEFT = INDIVIDUAL, ALSO PRO LGBT IN POLICY:
>LIBERTARIANISM vs authoritarian
Left wing favours the individual. Submitting to monarchy favours tradition, family, country. Libertarianism (left) favours individualism. Most gays are libertarian because authoritarian systems tend to clamp down on homosexuality.
>Individualism vs Collectivism
Individualism is defined as left wing and is by definition pro individual over group. Gays are pro individual.
>Globalism vs Isolationist
Globalism (left) is pro nation rather than "open borders, everyone is a human", and is individualistic. Gays tend to be pro globalism because international bodies e.g. the EU favour and protect homosexuality.
>Cosmopolitan vs Tribalist
Cosmopolitan (left) is individualistic, it doesn't care about nation, sovereignty etc, . Gays tend to vote with this because it is "pro diversity" which goes hand in hand with "pro LGBT".
>Progressivism vs Conservatism
Progressivism (left) favours individuals, and is pro LGBT. Conservatism is based around family and nation.

THE EXCEPTION:
>Communism vs Capitalism
Communism (left) does not favour the individual for once, and is for groups, HOWEVER, the people in the west who advocate for it happen to be social justice LGBT types because parties tend to be Communist + left in every other type of way, or Capitalist + right in every other type of way, for some strange reason. I wouldn't mind e.g. a socialist, nationalist party, but it wouldn't be pro gay so you would never vote for it.

Do people still care about you homos? You're not even relevant anymore it's all about trans people now. Gay men are seen as privileged over others in the lgbt community.

Slide thread.

Adaptive to what?

Gift giving, bug chasing, aids restaurants, gay pride parades in the nude and having children watch, convincing little kids it's okay to turn your dick inside out and become a "woman", forcing your political narrative on religious institutions, and just generally being the horrid faggots that you are.

Flawed logic. If we went by that rule, being a priest or other celibate religious leader would be immoral.

Is that a Billy Joel lyric? :^)

>Submitting to monarchy favours tradition, family, country.
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHhAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>individualism is defined as left wing
Individualism was created by corporate America, its a byproduct of capitalism. Individuals gain a sense of Identity through purchasing products and brands.

>Globalism
This is to deep and complex to get into.
>Gays tend to be pro globalism because international bodies
Go talk to /lgbt/ for 5 minutes. Globalism is not a gay issue.

>Cosmopolitan vs Tribalist
Because you live in a mega city like Newyork, or you live in a grass shack in the jungle.
Small towns don't exist, Small cities don't exist.

>Gays tend to vote with this because
Gays tend to vote democrat because the republican party is hostile to their very existence. That's it. Most of them don't give a fuck about everything else you brought up.

Now you have me humming Piano Man while reading my comment, haha!

I'm not a nazi and believe homosexuality is morally wrong. You have issues... you're attempting to target a large crowd with a title that only relates to an extremely small crowd. Manage your anger elsewhere.

>What is consent???

I meant We Didn't Start the Fire, ya dingus.
How the hell does that post relate to Piano Man?

We didn't start the fire would have been the better choice of songs, lol. Not sure why I went with Piano man, I guess whenever someone brings up Billy Joel that's where my brain goes.

Feminine boys are totally fine :3

High functioning autism is a developmental disorder.

Your ass you bussiness....

but i must say that i don't like to see guys doing gay stuff or kissing. I feel disgusted but also understad that is your freedom.

Question for uncircumcised faggots:

Do you get shit under your foreskin?

>fag
>wants to create more fags
faggotry is a less than optimal solution and destroys the family structure. There's no way I would encourage it and it makes me sick, you people are mentally ill and you need help not encouragement

Something a dog and a child are capable of.

I did your post as Start the Fire.
I'm really bored

Gift giving,
bug chasing,
aids restaurants,
gay pride parades
in the nude

having children
watch, convincing
little kids
it's okay
to turn your dick inside out

We didn't start the gay pride,
They were always bareback,
With a hairy ballsack.
etc.

become a "woman",
forcing your
political narrative
on religious institutions,
and just....
generally
being
the horrid faggots that you are.

nanana
na na na
Kevin Spacey

The Force Awakens

So no new threads are loading in the catalog

In politics Effeminate societies act similar to Bonobos while patriarchal societies act like Chimpanzees. Now, let's look at the difference between Bonobos vs Chimpanzees.
Bonobos are matriarchal and have a strong unity among their females and a weak unity among their males. They live in a rich environment with no natural predators and they don't compete with other Bonobo tribes. The Males gather food and the females distribute it based on rank. Their Social ranking is feudalistic in nature and depends on their birth mother. They raise children communally and basically have sex all the time having no sexual order.
Chimpanzees are the opposite, they are patriarchal where the males form tribes and political/social groups whereas the females have less unity. They live in a competitive environment where they compete with other animals as well as other tribes for resources. When two tribes go to war it ends with one tribe killing all the males of the opposing tribe and assimilating their females. The males often hunt for food in packs with the alpha being the lead. Social ranking for Chimpanzees is meritocratic as the males with the most capability to assert their will, either through raw strength or social prowess and often a combination of both, are the alpha. Children are raised almost exclusively by the mother in childhood. Chimpanzees have a strict sexual order where the males with the highest social rank are the ones who have sex with their females first, thus ensuring that they are the most likely to pass on their seed.
Humans are similar to chimps in their political behavior. On effeminate societies will behave as Bonobos, wanting to socialize resources and raising of their children, wanting less sexual order and being averse to both meritocratic and tribal competition. A perfect example of a Human matriarchal society is Sweden. Swedish politicians preach policies that will bring about the destruction of their culture, ethnicity and nation.

>nanana
>na na na
>Kevin Spacey
I'm fucking dead, hahaha!

This is not to say that humans act exactly like lesser apes but rather to draw a comparison of how patriarchy societies tend to succeed with individual as well as tribal competition, sexual order and group effort in working together towards a common goal. In comparison effeminent societies literally just live off the wealth of the land without any effort or reason whatsoever, only practicing hedonism rather than producing anything of value. If not for patriarchy we would not have civilization and if not for effeminacy and descent into hedonism, tolerance and apathy, we would not have the decline of countless civilizations. It's pretty obvious that the former is superior to the latter.
The problem with homosexuals is they create a effeminate, hedonistic societies through their influence as well as historically being a destructive force to gender roles, children's sexual development and societal morels.

incest is even more disgusting than yuri
kys OP

Where are you from, OP?

>Furthermore, homosexuals contribute little, if anything, to the global demography of a nation, which is an issue in an era where heterosexuals do the same thing. They are not the most important factor in demographic decline for a nation, but they do contribute to it, and that is a problem indeed.

Seems really stupid to put the onus of reproduction on the tiny contingent of society that by and large has never made a difference one way or another in the demographic rise and fall of nations, i.e. exclusive homosexuals. What that is, is a perfect example of scapegoating by hetero normies.

you're not making white babies if you're gay

The only people who should do that ,are defective people.To be celibate for life.
So we don't have to remove them by force,and they could still work and be usefull.

you don't even hide your nasty fedora. get fucked.

The only people who should do that ,are defective people.To be celibate for life.
So we don't have to remove them by force,and they could still work and be usefull.
I hope this uploads.

Gays have higher average intelligence. Remember that gene combinations and their relationship to genetic expression is not linear, so there could be a lot of overlap in the combinations that give rise to a higher likelihood of homosexuality vs just creating an above average intelligent heterosexual. The difference could be having 999/1000 of the right combinations to likely wire someone one way or the other. Males in particular have a lot of variance in intelligence from each other so it could be that any society with a decent number of certain hetero men with higher capabilities and aptitudes or psychological profiles that could make them more successful is also going to create a necessary proportion of homosexuals amongst the general population. Homosexuality in this way could be the sign of an adaptive, vigorous population with a healthy degree of genetic diversity.

> overpopulation
> making white babies

pick one.
Then kill some nigs

> overpopulation
not a problem in white countries in fact its quite the opposite
> Then kill some nigs
i can only hope you faggots will wake up at some point and shoot nogs that try to cross your border instead of giving them gibs

>Gays have higher average intelligence.
Please quote a non-biased source. (This excludes all medical and psychiatric journals published in Cuckanada.)

I very much doubt this is true.

Because it's unfair that you have to suffer like that, you deserve better than sexual confusion and deviancy :)

You are mentally ill and need to be treated with electro shock therapy. Someone call VP Pence to deal with this fag!

As long as homos don't go about raping and looting and vandalizing stuff, I can abide them.

Unlike niggers and arabs, homos at least can get a job and actually get work done.

Speaking of AIDS, if the epidemic is so bad down Africa ways, how come the populations keep growing?

Are niggers outfucking AIDS or is the epidemic exagerrated?

I'm not well-educated on the matter (or in many other matters either) but somehow I get the impression things aren't adding up.

>You are mentally ill and need to be treated with electro shock therapy.
>t. Yusuf

>As long as homos don't go about raping and looting and vandalizing stuff, I can abide them.
Homo's don't do that, they typically just stay inside for fear of getting stoned by the Muslim majority in Nordistan.

And yet most of them vote for parties that persist in advocating increased muslim-imports to North Somalia.

I guess they're suicidal, at least on some level.

hah dude you gonna ask this question on a forum run by autists?

you know Sup Forums represents the views of less than 1% of western world

the problem is not being gay but about making homosexuality into some kind of prestige encouraging everyone to act or be gay for virtue points

homosexuality exists everywhere even in nature. people will continue to be born gay. throwing gays off the roofs won't prevent gays from being born. is not a practical solution. there is no solution other than creating a fair and reasonable society where gays are allowd to coexist but not like libtards make it become gay for virtue points

Only girl gays are okay because girls can't actually be gay. Even 100% dyke lesbos still use fake dicks to get off or simulated phallus', so on some level, they still want dick.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22293319

>Abstract
The origin of preferences and values is an unresolved theoretical problem in behavioural sciences. The Savanna-IQ Interaction Hypothesis, derived from the Savanna Principle and a theory of the evolution of general intelligence, suggests that more intelligent individuals are more likely to acquire and espouse evolutionarily novel preferences and values than less intelligent individuals, but general intelligence has no effect on the acquisition and espousal of evolutionarily familiar preferences and values. Ethnographies of traditional societies suggest that exclusively homosexual behaviour was probably rare in the ancestral environment, so the Hypothesis would predict that more intelligent individuals are more likely to identify themselves as homosexual and engage in homosexual behaviour. Analyses of three large, nationally representative samples (two of which are prospectively longitudinal) from two different nations confirm the prediction.

mental illness

hahaha

i think you don't know what that term means

illness is a condition that prevents you from living your life and affects your quality of life. seems to me gays do just fine . the problem with being a homosexual is people like you hating on them is external or idiots who encourage gayness for coolness points

homosexuality is a condition but is not an illness.

Adaptive as in having a greater chance of survival and reproduction. The adaptiveness of homosexuality is very limited within a single community tho. Homosexuality in the animal kingdom is also quite common, but it stops being advantageous if the number exceeds a critical mass