White Male Backlash

>Misogynistic abuse against Cathy Newman is a symbol of the backlash against the MeToo movement

>When white men feel they are losing power, any level of nastiness is possible – and much power has been ceded of late

>When white men feel they are losing power, any level of nastiness is possible, and much power has been ceded recently. Amid the steamrolling effect of the MeToo campaign, of the sudden dominance of gender equality in the news and amid the fall of many Great Men, here comes the whirling centre of the storm, when we have to fight harder than ever to be heard. We are in backlash season.

>It’s not easy to defend a serial rapist, or even a one-off rapist, although some people do – let’s not forget that 63 million people recently voted for an alleged offender as President.

>But it is very easy to attack Cathy Newman, the female journalist whose male editor thought it would be a good idea to interview Jordan Peterson.

>The backlash against the MeToo movement has grown since day one, but it has also been precise in its timing. As soon as the conversation evolved this month from the binary “Yes means yes and no means no”, the calls of “witchhunts” and “McCarthyism” were becoming deafening.

>As Newman no doubt was conscious of during her interview, many people involved in MeToo have not had it easy. They may have been survivors of assault, and were forced to watch as their credibility was debated in what right-wingers describe as the “court of public opinion”.

>“Got ya,” Peterson said when Newman fell silent for a few seconds. Peterson laughed. The joke was on her, in a way. No matter what she would have asked, a woman daring to question his expertise was bound to have ramifications. Especially in 2018.

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5292915/Cathy-Newman-rocked-death-threats.html
youtube.com/watch?v=ssLZHKwXcH8
rt.com/uk/342513-dog-nazi-salute-arrested/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

They will try and link anything with #metoo.

Jesus fucking Christ it really is impossible for women to take responsibility isn't it
>
>But it is very easy to attack Cathy Newman, the female journalist whose male editor thought it would be a good idea to interview Jordan Peterson
>No matter what she would have asked, a woman daring to question his expertise was bound to have ramifications
I am at a loss for words
She's blaming her editor AND Jordan Peterson?

>Especially in 2018.
CUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNN

In their eyes, women only have agency when it suits.

Probably but more of a chance its shitty "news" outlets asserting shitty narratives

Basically this is manufactured news

is it weird i want her to peg me while she tells me how privileged i am?

I would have sex with her, if you know what I mean.

I think Peterson is a faggot but that interview is the clearest case of someone getting BTFOd I've seen in years. It was like watching a retarded child debate an adult, it felt somehow almost sadistic

>woman fucks up
>it's the fault of white men

So you are saying that lobster are humans?

it would be weird if you didn't

getting really sick of these kike run news rags.

Kathy's interview is a symbol of society's hatred of men.

there is no cure for this brainlets. they totally unable to escape childish identity politics

Cathy: so you are saying that wymyn are less intelligent that men
Me:
Peterson:

By the way for those curious what the 'threats' were:

>Sick messages posted online after the interview on Tuesday included ‘RIP Cathy Newman’ and ‘Cathy Newman we know where you live’.
>The mother-of-two was also called a ‘b****’ in more than 500 postings and was the target of other obscene misogynistic messages.
>Ms Newman, 43, suffered further distress yesterday when her 13-year-old daughter found a pornographic mock-up on Instagram of her mother with Dr Peterson.

They take two messages that could be considered threatening (though RIP was probably referring to her getting owned) and combine them with messages that merely include the word 'bitch' and then proceed to pretend they're all in the threatening category.

Then in the article above they claim it's actually a backlash against #metoo. Nutjobs the lot of them.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5292915/Cathy-Newman-rocked-death-threats.html

No, stop beating around the bush and tell us what you really mean

Does she even possess a soul? I doubt it.

It's like libshits and journalists are living in an alt-timeline

So you're saying you're a rapist

normies are so bluepilled, explaining what the black-ops are would be totally redundant

>the female journalist whose male editor thought it would be a good idea to interview Jordan Peterson

Can someone parse this for me?

That part legitimately infuriated me.

ideally the method of conditioning them to not do this is to attack them physically IF and only IF they fake threats to get attention. if they don't fake threats, they stay safe. if they do fake threats, they get acid attacked.

it shuts them up fast. china did this to shut up their activist journalists

Doesn't matter; I'm an ethnic minority.

>As soon as the conversation evolved this month from the binary “Yes means yes and no means no”, the calls of “witchhunts” and “McCarthyism” were becoming deafening.
Oh, I see. So we should just let women have free reign over ruining people's lives. Sounds great.

I'm loving watching these mindless fucks squirm and try to damage control. Having said that Newman herself didn't do anything wrong, it's C4 whipping up this 'omg backlash' white

Yes. Everyone feels the same way.

>"a man is to blame because she wasn't competent enough to perform the task set to her"

That's what I read.

>Be me
>Meet Cathy Newman while on vacation in England, visiting family there
>Excuse myself to go to the bathroom
>Knock on door
>It's Cathy Newman
>She demands to see my penis, or she won't give my cousin an intern position
>Show her my penis
>Well it's not hard yet, is it? Go on.
>I can't get hard looking at her
>She gets visibly angry and lumbers off
>Cousin doesn't get intern position
#metoo

a number of people have said she is legitimately hallucinating at this part

people that are stupid fill in the gaps of their understanding via hallucinatory illusions of concepts. in fact everyone does this in their vision and auditory circuits for everything in their peripheral senses every single second of every single day

normally it flies for normies but the lobsters thing is such an egregious error it cant be overlooked

>(((Newman)))
it gets the hate for being a subversive kike

>proclaim to be stronk independent womyn
>constantly playing the victims

hilarious.

This is true, but she has retweeted some of the channel 4 rubbish so I wouldn't be surprised if she agreed with what they're doing.

I'll never forget how distraught you were when you came back to the table
>#IBelieveYou

God, please let this become a fucking meme.

>fall of many Great Men
What great men? They were all losers who needed to fuck some underling.

me too

It's hilarious how these wage gap tauting dumb cunts continually prove the IQ gap is real.

If she felt like it is all threats, them it is threat, just like if he feels that a man looking at her is rape, them it is.

When you all will understand?

...

Cathy was intellectually destroyed because she is a woman!

How dare you, evil men!

Truth forms a chainmail of facts to guard against insanity. People who deny a truth must deny ALL truth, otherwise the surrounding truths will show them they are wrong.

Boy, Peterson really abused the shit out of her....

His explanation was so succinct it blew my mind that she couldn't grasp the concepts he was describing

Back

to

reddit

please.

What exactly are you trying to say?

Let's not beat around the bush, white western women are an abomination. No other women actively work to disenfranchise their own men from every facet of society.

>loses interview
>wins through mob mentality

Amusingly our hate crime records actually work this way. If the 'victim' thinks it was a hate crime then it's recorded as a hate crime. Won't always be prosecuted as once but they'll still stick it in the stats.

The explanation is long-winded and memey as fuck, it's infowars after all, but it rings true. Professional hypnotist explains how propaganda works. youtube.com/watch?v=ssLZHKwXcH8

Cringe warning though.

>#lobstersociety

Holy fuck the way they are fighting back is like digging their own grave. They seriously don't get that no one outside their bubble treats them seriously anymore

what does this old cunt getting shreked by jordan peterson have to do with #metoo, besides basically raping her in that interview

She looks way too Wasserman-Schultz. Have some standards

Couldn't fit these quotes in the op:

>When questioned by Newman if he believed that gender equality was a myth, Peterson said only if she meant “in terms of outcomes”.

>Newman also asked why he had the right to air his controversial views. He replied, “I’m a clinical psychologist”, with the cool calm of a cartoon villain.

>There is no doubt that Peterson was intelligent, determined and quick. No doubt, indeed, that the Channel 4 News interview was entertaining. But his words, on closer inspection, were vacuous and confusing, and he left gaps.

>He also failed to mention how centuries of patriarchy have brainwashed us, making us accept the status quo as logical and necessary, and one that benefits us all.

Women: Agency? Self-responsibility? What are those? I didn't go into STEM because I was brainwashed.

audibly kekd

Even a rat has a pussy.

I also like how this is being analysed in all the shitlib rags as being about the 'right to cause offense'. Deftly ignoring that what he said was totally uncontroversial and easily backed up, and making him seem to anyone who scans past like some shock merchant. These scumfucks must pay for their trickery.

Yeah, C4 was dumb to create the "theats against Cathy" story since it'll get more people to watch the interview out of curiosity. They'd have been better off just yanking it from YouTube without explanation.

I'm 10 minutes in and holy FUCK this is the dumbest woman I've ever seen on TV.

She's constantly cutting him off, putting words in his mouth and intentionally twisting his words. She hasn't been reasonable once so far.

This is what the left considers a case for feminism?

R
E
P
L
A
C
E

>It’s not easy to defend a serial rapist, or even a one-off rapist, although some people do – let’s not forget that 63 million people recently voted for an alleged offender as President.
brilliant

In summary: nothing bad that ever happened to me is my fault.

This article is also written by a woman BTW.

dman! thanks for the laugh!

It's frustrating to watch, but well worth it. Especially when he literally silences her.

>Misogynistic abuse

i.e. someone pointed out how ill-prepared and dishonest she was.

Funny thing is, they left it up because they thought she won. They're really that delusional

why are journalists such brainletts?

>Rachel (((Revesz)))

i watched the interview, it's like that chick has a learning disability. i wonder what it could be?

>>loses interview

>>loses interview
Really gropes my penis

>As the digital temperature rose, Peterson quite rightly intervened on Twitter to stop the abuse: “If you’re threatening her, stop. Try to be civilized in your criticism.”
>It is unconscionable that a journalist doing her job should be threatened as Newman has been by “alt-right” idiots, with their pathetic Pepe the frog symbol, juvenile memes and claims that their adversaries have been “rekt”.

He knows what they're trying to do with that quote though (from his twitter):

>Now my attempts to moderate the discussion surrounding the channel 4 interview with are being used as proof that she is a victim. Is this how you want this to go, Cathy @cathynewman ? Are you going to stand forth as a victim?
>And this is happening in dozens of newspapers (with, by the way, no proof of credible threats, despite the allegations) (and this is not to say that the online discussion has been entirely civil).

That one is actually Arab owned, if I remember correctly.

Pic related.

It's a backlash against the free speech hating authoritarian identity politics of the far left.

what's with being a victim?

as the maintenance guy at my work told the whiny tech support nerd at work, "sometimes you just have to deal with it and move on with your life"

(((Rachael Revesz)))
oy vey

...

>>“Got ya,” Peterson said when Newman fell silent for a few seconds. Peterson laughed. The joke was on her, in a way. No matter what she would have asked, a woman daring to question his expertise was bound to have ramifications.

FFS. She came to knife fight with a spoon and was properly rekt. Nothing more to it, move on.

I like how she just assumes all the men criticizing her are White.
Peterson's fans are Civic Cuck normies, are are multi-racial.

If a woman is playing chess against a man & she starts to lose......................... sexism.

Count Dankula (who is on trial in the UK for his Nazi pug video) makes a good point here.

The media plasters people's pictures on their front pages and ruins their lives and reputations and, when they get it wrong, the most the victim (a real victim) gets is a page 15 sentence long apology.

ahahah it's real: rt.com/uk/342513-dog-nazi-salute-arrested/

>The media plasters people's pictures on their front pages and ruins their lives and reputations and, when they get it wrong, the most the victim (a real victim) gets is a page 15 sentence long apology.

What the fuck britain has some of the strictest libel laws, just sue the fuckers for everything they got

>the two images are of completely different puzzle pieces

>I’m being criticized for saying dumb shit and getting stomped in an interview
>MUH SOGGY KNEE
Like clockwork.

>men criticizing her
They're probably teenagers anyway, rather than adults.

How much chance do u think a guy persecuted for hate speech for a racist joke is gonna have winning a libel case?

So your saying we should gas the kikes?

A goddamn homeopather sued a newspaper and won when newspaper said homeopathy is fake

Are they suggesting there was something inherently female about her words that a man couldn't have spoken, fought, and rightly lost by? The truth should be the truth, regardless of what mouth it came from. To say that "a woman daring to question his expertise was bound to have ramifications" is suggesting that she lost the debate either BECAUSE she was a woman, and/or BECAUSE he was a man. Do they not see the hypocrisy and patent sexism in their very own ideology?

No, that's not what I'm saying at all. What I'm saying is race war now.

Holy shit that face is great. Saved.

> I would have sex with her, if you know what I mean.
What did he mean by this?

>Do they not see the hypocrisy and patent sexism in their very own ideology?
short answer, no.
long answer: noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooope

i hope hell is a real place because anyone who does an acid attack should be at the worse part of hell

>get destroyed in debate
>try to recover by appealing to sympathy of women and beta males

Standard female debate tactics

...

Holy fuck. Well played