Do you think the world would be better if Germany won the First World War?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

history.com/topics/world-war-i/treaties-of-brest-litovsk
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migrations_from_Poland_since_EU_accession
neweurope.eu/article/poles-indians-uk/
express.co.uk/news/uk/703849/poles-poland-migrants-live-in-uk
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2614279/Poland-tops-league-foreign-inmates-UK-jails-ahead-Ireland-Jamaica.html
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-413985/Eastern-European-immigrants-carry-tenth-crime.html
data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=DZ
nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate#2005
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Yeah

yes

yeah

Without question

The sole reason the world is the declining shithole that it is now is solely because the allies won the wars

Probably, but even better would be if it never happened at all. A German victory would probably just find novel ways to fuck the world over.

Yes. Russia would still be a cucked monarchy

yes

Germany would probably still be consumed by communists from the inside tbqh.

But if everything worked out fine, Europe would fall into pax germanica. Maybe we wouldn't see all this leftist bullshit as is today.

I probably wouldn't exist. But yes.

yes

Why would you want monarchy to still exist?

The communists would have still taken over Russia if Germany won WW1.

Pretty much yeh

we're living in the best of worlds. never forget.

It seems you like this current timeline?

Yes

>The communists would have still taken over Russia if Germany won WW1.


lenin was actually helped by the Germans who sponsored the Bolshevik Revolution. In exchange for helping Lenin return to Russia (the germans even gave him a ride in an armored train) the Bolsheviks ended Russian participation in WWI and signed the heavily Pro German Brest Litovsk treaty.
history.com/topics/world-war-i/treaties-of-brest-litovsk
One of Lenin’s first actions as leader was to call a halt to Russian participation in the war and letting germany/AH win the war in the east was lenin a german oprative?????
did they stab Germany in the back, or did they stab Russia in the back and do Germany a favour?

>if Germany won the First World War?

we would have mars colonies and a cure for cancer

>Germany would probably still be consumed by communists from the inside

the weimar republic crushed the communist revolutions wit out even breaking a sweat.
Friedrich Ebert, (the president of weimar Germany) at the time, decided to destroy(obliterate more like) the Bavarian Socialist Republic in March, 1919. He sent 30,000 Freikorps. the poor bastards at the bavarian socialist republic didn't last for any period of time to even be relivant before it got shoahad.
karl liebknecht and rosa luxemburg whe're exicuted by the freikorps the bavarian socialist republic was also crushed by the freicorps so the revolution is a massive failure in every regard.

No, had they won the British Empire would have been disbanded and it's colonies turned into ungovernable shitholes which Germany could not have controlled or civilise.

Yes. but WW1 should have never happened. Wilhelm was very stupid to challenge England before the war. And they were stupid to enter the war. The Beginning of of the end of the British Empire.

Maybe. They wouldn't have been sore loser enough to force the other nations into a rematch.

We had no choice but to enter the war once Germany had embarked on its naval arms race to rival the Royal navy, which was the glue holding our empire together.

wilhelms biggest mistake was invading belguim and violating the treaty of london.

No. German imperialism has caused more than enough damage to European peoples as it is. Prussians went extinct because of them, who knows, maybe it was not only them.

No, they would've still been subverted politically by (((them))).
It should've been the Nazis who won WW2, because they would've been the only ones pretty much immune to the Jewry.

Nope they had no plans or ideologies. WW1 was a mistake from the start.

Since ww2 is a direct result of ww1, would it have still taken place in that timeline?

>We had no choice but to

This line of thinking got you to where you are today, my man.

The World isn't declining, just the USA

Nope. The emperors Reich was already carrying the disease of Jewish subversion - which is why it descended first into chaos and then into democracy after the war.

However the world would we better had we won the second world war.

We had no business building an empire. Angers me more than WW2 almost. We should have been allies. You had a choice, you just didn't expect to lose so much in the end. You could have fucked over France, we could have fucked over Austria, bad choices on every side. In the end we all lost too much.

Didn't stop WR from becoming a shithole still it seems

>Europe isn't currently undergoing a massive influx of turd-world deplorables, it's just your imagination.

>Didn't stop WR from becoming a shithole still it seems

weimars troubles where caused by the great deppresion the loans the US has been giving to them had to be recalled back tus shattering the economy.

Well, "the world" had always been as shitty as it carried darkskins. But on the other side Europe is declining as well. You probably can't see that, since in Australia you're on the island of the lucky whites.

>turd-world deplorables,
is the massive migration from eastern europe to western europe also a jewish plot?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migrations_from_Poland_since_EU_accession
>Since the opening of the labour market following Poland joining the European Union in 2004, Poland experienced a mass migration of over 2 MILLION abroad.
>By December 2015, 12% of Polish labor population left for UK to work there.
>According to poll from 2007 for around 29% of Polish emigrants their job abroad is the first job they had in life.

neweurope.eu/article/poles-indians-uk/
express.co.uk/news/uk/703849/poles-poland-migrants-live-in-uk
>“The most common non-British nationality in 2015 was Polish, with an estimated 916,000 citizens".

The Rothschilds already controlled most of Europe. Our ancestors(both sides) died at their pleasure, really.

How?
In 1917 Germany defeated Russia and then the Commies took over.

The Kaiser had the degenerate shit pretty good under control. You see what happened in Weimar then.

True. The Commies didn't stand a chance. Almost everyone was against them.
Unfortunately a part of our history that's very, very underdiscussed here.

Nah, England would have just been fine. France would have been fucked pretty hard (again) I think.

No empire lasts forever, and for a tiny island nation I'd say we're doing pretty well for ourselves - despite the endless hordes of shitskins settling here for gibs.

There would be no ww2 without ww1, hell there might not even be Nazi in that timeline!

"is the massive migration from eastern europe to western europe also a jewish plot?"

Obviously it's not, since Jewish dominated media does not feel any urge to promote it on a propagandistic brainwashing level.

The Caliphate wouldn't have been dismantled and would be even larger, so, no.

Much more significant is if Woodrow Wilson hadn't been the US President, then we wouldn't have the UN, and we would've supported the White Russians to stomp out the Bolsheviks while they were still relatively weak.

>Unfortunately a part of our history that's very, very underdiscussed here.
that's how you get stupid misconceptions like "hitler saved the weimar republic from da bollsjivics"

>Obviously it's not, since Jewish dominated media does not feel any urge to promote it on a propagandistic brainwashing level.
before the rapefugee crisis the polish where the scapegoat.

Germany spread communism in WW1. After they did that it mattered not who won - we’d all lose.

There were German imperial ambitions in Africa at the time, but I can agree with your statement.

Yes, they did. But 20 million deaths aren't the reason why the world today is sucking, is it? It's the subsequent subversion of western civilization that followed.

"before the rapefugee crisis the polish where the scapegoat."

Nope, it never was the same. Polish immigrants are the type of people that press wages and are somewhat little trustable. But they're not killing us, they're not raping us and they're not replacing us biologically.

From the outside, you might think it's the same. I guarantee: It is not.

...

the soviets turned russia from feudal shithole to a powerhouse matching the US.

In 1919 the Bolsheviks began the literacy campaign Likbez. In 1926 51% of the population were literate. By the end of the Second Five-Year Plan male literacy was 90.8% and female literacy 72.5%.

say what ever you want about them but the did turn russia into what it is today.

Made possible through communism, war and chaos. All that wouldn't have happened had the war be averted. We weakened ourselves.

>But they're not killing us,
wrong.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2614279/Poland-tops-league-foreign-inmates-UK-jails-ahead-Ireland-Jamaica.html
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-413985/Eastern-European-immigrants-carry-tenth-crime.html
the make up quite a large number of the crimes.

>they're not replacing us biologically.
this outbreeding narrative is bust.
our fertility rates are declining as well.
data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=DZ

>they're not raping us
i will assume your talking about swedens rape rates.
sweden always had the highest rape rates in europe lmao go look at the stats.
nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate#2005
in 2005 the rape rate (per 100,000 population was 41.9) the where 3 in line alongside south afrika in terms of the highest rapes per country. long before the rapefugee crises even started.

in other countries repeated rape is counted as one rape. In Sweden if a person is raped multiple times it is treated as however many times it occurred.
also given that in 2005 the definition of rape was expanded (yet agian) it's not supprising why the stats are so high.

but that's not to say the rapefugees don't have anything to do with it.

>There were German imperial ambitions in Africa at the time
bad mistake on our part

Noice

>There were German imperial ambitions in Africa at the time
Barely. These "colonies" weren't even real colonies but private entrepreneurships that were protected by the Kaiserreich.

These few islands in the Pacific, that one Chinese harbour and some of Papua New Guinea aren't even worth mentioning.

Still provoked the English. Wasn't worth it.

You got it backwards. It was the Commies that surrendered Russia and Handed Germany enough supplies to last as long as they did.

I don't know what I hate more, the average brainwashed leftcuck german or the "woke/no more brother war" german that's frequenting this board

My biggest regret about WWI isn't that AH collapsed at the end of it, but that when the German Empire collapsed and the Prussians were wiped out we weren't there to take over instead of them

Whatever I might think about Prussians like Friedrich II. or the chancellors like Bismarck when it comes to our shared history aside, atleast they were very capable statesmen and knew where they wanted to take Germany

They weren't goddamn political brainlets like what took over after WWII, or what is most of the german population in general

Yes. Only Kaiser Wilhelm who was a true Christian could've contained the twin evils of communism and the Yellow Peril

everyone who says yes is a monarchist that should be put to death

No

So what? No one cries about how the French made the Occitans or the Bretons extinct, and they both have an actual cultural history and body of great works.

>provoked the English
Oh noes. The English. Got provoked...
England had to learn at some point that they are no match to the Eternal Teuton. They did eventually. We rule Europe afterall - with a total worse outcome though.

Nah, we have to be honest here.
Germany was perfidious af towards Russia. We shipped Lenin in a sealed train to Russia and gave them a bunch of money to subvert the country. Shameful. Willy betrayed the institution of monarchy then.

>Whatever I might think about Prussians like Friedrich II. or the chancellors like Bismarck when it comes to our shared history aside, atleast they were very capable statesmen and knew where they wanted to take Germany
Agree.
t. Bavarian

Enjoy your freedums, Mr 56%.