You: Lolicon is drawn child pornographic

You: Lolicon is drawn child pornographic
Them: So if you play GTA, would you be a criminal?

How do you respond to their argument?

Other urls found in this thread:

crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2017/11/21-1/rurouni-kenshin-manga-author-charged-with-possession-of-child-pornography
thailawforum.com/blog/us-citizen-arrested-for-cartoon-pornography-in-canada
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4220648/Man-tried-child-porn-Japanese-sex-doll.html
vice.com/en_ca/article/dpkk5w/criminalizing-cartoons-how-the-law-is-dealing-with-anime-child-pornography-in-canada
knowyourmeme.com/photos/1005866-Sup
twitter.com/AnonBabble

neither of those are arguments

No images should be illegal to possess. This is AMERICA, goddammnit

jews are not going to give up their primary weapon to ruin the lives of single white men.
that's as they continue to sexualize children

lol jews :-)

lolicon isn't even jewish, you fucking retard

as much as I think pedos are total trash, people who fap to 2d lolis while being disgusting and such, they hurt no one, so it should be allowed

Why would I ever need to respond? I like fat, hairy 2D milfs and cakes, doesn't mean I want to fuck a hairy landwhale. Why would I believe that they'd want to put up with real children?

so you 're saying it's fine to draw little children getting fucked because it "hurts no one" despite the fact that several notorious pedophiles got inspiration from lolicon?

You dumbass, he means they won't allow child porn to be legal because it is easy to ruin lives with.

actually they are not children, but drawings
you cannot fuck a drawing, and if imagining stuff is offence now, then world nuclear anihillation
>despite the fact that several notorious pedophiles got inspiration from lolicon?
proofs, as usual

I wouldn't, its true. No harm done, who cares. If anything having outlets might prevent those people from doing anything to real people.
Keep it a hidden secret, we do not need or should accept pedophilia as normal or ok, but as long they dont actually do anything who cares.
GTA does not make you a criminal, would be a damn dumb argument to say otherwise.

ask me how i know you're both pedophiles

THEY want everything to be criminal so they can selectively punish people as they see fit.

nice ad hom
because we believe that as long as you hurt no one you can do whatever?
not really, no
not even ironic lolbertarian, it is just you have issue with drawings, they offend you and you want to ban them, which is unreasonable
why not ban stuff that actually hurts people, like tobacco, or loans?

>why should we be allowed to depict murdr in fiction? Don't you know several notorious murderers got inspiration from fiction?
>You disagree with me? Ask me how I know you're both murderers.

What annoys me is that so much shit gets labeled loli nowadays

Like, if you like skinny girls with smaller tits, that's basically automatically labeled loli even if they're of age

I want sauce. Story? Maximum cringe, please.

shut up, goy!

people who play gta have the natural instinct for causing chaos and being competitive (normal)

people who fap to loli have the instinct to fuck children (abnormal)

question: is Megumin a loli now or not?
I want to wait until I can fap to her legally

crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2017/11/21-1/rurouni-kenshin-manga-author-charged-with-possession-of-child-pornography

I have absolutely no problem with people making or consuming fiction. The current law in the UK is retarded with respect to giving cartoons human rights.

Go to adv
Sage

A person who watches Japanese pornographic cartoons isn't a criminal. He is still a shithead though.
Besides, crime is a grey area, there is a whole millennia old genre of a noble bandit. Being attracted to prepubescent children totally isn't.

>giving cartoons human rights.
this is you on jews
soon they will try to give rights to sexbots, it already began

Preferring girlchildren is completely normal.
She's a woman. And besides is also a chuni bitch.
Possessing images is not a crime.

>possession of child pornographic is not a crime even though it's illegal

what crack are you on, pedo?

Post lolis
>b-but officer I swear she is 500 years old!

>Videogames are responsible for murder and school shootings
>Cartoon Pornography is responsible for child abuse and molestation

>Possessing images is not a crime.
It is a product of most vile debasement of children. Would you say that getting things produced via slave labour is A-Ok as long as you aren't the one who runs the place?

Canonically 14.
Have a Suwako.

I don't doubt it. The Amendments to the Coroners Act 2010 places drawn media in the same category as rape mementos. It's quite extraordinary. To date, it's been used as a holding charge during investigations into real noncing, but the potential still remains to bust you for possession of fiction.

We do get most of our shit from Chinese slave labor.

sucks for you humanfags
feels good liking something that doesnt particularly resemble a real living being

here, have some OC porn, now you are illegal

yes i would be a criminal, if i could get away with it. by enjoying lolicon you admit you would rape a loli if you could get away with it.

14 in first season, now 15 so actually legal in Poland but I will wait one more year, I am gentleman after all
m'lady
but those are drawings, not photos, where is vile deed here?
not to be pedo apologist but if someone claimed one of these ye olde naked paintings was pedo art, would it really have any repercussions?
>The Amendments to the Coroners Act 2010 places drawn media in the same category as rape mementos
this is awful

kek

Thanks for the frog have a Remimimimimimimimimi

>by enjoying lolicon you admit you would rape a loli if you could get away with it.
??
by enjoying porn you admit ... ?
logic, sense pls

lolicon isnt child pornography

it is in legal way in some countries
but then, in some countries you can legally be a pedo and no one cares

I don't think I've actually heard of anyone getting charged for lolicon, aside from when they had real cp and the lolicon was just nrought to the forefront of reporting.

lolis are for show in most animes

its perfect logic, we pursue things that we cannot in real life in our media. if i could fuck a big booty slut in the ass i would, but no girls will touch me and im too lazy to put in the effort, thus porn. if you enjoy lolicon, then in some form youve fantasized about it in real life. its sick. less bad than actually touching kids, but it clearly shows the drive to do so is there.

>by enjoying money you admit you would robb money if you could get away with it
That was fucking dumb

>I don't think I've actually heard of anyone getting charged for lolicon

stop denying reality

ask anyone if they could rob a bank and keep all the money and never have to pay for that crime, and they would all say that they would. dont lie to yourself senpai

There was a famous Auz case with a guy going to jail solely over Simpsons porn. The judges summing up was farcical "If this had be real, it would have represented a serious crime agains children". But yeah, it's mostly a holding charge for now. Like police really need more of those.

>if you enjoy lolicon
I dont as I do not watch them, but for the sake of discussion: what about people who self insert as raped lolis or other deviants?

> what about people who self insert as raped lolis or other deviants

they don't exist

You are implying that everyone is a criminal because they enjoy money.

>If this had be real, it would
really shit application of law, charging for crime that never happened
it is only step away from pressing charges for being killed in vidya

thailawforum.com/blog/us-citizen-arrested-for-cartoon-pornography-in-canada
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4220648/Man-tried-child-porn-Japanese-sex-doll.html
vice.com/en_ca/article/dpkk5w/criminalizing-cartoons-how-the-law-is-dealing-with-anime-child-pornography-in-canada

do you know where you are? go visit Sup Forums Sup Forums and other boards

that doesn't prove the claim you made

>Lolicon is drawn child pornographic
but no children were used, so it's not the same way that murdering pixels in GTA is not murdering people

Anything degenerate is Jewish

Sause?

wait, are we having serious discussion?
rule of thumb is:
>if you can name a fetish, someone have it
there is guy who faps to floor tiles somewhere out there

Kobato from Haganai.

if you're going to go to such stupid lengths for an argument, you can say there are consequences in gta when you do criminal activity.

That's the difference between you (nigger) and me (white), no matter how warped and disgusting our desires are only one of us can recognize they're wrong and have control over them, that's what separate a criminal (who gave into wrong temptations) from normal person (who finds acceptable alternative to vent - a hobby).

man i dont fucking know, i think a lot of fetishes are just the psyche trying to take back control of bad feelings/memories. like how some guys "like" being humiliated by girls, when that guy has probably been humiliated by women most of his life and his brain makes him enjoy it to ease his suffering. maybe they were raped or victimized and try turn that memory into a positive, just a guess.

yes. most people are capable of criminality if pushed far enough, or given too much freedom(i.e. no laws n shiet to keep them in check)

"For some individuals, it might be a gateway to pornography that depicts real children, or to sexual contact offenses,"

Thoughtcrime is death.

>there is guy who faps to floor tiles somewhere out there

another claim which you will never be able to prove

stop grasing at straws, ivan

Thanks man!

Slide thread. Sage.
Criminals are so when they act upon it. Pedophiles are defined by attraction to children.
Fuck off, memeflag shill.

>Pedophiles are defined by attraction to children.

and lolicon are defined by attraction to children

found it for you and not ivan
I do not believe psychology at all, but that makes some sense

>and lolicon are defined by attraction to children
wrong, to drawings that represent children

knowyourmeme.com/photos/1005866-Sup Forums

now fuck off, you're clearly underage as you have no experience with the world and reek of unbearable naivety

Yes, retard.
I know the lolicon means pedo. Only you would think I don't. Since you learned it yesterday with the memo.

>found it for you

you didn't find shit, you saved that abomination on your hard drive, made a pathetic and obscure claim (one that you can "prove") and know you believe it'll validate all your previous shitty claims

prove this claim, pedo

you seem awfully upset by the fact that lolicons are pedophiles

Technically child porn shouldn't be illegal either. The word and intent of the first is pretty fucking clear. It's not like the idea of what they were writing was lost of them. The Marquis de Sade was a thing at the time. They were not strangers to the depths of some perversions.
There's a practical angle to it also. Why are we criminalizing the production and anonymous distribution of evidence? That's the only way some cases are solved, some missing people are found. There's a database in DC right now with the names of 600k+ children on it who are not being looked for, cold cases that will probably never be solved. What if some pervert saw one of those kids while he was consuming at filth and recognized them? Would you want him to keep that nugget under his hat out of fear of arrest, or would you want him to go to the cops? People bashed on Milo for not trying to gather evidence while he was at that Hollywood party, but the mere production of that evidence would've been breaking the law as well. I get that it's vile, but a deficiency I've noticed in other people is that they confuse their disgust with a crime with the crime's actual severity. We shouldn't treat a child's rape as something above and beyond the pale in comparison to murder, nubile rape, or any other victimizing crime, and our doing so is going to get people (children) killed, all because we can't grow up and act like adults in adult situations like policy making.

>you didn't find shit, you saved that abomination on your hard drive
I did just now, after typing "tile lover Sup Forums" into google
and what is obsession with claims? also, not a pedo, they are disgusting, but so are you
why are you not against Bulhakov "Lolita" ?

But I don't make that arguement

when are you going to prove the claim you made, dipshit


stop grasping at straws

I feel over and got my head real hard yesterday, I have a golf ball knot on my head and tunnel vision, I can not walk straight, I am thinking of going to the doctor after work. This Loli it's garbage, shadman 10/10

this is bad thread, ancap memeflag tries to ban stuff because his feefees are hurt by it

Hi Destiny.

I did and you just threw explanation away because it does not suit your agenda and narrative
no reason for arguments now, time for smug anime images

I was actually convinced by Justicar.
He's that gay cop guy on Youtube. I don't like Destiny. I saw like 30 seconds of his bit with Jonny boy before tabbing out. Someone like Justicar at least has a reason to be a smug prick beyond being a slightly educated star craft nerd.

Ah, I think that is pretty accurate.
> horse riding from my tenth to my eighteenth.
> when girls wants to switch assigned horse, they ask me
> some found they could whip me either instead of asking
> more girls was more effective
> I quickly started to enjoy this

Now, like I am 30 something, I am still fucked up. Pain or suffering is easy to revert into pleasure. My girlfriend is understanding though.

>I did

you didn't prove shit, your claim was "there are people who self-insert as the children getting raped" and you haven't proved that

you fucking retard, pedos are genuinely dumber than muslims

Isn't the argument that CP is used to groom kids? It came up a couple of times in passing during To Catch A Predator in fact. A show where the cops went to great lengths to distinguish between fantasists in a chatroom and felons leaving their basements to meet minors.

Also i will shoot pedophiles, I've killed two the cops don't care

>memo
Explain

still not a pedo just because you say so, also, you are obviously newfaggot if you do not know such basic thing about this taiwanese tapestry knitting forum as the fact that it is inhabited by shitton of sexual deviants

i identify as the children getting raped
his claim has now been proved. what are you going to do now niggerboy?
also
>drawn child pornographic
learn how to englando

It might be, but the thing is that I don't see how that purpose can't be served just as readily by normal pornography, if the predator in question is trying to convince a kid to mimic behavior.

Who would let this hypothetical kid use the internet unsupervised anyway?

when are you going to prove your retarded claim?

here, some guy was found
will you just ignore it again because it does not suit your narrative?

>causing chaos and being competitive

ummm so murder on a massive scale is ok so long as you dont fuck a girl who is 12-18 years old?

Those girls get fucked regardless once they hit puberty...

As a father I would much rather marry my daughter off young, it would be better for her too.

This slut culture just means they get fucked by 10 guys by the time they are 16 rather then having one husband and a stable family life.

Sure, it's more that's why CP is considered more than just a bunch of pictures/videos. It's an aggravated offence.

why are you refusing to prove the claim you made?

DISCLAIMER
I still find pedos disgusting, but banning drawings just because somebody panics over them is disgusting as well

what are you doing now, you invented new fallacy or just plain shitposting? I cannot even tell anymore