Why has /leftypol/ been shilling so hard against him lately?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You can say this about anybody remotely conservative and have the same validity

Not sure.

>/leftypol/ been shilling so hard against him
wtf i love cleaning my room now

He had a "trainwreck" interview with some dumb thot on channel 4 news, a Britfat tv show.

>exhibit a

youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54
Here. He BTFO of some dimwitted Sjew hole on national tv and the lefturds are triggered AF

He got himself back in the public eye after doing an interview with some stupid cunt who's entire argument was "Thank's for that detailed point, but what you really believe is that wymmym should get back in the kitchen huh?" Like said, a fucking trainwreck where her argument was that moron in the car who tries to drive over the tracks and gets T-boned by the train.

What's the story on this guy? I've been here for years and haven't seen his picture until a week ago (memes of the interview with the blind British lass), but I didn't click on any of those threads or watch the interview until tonight. Did he pop up out of nowhere? What should I watch of his next? Is the book good?

no jordan
your reverse psychology is dumb

He was saying the gender pay gap doesn't exist.

You should watch everything of his so you’ll finally realize how shitty and useless your life and this board are and improve your life

>never heard of Jordan Peterson
>been here for years
Pick one

Peterson is Canadian you tard.
He's a mystic, a new Carl Jung, and an unironic Presuppositionalist.

It's reasonable. I've seen him posted over and over again but I don't go for the whole e-celeb craze so I never really bothered finding anything out about him until this interview brought the lulz.

Because he speaks the truth in very matter of fact terms which laypeople can understand.
He is a direct threat to progressive policies and the potential stopgap to the movement.
(((They))) know.

He's a Cucknadian professor who refused categorically to use mentally ill pronouns because he considered Canada's Bill C-16 (along with the implications of their general "hate speech" code) to be an attempt to forcibly coerce individuals to alter their language. This obviously got him in a huge storm of shit which quickly made him internet famous and put his name in the news, later on a substitute teacher (pretty qt too) got shitcanned for having the audacity to play one of his debates without spinning him to be a literal demon spawned by the Alt-Right, and now most recently he completely humiliated the Channel 4 cunt.

So here I am watching a Jordan Peterson interview because I hate myself apparently, and he is introduced as an opponent of post modernism, among other things. And he's asked about his take on an interview he recently did on Channel four, which made the interviewer come off rather poorly.

Yet what is the first thing he does in his analysis? He starts to talk about his experience of being interviewed. His experience of being in the make-up chair along side her, and so on. His starting point is… his viewpoint, his experience. One would almost be tempted to call it his subjectivity. Is this not to a significant degree exactly what pomo is about?

Maddening.

their rooms are a total fucking mess

>Canada's hate speech code
It's hard to believe sometimes just how close the world has gotten to rampant prosecution for thought crime. You'd think people at large would be a lot more outraged about it.

Don't listen to him. Literally everything he ever said can be summarized in these two sentences:
>I am a psychoanalyst and I tell you that your brain chemistry craves goals to be achieved in order for you to be happy.
>Yes life is philosophically meaningless but happiness still comes from noble goals and you should be happy for the time you are existing.

he is a cult leader for brainlet kekistani college kids

He’s the last character assassination they can’t carry out.

They haven't fought or bled for it, they barely even understand the meaning of it. Why would it outrage them when they can hardly conceptualize the value of speech, of freedom, of self-sovereignty?

It's because he absolutely destroyed that cunt at the CBC and now they're doing damage control

>Is this not to a significant degree exactly what pomo is about?
>Isn't a person in an interview explaining this personal experience Post-Modernism.
No.
It absolutely is not, you brainlet red bastard.

You're right better to just be a decadent nihilist instead.

Because his interview with Cathy Newman got millions of views - that kind of exposure draws out all sorts of views from all sorts of different people.

He's a hack

>He's a mystic
A career that includes: like 7k references to his published research, working as a professor at Harvard and U of T., published books, etc.

>Presuppositionalist
He references other religions both pre-Christian and non-western in his works.

>meme flag
Explains the mental retardation you suffer from.

No, I actually agree that he is right about the brain chemistry. What I am saying is that everyone should simply either believe what I wrote, or check it out for themselves, JBP is not saying anything more than these two sentences. No 2 hours rants are needed to understand this.

WRONG. He picks his words very carefully user, didn't you listen to the interview? He says it exists, but it's entirelt due to female ineptitude where regards basic work-place competance and their silly inherent disregard for careers outside of the care sector.

I like the cut of his jib; especially more than a fucking idiot on Channel 4.

>asked about something he experienced
>begins talking about it from the point of view of his own personal experience
Wow that really baked my noodle bucko.

>isn't this what pomo is about
Is that really what it's all about? That personal experiences exists? And what do you consider your oppositions position to be? That personal experiences don't exist?

really like that interview with the poo from netherlands. he said something along the lines
>they said I have a troll army attacking cathy
>a voice in my head said " and what if I do? what happens if I march to their building and burn it down"
cant wait for bucko to start purging bloody neo marxists

Yes, partly. "narratives", discourses, and linguistics (derrida / deconstruction), power relations, and criticism

dr layman has a good vid on it

Its simple. He is very effective. They hate that.

Are you the oldfag in the 157777777 thread with the Seinfeld images?

Worse than that, he's shown himself to be completely immune to the usual tirade of logical fallacies. He won't ever be allowed back on British TV again.

>thats_the_joke.tiff

What the fuck are you talking about cunt? The Georgecostanza.jpeg reaction image is as old as Sup Forums.

So you are saying "cathynewmaning" is now a verb?

Bugger off, tosser.

absholutely codified

Are you Cathy Newmaning him?

They're afraid

JP plays both the "left" and the "right" to make money off of everybody, he's a centrist liberal that just wants to be alone to make money, the kind of person that pretends politics doesn't affect him caus he's successful.

even worse then that: even with their combined rick & morty trained intellect they cant tackle him. the left always proclaims how intellectual superior they are and now they dont even dare to debate him

Anklebiter

That's the thing, so far right wingers have been trying to convince commies that they were wrong.
They have to be removed from power by force, even gassing all commies might be necessary. Force, not arguments. You cannot argue with a post modernist (zombie) neo marxist (evil, determined).

>because I hate myself apparently
Yes, you have yourself, you are full of (fake) class guilt. And you are expecting redemption by betraying your fellow class members (white people) to our enemies (blacks and third world migrants.).

>/leftypol/
but peterson is a leftist?

I would not be considered white according to Nurenburg race laws.

For someone who theoretically understands Nietzsche, has read Solzhenitsyn, and ought to know the historical roots of the shoah, he pretends to ignorance of antisemitism with such seriousness that I have to assume that he's not being too genuine about the breadth and depth of his knowledge on the subject.

Did you just Mel Gibson me?

strawman.
One of your (nonbiological) grandparents were mexican?

Jewish.

SO, CHANNEL 4 - THAT'S THE BLOODY THING WITH CHANNEL 4. IT'S NO JOKE. LIKE- IT'S LIKE YOU DECIDE- OK, SO LET'S SAY YOU TURN IN AN ESSAY AND YOU GET A PRETTY POOR GRADE YOU KNOW, AND YOU FEEL IT'S NOT THE GRADE YOU THINK YOU DESERVED. NOW YOU'VE ENCOUNTERED AN ANOMALY. YOU'VE COME DOWN FROM THE TREES AND YOU'RE LOOKING AT A SNAKE. THE GUY WITH THE BIGGEST STICK WILL BE PRETTY POPULAR WITH THE LADIES, MIGHT I ADD, BECAUSE HE'S THE GUY THAT'S FIGURED OUT HOW TO KEEP EVERYONE SAFE. AND YOU'RE SITTING THERE LOOKING AT THIS GUY, OK, AND YOU THINK TO YOURSELF, THAT LOOKS DANGEROUS. AND IT BLOODY WELL IS. WELL YOU HAVE A CHOICE. AND BY THE WAY THE FIRST MONKEY WHO LEARNED HE CAN HOLD A STICK IN A RAIN STORM AND MAKE A FIRE STICK, THAT GUY WAS PRETTY POPULAR WITH THE LADIES TOO AS YOU CAN WELL IMAGINE. WELL SO YOU HAVE A CHOICE. YOU CAN DROP THE CLASS, HELL, YOU CAN DROP OUT OF UNIVERSITY, DROP OUT OF SOCIETY, DROP OUT OF LIFE. IT'S A SLIPPERY SLOPE EH. AND BELIEVE ME, BUCKO, THAT IS NOT. A ROUTE. YOU WANT. TO GO DOWN. IF YOU FOLLOW IT ALL THE WAY DOWN, YOU CAN EXTRAPOLATE THE RESULTS OF A BAD GRADE ALL THE WAY TO GENOCIDE. AND THAT'S NO JOKE.

I just hate him because he is a kike lover and a shill

Faggots with messy rooms, user
JBP is /ourguy/

Clean your room lobster boy now donate and pay me for a personality test.

He's a leaf faggot

I read it in his voice

good job

psst kiddo. wanna buy a carpet?

10/10

it's not lefty pol
it's oldfags who don't want your cult of personality reddit shit here

We haven't been shilling against clean your room talking head. You all are just paranoid.

pomo appears to make the claim that everything is entirely subjective

Jordan's position is very different, something of a narrative theory of truth which runs along the lines that a narrative that integrates facts, personal experience, and experience of cultures in successfully existing over time is the most true thing

You could describe the Peterson narrative as a combination of judeo-christian narrative, evolutionary biology, and Jungian and psychoanalytic psychology

he's staying away from it so he can stay in the spotlight, whether its for monetary reasons or because he genuinely believes he's fighting for a good cause is up to you. you can't just go name the jew, he'd be destroyed immediately. we aren't there yet.

Because they have nothing.
The left, including /leftypol/, have no idea what they like, who to admire, indeed not even who they are. They're a husk, a shell of a person, the NPC's of our time.

They do that to everyone who isn't a literal communist, and to many who are, but just happen to run afoul of the wrong commie's opinion at some random time.

Marxism is totalitarianism, and totalitarianism rules through terror.

Peterson is a Chinese zoo vet; instead of closing the filthy bare concrete enclosure, he gives the poor animals behavioral management strategies and jeers at them with lobsters.

Inevitably, the animals are irreversibly behaviorally destroyed by the enclosure. Peterson's interventions are only going to help for a while. Eventually the animals are just going to start gnawing at one another.

>appeal to authority
top kek, tell me more about how a psychologist's take on history and politics is actually academic in the slightest

wtf I love buckoism now

because he's winning

He's pretty smart eh?

The OP is the type of mind who falls under control of this idealogue. A mind that cannot think, in any appreciable sense. Criticism of this guy, who acts as a surrogate father to his pitiable followers, results in a thread like this -- an expression of fanatacisim. Meanwhile, this guy has nothing to say, except that whites should grovel before jews.

Because not a single one of his arguments in that Cathy Newman interview has been proven false.

Because between their shitty cashier retail job and shaking their fist at the bourgeois, they have nothing better to do.

...

Tbf cathy newman is a brainlet

True.
The reason that leftypol is fuming however is that they too can't dismantle his arguments.
They'd shill studies everywhere if they could, instead they're having a mental gymnastic meltdown.

what is lefty pol

...

Because that interview he did with that feminist a week ago has over 3 million views on youtube.

Read the comments. EVERYONE is sick of feminism. So now they are trying to tarnish the man who won the debate.

An alternate universe.

Because he's an anti-Communist.

Think about where you are right now.
A right-wing agora full of ideas old and new, relentless debate without a single regard for diplomacy.
Now imagine the opposite.
A left-wing hive with one unchallengeable ideology, unadulterated hatred for that which is different and obsessed with all sorts of tactics including extremely subversive diplomacy to the point of destroying debate before seeing a chance of winning.
That's leftypol.

They've admitted as much themselves: the only strategy they have that seems to gain any meaningful traction on here is discrediting conservative voices online and in the media by slandering them and pressing for independent creators to be dismissed as merely "e-celebs". The reality is these people are the strongest weapon Sup Forums has. Hate people like Milo, Shapiro, Warski etc. all you want, but without them this "culture war" being waged would not be nearly as successful as it has been up to now.

It is in the MSMs and the left's interests to disarm this movement as best it can, and they are aiming to achieve this by using Sup Forums's cynicism against itself. Do not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

>leaf intellectuals

sage

This also.

Fuck if Peterson is a "boomer" or doesn't address the JQ, he is a well-spoken, cogent voice attacking the very heart of the rot in Western societies. He is measured, effective, and they do not like it.

/leftypol/ hates idpol as much as Sup Forums does tho. There are many things commies and Sup Forums disagree on, pretty much everything else, but on the topic on idpol being shit both sides are pretty much in unison as commies think it's a capitalist plot to prevent class consciousness from spreading and Sup Forums believes it talmudic 4D chess to kill the goyim. Eitherway they might not like peterson being he's rightwing but I doubt they'd find a problem with him shitting on idpol for 30minutes solid.

>class consciousness
This is one of the most humorous parts of the leftypol world view to me. It's as if to them it is simply impossible that I could be aware that there are people in a higher class than myself without being outraged that life isn't fair, or without being convinced that it's been stolen from me.

Yet class consciousness revolves around one's financial class defining him, being his identity.
How can leftypol be against identity politics while relying on it for the core of its arguments?

This. No one's perfect, but he's close. The man is what the west needs right now.

Our heroes must be degenerate porn-obsessed gamers like Vee and Sargon, never anyone of real imitable character.

Met him today. He's nice.

I'm jealous.

...

Because they argue all other forms of identity/consciousness are ideological spooks and that class consciousness is the only rational one because it is based on materialistic evidence. Just like Sup Forums makes a similar case but around race and relying on biology studies/theories to argue their case.

In truth everyone dabbles into idpol a little , but when it is used by chanfags it typically means the more modern version of it (sjws, trannies, special snowflakes of all ilks) as opposed to the old fashioned commie vs race realist dichotomy of the early 20th century. It's basically oldfagging on an ebin scale, but not irrational. At least I can respect old commies for being consistent with their economic determinism and perspective. Sjws and neolibtards just change their argument every 5 seconds (I have a female brain, no wait its the hormones, no wait its societal pressure, no wait its genetics, no wait there are no true expression of xy/xx chromosome pairing and its all a spectrum, no wait its...).

jordan is that you?

whadda ya think? they apply divide and conquer tactics to anyone who might have real life effects