Why are extreme left wingers so based and redpilled on some subjects?
Cause we are smarter than you.
Yeah we know you think agreeing with leftist garbage means you are smarter.
It does not.
I fucking hate when I get duped into clicking a link to this guy's videos, shit cringy aesthetic, shit video and audio quality, soyboy, oversized suit jacket.
Yeah i know, i also can't stand this shithead. I clicked on this video expecting some retarded liberal logic but instead he had some solid points.
What a faggot looks like he stole the modern warfare 2 logo
Topkek
You're so (((educated))) you can't detect nuance and sarcasm.
He actually wants to win but doesn't know how because he doesn't have a firm grasp on Jewish and nigger behavior. He can't explain why the U.S. can't have the same things as every other "modern" (white) nation. He can't explain U.S. foreign policy. He can't explain shit.
People who think like him are honestly fertile ground for conversion once you explain they can only achieve their goals in the context of a fully hwhite nation.
And people like you are almost ready to swallow the final red pill, aka realizing that its about IQ and not race, and that this only incidentally means that the most successful nations will be almost exclusively white or asian.
Whites with subpar IQ will get the gas just as niggers will, and high IQ niggers will be allowed in just like whites.
HOLY SHIT someone has opinions that aren't all exclusive to one ideology???
IQ is the main component.
It's also thousands of other genes that culminate to make group averages and long tails. Group averages and long tails completely dictate the type of cultures and civilizations formed by those groups. Basic biology 101 (forbidden by communism).
>genetics dictate culture
Based lesbian
I can tell you are really young by how retarded your comment is :)
Imaging a world with only genetically superior individuals, it's going to be either heaven or hell on earth. Besides, who's to say you won't be exterminated as well? You might think you are intelligent and have a higher IQ than normal, but where is the line traced? Who should be considered intellectually acceptable and who shouldn't?
Regardless, while it does play a major role, intelligence is not the only trait which defines a succesful society, you should know that.
For example.
If the only difference was low IQ, that would be very manageable. The problem is that certain races carry genes prone to violence and uncontrolled psychotic outbursts at a higher rate. That small higher rate translates into an incredibly large number of innocent people suffering at the hands of violence. High IQ blacks are the first to escape it as they should. They either die by the violence or escape it. Whites have higher rates of empathy and are so much easier to manipulate through emotions which is why Jewish propaganda works. High IQ blacks literally need high white populations to exist in in order to have peace and upward mobility. That's why high IQ blacks are more likely to become republican, anti-open borders, anti-white-genocide.
You faggots are turning this country into a 3rd world shithole
They 100% do. Genetics are the basis of all humans. Humans given their genetic differences (intelligence, behaviors, pioneering, aggression, individualism, cooperation) are what bring cultures into existence. Groups of humans define societal cultures. Genetics => cultures => feedback loops of genes+cultures over time as the proportion of differences changes within the population's breeding and survival against external forces.
You're probably raised by communist theory if you don't understand this basic relationship.
MAO-A linked violent behavior depends partially on other factors like alcohol and drug use. It's not black and white.
Culture is by definition passed down by learning.
>muh communism
Not an argument.
Your pic means that Im correct though. The best possible society wouldnt consist of just whites, but instead of a mix of like 98% white and 2% black, where everything that isnt inside the rectangle is either kicked out or exterminated (inb4 edgy). There is literally no use in creating an ethnostate over a high-IQ-state.
Funny isnt it. I can tell how retarded your comment is just by looking at your flag. No need to even go on reading.
>a world with only genetically superior individuals
>only superior
How the fuck would they be superior then? Its not about selecting "superior" people, its about selecting people who are good enough to meet whatever standard you wish to adhere to.
Also in that regard I care less about what actually happens to me. In the end as long as I keep working hard and putting my genes to work I can be happy, and if that still isnt enough to make my life worthwhile for society then so be it.
Also dont underestimate IQ. Its a very good predictor for the success of people as well as groups of people.
I bet you're a Rick and Morty fan.
Nothing is black and white. The worst 2R variant is far higher in blacks. It results in horrific crime and failed states worldwide. Add low IQ averages in and it's a failure to start civil societies. Blacks in general never formed anything resembling "western civilization" nor some basic technologies that we take for granted. Throughout all of a history. Only communist-brainwashed leftists have an unfair distorted perception that thinks blacks must conform to western ideals when it wasn't evolutionarily logical in the first place, and that throwing money at the problem and displacing "whiteness" will help instead of hurt the world. High IQ blacks want to live in white western civilization, which is predicated on whites existing as a clear majority.
I remember being 16 once.
Yes, I was agreeing. I wanted to add the important point that there are also other damaging aspects genetically. Theoretically if it were only lower IQ averages but less aggression (higher peace) that wouldn't be a big problem so long as whites remain the vast majority and not much mixing occurs.
Feg
False. Learning is entirely depending on brains. Brains and thoughts are governed by genetics as a platform. The thousands of different emotions and actions you choose instinctively are all heavily shaped genetically. From natural retardation to natural genius and everything in between.
Culture is built on top of that platform. Culture is a coat of paint placed on the men and women who make up the groups.
very thought provoking - i think of Haiti and sub-saharan africa devoid of any modern development, save for what Europeans built and left there. i want to learn more about the 2 R Variant - you have linx or resources to point me in the right direction?
I don't have my usual stash of redpills at hand. There's already a blackout by genetics researchers trying to cover up race research from the public and making radical tongue-tied dismissals once it's discovered. Like usual.
Haiti and other sub-Saharan populations is without self-made modern development because white western civilization requires a mix of internal peace (manageable aggression) and intelligence that was specific to the effects of white genetics (and in the 20th century mimicked effectively by Japan and South Korea post-war). A nation can have millions of geniuses but if a violent minority of the population is large enough it will drag the whole down into destabilized, failed states. No matter how much money is thrown at it. Stability requires internal peace and order. Today's radical feminists and communists employ the cultural lens of communist western bias without acknowledging let alone understanding the genetic reason those cultures ever formed. They place this perception on to Haiti. The only logical excuse their pea-size brains can make up to explain Haiti is that they're "being oppressed" and "money will solve everything". Then extremist positions form against whites successfully developing. And so the explanation to low IQs becomes "white oppression" must be holding us back. Thanks to a steady diet of (((communist))) fakenews, education, entertainment.
>Person that fits a label is special
>Specific ideas are labeled as 'redpilled'
Jesus you're fucking stupid.
That actually makes sense, regardless, the today consumerism (demand) and production rate (supply) of our modern globalized world and by extent, of the stability of industrialised countries depend on the explotation of what you so like to call - shitskins, subhumans, niggers, etc -
You make a society with only intelligent individuals, they won't accept being placed on the end of the pyramid - and if they do, it won't be under the same inhuman conditions chinese workers have to endure - as pretty as a eugenic IQ cleanse in the world may seem - it would not come without change - make sure - economies, governments, society would colapse
Whites genetically have the sweet spot of high tail geniuses (above Asians), empathy, individualism, solid technological averages, and pioneering. History was a bitch for whites like it was for other races. Whites warred out their differences. All leading to these times of peace. Now hostile (((elements))) want enough white genocide to collapse America and Europe into a one world government slave class.
Eugenics will bring a nightmare to the world. Solely because the groups owning it will solidify power to the detriment of real men, real women, real families, and western civilization. States will gain unprecedented control over breeding. It starts benign with choices like eye color (today) and ends in anti-family tyranny. Christianity will be, again, one of the only remaining checks against anti-family NWO tyranny.
>A democratic socialist hating neoliberals is redpilled