Does anyone here NOT believe in evolution?

Does anyone here NOT believe in evolution?

I want to gauge how retarded y'all are

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=oYp5XuGYqqY&t=681s
dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5205097/Mother-34-claims-flu-vaccine-destroyed-life.html
sciencemag.org/news/2017/09/new-study-finds-link-between-flu-vaccine-and-miscarriage-it-real
slideplayer.com/slide/4929634/
newscientist.com/article/2082278-artificial-cell-designed-in-lab-reveals-genes-essential-to-life/
nature.com/articles/nbt.2958
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You use your senses and cognitive functions to judge whether a theory is correct or not. These sense and cognitive functions are the product of evolution. Evolution is solely informed by passing off of genes. These genes do not care what is accurate or true, if a misinterpretation of events result in successful passing on, then it's good enough. This phenomena can be shown like how some Australian Beetle tries to mate with beer bottles, or a persons own sexual attraction to cartoon pictures or porn videos. It's not real, it is all just shortcuts your brain uses in a attempt to successfully breed. Your senses and cognitive function, as dictated by the rules of evolution therefore are not informed by a objective reality or "truth", but by merely sexual selection and happenstance....

Survival and breeding ≠ Objective Reality.

Here's a video more in depth about this phenomena.

youtube.com/watch?v=oYp5XuGYqqY&t=681s

Darwin was a Jew
/Thread

Interesting

...

Believe in evolution, deny that some "humans" are more evolved than others.

I'm reprogramming my DNA in real time.

...

...

...

explain why humans havent evolved then

...

Evolution is an inherently racist ideology

...

...

...

...

Plenty of creatures are from 100 million years ago and still have not changed. Its just propaganda to make us think we are shitty and low life's.

...

Shutup you monkey!

...

Wat?

Evolution is completely observable in the modern era. None of these are remotely scientific nor do they disprove evolution at all.

Humans have evolved many times. High altitude populations have adapted to breathe more efficiently.

White skin evolved when darker skinned people moved to areas with less sunlight and needed more vitamin D to survive.

1/4 people will never develop wisdom teeth

Lactose tolerence is the result of evolution

...

Communists don't.

You have to be trolling.

Yet still you cannot provide proof...

We are racists BECAUSE we believe in evolution.

...

>Evolution is completely observable in the modern era

prove your claim

The fact that you need to get a new flu vaccine every year is proof of evolution

...

>hurr durr durr our planet was dust an shietttt and exploded,

evolution tards are fucking stupid.

Here's what I think: Eating non-kosher things like shellfish is a no-no.

Bacteria and Viruses.

Three toed skinks have evolved live birth

Darwin’s Finches

The Peppered Moth

These are only a few among many examples

He just did provide proof you massive idiots
Those are substantiated by changes in your genome and the way an organism produces proteins to make it more suitable to live in a given environment
I'm really hoping this is some kind of next level trolling and that people that dense do not actually exist on this godforsaken plant

this gon b gud

All of this is completely false. Numerous scientific papers validate the existense of ancient human relatives in Africa, Europe, and Asia

>The fact that you need to get a new flu vaccine every year

dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5205097/Mother-34-claims-flu-vaccine-destroyed-life.html

sciencemag.org/news/2017/09/new-study-finds-link-between-flu-vaccine-and-miscarriage-it-real

good goy.

haven't had a flu shot in 10 years, havent gotten the flu once

>proof of evolution

wew

was arguing the opposite

look folks, we got an intellectual here

>Bacteria and Viruses.

single celled orgaisms prove evolution of multicellular vertebrates.

no bacteria or virus has ever been observed evolving into another, just resilience to man made means of extermination, ie artificial selection.

>dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5205097/Mother-34-claims-flu-vaccine-destroyed-life.html
>sciencemag.org/news/2017/09/new-study-finds-link-between-flu-vaccine-and-miscarriage-it-real

Neither of these sources are remotely scientific

>haven't had a flu shot in 10 years, havent gotten the flu once

Good for you, that means nothing.

Viruses and Bacteria can evolve so fast that we can literally watch it happen in a lab. It has been proved 100%

It’s a half truth. It’s something that’s only been proven at the micro level not the macro.

>He just did provide proof you massive idiots
he did not

>adaptation=evolution

I guess when I work out and go from 1plate to 2plate i'm evolving huh

>just resilience to man made means of extermination, ie artificial selection.

This is literally evolution at work. Their evolution of resistence to man made methods of extermination is completely natural and they they do it on their own

>All of this is completely false

speculation, they're changing their minds all the time

the more things change they more they stay the same

there is variation, growth, decline, etc. just like with the weather, but underlying it all are fixed natural laws that do not themselves evolve

checkmate

>Does anyone here NOT believe in evolution?
There are a lot of aspects to evolution, some of which are supported by the evidence, and some are contrary to the evidence.

There is certainly a lot of adaptation that goes on, especially in the gene regulatory networks. But when you get to the biochemical evolution relating to the development of new proteins, the evidence becomes very sketchy. Likewise there is excellent evidence for speciation, but the evidence that it is due to adaptation in aggregate is broken: e.g. punctuated equilibria, which looks a lot more like incremental design rather than gradual evolution. And when it comes to origin-of-life scenarios, it starts to look really bad: even the best (RNA world scenarios) fail to propose even a *possible* let alone actual pathway to a cell.

>I want to gauge how retarded y'all are
In general, litmus tests are a poor way of arriving at the truth, and are foolish to employ.

>thinks artificial selection= evolution

yea I bet you think breeding dogs with thick winter coats is evolution too.

> underlying it all are fixed natural laws that do not themselves evolve

proof

>I guess when I work out and go from 1plate to 2plate i'm evolving huh

Thids is completely different to the adaptation that occurs in genes. Adaptation of a the body to stresses suchs as heavy weights is not evolution.

Adaptation of genes over multiple generations is evolution.

You have no interest in evidence, you will automatically dismiss anything that contradicts your position with inane half truths or moving the goal post by requiring impossible standards of evidence.

Selective breeding of animals is possible, replace selective with natural pressures from the environment you got the fundamental mechanism of evolution.

If you had any, I mean any interest in proof, you have already studied the methods and at least seen some sort of pattern. Instead, you don't do shit and act like a nigger with "muh buble" attached to everything.

>Viruses and Bacteria can evolve so fast that we can literally watch it happen in a lab.

but 30 years of breeding fruit flies and subjecting them to all sorts of conditions still give you fruit flies

Where can i find the entire presentation?

provides reason why he refuses to provide proof of his claim when asked.

peer review indeed

>y'all
fuckoff, hillbilly

That doesnt disprove evolution

>artificial selection= evolution

I never said that. The fact of the matter is that viruses and bacteria evolving resistences is NOT artificial selection, it is completely 100% natural.

Artificial selection is like using gene editing to remove genetic diseases from a embryo

slideplayer.com/slide/4929634/

This is Sup Forums, not some science faculty. You can also just go to sciencedirect.com and read the articles yourself.

Again, you'll start moving those goal posts pretty soon I suspect.

>yea I bet you think breeding dogs with thick winter coats is evolution too.

Its artificially performed and human influenced but if follows the same principles. If evolution didnt exist then dog breeds would not exist.

>newscientist.com/article/2082278-artificial-cell-designed-in-lab-reveals-genes-essential-to-life/

We can make cells from scratch. This picture depicts flies with repeatable mutations. These mutations don't occur randomly or according to any form of selection - they occur constantly at a steady pace and the only way of increasing the chances of the mutation is to increase the density/frequency of exposure.

In the Bible, God made man from clay - which we can now do with bioprinting;

>nature.com/articles/nbt.2958
>3D bioprinting of tissues and organs

So, what's more likely - evolution, which has never been observed, or Intelligent Design, which can re-create all the diversity of life?

accepting a belief system does not constitute proof and your need to attack hte bible also doesn't validate your argument, yet shows your ulterior motive for supporting the theory of evolution. Which is not to find truth but to denigrate the beliefs of others

>y'all
>using retard nigger speak
Found the retard

I never talk to People who dont believe in absolute truths like evolution. Best way to spot a retard is to ask him about evolution

Yes, because evolution doesnt happen that fast and they can still breed with each other. Speciation does not occur over just 30 years you fucking idiot.

proves evolutionists lie like fuck to support their theory.

>Which is not to find truth but to denigrate the beliefs of others

This is the problem with you religious types. Anything that you think goes against the bible is automatically wrong.

Did you know the Pope said that evolution is real?

>If evolution didnt exist then dog breeds would not exist.

yet dogs can breed successfully with wolves, also very slippery slope to scientific racism there

>viruses and bacteria evolving resistences
The thing is, viruses e.g. are just altering the shape of the protein capsid, and bacteria e.g. are getting chemical pumps via lateral gene transfer. As I said in my post, these kinds of things are common, but they are not evidence for the sketchier parts, such as the development of new polypeptides, new protein structures, nor do they help the origin of life problem. They only help in the simple adaptive realm, and that has only been posited to lead to macroevolution in aggregate, not observed nor demonstrated to.

Nothing in this post disproves evolution. Try again

I'm going to hate myself, but, explain.

>The Peppered Moth
implying it wasn't somatic mutation caused by environmental mutagens

This just proves that people will fake shit for attention, shit that everyone does. There are dozens of examples of real, scientifically confirmed extinct human relatives

The actual scientists suggest otherwisae.

>Speciation does not occur over just 30 years you fucking idiot.

implying 1000's of generations of fruitflies don't go by in 30 years, but if you're talking bacteria resisting the by product of other bacterias quickly then it supports evolution..convenient

>scientifically confirmed

yea just like nebraska, peking, and piltown man. oh and lucy

>The actual scientists suggest otherwisae.
what does my statement mean? what did I say in the post, explain as to a child.

>yet dogs can breed successfully with wolves

Yes, because speciation has still not occured in dogs. Evolution isnt just when new species form, its what explains why species change in responce to their environments

>also very slippery slope to scientific racism there

races exist scientifically, different people evolved different traits for different environments. This is 100% fact

>The actual scientists

the ones ith vested interest in evolution to support their politically involved royal society fellows upon whom you base your appeal to authority?

You are calling it an attack, religious people have an ulterior motive as well. Accepting their belief system doesn't constitute proof either.

This the plain and simple truth, all organisms pass on traits via reproduction, this reproduction can be guided. Plentiful examples of such, anti-biotic resistance or progressive changes in features in plants and animals via breeding. The guiding process can a natural one, claiming that no natural process can guide the progression of traits in organisms is willful ignorance at best or more likely premeditated dishonesty.

Again, you don't want proof, you want to stroke your ego.

>Evolution isnt just when new species form, its what explains why species change in responce to their environments


so again I evolved when I went to the gym earlier.

Now you are being obtuse and childish.

You're forgetting all the Devinosans, The Neandethals, Homo Erectus, Homo Heidelbergensis, Homo Florensis, and Homo Habilis

All of these are extinct human relatives that have been 100% proven to have existed

>implying 1000's of generations of fruitflies don't go by in 30 years

Doesnt mean shit. Its still not long enough in the slightest to actually form a new species.

Thats a completely different type of adaptation you literal child, how many times do you need that fact told to you?

>posts some of the best and most evolutionarily foundational modern biology research
>CHECKMATE BIOLOGISTS. BET YOU DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THIS WHEN FORMULATING YOUR """""THEORIES"""""

Actually the vast majority of scientists accept evolution as fact

>religious people have an ulterior motive as well.

which they are honest about so much so they critique eachother, see protestants vs catholics

scientism priests like to pretend theres a universal consenses based in enlightened reason and when they get btfo they just cclaim it was a theory and when their theory gets btfo "you don't know what theory means"

scientism i worst than any other religion because at least the religous zealots stic to their book as a foundation, scientists will retrofit shit anywhere to make sense of their fallacies and not nearly enough people call them out on it. And they call this science.

it's so bad many scientists just extrapolate with thought experiments and formulas they created without performing a single real experiment

>The Neandethals, Homo Erectus, Homo Heidelbergensis, Homo Florensis, and Homo Habilis

bred with humans and so anatomically modern they may as well be comsidered human, especially neanderthal who successfully reproduced with homsapiens sapiens

>not long enough in the slightest to actually form a new species.

therefore you are shit out of look in proving speciation and by extension evolution.

Agreed

>races exist scientifically,

there are scientists that disagree

>This is 100% fact

wew

>scientism

Lmao you say that like its on the same level as religion

Here's the thing., Science doesnt require belief in it for it to be true.

If all religious were wiped out, they would never form in the same way again. If all knowledge was lost, we would regain all of it exactly as it was before

ad hominem .

Prefect creatures. KEK

>completely different type of adaptation

very convenient way of dodging your" adapting to environment" bs

>modern man
>glasses and goatee soy boy
checks out