Why do so many middle class whites blindly vote against their own economic interests?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Cut Bait n fish somewhere else (( ))

>why cant i understand simple economics

Idk, maybe you're stupid?

Inbred trump supporters clearly don’t have a good grasp on economics otherwise they wouldn’t vote agaisnt their interests

I can't wait to see you post this shittier meme in February when all us middle class workers are taking home more money.. i know Nancy Pelosi called it crumbs, my wife and I consider $500/month a nice crumb.

Shill or CIA nigger

Complete lies

The only people who voted for Trump are rural and suburban retards.

City people all voted for Hillary.

>more take home pay is bad for your socioeconomic status

You guys are doing great, don't change a thing

Why do you vote for nigger gibs?

How does willingly living amongst feral niggers make a person smart?

Will voting democrat make me rich or just keep me poor as well?

More whites use Gibs than nigs you dumb inbred chud

Out hard tonight

but pic related is not middle class

just got home, what's this?
also when did imageposting come back?

Yea they are poor trailer park trash Inbreds but they consider themselves middle class

Because whites make up more of the total population, retard. In relative terms, nigs use more gibs. As for violent crime, blacks commit more in total (despite being a minority of the population)

...

you probably aren't interested in what they are interested in, and can't put yourself in others shoes (autism?). voting is a myth anyway. you couldn't pay me a million bucks to live in a city of retarded people on social welfare.

White people vote for the party that represents their morals. Most white people are pro-life, pro-gun, and pro-freedom. Democrats advocate for abortion, appealing the second amendment, and hate speech laws. Most rural towns have a single factory where everyone works; There is a tight-knit bond amongst the owner of the company and the employees. This is why factory workers outside of city limits make about 30% more than the workers inside of cities. The perspective on trickle-down economics is different in the rural areas. You're welcome.

if they live in a park, doesn't that mean they have access to their own means of food production, unlike urbanites?
practically, they're more communist than those city beggars.

Have a sage for posting the same tiny-brained crap over and over and over and over and over.

What if OP wasn’t a faggot
Oh wait he is. Here’s a picture of OP

It wouldn’t get posted so much If it weren’t true

>tfw voting for minor interests over the interests of your blood and soil
Shareblue can fuck off and die

Sounds like inbred rural people are corporate bootlicking scum

Yeah because voting for the Jew Nigger Socialist party will totally benefit them

This kind of shit is orientalism for white people and even if it's fake i'll still get mad

t. ruralfag

> muh blood and soil

Tiki torch nazi detected

proxyfag?

>how do percentages work the post

>voted for Trump
>getting a raise at the end of the year

What would I get if I voted for Hillary? A smaller paycheck in all likely hood. How is it you could possibly interpret taking money from the white working class and giving it to blacks and Hispanics is in the interests of white people? That's absolute delusion.

Reposting threads repeatedly is against the rules.

Because white people are poor too , esepcially in red states

But the Dems don't offer white poor people anything. White poor people don't want handouts. They want industry.

88.8% of city people are immigrants

It's simply taken for granted that the Democratic Party is in line with middle class whites' economic interests. This seems obviously false at the moment, since the Democrats' diversity policies don't really help middle class whites. Certainly they hurt more than a tax cut for rich people.

White people..

WE DEMAND HIGHER TAXES SO THAT CORPORATIONS HAVE TO LAYOFF LOTS OF EMPLOYEES AND ARE WAY LESS LIKELY TO BE HIRING COMPARED TO WHEN TAXES ARE CUT FOR BILLIONAIRES


t. libs

I genuinely believe these people want a dependent population.

We want jobs, not handouts, faggot!

Why do massive faggots have absolutely zero understanding of anything

...

>8 posts by that ID
Huh. Okay, I'll bite.

Because billionaires create jobs. Because most of them got their money through trade and fair exchange instead of pulling out a gun. Because turning a country into one big Detroit is not their economic interest.

And that's coming from a fucking leaf.

>we've posted this thread over a thousand times to no avail, but surely THIS time it will work!

The politicians certainly do. It's the whole point of left wing politics.
The pleb libs just either want free shit, or they just look at issues from a shallow point of view "why shouldn't rich people just give their money to poor people? they need it more" "why shouldn't people be able to migrate whenever they want?" "why doesn't the government just print more money?"

Its not YOUR FUCKING MONEY YOU GREEDY ASSHOLES!
Who's the greedy ones here?
The guy who makes the money, or the fuckers that want to use the law to steal it?

because I'm more fucked by the racial vengeance advocated by the dems than I am by "the 1%"

These threads didn't exist when the government was shut down.
Really twists my lemons.

>Who's the greedy ones here?
Greed isn't bad. Using force to satisfy it is. Putting up a system that rewards that punishes those that live by its ideals and rewards those who abuse it is pure, destructive, suicidal madness.

> that rewards that punishes
Derp... ignore the first "that rewards" of that sentence please. Imma go to sleep now.

I'm saving over $300 a month from the tax cuts.

kys and stop spamming this fucking thread every day. Sage

>why do rep vote for tax breaks that give them more money instead of voting for tax increase/losing money which is what you usually get with democrats?!?!

You are a big sack of stupid you know that right?

I wouldn't expect a soulless kike like you to understand, but one's interests goes far beyond a few extra dollars

>Why do so many middle class whites blindly vote against their own economic interests?

Why do so many faggot shills blindly paste the same fucking thread with the same fucking text over and over again?

>$300 a month

That's jack shit compared to what your boss gets.

>i hate you
>but i also know whats best for you
>vote for my party
go fuck yourself

>le vote against your own interest.

I am my own boss. Now fuck off and get a life loser.

Because it pisses off liburlsss

A) "President Business"
B) "The Wall"
C) "Winning"
D) anti-abortion, a modicum of "Christian" "family values"
E) Racism
F) A belief in the false ideology of "trickle down economics"
G) "the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires."
F) Those billionaires run Fox News

Okay so this year might be good for you. But how does millionaires stealing $1.5 trillion from millenials benefit you in the long run?

It's like the Music Man. The cityslicker conman fleeces all the ignorant country rubes.

But it's just another reason that None Of The Above should be on every ballot. Why should people have to choose between a Giant Douche and a Turd Sandwich?

because unlike darkies we truly believe given the right circumstances and enough work that we can be in that position someday or maybe at least our kids will. You know, the mindset that kind of keeps civilization alive?

The alt-right is communist and far-left on economics.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right

Richard Spencer supports global communism for the European race. We have no opposition to the government controlling industries or taxing people.

How is adding 1.5 trillion to the deficit good for your socioeconomic status? It's like the federal government spends all its time going to payday lenders. Oh, and Mick Mulvaney is actually helping those parasites.

Richard Spencer has explained that a true nationalist must also be a socialist. You can not get around it.

President Donald "I'm putting you commies to work" Trump

what a guy.

Why are you opposed to "nigger gibs" but support millionaire gibs? The 1% are the last people on Earth who need welfare. That's just socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor.

In 2017, 82% of the wealth generated went to the richest 1% of the global population. Oh these poor poor billionaires, how will they ever feed themselves if they're taxed more?

Not stealing from people isn't welfare. You want what they have take it yourself you bitch made commie faggot.

Nigga, a trailer park is a lot that is occupied by trailers

>doesnt know about trickle down economics
>doesnt know that less taxes spur the economy
>OP literally retarded and btfo

Where's the wall? Oh, and do people in Laos know how to defeat walls?

That's why None Of The Above should be on every ballot. Vote to make every candidate in the race a loser. Vote to make all their ad campaigns moot. Vote to waste their money because they bet on themselves.

>tax cuts
>against my economic interests
Your not even trying.

>this again

>You like the tax cuts? You must like giving tax breaks for the billionaire.
>You don't like the tax cuts? What you support billionaires outsourcing jobs and to get tax breaks?
See how this works yet? You can't win if ya don't have the cash flow.

How does the boot taste , inbred chud?

You shouldn't have had to vote for Trump or Hillary. That's why None Of The Above should be on every ballot in every election in every station. Fuck em. When a chef in a restaurant asks if you'd prefer the pee soup or the shit salad, you don't pick either. You tell him to fuck off.

So it's okay if the middle class get more money one year (crumbs basically), but that the 1% get to keep even more money every year forever after that, all while not paying for those losses in tax revenue, by just adding 1.5 trillion to the deficit?

Sure, Jewish friend of George Soros and Treasury Secretary, Steve Mnuchin, says 3% economic growth every year will pay for the taxcuts for millionaires. But then didn't study it, and released a single page, with no math, simply stating that 3% economic growth every year will cover that $1.5 trillion added to the deficit. What if that doesn't happen? What if he's wrong? These retards face no consequences for their bad bets, just like the stupid banks that nearly blew up the world economy in 2008.

>lefties pretending they cared about the debt all along

>Stealing from people
>Welfare
Wut?

wtf op your beard is full of cum

Do you think middle class whites are crawling over each other to be maids in motels, and pick lettuce all day in the blaring sun, and slaughter cows for dozens of hours in a slaughterhouse, and make sure the milkshake machine is unclogged at the fast food joint, and pour asphalt on a road in the middle of summer?

Rich people hire "diversity" laborers for cheap labor. The idea that rich people don't want a workforce that will work for much less than whites is ridiculous. Rich people outsource jobs to other countries with shit pay, and rich people outsource jobs to poorer demographics in America so they can get the job done with shit pay. So they can hoard more profit for themselves.

> Fiscal
> conservashits

Pick on Cletus

>Why are you opposed to "nigger gibs" but support millionaire gibs?
The niggers don't contribute, they just take. Millionaires are just being fleeced less.

>richest 1% of the global population
Oh, we're talking GLOBAL 1%? Yeah, I fall into that category and I'm a pretty average middle class guy just doing the daily grind. Are you functionally retarded or just pretending?

>advocates for govt taking more money from people
>usually accomplished by monopoly of force, often depicted by a boot on someone's neck
>call someone else a bootlicker
Try and pay attention. Taking less money from people = less money for voting cattle minority gibs and boots NOT more. Unironically calling someone a "bootlicker" while they arfue for less govt intrusion shluld be considered documented proof that socialism causes brain damage.

why pick on cletus what has he done to you?

> vote for less government intrusion
> for for massive increases in Authortarian police state
>Vote for a petty foreign adversarial installed under criminal investigation corrupt conman who’s fleecing generations blind to enrich his family and cronies

> calling others “ brain damage”

Let's examine your theory by looking at some recent headlines.

>AT&T sheds 1,000 employees after touting GOP tax plan, giving out bonuses
>AT&T Credits Trump for Bonus Its Union Already Negotiated
>AT&T announces thousands of layoffs, firings just in time for Christmas
>AT&T lays off DirecTV workers despite pledge to create jobs
>Comcast Fired 500 After Claiming Tax Cut Would Create Jobs
>Kimberly-Clark, maker of Kleenex and Huggies, says tax bill helps fund plan that includes more than 5000 layoffs
>Walmart becomes the latest of dozens of companies to announce one-time bonuses related to the new tax law
>Walmart is abruptly closing 63 Sam's Club stores and laying off thousands of workers
>Carrier Employees, Soon to Be Laid Off, Feel Betrayed by Donald Trump
>Companies that announced big bonuses after GOP tax cut are now laying off their workers

Corporations care about profit. They don't just do things out of the "goodness of the hearts." So if a corporation can take advantage of something to increase their quarterly profits, they will. Because the stock market is dominated by short-term, immediate gratification, quarter to quarter thinking.

When a corporation gets taxcuts, and it benefits them, why wouldn't they like that? When a corporation lays off employees, and it benefits them, why wouldn't they like that?

The Republicans at the top know that corporations have no soul. But they sell the Great Lie to Rebpulicans at the bottom, who think corporations will ever want to "give back" to the people.

>Because billionaires create jobs
And they can't do that if they pay taxes or higher taxes?

>"why doesn't the government just print more money?"
Um, it was Rebublicans in America who just voted for a tax bill that gives taxcuts to millionaires (oh those poor starving millionaires), and adds $1.5 trillion to the deficit, by basically stealing that money from future generations, by just printing more money, which has to be paid back, with interest. And it wasn't liberals who voted for it. It was right-wing conservatives. Because they are paying back their billionaire donors, who give them millions of dollars in donations, so they do shit just like this, give taxcuts to their donors.

The whole point of right-wing politics is to blow up the deficit, and then point at that, and say they need to cut spending (but never military spending, including $7,600 coffee-makers and $74,000 ladders and other stupid fucking bullshit that scratches some guy's back because he's the brother of some stupid fucking redneck Republican from Buttfuckistan and rah rah why do you hate your troops?)

>Greed isn't bad.
Are you fat? Greed is bad. In fact, that's probably why fat people tend to be Republican, the whole selfish, I got mine, me me me attitude.

In fact, the seven deadly sins are mostly all variants of greed. Pride, like greed for self-esteem. Greed. Lust, greed for sex and hedonisim. Envy, greed for what other people have. Gluttony, greed for food. Wrath, greed for vengeance. Sloth, greed for laziness. And each of the seven deadly signs are likely to increase suffering, not decrease suffering.

If someone thinks taxes are "punishment", they are free to leave whichever country is taxing them, and maybe even go start their own country with seasteading. And if welfare "rewards those who abuse the system", then corporate welfare is just as bad, if not worse, because it's not like they would suffer if they didn't get it.

3 people in America own more wealth than the bottom half of America combined. Does their happiness increase with every million dollars at the same rate that that same million dollars would alleviate suffering for many others? If you're starving and Jeff Bezos passes you by (say, he's greedy), who is being "punished" in that scenario? One person's happiness cannot negate another person's suffering. If that were true, then a sadist who enjoys torturing you to death would be justified in inflicting the most amount of suffering on you.

42 people in the world own the same amount of wealth as the bottom 3.7 billion people in the world. Is it "punishing" those 42 people if they pay higher taxes? Would that "punishment" feel better or worse than starving to death?

The people who suck billionaires' cocks online make no sense to me. The only thing I can think to explain it is, "the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires."

Here's the thing. Rich Republicans actually hate poor Republicans, but rich Republicans need the votes of poor Rebublicans, so they dress up their corporatist religion with Christianity and bullshit platitudes about "family values" (all while marching in lockstep behind an adulterer who paid off a pornstar to keep quiet that he cheated on his 3rd wife at Lake Tahoe).

The Republican establishment thinks that the majority of Republican voters are stupid. But when you are running a con, you convince the stupid person that they are actually smart for going with you, or even that your idea (that will pay back your billionaire donors) was their idea, or in their best interest, because you throw the idiots a bunch of crumbs and point to the crumbs, and hope they ignore the yachts that the millionaires are getting.

It becomes really hard not to disdain stupid people after a while. Republicans just hide it better.

It’s already been pointed out to you twice at least that people are taking home more money for themselves at the end of the month as opposed to less. Stripping out the destitute of the world for a moment - why wouldn’t a person vote for that? Long term and broad reaching thinking isn’t viable for a massive percentage of most countries - those that sit squarely in the middle and just get by.

Corporate welfare is welfare. Bailing out banks is corporate welfare. Taxcuts for corporations already making billions is corporate welfare. Starting wars and not paying for them is like giving welfare to war profiteers, while having future generations foot the bill.

If they don't want to pay taxes, then those corporations can move elsewhere and not do business in America.

Corporations want socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor. Corprations want to privatize profits and socialize losses, meaning if they make profits they want to keep it all for themselves, but if they incur losses they want everybody else to help bail them out of their stupid decisions.

>Doesn't know that trickle down economics failed in the 80s
>Doesn't know that trickle down economics failed in Kansas.
See, the whole theory of "trickle down economics" assumes that rich people will be altruistic and generous, when just the opposite is true. It's poor people, who have actually known hardship in their life, who are more empathetic and generous. Which rich people may as well be living on a different planet.

Why do so many upper class City Whites blindly vote to kill off their own race and then follow to waste everyone else's time on Sup Forums?

Oh I'm sorry. Was it lefties who wanted the Vietnam War to go on nearly 20 years, sacrificing over 58,000 Americans, many of whom were drafted by force, simply so MURICA wouldn't lose face by fucking losing?

Was it lefties who wanted the War in Afghanistan, the longest war in US history?

Just admit that the military is essentially welfare for defense contractors, spics, and stupid fucking rednecks. And try to remember if the US military did fuckall on 9/11.

Do taxes steal from people? Do you pay taxes? Could you move somewhere where you wouldn't have to pay taxes? Why don't you live there?