Is socialism with Chinese characteristics the ultimate ideology?

Is socialism with Chinese characteristics the ultimate ideology?
>b-but China is a shithole
Rapidly improving shithole.

>socialism with Chinese characteristics

National Socialism?

You could call it that way, but it's not really similar to German NS.

It is literally neo-fascism
Modern China is basically Franco's Spain
They basically just chopped the head off of Chiang Kai-Shek's government and when Mao died they reverted back

It pretty much is, yes.
The Chinese did it right an will rule the world in the next century, almost nothing can prevent that.

china is a shithole it's not improving
t. chinese immigrant

I suppose when shit is allowed to air itself out it does lose it's smell but when you dig into it -- it's still shit.

>23 hour work day
>1 hour commute
>smog everywhere
>paid $1

Reason why China is grabbing forward is because of a slave work force. Soulless, worthless sacks of flesh and bone. If you're ever been to China, you'd realize they have nothing to show but work for foreigners.

There is no culture, no history, no sense of a nation state, nothing but cheap plastic and disgusting pollution. Everything you see there is fake, it's like "They Live."

It's what happens when organisms who've never evolved try to copy civilization. On the facade it's all nice, but scrape a bit, and you see rot of retarded subhuman protocellular filament.

If billion Chinese died right now, nobody would notice but world would be a better place.

>It is literally neo-fascism
Explain how is it neo-fascism?
Just because some regime is authoritarian doesn't make it fascist or NS.
>I'm from this country so my opinion trumps statistics
No.

>Rapidly improving shithole.
Only because they've been constantly compromising Marxism when it suits them. They literally have special zones where they don't have Socialism, because their economy needs it.

Not at all, it's just a version of Marxism that's different from the USSR's Marxism-Leninism.

>Rapidly improving shithole
Since 1000 BC at least. Will they ever catch up?

It's missing the innovation, but I'm sure that has something to do with the fact it's full of chinks.

I don't really understand you, you might not like China and it's culture, but saying fucking China has no culture or history or that they are ''copying civilization'' is among the dumbest statements on Sup Forums right now.
It's literally among the oldest cultures in the world.

>organ harvesting with chinese characteristics
>cancer villages with chinese characteristics
>a filthy yangtze river full of dead bodies with chinese characteristics
>deadly smog with chinese characteristics

certainly NOT a shithole

no, the Chinese still use Marxist socialism, which is not the same as NSDAP type socialism

They were arguably ahead of everyone else for a large stretch of history.

They had some semblance of civilization until Maoists took over. From there it's pure Matrix pod tower dystopia.

And how did England look like in late 19th/early 20th century?

Hello Montenigger user

nowhere near as bad and that was over a century ago

i like how the only defense people really have for the shit going on in china is to point at other peoples problems

When the fuck did Jackie Chan become president?

I'm living in China right now (ignore Taiwan flag).

Most people don't realize that China is not socialist or communist in practice, it only is by name.

It's far more capitalist than America. The government doesn't give you shit. Taxes are lower. Family structure is still intact and necessary in society.

People are not dirt poor (at least not in the cities). People make wages comparable to Americans, and keep more of their money due to lower taxes. Tax laws are far easier to understand as well and way fairer.

People paint it as some sort of communist totalitarian shithole, which there is some truth to it (internet censorship being the biggest one), but in all other areas it's like an anarcho-capitalist paradise.

Are you retarded? That's the stupidest argument ever. China was the most advanced place in the world in many points in history. On top of that, a country does not simple improve more and more in a time-span of 2000 years. How low is your IQ?

This. Not to mention that China is not communist. The reason they have been able to expand their economy so much is because they enforce their capitalism under a dictatorship. That way, say the government has to mobilize people from a certain area to build a Hydroelectric powerplant. In a normal capitalist democracy that actually works, you'd need to pay a gorillion dollars in compensation. What happens in China however, is akin to giving people a "2 weeks notice" and then they are off to demolition. China is pretty much the example of a final stage capitalist society: Slaves who literally "live" to sustain the economy of rich corporations running amok unchecked. They make shit tons of money, but they also are not any standard to be taken seriously by anyone less than insane.

>hyper jewish market economy bordering in anarchy
>just a version of Marxism

pick one, retard

The housing bubble makes our crash look like nothing. Large new empty city's is not an economy its a lie.

Ask yourself this, OP.

Are Chinese people happy?

This is what I have been telling everybody. That China is using the Nazi ideology and now they are starting to become a stronger nation then the USA.

> it's not really similar to German NS.
> NS is applicable to any "people" or volk

In what way are the Chinese industrial interests, single party system, ethnic "people's" narrative any different than National Socialism?

What even are the "Chinese characteristics"?
Can you identify them?
Public Double-speaking as a means to preserve "face"?
Confucianist ideals?

Daily reminder China is image obsessed and has a fuckton of people employed to police the internet. It's only a matter of time before we're neck deep in PRC shills.

> Explain how is it neo-fascism?
strictly enforced hierarchy of plebs -> party members -> inner party -> party leadership

Wouldn't a (truly) fascist regime that falsely calls itself "democratic" or "socialist" still be a fascist regime?

Wouldn't a (truly) democratic or socialist regime that calls itself fascist still be a democratic or socialist regime?

I guess it depends on how these terms are defined, and whether their definition relies on some aspect of what they project or label themselves as actually matching what they do

>Explain how is it neo-fascism?
>Just because some regime is authoritarian doesn't make it fascist or NS.
Their economy is basically a copy of Franco's. You have certain capitalist "zones", but the government enacts strict wage controls while heavily regulating trade and manipulating currency.

...

For OP's country, Mozambique, of course.

China isnt socialist.

>have a big ass domestic market that attracts foreign Investors
>force cooperations to share their tech/hire local workers
>but still make it profitable for them
>slowly outsource the shit tier jobs to Bangladesh, subsidize Chinese businesses to make them competitve
Thats how you do it. Now the West tries to prevent other developing countries from doing the same thing