Can you be a white nationalist but not dislike other races or think that your race is superior?

Can you be a white nationalist but not dislike other races or think that your race is superior?

>Can you be a white nationalist but not dislike other races or think that your race is superior?
Absolutely. There are many societal benefits to a homogeneous society. Japan is a good example. One can champion those benefits (like way less terrorism) without invoking the race in specific.
Is Sup Forums this though? No. We know white is best and history proves that.

Sure, but what would be the point?

I try to consider people on a case-by-case basis regardless of how badly the media paints white people.

>Can you be a white nationalist but not dislike other races or think that your race is superior?

That's what a white nationalist is: They want the best for their own people.

You can want the best for your own people without wishing for the detriment of other groups of people.

I hope other races thrive and flourish, I just don't think it should to our detriment.

So you're a non-white?

>Superior
White people suck at colonizing. As soon as they move into a new area they start fucking the local population. Look at any former European colony the "White" people are all pig faced and ugly.
The black man is of course undeniably superior in terms of fertility. Most "White Supremacists" fail to conduct a multi-variable analysis on race.

1488 Takbir! Allahu Akbar! God wills it! Deus Vult!

Have a nice day faggot.

Even the most extreme nazi types dont really hate other races they just dont want to see them close to their homes/countries.
when you force different races/cultures on people they usually fight back against it.

Yes, you're conflating white nationalism with white supremacy.

White nationalism is ridiculous. Europe must free itself from American domination. Nation states are not the answer to this. "We" must go the route of Imperium. Embrace God and embrace nature.

Yes. Its mostly about recognising that people prefer to live around and group with other people who are similar to them. It leads to more happiness and its a survival mechanism.
We all agree that East Asians (Chinese, Koreans, Japanese) are more intelligent.
The only attribute whites are clearly superior in is beauty, mostly due to the eye and hair colour variations.

Increase in in-group preference will result in more dislike for outgroups.

In other words - no, but it doesn't matter.

This is what the EU is. Let's see how it works out.

The national option is the only option.

>Nation states are not the answer to this
That's right! One world government ran by smart, qualified people is goyim!

Intelligence isn't absolutely determinant. Asians are also very non-confrontational to the point that they are faggots. They can't even talk to their own women.

>The only attribute whites are clearly superior in is beauty, mostly due to the eye and hair colour variations.
One can make a strong argument for creativity and invention too. The East Asians are very smart (or at the very least motivated), but not so creative or spirited.

To save your race and culture

That is not what the EU is and you know it.

>Nation states are not the answer to this.
>Posts pic bemoaning the death of the greatest advocate of the Nation state.

The EU is an economic union run by extra-European forces. There will not be European nations in the future. There will be cultural zones that focus power towards one single goal. That goal is Imperium. Domination of world affairs.

You are a retarded yank. That yanks fucked the world in the pursuit of middle class comfort. What you retards need to understand is that nationalism is not the solution. To be nationalist is to be destroyed or controlled by ZOG.

>Doesn't even understand the ideology he worships.
It was about Volk. Groups of similar peoples and cultures working towards the same goal. The end goal was not Germany, Sweden, Noway, etc... It was the Reich and Europe.

> To be nationalist is to be destroyed or controlled by ZOG.
Oi vey! That's right. Just centralize your power and control systems. I swear it will be okay. Nothing will go wrong and only the RIGHT people will get to the top.

This is literally what the EU is doing right now - trying to emancipate itself from the American Jew and replace it with a more liberal European Jew.

Stop reading Evola's nonsense. Nations made Europe great, not pan-Europeanism. This is kike-tier.

>Can you be a white nationalist but not dislike other races or think that your race is superior?
Yep.
It could easily, EASILY be argued that diversity hurts other races just in the way it hurts whites. They also have uniformity, peace, trust, and a sense of belonging taken from them. I don't want to live with blacks but I have admired plenty of the literature and art that came out of the "Harlem Renaissance"- a movement that would be impossible to recreate in modern integrated society. We're all goys, so we're all being poisoned.

Yes
/Thread

Never read Evola. I'm a neo-Spenglerian.

White nationalism doesn't have to have anything to do with superiority or hatred. It's about caring about your own. Wanting to preserve and separate from other races so yours doesn't go extinct. I never understood the whole 'I have to hate everyone else to be a white nationalist' crap.

I do love how he says,
> The EU is an economic union run by extra-European forces
Just the paper definition. From all of the shady voting and moves the EU has pulled since its humble origins as a post-WW2 reconstruction steel and coal trading union, I think it's safe to say it's moving away from being JUST an economic union.

Of course. As has been said already, there's a difference between white supremacy (thinking your race is superior) and white nationalism (wanting your race to continue to exist, control their own destiny, and have a place of their own).

Advocating "white supremacy" in the real world is usually stupid/counterproductive. It's not even a policy of an sort. It's just proclaiming "we're better!" On the other hand, advocating white nationalism (or even something softer, like identitarianism) is an actual set of policies or a course of action one can advocate for.

White nationalism doesn't depend, in any way whatsoever, on hatred on a sense of superiority. In fact, you'll often find that nationalists in Nation A want to work to preserve nationalists in Nation B, even if the people are from different races. Look how many white westerners on Sup Forums get upset when people try to push 3rd world immigration into Japan

Oswald Mosley said it well:
>"Naturally we believe in our own race. Any man or woman worth anything, believes in his own race, as he believes in his own family. But because you believe in your own race or in your own family, doesn't mean you want to injure other races or other families."

Your race is essentially an extension of your own family. Envision someone who cares deeply about family values and protecting their own family. Does he usually wish to see the degradation of other families around him? Does he hate those families? No. In fact, this guy is usually the fiercest advocate for broader society to maintain family values and ensure other families stick together. The same is true, on a broader scale, with respect to race.

Kek, have this by my side as I'm typing this.

Yes. Obviously.

I unironically think mutts are more beautiful than whites on average.

Our power and control systems are centralized right now
Our democracy is just a really shitty reality TV show.

A ethnic European dictatorship run by someone who will put the Jews in their place is what we need.

>I have never regarded the Chinese or the Japanese as being inferior to ourselves. They belong to ancient civilizations, and I admit freely that their past history is superior to our own. They have the right to be proud of their past, just as we have the right to be proud of the civilization to which we belong. Indeed, I believe the more steadfast the Chinese and the Japanese remain in their pride of race, the easier I shall find it to get on with them

you can pretend to be in order to seem slightly more socially acceptable, but in reality, no

Some good post in this thread let's keep it up. Good to see actual information...

Separate white nationalist and racist; the Goldstein media paints it that way, but not us.

White nationalism just means that you think white people should have a nation. It's not technically necessary to dislike other races, but if you think white people should have a nation of their own, it's likely that you think this way because you do dislike them. The notion that whites are a superior race is white supremacy, not white nationalism, so they're distinct ideas.

> A ethnic European dictatorship run by someone who will put the Jews in their place is what we need.
Now that we've found some common ground, let's straighten up the tone of this exchange.
I fundamentally disagree with your statement, because to focus into a more authoritarian empire would have devastating effects. The european cultures and American culture (for whatever that's worth) would erode under the mores of the new Imperial culture. Cohesion will be a must, especially when facing (((them))) so it seems like the only move.
It may be more lofty, but encouraging nationalism and then a coalition against (((them))) is a better route. In this way we revitatlize and retain existing cultures which makes Europe and America (for whatever ours is worth) so nice. We also keep a system of competition partially fueled by national pride. This will help keep the engines of innovation roaring at a greater speed.

I have no problem being called a white nationalist. It isnt about hating the other but about loving your own. I do not think whites are superior to all others. Thats white supremacy.

Precisely though their standards don't typically equal white standards nor demeanor. They can work towards being equal if not better. Its all about SIG and values. White people value our communities. Other races should respect that but the Gov. and buck want to push anyone into anywhere. It makes them absolute traitors to the citizens of the United States which is a White predominately Christian values Nation. If it was completly jewish in its running. Niggers would still be picking their cotton. So is life. Part and Parcel as some would say.

False dilemma.
Loving your own kind does not mean hating others.
Me loving my own family does not mean I hate all other families.
OP might have figured that out on his own, but I guess sucking dick took priority.

Im not even white, but i believe whites are preferred if they are the better candidate. Theres nothing wrong with a having a black gay ceo or brown women FBI director when they the best candidate. The problem is fucking affirmative action and diversity shitting up our nation in every way. Both of these things came about because obviously whites preferred whites even if they weren't the bettet candidate. Now we have non-whites being chosen dispite their short commings.

Burn the whole thing down.

Objectivity yes, subjectively no. Also learn english.

Acknowledge racial differences and yes. Niggers aren't equal to whites or asians.

>he still believes Hitler supported pan-Europeanism

Yes. But some races are simply superior for certain things.

white nationalism is white supremacy dressed up in a button-down. it replaced WOT PAR because it sounded more palatable, but now that all the skinheads stand behind the white nationalist banner, its no longer something to hid behind, and is giving way to terms like alt-right etc

Anybody who truly hates other races has a

see "Leon Degrelle"

>German racialism has been deliberately distorted. It never was an anti-"other race" racialism. It was a pro-German racialism. It was concerned with making the German race strong and healthy in every way. Hitler was not interested in having millions of degenerates, if it was in his power not to have them. Today one finds rampant alcohol and drug addiction everywhere. Hitler cared that the German families be healthy, cared that they raise healthy children for the renewal of a healthy nation. German racialism meant re-discovering the creative values of their own race, re-discovering their culture. It was a search for excellence, a noble idea. National Socialist racialism was not against the other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and improving its race, and wished that all other races did the same for themselves.

I do believe there is intelligence differences between populations that is drawn up on many different levels, but it really has nothing to do with why I'm a white nationalist.