A person should be judged by their merit, not by the actions of those who share an arbitrary and immutable trait

A person should be judged by their merit, not by the actions of those who share an arbitrary and immutable trait.

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

A

Is it okay to be racialist? "The races" have degenerated significantly, but if you COULD look at someone and know their values, beliefs, and political affiliations, would it be worth it to judge them off of it?

What if the trait you share is 2-repeate allele of the MAOA gene? Is it racist for others to exercise caution around you?

If you kill yourself today, I'll give you a hamburger on tuesday.

Underrated

I'm not racist, I only hate Jews.

FUCKING

The issue is that their race is indicative of other traits, just like pit bulls are aggressive, and border collies are smart, niggers are violent, and jews wreck nations.

We will fight against the hatred. We will not stand ideally as the virus openly mocks us. We will removes the illegal minorites. We will not fear those who screech against us. There is no shame to defending ones people and ones nation. There is no shame in defending ones family. There is no fear in defending ones lifes. We are one people. We will fight.

theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world

"In its World Population Profile 1998, the US Census Bureau predicted that by the second decade of this century all the net gain in world population will be in developing countries. 'The future of human population growth has been determined, and is being determined, in the world's poorer nations,' it said."

>A person should be judged by their merit
says who?

me

do you disagree?

>A person should be judged by their merit
We already do this OP.

sure would be nice if people would stop being so racist against whites

Oh yeah? Get rid of affirmative action then

Yes.

HOLY SHIT WE ARE TRIBAL. KIKES ARE TRIBAL.
IF SOMEONE TELLS ME THEY ARE RACIST. I WILL TRUST THAT PERSON. IF SOMEONE TELLS ME THEY ARE NOT RACIST/BIAS.. FUCK OFF, I'M MY OWN BEST HYPOCRYTE, I DON'T NEED SOME BITCH PRETENDING SHE ISN'T TRIBAL AND SEES EVERYONE AS A.. SOME GLOWING BALL OF LIGHT OR SOME SHIT.. FUCKING BS.

I don't need your permission for anything. I will do and say and think as I please, and there is nothing you can do about it. Go fuck yourself.

why?

Not every wild dog I encounter may have rabies but because I'm a sapient being capable of making judgements off of past experiences, stories I've heard from people I trust and common stereotypes of wild animals I know not to judge him off of his "merits."

The same applies to niggers.

>A person should be judged by their merit
but it does not work that way

First off race is not arbitrary. The racial makeup of a society determines the values of that society. The values that a society holds are what determines the success of that society. I agree that you shouldn't deny someone a position because of their race. I also acknowledge that racial groups have different distributions of intelligence, therefore some groups will outperform others. This is not racism, it is a basic biological fact.

>I agree that you shouldn't deny someone a position because of their race.
Why? What about freedom of association?

>A person should be judged by their merit

sure sage, whatever

EGG

...

LEAF

True, but faggots that fawn the flames of racism like Rev Jackson, Rev Sharpton, and most liberal faggots are equally as bad.

Why are white cops automatically assumed to be guilty when they shoot a suspect in self defense?

>A person should be judged by their merit

I agree, but this is considered racist in the modern sense of the word.

Ever live in the Ghetto? Would you move into one? Then you are racist.

Merit is Arbitrary based on personal set of values.

What is Immutable is by definition not arbitrary.

You statement is self-contradictory and wrong.

Morality does not exist. The proper basis for organizing society should be based on what people will do based on their biology not what we like them to do based on an religious ideal called "morality" which does not exist.

A person will be judged according to their likely ability and action.

Ancestry and Genetics will form a large of any such determination regarding a population therefore discrimination based on race is rational and will occur not matter what degree of religious thinking says otherwise..

Stop moral fagging...

You’re right OP, we should go out of our way to pet every alligator we see. Just because some alligators bite the hands of those that try to pet them doesn’t mean every alligator will bite you, right?

Everyone is racist to some degree, le'ts be honest here.
It how strong the racism is and at what group it is directed that are criticized.

It's basic statistics. You can create any type of test to judge merit but as long as they are imperfect, relying on group information always decreases the chances of avoiding undesirable outcomes.

What you should argue for instead is whether it is sensible that false positives pay the price of the shit true positives do, e.g. good niggers who dindu nuffin are dealt with suspicion by the police or the general public. I'd still say you're wrong but it would be sensible.

How much time has OP spent actually living in a heavily black urban area? You change your tune really fast after the first couple of weeks

Fair enough, and I agree. If I have a reason to interact with a person I will judge them individually. Until then, I will base my opinions on evidence of their race.

...

...

>it's not okay to be racist
Is the same as saying it's not okay to be white, because the the same lefties changed the definition of "racist" to mean whites only

Judging people by their merit IS racist, though. You also have to assume that minorities who score lower on merit do so as a result of oppression and not inferiority.

...

they've had the last 60 years of integration to show us their characters and it turns out the segregationists were correct

NOW WHAT

If we replaced the word "race" with "breed" in the context of humans, the fucking "dat's waycist!" argument would be shutdown for good.

Just because you can train a pit, or a nig, to be behaved and civilized doesn't mean that they're automatically 100% the same as the rest of dogs/humanity.

>A person should be judged by their merit, not by the actions of those who share an arbitrary and immutable trait.

That is racist, these days.