Researcher gets study on people who regretted gender reassignment shut down

thetimes.co.uk/article/university-trying-to-hound-me-out-says-gender-researcher-nswr9wn62?shareToken=f82c909c0c1e6bb31fe2bddf6eed7a79
archive.fo/yfBr4

>A researcher barred by Bath Spa University from studying people who regret having undergone gender reassignment says the university is trying to “bully” him out of taking it to court over the decision.

>James Caspian, a psychologist specialising in therapy for transgender people, was told his subject was “potentially politically incorrect” and risked triggering attacks on social media.

>Caspian said he tried to challenge the December 2016 decision in court, but was advised to use the university’s complaints procedure first. He said Bath Spa delayed the process so it was not yet finished when the case first came to court. As a result, his legal action was thrown out.

>Bath Spa then applied for, and was awarded, costs of just under £5,000 against Caspian. He has offered to pay the money at £200 a month but has received what he describes as a “nasty” and “aggressive” email from the university’s solicitor demanding immediate payment.

>Caspian, who is now trying to raise money for a fresh legal challenge on the CrowdJustice site, said: “This is obviously a tactic to get rid of me. They have breached the most basic tenets of intellectual freedom of inquiry and are now trying to shut me down by bullying me about the money.”

>Bath Spa said the research had been rejected on methodological, not political, grounds. It declined to comment on the demand for money or on Caspian’s allegation that it was threatening him.

You know how (((leftists)) managed to shut down almost all research on race & gender differences (and homosexuality to an extent) in the 20th century? They're now trying to do the same thing with research on the consequences of "transgenderism".

Other urls found in this thread:

npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90229789
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18194003
psypost.org/2017/12/many-transgender-kids-grow-stay-trans-50499
pinknews.co.uk/2016/12/11/study-finds-40-of-transgender-people-have-attempted-suicide/
archive.fo/aKoKZ
nationalpost.com/news/canada/heres-the-full-recording-of-wilfrid-laurier-reprimanding-lindsay-shepherd-for-showing-a-jordan-peterson-video
wsj.com/articles/SB115040765329081636
thinkprogress.org/1-200-harvard-students-demand-investigation-into-jason-richwines-thesis-on-hispanic-iq-161465559121/
youtube.com/watch?v=II96QkZaz1E
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298715/Children-young-FOUR-given-transgender-lessons-encourage-explore-gender-identities.html
eagnews.org/michigan-pushes-schools-to-teach-transgenderism-throughout-the-curriculum/
dailysignal.com/2017/06/27/new-law-canada-remove-kids-parents-reject-transgender-ideology/
breitbart.com/london/2015/11/03/swedish-gov-advocates-sex-change-12-surgery-15-will-parents/
express.co.uk/news/uk/821899/primary-school-kids-gender-identity-treatment-number-trebled
rt.com/news/380973-swedish-children-change-gender/
independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/church-of-england-schools-let-children-explore-gender-identity-transgender-gender-fluid-a8051406.html
dailywire.com/news/23963/watch-transgender-punk-rock-star-teaches-gender-hank-berrien
washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/23/california-parents-feel-betrayed-transgender-revea/
breitbart.com/california/2017/08/17/california-bill-1-year-in-jail-for-using-wrong-transgender-pronoun/
crowdjustice.com/case/uphold-freedom-of-speech-in-our-universities/
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjernevask
redalertpolitics.com/2017/05/19/lack-diversity-science-prompts-200k-study-microaggressions/#eQy5kroqgidHGEfw.99
archive.is/8wMFZ
archive.is/2ivF3
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Hirschfeld
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific-Humanitarian_Committee
thejewniverse.com/2016/the-small-town-jew-who-pioneered-sex-change-surgery/
haaretz.com/jewish/transgender-bathrooms-are-a-human-rights-struggle-and-a-jewish-imperative-1.5385053
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You are going to lose the culture war, deal with it fucking leaf

>About 88% of children who have gender dysphoria do not hold those beliefs when they grow older.
npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90229789

>Only 12% of boys who believe they are transsexuals still believe so when they are older.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18194003

psypost.org/2017/12/many-transgender-kids-grow-stay-trans-50499
>There are 12 such studies in all, and they all came to the very same conclusion: The majority of kids cease to feel transgender when they get older.

pinknews.co.uk/2016/12/11/study-finds-40-of-transgender-people-have-attempted-suicide/
>How many transgender kids grow up to stay trans?

archive.fo/aKoKZ
>I’m a Pediatrician. How Transgender Ideology Has Infiltrated My Field and Produced Large-Scale Child Abus

Good thing people already studied this though. John Hopkins quit doing the procedure due to their findings on the matter. People like Money's research also have shown this. I wish this researcher luck though. Its insane debating one of these lunatics because they keep referencing pro trans studies done by openly pro trans groups like WAPATH and others. There was a Swedish study not long ago that I used to throw in their faces though that dabbled in this area. See if you can dig it up.

These extremists in positions of authority at Universities should have their ties looked into further. Politically Correct only reseach is unacceptable. Follow the money.

Which one CIAnigger?

Trannies will lose the culture war about tranny acceptance once Muslims become a larger demographic bloc in every Western country just like homosexuals.

And Marxists already took over institutions in the 60s, this is just about seeing how far they get push their brand of insanity before self-imploding.

How sad does it feel that your position is so fundamentally wrong, contradictory, easily debunked and against human nature that you need constant censorship at every level to enforce it everywhere? And even with all these institutions like media and academia on your side, most people still reject it. Keep fighting nature, it will all come tumbling down

>They can never hide the truth no matter how hard they try. There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and the truth will triumph again

(((Schnoor)))

Devils advocate, maybe his methodology is shit? It's not an impossible notion. Need more info.

>studying people who regret having undergone gender reassignment

With no more facts I might assume they're concerned he's got selection bias, but even that should be ok, if you can explain why interviewing just a sample of regretful people matters. Maybe it's better to interview regretful and non-regretful people so you can at least compare and contrast any results? Otherwise all you're learning is that regretful people think XYZ but you can't know how that differs to non-regretful people, so it might be a total waste of time to even research.

>Selection bias
The numbers alone should account for effectiveness of (((treatment))).

Have you ever thought that maybe it’s because asshole BIGOTS such as yourselves continue to BULLY and TORTURE these poor people even AFTER they’ve gotten their gender reassignment in order to be as close as possible to the one that they feel represents them the best? You people are so clueless it doesn’t even compute sometimes. Either that or you just can’t HANDLE the fact that some people don’t fit into your binary little mold, it has to be born male or born female, you can’t just accept that not everything fits I to your binary little mold.

Numbers of what?

Lets say you interview the regretful and they say XYZ about their mindset before their surgery and all that. How do you know whether that is the same or different to non-regretful people? All the info you get is fruitless without some sort of control group to compare with.

>wahhh the entire planet needs to change to accomodate me

Maybe you need to change?

Nobody gets this treatment for bad methodology lol. The majority of research has shit tier methodology anyway

Hahaha. So funny.
So basically their logic is, "Dont ask questions or think things through its politically incorrect"

Terrible and typical post modernist argument. Basically your saying no one is responsible for their actions and if they regret a choice they made, they can always blame someone else? If i am verbally attacked and spit on for choosing to wear a MAGA hat and feel bad about myself, get drunk, drive my car and kill someone, i can always say "i felt bad about how i was treated for wearing this hat, and im an alcoholic which is a disease, there for i am not responsible for killing that person while driving drunk".

Oh yes great answer. Society should NEVER advance. We should have just forever been throwing sticks at people and rolling in the mud like heathens, because WHY should the world ever change? You ever think that MAYBE this trend is growing because it’s finally allowing people to BE who they FEEL, not what some DOCTOR tells them they have to be? MAYBE. JUST MAYBE people can finally be who they FEEL,

Nobody should SPIT on you for your HAT, and NOBODY should attack transgender because of their skin

what's more postmodern than having a 'god wills' flag on a website famed for anime porn

or maybe you just need to accept that current gender reassignment technology is too primitive so its obvious that people would regret getting a surgical wound with no practical use outside getting infected and collecting balls of hair instead of just their old genitalia

Somebody get this guy on a livestream with Jordan Peterson.

In any event the world doesn't have a duty to accommodate you and you shouldn't act belligerent when it doesn't

based syrup bro

Sadly true for biology. I worked counting birds for a study and the lady just wanted to shut down oyster farms in the area. Made bullshit claims in such a way that her point got across, cried to a judge and he obliged to not look like he hated nature. Feels bad man.

WE are ALL primitive, we are ALL human and we will ALL DIE let those do what they wish so they may DIE happy

The devil controlls this planet. Thats the dam sure.

so much this

If I were Peterson I'd probably want to thoroughly vet his methodology before agreeing to that just in case the university does have cause. And if it is bad I'd spend the entire time attacking his shitty methodology and trying to work out a better framework.

/thread

Good on you for being a voice of reason, but also how many proposals get this much shit just for bad methodology? Seems extreme as fuck, and very likely for political reasons.

Why are you here defending the clinically insane? What do you get out of it?

In the eyes of the LAW we are innocent until PROVEN guilty, only GOD may judge these people we have no RIGHT

They're just postponing shit at this point. We could just defuse this situation, but they keep setting shit up for a Day Of The Rope. And as science advances it looks more and more like the rope will be made of affordable, mass-produced carbon nanofilaments.

The only outrageous part is that they stalled in the review, and that isn't that outrageous as universities are run by retarded faggots who can't do anything. So you'd need to know whether they dragged their feet in bad faith. That would indicate they aren't interested in methodolgy and have some bias. The comment about bad facebook exposure could be unofficial conjecture easily.

After that the psychologist himself brought legal action, lost, and then thinks it's unusual to have to pay $5000 in a lump sum. That is not a very onerous sum. He probably had costs awarded against him because he brought action while the review was being conducted, and if the judge isn't retarded, the evidence would show they aren't dragging their feet, which would be bad faith and cause for the psychologists claim to succeed.

On the face of it it's not exactly the strongest case.

It sounds like the lawyer wants to get paid his $5000 and doesn't want $200 a month which will take over 2 years to repay. Which is reasonable. Someone owes you money, he makes an offer, you say no, it's not suspect, it's commonplace.

That kike fag will just tell him to clean his room and sell him one of his fucking rugs. Lmao

>researcher barred by Bath Spa University from studying

Bit antithetical, to bar the researcher from researching.

Lol go take your meds

If the number of regretful is greaster than non-regretful or even just a significant portion than that alone should be grounds to halt that form of treatment especially if it leads to a fatality due to mental instability. Basically what John Hopkins did. You want to get into their reasoning but that has no bearing on the issue.

>Devils advocate, maybe his methodology is shit?
If that's the case then it should be up to his peers to review his work and offer criticism, along with other studies that address the issues with the methodology. Having the university shut down his research before it's even been published is inexcusable.

How do we combat the establishment's pushing out of all ideas that go against their agenda?

At this point this is their prime weapon. About half the public won't consider any idea that is labeled 'fringe', and they're just going to keep pushing us out year by year until they have a stranglehold on society.

What about the fact that Bath Spa declined to comment on the fact that they were using economic pressure to threaten him? It's obvious they know it's true, and the man has proof, that's why they refuse to comment in case he uses that against them later.

Why would he go through the trouble of suing them instead of changing his methodology if he didn't have a bulletproof case? Is what's mentioned in the OP about his subject being politically incorrect really that hard to believe considering everything that's been happening in the last years?

This isn't even that abnormal in academia, look at what happened in a Canadian university recently:

nationalpost.com/news/canada/heres-the-full-recording-of-wilfrid-laurier-reprimanding-lindsay-shepherd-for-showing-a-jordan-peterson-video

No this is all about enforcing Gramscian cultural hegemony at every level of academia. They wouldn't give a shit if they got the result they wanted (or one that was less likely to trigger backlash & bad rep by the PC police), or if it was a communist doing the research.

- Jordan Peterson was denied a grant for the first time in his life after speaking out against political correctness.

- James Watson, molecular biologist, Nobel Prize winner and the discoverer of DNA, had his career destroyed after he implied that Africans were less intelligent than other races, and that our humanitarian efforts in Africa are failing to produce results because of the false assumption that all races are born with the same cognitive abilities.

- Tim Hunt, biochemist and Nobel Prize winner, had his career destroyed after he made a joke about working with women. He literally had to sell his Nobel Prize medal to survive.

- Lawrence Summers was forced to resign his position as President of Harvard, after a speech where he implied that the lack of women in STEM was a result of differences between the sexes, rather than environment. Same with that guy who wrote the Google Manifesto.

You also have people like Richard Dawkins, Richard Lynn, Charles Murray, Arthur Jensen and several others who have been persecuted, smeared or pushed out of the scientific community for not kowtowing to their politically correct masters.

wsj.com/articles/SB115040765329081636
>Mr Watson told the Financial Times he had become an “unperson” after he “was outed as believing in IQ” in 2007 and said he would like to use money from the sale to buy a David Hockney painting.

thinkprogress.org/1-200-harvard-students-demand-investigation-into-jason-richwines-thesis-on-hispanic-iq-161465559121/
>1,200 Harvard Students Demand Investigation Into Jason Richwine’s Thesis On Hispanic IQ

This is all about punishing and censoring anyone who doesn't follow the new "woke" "poltically correct" narrative and (((consensus))) of the year, which happens to get crazier and crazier every year.

we can't allow a study to prove mental illness
such a thing would undermine the entire psychiatric industry.

youtube.com/watch?v=II96QkZaz1E

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298715/Children-young-FOUR-given-transgender-lessons-encourage-explore-gender-identities.html
>Children as young as 4 being given transgender lessons which encourage them to explore their 'gender identities'

eagnews.org/michigan-pushes-schools-to-teach-transgenderism-throughout-the-curriculum/
>Michigan pushes schools to teach transgenderism throughout the curriculum

dailysignal.com/2017/06/27/new-law-canada-remove-kids-parents-reject-transgender-ideology/
>This New Law in Canada Could Remove Kids From Parents Who Reject Transgender Ideology

breitbart.com/london/2015/11/03/swedish-gov-advocates-sex-change-12-surgery-15-will-parents/
>Swedish Gov Advocates Sex Change At 12, Surgery At 15, Against Will Of Parents

express.co.uk/news/uk/821899/primary-school-kids-gender-identity-treatment-number-trebled
>Number of primary school kids referred for gender identity treatment has tripled

rt.com/news/380973-swedish-children-change-gender/
>The number of children feeling the anxiety of being trapped in the wrong body is doubling each year in Sweden, with children as young as six wanting to become the opposite sex, doctors have said

independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/church-of-england-schools-let-children-explore-gender-identity-transgender-gender-fluid-a8051406.html
>Church of England tells schools to let children 'explore gender identity'

dailywire.com/news/23963/watch-transgender-punk-rock-star-teaches-gender-hank-berrien
>'Transgender' Punk Rock Star Teaches Gender Fluidity To Young Children

washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/23/california-parents-feel-betrayed-transgender-revea/
>California first-grader sent to principal’s office for misgendering classmate

breitbart.com/california/2017/08/17/california-bill-1-year-in-jail-for-using-wrong-transgender-pronoun/
>California Bill: 1 Year in Jail for Using Wrong Transgender Pronoun

Lol kek wills the death of all kike, even their children.

In the future this is going to be a massive issue akin to the thermaldahyde disaster of the 70s. Its fucking insanity, the only medical treatment for gender dysphoria, a literal mental illness, is gender reassignment surgery and counseling. They dont even question the validity, their first course of action is to cut your dick off.

it's literally always ((())). started as a joke. once you begin to look, you can't look away.

Guess we just have to kill about half the public.

Universities are anti truth, status quo propaganda pushers when it comes to social and political subjects.
All they care about is funding and they bow to the slightest social pressure from sjws instantaneously every single time.

Laundry Tap here
Bath Spa is a faggot

Thats a good methodology and I don't think he's using it. He isn't comparing sample sizes as far as it appears, it just looks like he wants to interview regretful people. From there you can't determine regretful number versus unregretful.

No it's actually completely standard to not allow research that doesn't have proper methodology. They don't have to waste money and time on research that can be dismissed in five seconds by peer review.

The science behind this is settled. Period.

>What about the fact that Bath Spa declined to comment on the fact that they were using economic pressure to threaten him? It's obvious they know it's true, and the man has proof, that's why they refuse to comment in case he uses that against them later.

A lawyer requesting $5000 lump sum instead of $200 over 2 years isn't economic pressure. It's life.

>Why would he go through the trouble of suing them instead of changing his methodology if he didn't have a bulletproof case?

People lose cases exactly 50% of the time. If the case were bulletproof he would have won. The fact he was unable to convince a judge they had committed some sort of inequity to him suggests they did not. Slow procedures at shitty universities is not uncommon, it's actually the norm from everything I've ever experienced.

This is all irrelevant to the case at hand. All it demonstrates is some right wing people have difficulty in academia, we already know this, but that isn't evidence.

You're going to lose your skin, I don't give a shit if you can deal with it or not

No need to follow the money. We already know they are CIA infiltrates who got there through one of the thousands fake NGOs of USAID (which is CIA).
The modus operandi is that they come and offer funds to the University in exchange for hiring a teacher from an outside University (with fake qualifications) for a propaganda study, who later brings his/her "research team".
CIA got infiltrated by commies, and they infiltrated the Universities to sabotage students with the shittiest bullshit. This hydra is impossible to kill without first cleaning CIA and USAID.

Um user that piece was made by the Church of Scientology...

>guise, I sware on me mum, I'm just playing devil's advocate, not a concern trolling SJW at all
>no way academia would be biased in any way
>muh stoopid rght-wingers

It's time to go back to Rebbit my friend.

>He isn't comparing sample sizes as far as it appears, it just looks like he wants to interview regretful people. From there you can't determine regretful number versus unregretful.
You're just pulling shit out of your ass at this point. Pure conjecture.

Here's how it works:

>leftists agree with the outcome
Good methodology, science is settled.

>leftists disagree with the outcome
Bad methodology. Do it again until you get the result we want. Let's attack who funded or made the study rather than the data.

>A lawyer requesting $5000 lump sum instead of $200 over 2 years isn't economic pressure
No it's called economic pressure to force his hand and demand something he can't provide. They wouldn't object to delayed payments for such a small amount if they didn't have an agenda.

> If the case were bulletproof he would have won.
Did you even read the article? It didn't actually go to court.

>He said Bath Spa delayed the process so it was not yet finished when the case first came to court. As a result, his legal action was thrown out.

>This is all irrelevant to the case at hand
It's completely relevant since it demonstrates a well-known pattern of trying to stifle intellectual freedom to enforce politically correct dogma in academia, one that has become more and more intesen and blatant in recent years with the internet, and has been pointed out even by dozens of liberal professors. This is another story examplary of that practice, so it's 100% relevant.

>All it demonstrates is some right wing people have difficulty in academia
See above. Besides, can you prove that they're "right-wing people", or that their data is somehow flawed? Richard Dawkins is a liberal atheist. Lawrence Summers is a Jewish Democrat.

mate just cause your emotional bullshit doesnt stand up to logic doesnt make me some sjw

fuck off back to your shitcunt uni dipshit

this place isnt for emotional appeals, its for the truth, gaycunt

Wow I’m convinced now.

How are people even entertaining such a stupid fucking comment? The first thing they teach you in intro to psychology is how to conduct an experiment. If you are measuring "dissatisfaction among those who have had gender reassignment surgery" then your sample is people who regret it. This isn't politics retard where you have to represent everyone equally. The whole point of the experiment would be to reach a conclusion as to why people regret the process.

>its for the truth

The "non-emotional" "truth" such as:

>he just looks like he wants to interview regretful people and his methodology is bad even though I have no proof of this at all
>let me complain about "conjecture" while I make conjecture in every other post
>he should have won the case if he had a point even though his legal action was thrown out
>his methodology must be shit because I say so
>refusing to accept delayed payments doesn't mean anything, couldn't have any further reason behind it to go into, it's just "life"
>a Jewish Democrat who worked for Bill Clinton is a "right-wing person"
>Western academia and the social sciences not having an obvious leftist bent and not stifling intellectual freedom
>if you get fired or wronged for not blindly following the Ministry of Truth™ and the PC thought police, you shouldn't make criticism, complain or take action because "the world" (whatever that is) doesn't need to accomodate you, it's "life"
In that case why should you complain when "the world" (or Caspain in this case) doesn't accomodate the school?
>starting to call people "dipshit" "shitcunt" "gaycunt" with no argument when you get BTFO

You're not fooling anyone m8. Pilpul doesn't work as well here as it does on Plebbit.

Gender is a biological function for the purpose of sexual reproduction; the process by which our species propagates itself. There are two genders: male and female. While there are rare occasions for a person to be born with both or neither sex, that is due to genetic or environmental abnormalities interfering with the biological process.

Gender is not a state of mind. It is not a choice. We are all born either male or female, and that is what you are and always will be. Altering your appearance does not change your genetic code.

That said, gender is also not a set of social rules that define how you must dress or act. If you want to dress up, get surgery, or in some other manner pretend you're something you're not, go for it. As long as it doesn't interfere with your ability to function within the society to which you belong, you should be free to act however you like.

But seriously? Stop acting like you're special. You're not. Most people lie to themselves in some manner about who they are or what they want all the time; it's how we all cope with our lives. When you rant about things like 'forcing gender stereotypes on children' because some parent put their male child in a blue sweater, you sound just as moronic as the bigots that say homosexuality is a disease.

How do you know non-regretful people had different thoughts? What if everything they thought leading up to the surgery etc was the same? It's a bunk experiment if that's all it is.

>So we've discovered regretful people think X, and we have no idea if non-regretful people think X or Y, so our conclusion is that all transgender people might think the same thing, we have no way of knowing, because we forgot to ask a different sample, because our methodoloty was shit.

What kind of fucking name for a university is Bath Spa?

>conclusion is that all transgender people might think the same thing

If the research is about what regretful trannies think, the conclusion will be about what regretful trannies think, not about what all trannies think, and will make that clear.

If the research is about what trannies in general think, the conclusion will be about what trannies think and will consider sampling and how many regretful and non-regretful trannies were surveyed

You're just scared that in either case you won't like the results (and this is also why the school rejected it, as they admitted to him). However it could save countless lives so regardless of how "politically incorrect" it is, it's necessary. Libtards would rather have thousands of kids mutilating themselves at a young age without understanding what's going on, not knowing the potential repercussions. then killing themselves at 30 once they realize they ruined their life than risk offending a "minority".

White Sharia™
الحمدلله، الله اكبر

>If the research is about what trannies in general think, the conclusion will be about what trannies think and will consider sampling and how many regretful and non-regretful trannies were surveyed

Yes, this would be good research. From everything in the limited short article it doesn't appear to be this way. For some reason you're some sperg who thinks anyone who doesn't automatically agree with every stupid thing you say is against you.

It'd be great if the research showed the differences in thinking between regrets and non-regrets. It'd be retarded to ask a univeristy to give you money and resources just so you could get a questionaire on what people who regret think, when you didn't gather any evidence from a control group to show whether or not non-regrets think different or the same.

By all means he can do the research privately and fund it himself if he thinks it's great research, maybe even source a private backer. Instead of demanding gibs and having a cry when your research is rejected (which is completely common and normal) and the review takes a while (which is completely common and normal).

No you'd be simply trying to observe the circumstances of their regret and see how they relate to your hypothesis. Some people for example will say they regret it only because they live in pain now. You can then compare that to the rate of complications in reassignment surgeries. But the theory (I'm guessing) is that they expect to find a lot of people who rushed into it or did it for the wrong reasons. That can then be used to help the transgender community by giving a more accurate representation of transgenderism to people on the fence.

Isn't it suspicious that there's exponential more MtF trannies than FtM? If it is truly something realized at birth should the rates by original gender not be more similar?

Reading the comments it seems James Caspian is commenting too, he gives this link crowdjustice.com/case/uphold-freedom-of-speech-in-our-universities/

>I am a counsellor and trainer specialising for over a decade in working with transgendered people. I became aware that there appear to be a growing number of people who have sought to reverse the surgery they had as part of a gender transition. As part of a Masters degree at Bath Spa University I applied for permission to research this group to find out more. Gender Reassignment Surgery includes surgery to the genitals, and for women changing to male, often removal of the breasts. I wanted to talk to the people who regretted their GRS and then had surgery to try to reverse the original surgery. There is no research into this phenomenon, and it is needed to develop insight into why this is happening and to learn from these peoples’ experiences. I was invited by the hosts to bring my findings to the European Professional Association of Transgender Health conference in Belgrade in 2017. This was not to happen, as the university vetoed my research

Shutdown by leftist faggots attempting to normalize faggotry

Fair enough sounds like he's crowdfunding his research now. If it's an area that has never been studied at all it's probably not a bad place to start. I wish the kid all the best.

>Bath Spa University
Sounds relaxing

I'm from Bath, it's fairly comfy. Spa is a bit of a shite uni tho.

>The Court upheld the costs order against me, and last week the University's investigating officer concluded that the only mistake the university had made was in allowing my initial research proposal through in the first place, saying that it warranted higher scrutiny. There is the possibility of a final meeting with them to object to the investigating officer's findings, but I am anticipating that we will be re-applying for permission to proceed to Judicial Review as soon as the investigation is formally concluded.

>I am now crowdfunding for an additional £15,000 to cover legal fees and costs, and court fees.

>NEXT STEPS

>On conclusion of the university's complaints procedure we will re-apply for permission to proceed to Judicial Review in the High Court.

He wants to fight on and trying to raise funds to do so. Any richfags willing to donate to fight the faggotry?

>No it's actually completely standard
It's not. If it were 90% of psych/sociology papers wouldn't be published (n = 10, lmao).

I’m gonna enroll and major in bubbles.

It’s likely going to be a qualitative study with in-depth interviews conducted with the handful of people who respond. If there is a large enough sample group then he’ll probably devise a short questionnaire in addition. There’s not an awful lot of methodology involved when you don’t have enough participants to randomize

The """Science""" community hasn't changed.
Recommend the Norwegian documentary "Hjernevask" (Brainwash), it's English subtitled, links to episodes can be found in the Wikipedia article;

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjernevask

Mandatory Sup Forums viewing IMO.

>It'd be retarded to ask a univeristy to give you money and resources just so you could get a questionaire on what people who regret think, when you didn't gather any evidence from a control group to show whether or not non-regrets think different or the same.

Would you also refuse any study about people who regret marriage, consumer purchases, moving from country to another, having tattoos or piercings, etc. if they didn't include people who don't regret it? Would you also not allow studies about black people because it's too specific and it should just be "all humans"? Sometimes you need more specific data you fucking idiot, it's how it's always worked. And either way you would still complain that it has "selection bias" and the "methodology might be bad"

Meanwhile schools regularly fund shit like this and every "social science" "critical theory" course, I don't see you complaining
:
redalertpolitics.com/2017/05/19/lack-diversity-science-prompts-200k-study-microaggressions/#eQy5kroqgidHGEfw.99
>Lack of "diversity" in science prompts $200k study on "microaggressions"

> Instead of demanding gibs and having a cry when your research is rejected (which is completely common and normal) and the review takes a while (which is completely common and normal).
You're full of shit. This is why these departments and funds are made for, and they specifically admitted it was because of it not being politically correct. The only thing that's getting more "normal" is censorship and refusal to address "taboo subject", which isn't good for anyone who actually cares about truth.

>For some reason you're some sperg who thinks anyone who doesn't automatically agree with every stupid thing you say is against you.
You're barely even hiding your agenda.

Valid fucking question. Don't ignore the Aussie

archive.is/8wMFZ
>MRI scans indicate that most MtF transsexuals are either men aroused by the thought of possessing female genitalia or homosexuals who want to seduce straight men

archive.is/2ivF3
>Only 28 percent of identical twins both identified as transgender.
>The fact that the identical twins differed 72% of the time is highly significant because it means that at least 72% of what contributes to transgenderism in one twin consists of nonshared experiences after birth—that is, factors not rooted in biology.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Hirschfeld
>Jew Magnus Hirschfeld coined the term "transsexualism", identifying the clinical category which his colleague, the Jew Harry Benjamin would later develop in the United States

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific-Humanitarian_Committee
>The Scientific-Humanitarian Committee (Wissenschaftlich-humanitäres Komitee, WhK) was founded in Berlin on 14 or 15 May 1897 [by Magnus Hirschfeld, a Jewish-German physician, sexologist and outspoken advocate for gender and sexual minorities], to campaign for social recognition of gay, bisexual and transgender men and women, and against their legal persecution. It was the first LGBT rights organization in history.
>The Committee was based in the Institute for Sexual Sciences in Berlin, until 1933 when it was destroyed by the Nazis, from which it took a great deal of scientific theories on human sexuality – such as the idea of a third sex between a man and a woman.

thejewniverse.com/2016/the-small-town-jew-who-pioneered-sex-change-surgery/
>The Small Town Jew Stanley H. Biger Who Pioneered Sex-Change Surgery

haaretz.com/jewish/transgender-bathrooms-are-a-human-rights-struggle-and-a-jewish-imperative-1.5385053
>Transgender Bathrooms Are a Human Rights Struggle - and a Jewish Imperative

...

Give me a quick rundown so I can decide if it's worth my time watching.

...

>being a voice of reason
>it's now reasonable to wack children's willies off
pls

If you can't prove that it's unreasonable using proper science then your argument is moot. It's university, either bring actual valid science or you can throw your "science" into the trashcan of opinions.

So the question remains: was the methodology right or wasn't it?

I watched it a while ago but it's a documentary (in 7 parts I think) that talks about the insane denial of basic biology among social "scientists" & "critical theorists" (cultural marxists) in various fields: gender identity, racial differences, homosexuality, nature vs nurture on intelligence...

For example, they talk about how despite being considered the most gender-egalitarian country, Norway has seen its rate of female engineers plummet below other less gender-egalitarian countries, because when given the choice women would rather not do engineering for a living.

In Episode 1, they completely demolish feminism, and in Episode 6, they interview several important scientists who've studied IQ, including Charles Murray, who co-wrote The Bell Curve, and Richard Lynn.

It really is a must-watch. I heard that it was so popular and succesful that it got the social sciences defunded there and embarrassed the people there, which is something they completely deserve. It's also free on Youtube and other sites like Vimeo.

...

what happens if i delay puberty until the end of my life?

>- Tim Hunt, biochemist and Nobel Prize winner, had his career destroyed after he made a joke about working with women. He literally had to sell his Nobel Prize medal to survive.
Tim Hunt was a feminist who had tutored hundreds of women and spent decades helping them get into academia.

He got punished far more harshly for a minor thing because he had no defenders. It's politics, and like a nazi jew, a feminist man has no one to stand up for him when they turn on him.

>Trannies will lose the culture war about tranny acceptance once Muslims become a larger demographic bloc in every Western country just like homosexuals.
you know nothing of muzzies. i iran you can be a faggot legally if you change sex and the state will pay for it. if anything they will force more to transition

This is another thing to keep in mind also (pic related)

>He literally had to sell his Nobel Prize medal to survive.
having a skill so useless you rely on popularity handouts to survive

You become an infertile stunted man with a microdick, and you can't go back.

There's going to be a huge issue in 20 years with children realizing they were manipulated by their psycho gender bender parents and demanding things like compensation from governments and organisation that provided hormone blockers.

Was he really? I didn't even remember that.

That's only a meme spread by liberals to push for the acceptance of Muslims, like the idea that transgenderism is widely accepted in Japan because of traps in anime.

The Muslim world hates trannies, they only legalized it because they see it as a preferable alternate to homosexuality. They force gay men to transition in Iran, gays are hung and throw off roofs. Trannies are still likely to be laughed at beaten, raped, and killed. There's also a difference between Shia Muslims (who are more common in Iran and less likely to be terrorists and move to the West) and other Muslim.

You would never see transgenderism being pushed on children, in the media, in the education system or laws that prevent you from "misdgendering" them in any Muslim country, even Iran.

>they only legalized it because they see it as a preferable alternate to homosexuality. They force gay men to transition in Iran,
whats your argument again user?

Fucking kikes

That the only reason "transgenderism" is ostensibly supported by the state in Iran (but not most of the population) is to "correct" the problem they see with homosexuality because of their faith.

ya, were doing it here to make fags palatable to muslims. imagine being a little gay dude now in the states or canada. the parents would put the little queer on hormone blockers faster than you could blink. transgenderism is a direct attack on homosexuality

>shareToken
Way to out yourself as a Sup Forumstard to the ad agencies, and by extension, the Canadian government. Your cease and desist hate speech letter should be arriving next week.

>Caspian said he tried to challenge the December 2016 decision in court, but was advised to use the university’s complaints procedure first. He said Bath Spa delayed the process so it was not yet finished when the case first came to court. As a result, his legal action was thrown out.
Oh, that sucks. Failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Lawyer should’ve seen that coming.
>Bath Spa then applied for, and was awarded, costs of just under £5,000 against Caspian. He has offered to pay the money at £200 a month but has received what he describes as a “nasty” and “aggressive” email from the university’s solicitor demanding immediate payment.
Hahahaha fuck the Bongs. Loser pays legal costs.

>ya, were doing it here to make fags palatable to muslims.

That or making them "genderfluid" or asexual.

Someone should make commercials or memes with a before & after transition.

>This is your kid.

>This is your kid on hormone blockers.

>Any questions?

Holy shit leaf just stop he's already dead.