Anarco-Capitalist thead

this a theard to discuss Anarcho-Capitalism .Statists allowed

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/
youtube.com/watch?v=rlgaADnL-qs
youtube.com/watch?v=cIxJicyjLLE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Anarcho im retarted so dont tell me im already know

Discuss your stupid regime that wasted money on helicopter fuel and only lasted a few years?

...

...

ok lets talk about your stupid ideology that killed millions of people and will never work

...

...

...

Gorrillions!

You subhuman baboon. You literal dog.

How dare you speak, you sickly pale monkey. How dare you open your thin lipped, rim encrusted, menthol cigarette smelling mouth?

You are human trash, wh*Toid. Universally despised, derided and mocked. Your species and skin tone offers no hope to the world that Europe can ever prosper. Crawl back in to the frozen tundra you came out of, you literal chimp.

I hope you decide to sail your grandfathers skip to the Bosphorus and rape some sheep, as is in the whTes nature. It would still be the only pussy you ever had. Give Mehmet and Mustafa a chance for some target practice, your sole use to the world. whTes obsession with Istanbul is hilarious but sad. Coincidentally its the only worthwhile contribution whTes have made to the medical field. The MUH CONSTANTINOPLE sentiment in the average whTe dog is both an early warning sign of autism in children, and early on set Alzheimer's in adults.

Take your wh*Te hairy fingers off your keyboard, and never talk about the human species again, you mockery of our supposed shared ancestor.. No amount of semen slabbed on your face every morning will make you BLACK. It's about as delusional of an idea as your daydreams of AFRICAN heritage.

You wh*Toid.

You make a dumpster look like a beacon of civilisation.

You are the blight of the world.

Go rot beneath the Earth's surface you and your families corpses, its the best you can hope for in life. For the first time in your life, whToid, you have a job making an object vastly superior to yourself. A dildo. Coincidentally, it would be the first time a whTe "man" satisfied a woman.

Die, wh*Toid. No one would miss you. Except for eunuchs, who now would have no one to make them look good.

...

...

...

How do you propose to avoid the formation of a state?

...

>ACT

About fucking time you cucks.

And I just wanna give a hola at the Nazi/Communist scum on here.
Listen, Nazism sucks. I'm a capitalist and support freedom. Nazis are against natural selection and survival of the fittest.

Here's an example of why National Socialism is also anti survival of the fittest and natural selection; I'm a black male, and I currently have 3 girlfriends. 2 white women, and a Japanese woman. Now, in a natural world, I aquire all three of them, and can even seek more.

Meanwhile, National Socialism and other collectivist retards want to take 2 of them away from me since i'm ''only supposed to have 1 gf'' in this world of monogamy. In fact, no, they want to take all 3 of my girls away from me ''because I'm black''. They want the state to come in and remove my girls from me just so they can partner them up with some of Richard Spencer's tiki torch virgin boys.

Collectivism is for losers, and doesn't value survival of the fittest/natural selection.

This. If people start voluntarily forming a state, it's only a matter of time until their army either buys off your hired guns or takes you over. It's inevitable. Just give up your freedom!

checked

this would be alpha if it wasnt a larp. collectivism is the survival of the fittest. there a reason stalin and hitler killed junkies

this pic is fucking hilarious

I'm sympathetic to your goals, and am a huge proponent of voluntary association. I used to be ancap, but kinda gave up on my acknowledgement of the NAP and the illegitimacy of the state. Overall, I think anything close to Anarcho-Captitalism is unachievable without a European supermajority.

have a society were the NAP is thought in schools

>At last he had conquered everything, and he inherited... dust.
This is what "fittest" means to a nigger.

There is a hidden message in this image but I can't quite tell what it says

So you have no response? It's a pretty basic question.

>statists allowed
And just like that, your system collapses.

yes i dont think an ancap society can be multi-ethnic

I hate to be pedantic, but what about families who can't afford schools or the schools themselves who would have the right to not teach the NAP?
I'm not a fan of public schools btw

Do you know how to reply directly to a post, newfriend?

I think you'll find the dark triad can get you lots of attention from women and is indeed "alpha", but it isn't noble and results in the kind of society you see in shithole countries.

Also,
>survival of the fittest
>but retards want to take 2 of them away from me
Do you see the problem? If he can't stop it then he isn't really the "fittest".
>implying niggers even understand that word

chartity maybe i don't know i will have to think about or maybe smarter people can answer that one

It was obvious sarcasm. It's kind of obvious. Fight until you win, or lose. If you insist that a state is truly inevitable, there is still no logical reason to concede to it. It's like saying "you're going to die eventually, might as well kill yourself". It simply does not follow. In the end, at least you were free for a time. Everything is temporary. Do you have a better question?

Contracts or similar culture. Private property. Respect for self ownership. Faith. Guns. Family and friends. The recognition of your property by others, even states.

also ancapistan would not be utopia anyone that says i would be is complete moron it would have problems like any system will

Just gonna leave this here to remind people that commies or or any similar group, regardless of name, have no rights in America and as such are free to be killed.

The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein by force and violence, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and whatever rights, privileges, and immunities which have heretofore been granted to said party or any subsidiary organization by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are terminated: Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed as amending the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.]
(Aug. 24, 1954, ch. 886, ยง3, 68 Stat. 776.)

Tbh, most people aren't going to want to fight, so you're going to have to rely on technology or be an indispensable neutral party (think Switzerland). A few nukes wouldn't hurt.

Friedrich Engels was not for monogomy.

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/

So you would die for an impossible ideal and doom everyone to tyranny rather than attempt to build a system that maximizes liberty?

sorry still kind of a new fag

>this a theard to discuss the jungle
ftfy

Fuck my white daughter?

This is the thing that pisses me off so much about fucking commies. You have no integrity.

When you call a nazi a nazi, he will own up to it. And when you talk about the holocaust they will either own up to that too or explain why in great detail as to how they believe it did not happen.

Communists on the other hand, if you call them a liberal they will go.
"Oh sorry im not a liberal, im a lennist stalinst trotskyist maoist ..."

And in addition when you talk about the millions of deaths they will say either.

"Kulaks deserved it", "Revisionist propaganda", "Or muh xxx,xxx,xxx (in the contex that they dont think anyone died but dont even care to back up their claim)"

nope

The problem with polygamy is it results in young bachelors. Without a sense of investment in life, young bachelors won't work as hard and can even be dangerous. Monogamy is a civilizing force, and a wife and family makes a man work harder, think about the future, and gives him something to lose. This helps if you don't want a bunch of young, lonely workers slitting your throat.

>So you would die for an impossible ideal
All ideals are impossible. Humans are fundamentally flawed.
>doom everyone to tyranny
That's a little melodramatic...
>rather than attempt to build a system that maximizes liberty?
That wasn't part of your question, nigger.

Checked and true. Ppl are weak now but maybe that will change. We can all have floating cities and nukes to stop from being preyed upon.

anyone have a video that can redpill a normie about the benefits of ancap? not just some retarded old dutch guy blathering on about imaginary warlords.. how do angry miniorities like blacks and women survive in an ancap world

while i don't think it should be banned it should be shamed as much as possible

Would not roads be maintained by their local communities? It would have to be a conscious effort but it isn't possible to maintain roads with a small community effort. Of course you'd have some areas that are better than others but that all comes down to how committed one neighborhood/city is to having smooth travel. One should know that having terrible roads would make for less travel and less business.

Tiggered nigger communist detected.

youtube.com/watch?v=rlgaADnL-qs not perfect but i think it could do the trick

>rather than attempt to build a system that maximizes liberty?

Your 'system' is a 'lack' of system in a sense, is it not? Does it not follow that you would oppose the formation of any sort of government?

Who enforces the contracts and Private property laws? Hired mercenaries?

If someone does not respect your claim to property and is strong enough to take it from you what mechanism would be in place to discourage that?

I could kinda tell by your posting style (^;
I might also infer that you're somewhat young.
Might I ask how you came to holding your position as an AnCap? For me it was Stefan Molyneux podcasts and then I started reading Rothbard, Rand, and Hoppe (of which I would recommend if you haven't already read them, especially Hoppe).

That isn't natural selection though...

Maintained by communities or start up businesses or who knows. But the extended order would provide a better solution than state monopoly. I live n a state with a lot of roads. Mayb n ancapistan some guys will get vehicles and equipmonk and go secure maintenance contracts from businesses or communities or benevolent reptilian philanthropists.

I propose that we start calling ourselves Radical Capitalists because we're only making the hierarchies voluntary instead of eliminating them entirely. Also, statist should not be allowed and should get the same treatment as commies.

In the transition to having no state, who gets the nukes?

Everyone. The free market will make mini-nukes available to those who can't afford full warheads.

many options. communities are certainly one. free private cities would build and maintain their own infrastructure. some roads could be toll roads run by private companies. something i recently discovered is russian smugglers voluntarily repairing the roads they use because it's good for business, so that is always something that could happen

I think you missed the dudes point. He was just saying that being as biologically successful is absolutely survival of the fittest. He wasn't advocating for polygamy but he used it as an example since natural selection favors parents that can breed the most, and have their off spring be the most resistant to what ever may kill them before reproduction, which is exactly what polygamy does.

For a New Liberty by Murray Rothbard is a good start. I hear Ludwig von Mises is also good, but I can't testify.
If books are too long for normies, Molymeme videos are a good alternative.

Wait so Ancap Utopia is Fallout? FUCKING SICK

Yes user it is force. It is the threat of violence too. You need ppl on your side. Some ppl would say the Church helped hold western civilization together over the centuries. That is an example of how religion can provide some peace, laws, and order. And things other than religion can bind groups and allow for peace and prosperity. But it obviously takes vigilance and hard work. And dead commies.

mr.dapperton, killian,that guy t and pretty much every other ancap youtubers for me not the must amazing starting place but hey you have to start some were also im getting in to hoppe recently

No.

I don't think we would see these massive thermonuclear warheads that we see today in an ancap.

There just too big and expensive. Smaller nukes around the size and magnitude of a davy crocket would possibly be very present in an ancap since it would be cheaper to launch a davy crocket in terms of fuel. You wouldn't need as much fissile material either.

They still likely be expensive, probably around the cost of a small yacht.

Yeah but they already exist today in huge amounts owned by the state, after the state is gone where do those nukes go?

Dapperton has a very bad habbit of remaking his videos over and over as well as uploading other youtuber's videos to his channel. Plus the way he argues is not as clear and detailed as for say someone like Stefan Molyneux or Hans Hermann Hoppe.

Not familiar with the first two, but T is a based negro.

...

...

like i sad that was my starting point i have grown from there also hoppe is awesome i have not read the god who failed yet but i will when i get time to

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

I think we may have different definitions of words like 'government' and 'libertarian'. I am having trouble seeing how what you propose is libertarian. I thought that non aggression was a principle part of the ideology, but threats of force is aggression in my view.

How is a church or group of people enforcing law and order not a form of government? Especially when you go into how that group would need to have some sort of structure. I infer the 'leaders' would be democratically appointed?

Sorry if I am I missing something, trying to get a feel for what this society would look like.

...

> when you win the argument so they resort to memes and insults
Superior ideology right here.

wouldn't recommend daps and killian for people that already know about the ancap ideology but to red pill normies would recommend 100% also im getting tired so i will stop for now bye

The most disingenuous snakes slithering around our society....

The answer to that question is "perverse incentives".

...

...

BROKEN ARROW BROKEN ARROW! SNAKE AND NAPE DANGER CLOSE ON MY SIGNAL!
We need Anti Com Act Support at Courthouse Square in Prescott Arizona Now! Arizona Statists report in! We are being over run! BROKEN ARROW!

BTW, have we ever established a fundamental difference between ancaps and libertarians. To me, it was always about motive with libertarians favoring freedom and ancaps favoring productivity.

As a transhumanist, I would have to favor productivity in order to gain the tech and medicine capable of pushing me past peak human abilities, but my ultimate goal was freedom and thus I've always identified as a libertarian.

> Take a peak at the ancap thread for comparrison
> actual discussion and passable political memes

Well shucks
Carry on

Drink a frosty glass of class-analysis comrade!

>caught me posting with my meme flag
Never call me comrade, that is a disgusting word.
/k/omrade is acceptable

I don't know how a copyright would work in an ancap, but this is pretty funny.

What do you guys think about the rampant SJWism that consuming the libertarian movement? This chick freaked out on a guy who posted some anti-african migrant thing and banned him from an ancap group.

Read the last sentence and tell me that isn't cognitive dissonance of the highest order.

I think copyright will be secured cryptographically somehow.

copyright/patent is basically claiming to own an idea, and ideas are not property, so it wouldn't exist in a free society. but it is a good meme

DRM and price walls could work, but beyond that I have no clue.

Not being able to have exclusivity to your idea is a huge loss for innovation. How this would be overcame is beyond me.

The American Libertarian Party is full of mostly liberals who support legalization of canabis and are more free market.

But hell Gary Johnson had the audacity to call Hillary a "wonderful public servant".

youtube.com/watch?v=cIxJicyjLLE

on the contrary, patent/copyright are often used to stifle innovation by patent holders suing competitors with similar ideas

To be honest I can understand the sentiment that just because we defend free speech doesn't mean subjectively that we have to prefer being assholes.

I want to win and I want the world to change and we still live in a society which means appearances matter and getting people to like us matters.

It was the same with when Tucker came out about Libertarian brutalism, yes you can say what you want but should you want to and should we want each other to as our subjective preference? Let's just say both are understandable and I don't think one is anymore of an SJW influence than we are also having an alt-right influence at the same time.

I would like to just say 6 months seperates the two but it really comes down to whether people believe enough in an uncertainty about not needing the last vestiges of the state and the comfort and familiarity of going almost all the way there but with some "pragmatism" to help justify your stance in the views of normies.

As a communist fascist, I am sick of antifa and I think the attempt to borrow from antifa is stupid