Trump socialist policy

Trump administration is thinking of nationalizing the countries wireless 5g network

thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/371148-axios-trump-administration-mulling-nationalization-of-5g-network

Other urls found in this thread:

mobile.twitter.com/grantstern/status/957767308407078912
axios.com/trump-team-debates-nationalizing-5g-network-f1e92a49-60f2-4e3e-acd4-f3eb03d910ff.html
mobile.twitter.com/danprimack/status/957748659671764992
youtube.com/watch?v=jrNcOhe1ZhQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

4th Reich when?

I don't like this.

I totally support this.

It will open up the market to smaller companies to offer services.

Literally Hitler

mobile.twitter.com/grantstern/status/957767308407078912

This is the original article

axios.com/trump-team-debates-nationalizing-5g-network-f1e92a49-60f2-4e3e-acd4-f3eb03d910ff.html

your taxdollars already paid for it

telecom infrastructure is pretty much 100% covered by the amount of subsidies we gave them

Kill yourself

its better than being a globalist

So what's wrong with this?

Kek. Hillary literally campaigned on free WiFi. The faggots are insufferable.

Many free market conservatives are made saying it is socialism, and the left is mad saying it is literally Hitler

What’s the difference

mobile.twitter.com/danprimack/status/957748659671764992

...

...

Oh so socialism is okay as long as you don't give a shit about the place you live.

Ah yes, I remember that time that Hitler nationalised the 4th Reichs internet

"I'm a nationalist and a socialist".

HAHAHAHA OP LEAVES AND KILLS HIMSELF LOOK HOW LONG ITS BEEN SINCE A POST LOL GET REKT FUCKING LIBKEK IMA BOMB YOUR NEXT ANTIFA RALLY DOGS LOL

(((Stern)))

I’m here memeflag

This is just net neutrality without the Obama wtf Donald?

How fast is 5G? Good enough for free internet?

>leftists are constantly screaming about how the internet infrastructure needs to be nationalized because de facto monopolies are created by ISPs and it fucks everyone over
>Trump says, "huh, you're right, we'll do that"
>they change their stance overnight
holy fuck that's just sad

There are no brakes on the accelerationism train

It can be justified for the same reasons high ways were justified
National Security

Literally who, but still fun

>muh private roads
>muh principles
Lolbergs don't even know why they 'believe' what they do, they just repeat what they've heard someone else say as justification.

>free market conservatives
Who gives a fuck what they say anyway?

It's always annoyed me how we (in Australia at least) have three overlapping and redundant mobile networks (and three times as many ugly cell towers as we need), have long supported renationalising the system

Trump is literally Mussolini

Free market in this day adlnd age is like giving freedom to a girl and call it a success when all she does at school is turn into a slut instead of acquiring knowledge, the real way to attain freedom.

Is this slide the evidence of the said claim? I don't see it.

The left are scum and they always will betray their own beliefs if need be to oppose the right.

If Trump can get us a 5G network that 1gb/s download and unlimited for $80 a month, he'll win a second term.

As a bonus legalize weed and he wins a third term

That's what I was voting for.

This desu senpai

jesus christ these brainlets....

>break up ISP monopolies
>no need for NN

>WTF I HATE SOCIALISM NOW

Does this """academic""" not realize that there is a massive gulf between the Republican electorate and Conservative Movement ideologues?

Does 5G even exist now? Thought it was still in the R&D phase.

Kek, people are starting wondering if this National Socialism I want more of it.

I stopped being a conservative when I realized there was nothing left to conserve.

Correct. Now it's a movement of the future. An alternative to leftist progressivism

(Reuters) - President Donald Trump's national security team is looking at options to counter the threat of China spying on U.S. phone calls that include the government building a super-fast 5G wireless network, a senior administration official said on Sunday.

The official, confirming the gist of a report from Axios.com, said the option was being debated at a low level in the administration and was six to eight months away from being considered by the president himself.

I have a 5g router

But I bet you love all the corporate welfare subsidies that go from U.S. taxpayers into the pockets of oil companies, the telecoms, and the defense industry

5G (fifth generation cell service) is not the same thing as 5G (5 gigahertz wifi).

Trust me dudes it's nothing but trouble, learn from our mistakes

> Makes a retarded post not knowing the difference between 5GHz WiFi and 5G networks.
> That flag.
0 surprises so far today.

im betting its FAKE NEWS

I absolutely support it

Government owns the infrastructure - like the national highway, but leases it out to ISP's to sell to people.

Avoids the inherent natural monopoly problem with internet infrastructure by having the monopolist be the government beholden to the people, and most importantly - making money by selling the lines to ISP's while effectively also sponsoring competition between ISP's.

Completely avoids the need for regulations like net neutrality by imposing competition a more effective way.

I like the proposal even as someone against the net neutrality repeal.

The president himself wasn’t present, his National security team was debating the idea.

That's pretty much exactly what a nationalized 5G internet would do.

1. 5G internet infrastructure is still separate from the rest of the internet infrastructure. So there isn't even a government monopoly - all the land lines are still owned by private corporations that built them out.
2. The government can roll out the 5G network at a fraction of the price of a regular landline network, with equivalent or better speeds and latencies.
3. The government can then lease the 5G network to privately owned ISP's, creating competition between providers without creating a monopoly situation that current landlines suffer from.
4. Worst case scenario you can just get a landline connection if you think your 5G ISP are being shitheads or you hate government anything.

More competition, improved infrastructure, better for national security, and it makes the government money instead of costing the government money.

Trump wins again! He can do no wrong, truly /ourgodemperor/. Now how do we get those 2 million basedpedes amnestied and breeding with our white womanpedes?

>trust telecomms giants with 5g
we get jew'd
>trust the government with 5g
we get jew'd

this is a lose-lose situation, we're just helpless goyim in a conflict between kikes over who gets to rob us of our money. Why even discuss it? We get shafted regardless.

Great, 5g would save America 50 percent on electricity

I don't even utilize 4G i hate phones mines used just for communications & "idk lemme google that"

>this is a lose-lose situation, we're just helpless goyim
I don't understand man what can you do with a connection even faster than LTE other than consume jew media in 4k?

If the government leases to the ISP, then the ISP can't deplatform for hate speech because the first amendment would apply to a public space.

I use a cell SIM in my thinkpad and you can get mobile modems. 5G isnt just for phones.

5g is going to make everyone electrosensitive, enjoy your chronic diseases

Trump should nationalize ICANN next as well.

This puts a permanent stop to leftists trying to control the internet.

Obama gave away ICANN by the way. Trump should undo his damage.

This thread is really showing how stupid people are who poste on pol

>the old, 'people who aren't constantly surrounded by computers or informed on upcoming technologies are stupid'
cityboy detected, how's that soymilk

NATIONAL

SOCIALIST

They want 5G for mind control

nazbol is the future. trump got eleceted based off nazbol platform

correct

And also, it means if you ever do get deplatformed for 'hate speech' or what the fuck ever, you have an avenue to take through suing the ISP/government as a violation of your constitutional rights

He can't do that
ICANN has a "physical core", it's suspected it's in china now
you can't bifurcate
You can create an intranet but i doubt you will do that

>5G network is public owned
>5G network now is under the purview of the Constitution and it's inalienable rights
>5G network is 100% protected under the 1st Amendment
> YouTube comments can't be deleted for "Hate Speech" if YouTube accesses the 5G network to stream on.
> YouTube has to use the 5G network or be slower loading / worse resolution than new competition running on the 5G network

Seems like a win too me.

>ICANN
>in China
lol, sorry Juan, it's in Canada.

>When neoliberal shilling makes libs forget what socialism is so you can call trump Literally Hitler

> (OP)
>4th Reich when?
this

5g is a bad thing, nationalizing it is not.

4g is more than enough desu

yay, let's argue about who gets to give the population cancer and sterilize them with microwave radiation, while also controlling them in a full spectrum surveillance grid

>5g is a bad thing, nationalizing it is not.

plz explain this. how is a larger number not better?

Isn't 5G DNA-frying poison?

youtube.com/watch?v=jrNcOhe1ZhQ

lol prolly

Makes you wonder why Australia doesn't just do this.

They are doing that expensive fiber to the node or home shit.

Good. The heavy industry, the military–industrial complex and the banking system are next.
After that liquidate all student debt and the US govt. will be republican for the next 100 years.

It would easily win him reelection tho

wtf, we love centralized economies now

Fucking Jewish capitalist piece of shit
1488

I support this, fuck corporations and greedy capitalists. This will also piss off librls

Same.

NATIONALIZE TWITTER!!!

Literally 1984

>ICANN has a "physical core", it's suspected it's in china now

link me to an article about this, Pablo.

also if I destroy this 'core' will I destroy the internet?

Not a fan either.

Don’t see how this will stand up in court or even pass Congress

>want net neutrality but not this

Literally lefties need to be shot

Why in the fuck would this be cheaper

The government has never done anything cheap and never will

Without something like this, the telecom companies will NEVER connect rural America to any reliable, truly broadband network. It's not profitable enough for Verizon, AT&T, Spectrum, Comcast, Etc to bring high speed internet to the people that aren't living in the cities, this is the only way that will work.

Something as powerful as 5G is considerable a strategic resource you dumb nuts. Of course they will nationalise it, they want to control like to prevent foreign enemy powers to do it in their place, like with electrical distribution or arms manufacturing
Dumb liberals

Who the fuck cares about internet? What you should be worrying about is if people start killing government officials and reporters.

I'm assuming the tweets being shown are all from Liberals who would support this but because it is Trump they are flat out against this?

Obama did promise this, in 2007. He failed to deliver.