Ancap appreciation thread

Post anarcho-capitalist material.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=KAExa9P7hME
libcom.org/files/intro pamphlet reading.pdf
infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionA
infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionF
c4ss.org/content/4043
theanarchistlibrary.org/library/pierre-joseph-proudhon-what-is-property-an-inquiry-into-the-principle-of-right-and-of-governmen
theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-the-conquest-of-bread
radgeek.com/gt/2011/10/Markets-Not-Capitalism-2011-Chartier-and-Johnson.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

...

...

...

Wait a minute, who the fuck is THAT guy? That guy in the Garfield cartoon, since when did Jon Arbuckle have any friends? I could swear he's never had any friends. Ok, he had a girlfriend but that's different, she only dated him because he was pathetic enough to tolerate her frigidity and cynicism. But a friend?

WHAT THE FUCK

Welcome to universe B. Your heart is in the center of your chest instead of the left side now.

youtube.com/watch?v=KAExa9P7hME

Oh boy thats my chance

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

fuck

...

...

goth girl

...

...

These may all be ridiculous strawmen, but I like how everybody is so rich they have their own personal attack helicopters.

...

...

last one for now

Welcome to our timeline friend.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

These last ones are good for a laugh.

...

...

...

...

...

...

That's all.

ahahaha this is new.

well, I'm on the side of the renegade jew that wanted to eat the rich jews

>wanted to eat rich Jews
No, he wanted to eat all business owners in general. Retard tier ideology, just like Libertarianism. Same shitty quality of life, just in different ways.

Ah, to have crossed over again

...

Lyman

>who is Hoppe lmao
You're posting in the wrong thread, buddy. Unless disinformation was your goal all along.

0.02$ has been deposited into your account

>You're posting in the wrong thread, buddy.
"I can do what I want"
-Libertarians
Also Hoppe doesn't solve any of the problems presented by Libertarianism and Capitalism.
It makes assumptions that, for whatever reason, these societies will be perfectly self sustaining and that companies will never abuse their power.
Newfaggotry at it's finest. Go to Sup Forums for your borderless Libertarian paradise. Sup Forums used to be a NatSoc board until you niggers came along. You don't even have any pre 2015 OC, that's how fucking new you all are. Ron Paul doesn't count, by the way, because NatSoc supported him too.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
ITS CHANGING

Copyrights require a government Dingus

Like NatSocs make the assumption that some magical Mary Sue leader will come about?

>Like NatSocs make the assumption that some magical Mary Sue leader will come about?
No, the purpose of shit like the Hitler Youth was also to train future leaders. How retarded are you?

...

...

Capitalism has no problems, which is why all political systems hang onto it to leech off of productive citizens.
It is the backbone of everything, carrying not only its own weight, but also the weight of those who hate it because they can't compete.
Borders come naturally with property, there aren't many states that will allow you to shoot a Jew banker for violating the terms of his contract, because he lended you money he didn't have.
We took this board from you because you're pushovers, and we made the right decision. Ron Paul is the only truly libertarian politician.

No they don't you moron, they require someone who enforces them.
A private entity can enforce copyright, given the right conditions.

...

...

...

>Capitalism has no problems, which is why all political systems hang onto it to leech off of productive citizens.
HAHAHAHAHA
Depressions, slave labor, starting wars for profit, abysmal working conditions, scandals, theft, abuse, rigging the markets, etc. The only reason we aren't in such horrible working conditions is because Fascists and NatSocs revolutionized the working world with shit like mandatory bathrooms, working conditions, etc. Without government intervention, you would have industrial revolution tier working conditions. Your system is so shitty it literally made people think that Communism was a viable alternative. There's a reason it got so popular, and it's your fault.
>We took this board from you because you're pushovers, and we made the right decision. Ron Paul is the only truly libertarian politician.
t. skeptic
The only reason Sup Forums even supported Ron Paul is because he wasn't ZOG.

This. Nazis are pure larpers and the delusional. I appreciate the intellectual discussion when brought forth, but literally the serious Nazis here think they are going to invade Tuvalu. Real bunch of winners, those Nazis.

A private entity could theoretically take your money at gunpoint each month.
Intellectual property isn't libertarian.

...

You have inalienable rights concerning your person. This means you have the right to terminate a contract concerning your person. According to said contract, though, you might be obligated to compensate your employer financially to the tune of what you agreed to pay in this instance when you signed the contract.

>A private entity could theoretically take your money at gunpoint each month.
Yes, how is that different from what the government does?

Obviously, the implication was that this private entity is recognized, that it is able to enforce its decisions, and that it is (or at least appears) fair (or, failing that, that people are too scared to contest it, and that if they do they're easily repressed).
Like, you know, the government.

>Libertarians
>understanding that people will do fucked up shit for profit
Pick one.
He's going to say "muh public relations" or "muh NAP, people will defend themselves"

I'm not even a lolbertarian or ancap, but what you're saying here is retarded.

All of those problems are problems with coercion, not capitalism. Business owners have an incentive to build toilets and provide decent working conditions if they wish to employ the best workers. All socialism is a high-time-preference savage's way of looking at the world, whether it wraps its hideous body in a national flag or in the red banner of the international Jew. At least the fascists are smart enough not to out themselves as degenerate socialists, unlike yourself.
As for Ron Paul, his main merit was his sound policy. Of course he wasn't ZOG, the kikes hate libertarianism so much they kick actual libertarian thinkers out of the movement - even the Jews!

>All of those problems are problems with coercion, not capitalism.
Wrong.
>Business owners have an incentive to build toilets and provide decent working conditions if they wish to employ the best workers.
Or they could outsource jobs and import people who work for cheaper.
>All socialism is a high-time-preference savage's way of looking at the world, whether it wraps its hideous body in a national flag or in the red banner of the international Jew. At least the fascists are smart enough not to out themselves as degenerate socialists, unlike yourself.
Here we go, with the accusations of Marxism from you retards, just like clockwork.
>calling me degenerate when you want porn, drugs, and materialism encouraged and normalized
What are you on, user?
>As for Ron Paul, his main merit was his sound policy.
Yes - not being ZOG.
>Of course he wasn't ZOG, the kikes hate libertarianism so much they kick actual libertarian thinkers out of the movement - even the Jews!
lmao, then explain all the Jewish thinkers of Libertarianism. The kikes don't hate Libertarianism - they love it. They can enforce selfishness and materialism, playing on the want for freedom. The Jews were able to take the concept of Liberty and twist it, because it's a vague term. The American melting pot shit was made up by a Jew, and Americans defend it because "you can't generalize people, you have to look at them as individuals." It's literally: ignore trends - the ideology. The only people Libertarians go after are "statists". You must be retarded if you haven't seen this trend of Libertarians and skeptics going after people further right than them. All this while you can't agree on policy among yourselves. Don't be confused - I don't fear a Libertarian uprising because you retards are too divided and stuck up your own asses to agree on anything. That's why so often you refuse to be "grouped together". You all have your own special snowflake ideology. I just want you to stop wasting time LARPing.

What about it is retarded?

>Retards voluntarily sign contract that makes them slaves
>This is bad and would be forbidden in ancapistan
Best strawman/bait yet

Basically everything you said.
>Copyright needs a government to enforce it
No, it just needs some sort of authority.
>But a private authority can just threaten you and take your money
So can a government
>MUH LIBERTARETARDS
Not an argument.

>Copyright needs a government to enforce it
When the fuck did I say this?
>So can a government
Yes, but governments, just like companies, are just tools. It's not the government, it's the people filling those positions and abusing power. All you have to do is have a system, like the Hitler Youth, train people to be fucking responsible and have a system that trains exceptional volunteers from such a program to be leaders. Once that happens, you get a self sustaining system where it's not bound to bloodline or retarded democracy, but to the best and strongest. You can reasonably guarantee that a government won't abuse it's power in such a way, but you can't really do that with a company. Most companies just want profit, and while this isn't bad, they shouldn't be able to abuse their power to get it.
>Not an argument.
Never said it was, user. Also, what you said isn't even what I replied to you with.
In any case, I'm going to bed.

Implying any non shill here appreciates them

(((Someones))) worried that people might become independent of the system ITT

'Anarcho'-capitalism is an oxymoron and is not a form of anarchism. Anarchism doesn't mean just opposing the state, it means opposing all forms of coercive hierarchy and authority. 'Anarcho'-Capitalism is better called feudalism.

>Introduction to Anarchism
libcom.org/files/intro pamphlet reading.pdf

>The Anarchist FAQ
infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionA

>Is 'Anarcho'-Capitalism a form of Anarchism?
infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionF

>'Anarcho'-Capitalism is impossible.
c4ss.org/content/4043

>What is Property, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon
theanarchistlibrary.org/library/pierre-joseph-proudhon-what-is-property-an-inquiry-into-the-principle-of-right-and-of-governmen

>The Conquest of Bread, Peter Kropotkin
theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-the-conquest-of-bread

>Markets not capitalism
radgeek.com/gt/2011/10/Markets-Not-Capitalism-2011-Chartier-and-Johnson.pdf

...

It means no rulers. It doesn't mean collectivising in a smelly unwashed heap so we can all grow dreadlocks even though we're white

...

...

actually one of Poles that live in UK also wanted a duel i think with Nigel Farage
sabres of course

Civic anarchism is an even bigger meme than civic nationalism

Its your choice who you associate with - you can stick to whites if you want

>it means opposing all forms of coercive hierarchy and authority
Ancap believes itself voluntary.

welcome to the world where our gut is a disorganized mess, instead of neatly organized

Atomic Cars When?

what the fuck
heart is on the left side of body not in center
it's just badly drawn scheme

>>/leftypol/

We already know that we are not anarchists in your sense of the word. In our sense, we mean without government.

Quite frankly I don't really see why people get so pissed off at hierarchies. They have existed long before civilization and can be found seemingly everywhere and are incredibility complex.

But when people get pissed off because they have to work for any employer (including them selves) I honestly fail to understand why they are so upset in the first place.

If we where on our own we would have to work to survive so what is the difference anyway?