He did nail it in some (mind you, some, not all) aspects of the modern day left, but he wasn't the first one to do so.
Anyway, while his "diagnosis" may have been somehow accurate, the "antidote" that he chose to administer was beyond fucked up.
>He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster.
Rings a bell? That's what happened here. Shame too, because he's obviously a very smart guy.
I don't support killing people in general, but even more so innocent people. And while you could argue (and I know that at least some of you would, because we've had similar threads about Breivik over the years and it's pretty much the same shit, isn't it?) that the university professors were accountable for social engineering the youth towards what he perceived to be the destruction of traditional values etc., why would you target some random fucking nerd working his ass off at a computer store?
And even with all of them university professors, what sort of autistic logic is that? You can't kill a thought or an idea, there's always going to be a clash of ideals because that's how the world is, we'll always argue about stuff because we're humans. And very similar ideologies pop up in different cycles all the time, just under different guises.
With each person that he killed, he created a martyr for the ideology that he was trying to resist. In other words, he helped his own enemies. Hopefully at least some of you can see this?
Killing is wrong desu. And I love it how whenever someone like that hates da gubbamint with a burning passion they'll still always target the civilians, because that's easier.
What he did was wrong, IMHO. We're humans, not beasts. And it's good to remind yourself of that every now and then and ponder on what separates us from animals.
>Is it worth discussing in philosophical circles?
Everything is worth discussing, that's why we have brains. If someone can't handle it, they need to man the fuck up.