Ok, quick question, where does this whole "Black people are ANIMALS/subhuman" shit even come from...

Ok, quick question, where does this whole "Black people are ANIMALS/subhuman" shit even come from. All of the examples I see to back up those claims are cherry picked, the cause for them usually being from their upbringing rather than genetics, which was a result of a large amount of factors out of their control. This doesn't justify their actions, mind you, but it makes the "subhuman" thing feel like a sloppy label to help people feel justified in not taking any steps to improve the living conditions in these areas, giving them the excuse of it being a "lost cause", when in reality if they were put on equal footing as you there wouldn't be much of a difference, it's just that some people don't want to go through the trouble of doing so, so they shoddily rationalize just ignoring the issue as it gets more and more dire, and if the situation ever gets to be as bad as some are fearing they'll have nobody to blame but themselves.

Tl;Dr Nurture > nature, faggots.

[spoiler] also pic somewhat related. Apes exhibiting human intelligence, something that some idiots would view as foreign as a dark skinned human acting like a human, as nature intended in their case, while said idiots view it as foreign an idea as the apes in pic related..
But mostly because I wanted a visual gag. [/spoiler]
[spoiler] also realized that my quick question derailed into a soap box WHOOPS [/spoiler]

Other urls found in this thread:

researchgate.net/publication/260436834_Factor_Analysis_of_Population_Allele_Frequencies_as_a_Simple_Novel_Method_of_Detecting_Signals_of_Recent_Polygenic_Selection_The_Example_of_Educational_Attainment_and_IQ
biochemsoctrans.org/content/33/4/582.long
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15654335
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20116045
academic.oup.com/hmg/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/hmg/ddh127
johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/genetics/brain/lahn_2005_aspm_microcephalin_science.html
youtube.com/watch?v=hR90t55CvbE
dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2013/09/22/wide-racial-gap-persists-in-testing.html
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html
lagriffedulion.f2s.com/testing.htm
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/the-bell-curve.pdf
object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-298.pdf
ncpublicschools.org/docs/accountability/reporting/sat/2010/satreport2010.pdf
researchgate.net/publication/280232788_Race_Poverty_and_SAT_Scores_Modeling_the_Influences_of_Family_Income_on_Black_and_White_High_School_Students'_SAT_Performance
files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED469243.pdf
emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/The-g-factor-the-science-of-mental-ability-Arthur-R.-Jensen.pdf
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a2d7/85edd7aa61b7ba51355053cc61d8b924fe35.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Evolving for several hundred thousand years under different selection pressures leads to no differences
>dogs have hundreds of breeds for the same reasons
>not humans though we are all the same

Ok, then how would you define human?

In regards to Aborigines we literally treated them as animals. We dealt with them under the Flora and Fauna Act until 1967 or something.
They didn't meet any of the British criteria for civilization or society when Europeans arrived. Maoris in New Zealand had recognisable civilization so they got a treaty and were dealt with as people. Aborigines though:
>No recognisable king or political system
>No cities or towns
>No major civilization
>Even other tribal societies like Aztecs and Mayans had recognisable civilization

they smell bad and act like monkeys

It comes from real world encounters and actual first person experience. Holy shit, do you live in some kind of all white nature preserve?

Checked.
It's not cherry picking it's the truth extracted out from all groups of niggers.
Stereotypical niggers are the META niggers if you will.
Glad I could clear that up user.

...

Also

Lastly

...

* Factor analysis of population Allele frequencies as a simple, novel method of detecting signals of recent Polygenic selection: the example of educational attainment and IQ. (this is by far the most extensive and profound work on identifying genes responsible for cognitive ability, with extremely strong and significant correlations, the The correlations between races is also extremely significant. This study really shows A very strong probability of how different the races truly are [and there's nothing wrong with that it may just be a factor of nature], of all the studies this one is by far the most interesting and I recommend reading it in its entirety).
The first is rs236330, located within gene FNBP1L, whose significant association with general intelligence has been reported in two separate studies (Davies et al, 2011; Benyamin et al, 2013). This gene is strongly expressed in neurons, including hippocampal neurons and developing brains, where it regulates neuronal morphology (Davies et al, 2011). The second SNP is rs324650. It was included because its association with IQ has been replicated in four association studies (Comings et al, 2003; Dick et al, 2007; Gosso et al, 2006, 2007). This SNP is located in the gene CHRM2 (cholinergic receptor, muscarinic #2), which is involved in neuronal excitability, synaptic plasticity and feedback regulation of acetylcholine release... Genes associated with educational attainment were
obtained from a very recent genome-wide association study relying on a very large sample (126,559 individuals), which identified 10 SNPs associated with educational attainment that reached suggestive genome-wide significance.

The outcome measures were an individuals years of schooling and a binary variable for college completion (Rietvald et al., 2013). Three of the 10 SNPs (rs9320913; rs11584700; rs4851266) replicated in a subsequent meta-analysis. The 10 SNPs were searched on HapMap, release #28 (hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and 1000 Genomes, in order to
find allele frequencies for different populations.

1000 genomes were correlated with population IQ. Correlation was very high and highly significant (r=0.90, N=14; p

The national ranking for scores on standardized tests of educational attainment closely mirrors the gradient observed in frequencies of genes associated with this construct. East
Asians have the highest frequencies of alleles beneficial to educational attainment (39%) and consistently outperform other racial groups both within the US and around the world, in terms of educational variabilities such as completion of college degree or results on standardized test of scholastic achievement. Europeans have slightly lower frequencies of educational attainment alleles (35.5%) and perform slightly worse in terms of educational attainment, compared to East Asians. On the other hand, Africans seem to be disadvantaged both with regards to their level of educational attainment in the US and around the world. Indeed, Africans have the lowest frequencies of alleles associated with educational attainment (16.4%).
Source: researchgate.net/publication/260436834_Factor_Analysis_of_Population_Allele_Frequencies_as_a_Simple_Novel_Method_of_Detecting_Signals_of_Recent_Polygenic_Selection_The_Example_of_Educational_Attainment_and_IQ

* Evidence suggesting that Homo neanderthalensis contributed the H2 MAPT haplotype to Homo sapiens.
The tau (MAPT) locus exists as two distinct clades, H1 and H2. The H1 clade has a normal linkage disequilibrium structure and is the only haplotype found in all populations except those derived from Caucasians. The H2 haplotype is the minor haplotype in Caucasian populations and is not found in other populations. It shows no recombination over a region of 2Mb with the more common H1 haplotype. The distribution of the haplotype and analysis of the slippage of dinucleotide repeat markers within the haplotype suggest that it entered Homo sapiens populations between approx.10000 and 30000years ago. However, sequence comparison of the H2 haplotype with the H1 haplotype and with the chimp sequence suggests that the common founder of the H1 and H2 haplotypes was far earlier than this. We suggest that the H2 haplotype is derived from Homo neanderthalensis and entered H. sapienspopulations during the co-existence of these species in Europe from approx.45000 to 18000years ago and that the H2 haplotype has been under selection pressure since that time, possibly because of the role of this H1 haplotype in neurodegenerative disease.
Source: biochemsoctrans.org/content/33/4/582.long

* A common inversion under selection in Europeans.
A refined physical map of chromosome 17q21.31 uncovered a 900-kb inversion polymorphism. Chromosomes with the inverted segment in different orientations represent two distinct lineages, H1 and H2, that have diverged for as much as 3 million years and show no evidence of having recombined. The H2 lineage is rare in Africans, almost absent in East Asians but found at a frequency of 20% in Europeans, in whom the haplotype structure is indicative of a history of positive selection. Here we show that the H2 lineage is undergoing positive selection in the Icelandic population, such that carrier females have more children and have higher recombination rates than noncarriers.
Source: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15654335

* The distribution and most recent common ancestor of the 17q21 inversion in humans.
(this study contested with the alternative explanation that the higher age to frequency is a founder affect. So basically it contested the previous two studies however it still concludes that H2 is found at highest frequencies in parts of Europe and Asia, and lowest in Africa and other parts of Asia) The polymorphic inversion on 17q21, sometimes called the microtubular associated protein tau (MAPT) inversion, is an approximately 900 kb inversion found primarily in Europeans and Southwest Asians. We have identified 21 SNPs that act as markers of the inverted, i.e., H2, haplotype. The inversion is found at the highest frequencies in Southwest Asia and Southern Europe (frequencies of approximately 30%); elsewhere in Europe, frequencies vary from < 5%, in Finns, to 28%, in Orcadians. The H2 inversion haplotype also occurs at low frequencies in Africa, Central Asia, East Asia, and the Americas, though the East Asian and Amerindian alleles may be due to recent gene flow from Europe. Molecular evolution analyses indicate that the H2 haplotype originally arose in Africa or Southwest Asia. Though the H2 inversion has many fixed differences across the approximately 900 kb, short tandem repeat polymorphism data indicate a very recent date for the most recent common ancestor, with dates ranging from 13,600 to 108,400 years, depending on assumptions and estimation methods. This estimate range is much more recent than the 3 million year age estimated by Stefansson et al. in 2005.
Source: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20116045

Actually I've dealt with a large amount of darker skinned individuals in my time and pretty much all the experiences were either positive or indifferent. Perhaps like with all of humanity both good and bad can come from them.

* Molecular evolution of microcephalin, a gene determining human brain size
Microcephalin gene is one of the major players in regulating human brain development. It was reported that truncated mutations in this gene can cause primary microcephaly in humans with a brain size comparable with that of early hominids. We studied the molecular evolution of microcephalin by sequencing the coding region of microcephalin gene in humans and 12 representative non-human primate species covering great apes, lesser apes, Old World monkeys and New World monkeys. Our results showed that microcephalin is highly polymorphic in human populations. We observed 22 substitutions in the coding region of microcephalin gene in human populations, with 15 of them causing amino acid changes. The neutrality tests and phylogenetic analysis indicated that the rich sequence variations of microcephalin in humans are likely caused by the combination of recent population expansion and Darwinian positive selection. The synonymous/non-synonymous analyses in primates revealed positive selection on microcephalin during the origin of the last common ancestor of humans and great apes, which coincides with the drastic brain enlargement from lesser apes to great apes. The codon-based neutrality test also indicated the signal of positive selection on five individual amino acid sites of microcephalin, which may contribute to brain enlargement during primate evolution and human origin.
Source: academic.oup.com/hmg/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/hmg/ddh127

* Recent human brain evolution and population differences
"I say "human brains" rather than "the human brain" quite deliberately: with these alleles, some people have them, and other people don't. And more noteworthy, some populations have them, and others don't."
The genes are two that we have seen before: ASPM and Microcephalin. Both genes were subjects of papers by Lahn's students Patrick Evans and Jeffrey Anderson last year in Human Molecular Genetics (Evans et al. 2004a; Evans et al. 2004b)... The current papers take the next logical step: Take the genes that have changed a lot during human evolution, and see whether they vary among people today. A functional difference between alleles in different people might reflect a difference in the structure or function of their brains. Microcephalin is covered by Evans et al. (2005); ASPM by Mekel-Bobrov et al. (2005).

if humans began in ethipoia isnt the logical conclusion that modern humans evolved from black people?

We're all animals.

The teams took one further step: they assayed over 1000 people in populations around the world to see where the selected alleles were more or less common.

Some populations have these alleles at high frequencies; other populations have them at lower frequencies or not at all. The genes are slightly different in their pattern: for example, the Microcephalin haplogroup D is virtually universal in New World populations; the recently-selected ASPM haplogroup D is almost completely absent there. The selected ASPM variant is most common in Europe and West Asia and less so in East Asia; Microcephalin haplogroup D is common across Eurasia from west to east. These differences may reflect time -- with the ASPM variant much more recently selected. Or they may reflect different selective gradients: perhaps the alleles are adaptive in some ecological contexts or genetic backgrounds but not others.
Both selected alleles are relatively rare in subsaharan Africa. Again, one of two explanations is possible: either they are advantageous but haven't had time to increase in frequency there yet, or their adaptive value is less in Africa than in other places where they are found.
Source: johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/genetics/brain/lahn_2005_aspm_microcephalin_science.html

Mostly bad. The statistics are clear on this.

>upbringing
K.

Here's what the experts don't want you to know OP. Mental illness is a factor in neurodiversity and what ultimately leads to divergent and innovative thinking. The whole "subhuman" thing can be explained away when you consider that most blacks who were brought to the US via the slave trade were under the mercy and whim of whites. Think of them as pets in this way, being taken care of in return for manual labor. There is no need to "think differently" under these conditions if the master will take care of you in the end.

Whites selected the population for blacks being unable/unwilling to think outside the box and do anything for themselves. And when you consider that at the end of the day, we should be able to agree that intelligence is the ability to learn and adapt to life experiences, it's no wonder they show lower than normal performance compared to whites.

Look to blacks that come from other western african countries, for example, that immigrate to the US. These countries are shitholes. If they were intelligent enough to study hard improve their critical thinking skills to gtfo of africa and find a new environment that allows for more growth and better survival for offspring, what do you get? Exceptions to the sterotype that all blacks are subhuman.

Pay attention to the environmental factors, not genetic. Also, read the prologue of "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond.

>t. first gen nigerian

>Ok, quick question, where does this whole "Black people are ANIMALS/subhuman" shit even come from.
Black Africans were living in mud huts until the anglo colonization era and still are in some places.

youtube.com/watch?v=hR90t55CvbE

> oh nurture over nature, sub human nonsense is just an excuse so we don’t do more to help them
Racial differences in intelligence are explained by socio-economic factors

Binkley Collin wide racial gap persists in education testing, the Columbus dispatch.
dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2013/09/22/wide-racial-gap-persists-in-testing.html

Family income differences explain only a small part of the SAT racial scoring gap. The journal of blacks in higher education
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Standardized tests: The interpretation of racial and ethnic gaps\
lagriffedulion.f2s.com/testing.htm

Herrnstein, Richard J and Charles A Murray The bell curve: intelligence and class structure in American life New York Simon & Schuster
(Pages 150-186 by the PDF pages, not each page of the actual book)
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/the-bell-curve.pdf

Ciotti , Paul: money and school performance: lessons from the Kansas City desegregation experiment
object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-298.pdf

Public schools of North Carolina. The North Carolina 2010 SAT report
ncpublicschools.org/docs/accountability/reporting/sat/2010/satreport2010.pdf

Dixon-Román, Ezekiel et al. "Race, poverty and SAT scores: modelling the influence of family income on black and white high school students' SAT performance. Teachers college record (page 14)
researchgate.net/publication/280232788_Race_Poverty_and_SAT_Scores_Modeling_the_Influences_of_Family_Income_on_Black_and_White_High_School_Students'_SAT_Performance

Wightman, Linda F. Analysis of LSAT performance and patterns of application for male and female law school applicants. LSAC research report series. Law school admission council. (Pages 32-33)
files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED469243.pdf

Jensen, Arthur. The G factor: the science of mental ability. Praeger (pages 350-358)
emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/The-g-factor-the-science-of-mental-ability-Arthur-R.-Jensen.pdf

Scarr S, Weinberg RA The Minnesota adoption study. Genetic differences and malleability. Child development
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a2d7/85edd7aa61b7ba51355053cc61d8b924fe35.pdf

Agreed. Most blacks that are in the US as a result of the slave trade are very likely to be low IQ. This is nothing new.

> One group of people goes up north, one group of people stays south in the continent of Africa. Subsequently developing nothing in comparison to the group that travels north, eventually becoming enslaved by even less Advanced people that migrated to the middle lease, and then the group that went to the north become the Europeans and colonize Africa, best Time for the continents development… But all we feel bad leave them to their own devices. Results: median IQs below that of a fucking gorilla
The argument hinges on oh well they just didn’t have a fair shake, will guess what we all started out with sticks and rocks and bare hands and the results are what they are… In short reality is a bitch

"Someone from Europe."

But to answer your question as to what makes you animals; besides looking like chimps, you never got around to inventing the wheel or written language. Your race has no major accomplishments in it's supposedly long history, is the lowest subgroup wherever it goes, and has no capacity for future planning or empathy. You're a nuisance to the planet, and the only reason you weren't wiped out is because Christian compassion made us try to raise you above the status of oxen.

> blacks are the ONLY race that does not have any NEANDERTHAL DNA
> this means niggers never made it out of Africa in the first place
>we are not the same species

/thread

>did not explain why mud huts are subhuman

If survival in the environment they live in has no preference for black africans who build better houses, then why is this a sign they are sub human.

Nature doesnt give a shit if you make houses out of leaves, mud, or dung. If mud huts allow you to live another day and spend more time to develop other high-yield means of survival, then why bother trying to "look civilized"?

The african societies you are referring to were mostly huner-gatherer populations, you know. Tell me, how intelligent will you look when you are unable to adapt to their way of catching prey? Same difference to them when you find they can't use a basic QWERTY keyboard.

But here's the million dollar question-- which one most directly helps you to survive another day?

>poor impulse control
>Aggressive
>Tribal nature
>Lack empathy
>Low IQ
>Difficulty with concepts such as future thinking, reciprocity, etc

I regard humans as social animals, nigs struggle to build a decent civilization and fuck up ours ergo sub human

>All of the examples I see to back up those claims are cherry picked, the cause for them usually being from their upbringing rather than genetics,


1. black people create their environment. Their communities are shit as a reflection of their nature , culture, lack of intelligence, impulsiveness and inclination towards violence.

2. even when you raise black babies in white families and compare them to white babies adopted by white families, black babies still have an average IQ 15 points lower than the white adopted babies. So it almost certainly is not entirely culture.
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a2d7/85edd7aa61b7ba51355053cc61d8b924fe35.pdf
Pic related and source

FUCK OFF JIDF

I have a question for all you guys, ok so you've "proved" your point that black people are subhuman

so what?

You guys really should have removed them when you had the chance, i know we should have...

LOL lefty BTFO
What happened man, too much truth for you? You asked for it didn't you?

How could anyone think this sheboon is anything less than godly perfection?

Good question... Now when they are encouraged to attack by their handlers we won't feel bad going through with a full purge I guess.

So we should stop pretending that we are identical and end the nonsense that if we just give them money, hugs and wish really hard that they'll spontaneously transform into a functioning civilisation. You may as well be doing the same with chimps.

>cherry picked
FBI Crime Statistics by Race are not cherry picked, the opposite of your claim is the truth.

if they are capable of functioning as a human then they are

How are you defining that? Can breathe and walk around at the same time, eat food and discover what happens when you put penis in vagina?

That's not how it works actually, blacks in the US have a slightly higher iq than africans because they've got atleast some white in their family tree. African blacks are barely sentient feral monkeys

Africas extremely diverse with that actually (It's a big, old place). Some are literally dumber than a gorilla, others not as much.

Nature bs nuture huh? Show one African country that is self sustaining. Show one black city council that works? Show one black congressman or woman who isn't corrupt. I'll wait nigger. Oh and sage.

>All of the examples I see to back up those claims are cherry picked,
they are really not. examples are representative for the whole
> cause for them usually being from their upbringing rather than genetics
bullshit
niggers have genetically lower iq
>when in reality if they were put on equal footing as you there wouldn't be much of a difference
nah. richest african american districts/neighborhoods have disproportianely more crime than poorest white districts/hoods
Also, studies have been done on empathy and violent behavior with adopted niggers raised in higher middle class families
They are more prone to violence than whites even if raised in relative wealth
> they shoddily rationalize just ignoring the issue
the only ones ignorant are leftists like you, you ignore the facts. It has been empirically proven through hundreds of years of history that niggers are WORTHLESS human beings. Wait, actually not. They are good slaves. They perform the best when they are under white supervision. Look colonial africa, apartheid, pre-civil war america - yeah sure some blacks had shitty lives but MANY of them fared better while being slaves than being free. They had roof, food, work, happy life! Its no secret that today every older black person in south africa wants return of the apartheid.
asians could go from 3rd world to 1st world standards without anybody help

No. Blacks are completely different animals.
Whites dont come from africa, it has been debunked.

there are blacks that can perform brain surgery
something that nothing inhuman has come close to doing

whites were seeded here from the stars to live on this rock amongst the nigger ape animals thousands of years ago.
this is a fact

A few. Very few. The bell curve is damning. US blacks (themselves actually rather intelligent by black standards) have an average IQ of 85. This means, due to the mathematics of statistics, that only 20% of all of them meet or exceed the white average of 100. 100 IQ is nothing special - your everday dimwit.

When you are talking about the number that you could actually call *smart* that number plummets even further. You could likely fit every single one of them inside a football stadium.

kek

> All of the examples I see to back up those claims are cherry picked,
on the basis of what? just saying, 'cherry-picked' doesn't make it so

>the cause for them usually being from their upbringing rather than genetics

what's 'them'. because probably not.

>a "lost cause", when in reality if they were put on equal footing as you there wouldn't be much of a difference
they're already advantaged

>Tl;Dr Nurture > nature, faggots.

wrong

see africa

IQ measures how well you can do on a test
try again

wrong post

It measures how good you are at working out logical puzzles. This applies to things as basic as how do you open a box to how do I operate on this brain to the most complex maths out there.

iq is used as a way to measure your dick except the dick isn't real

Because Africans never valued the skill of "intelligence"; there's no such thing as being black and intelligent.

It can be if you're going to be a twat, but it is still measuring how good you are at actually using your brain to work things out and this does apply to the real world.

>muh upbringing

I mean it's not untrue - nigs with horrendous upbringings tend to be borderline feral - but even "properly raised" ones still tend to lack in intelligence and foresight and will have more irrational bursts of emotion than your average white dude.

>where does it come from
Spending enough time with them

I grew up surrounded by them.
Went to school with them.
Worked with them.
Most of them are retarded.

If you have been around lots of blacks and think they're on the same level as other races, this is a sign you are also a retard.

Not even meme'ing bro.

Only retards feel genuinely comfortable with blacks.

Oh yeah? What about KoKo? She learned sign language and to care for kittens. Not all blacks are emotionally irrational and unteachable.

>Blacks
>people

no it doesn't, having a high iq doesn't make you successful, no successful person gives a shit about iq

You can get every race from a black person, but you cannot get a white person out of an Asian person.

Blacks are the wolves of the human race. They are strong and cunning, but they are also primal and don't have the genetic traits bred into them that world wonders do.

Blacks are the trunk, every other race are the branches that bare fruit. They are the base of what a human is and was and is a step closer to animals than the other races. It's a very small step.

Actually IQ is highly correlated with life success. It's not a guarantee, sure, but to say that it doesn't matter is simply false.

Take a look at africa. There's your answer, you subhuman ape.

have you ever heard of a successful person saying that they owe it all to their iq?

you can literally study yourself into getting a higher iq because it isn't any measure of how inherently smart you are, just how well you do on a test

What they say is irrelevant. Sucessful people, when measured, have high IQs. Kids who are measured to have high IQs are very likely to go on to become successful people.

Sorry.

>Niggers
>Nurture
propping them up for rep from white people for white people isn't really nurturing them

For the second part of you post:

Yes if you practice them then you can raise your measured IQ by a couple of points because you know what sort of thing you are supposed to do already (this is why you are ideally supposed to only ever take the test once). However, no amount of study can raise a 100IQ person to a 140IQ result in the test. They simply don't have the brainpower, even if they are advantaged by being used to the testing style.

>africa, and entire continent of niggatry
>cherrypicked

>cherry picked
you guys really need some new copypasta.
sounds like someone needs a webm dump

A carnivorous animal is also better adapt to catching prey and need no house to survive, not even mudhut. Black africans mostly stick to the bare minimum of what keeps them alive, they aren't exactly thriving as a civilization. And if you tell me that's no difference than European, Asian or even ancient Aztec, Inca, etc than you're retarded

>But here's the million dollar question-- which one most directly helps you to survive another day?

If you have a functioning advanced civilization, you don't need to even consider hunting in the first place. To other groups, catching prey is an option, to an average african tribe, it's a must.

go find the nigger brain surgeon so that he can explain what an exception to the rule of a statistical curve means. Clearly you are too dumb too understand.

wrong. Iq correlates with G, which has little to do with test taking and cultural acquaintance. G tests how the brain functions in several aspects. kill yourself

Welp. looks like a nigger hate thread

>Racial differences in intelligence are explained by socio-economic factors
hahahahhahahaahahah
fuck off jew

I have a question for you, are you unemployed? Because if you were you'd realize you delusional you are.

IQ doesn't cause success

You look at any millionaire that doesn't manage a company and they'll have an iq below 120

I'm not, but I have been.

How does that relate to anything?

>You look at any millionaire that doesn't manage a company
>that doesn't manage a company
So random celebs who lucked out on looks or a record deal and that's literally it?

Because you don't seem to quite understand what I have told you:
IQ predicting success is not a matter of oppinion. It is tested. We asked "does IQ predict success or not? Let's find out". We then went out and measured successful people, and measured kids and tracked them through life to see if they become successful.

Turns out, by experiment, that it does.

Because you believe that IQ is a measure of how successful someone is

you can be a surgeon with 90iq (most people on Sup Forums)
you can be a NEET (most people on Sup Forums) with 160iq

grow up and enter the real world, iq doesn't mean shit

>be 8 year old literal autist
>can recognize patterns
>get iq of 170 because can recognize patterns
>get nowhere in life because you're autistic

ok

>Because you believe that IQ is a measure of how successful someone is

I said that it correlates with life sucess. That someone with a high IQ is more likely than someone who doesn't to become sucessful. I also said it's not guaranteed.

>you can be a surgeon with 90iq (most people on Sup Forums)
Not a chance in hell.

>you can be a NEET (most people on Sup Forums) with 160iq
Certainly. Like I said, not guaranteed.

>grow up and enter the real world, iq doesn't mean shit

The data, (you know, grown up shit) says you are wrong.

>Be 8 year old autist
>can recognise patterns
>become maths wizard
>go to the moon

Literally the Apollo programme.

At this point I am 100% convinced that you're just some 16 year old who thinks being on Sup Forums and using big words like inherently makes them smart

go to bed kid, because I am

Relevant to OP, somewhat

Interesting topic though

more like
>be 8 year old autist
>can recognize patterns
>get bullied at school because you're autistic
>hate school
>become NEET

>storming off in a huff
Very mature. Goodnight.

I sorry that some people being smarter and more sucessful than you makes you so insecure. I hope you grow up and get over it one day.

i totally agree, here is a one-way ticket to detroit. please live there for one year and come back and tell us your opinion again.

If you can provide any proof that you are above the age of 18 years old, I will paypal you a grand NZD

I'm one year away from being a doctor and making 13x k a year so I really don't care what you say

Where does the bad upbringing come from? Black neighborhoods weren't always shitty. Harlem used to be a finnish neighborhood for example. Niggers just tend to ruin the places they settle in. See Detroit. Shouldn't niggers themselves be held accountable for their terrible upbringing?

Tony Blair's 1997 campaign song was "things can only get better" by D:ream. Grand please.

>where does this whole "Black people are ANIMALS/subhuman" shit even come from
Unironically, it comes from the elites that rule over society. They want the average sheeple to hate one another. They have used this type of tribal hatred to make white people serve as an army to subjugate the more rebelious/humane african population. After they were done, africans were dehumanized. The elites fear that african populations will bring humanity back from the shadows, so they work hard to promote a fake "black culture" and spread drugs, guns and disease in black communities and african countries. Meanwhile, the elites use fear/hatred tactics to keep white people racist and unable to see the real cause of the problem. White people are still being used as a robot army, even today. Th few groups of white and black people who unite against oppression, quickly get infiltrated by "extreme left wing" agents that focus on "let's bring down whitey" instead of "the elites are oppressing ALL of us".
>short answer: it's just the elites, afraid of human's compassion and empathy (those qualities can easily break mind control and make people see the source of the problems of society). Racial tensions were created by the elites and their pseudoscientific racism. Most forms of extremism in society are funded by the elites. THEY are the cause of al the world's suffering.
Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, the authorities which rule of the shadows of this world.
There will be no end to this struggle, no joy, until we can shed light on the shadows. We must expose the elites as the source of the problem, instead of pointing fingers at other humans who have been subjected to the same oppressive force that is killing all our humanity.

BUMPing your thread once. This discussion has potential to awaken some sheep.