What is the best system of government?

What is the best system of government?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=rn85RHrShrI&index=25&list=PLleDaRccHSQBLTpMX4c1a00VYWt9DmFtI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

none.

Capitalism with Tradition.

Facism. No contest

are you actually cuban or tourist?

beach justice, obviously

He's a tourist who posted here yesterday. I hope you're enjoying funding a truly horrible regime op.

basically draw up a grid where each square represents a sector of the economy where funding should go (agriculture, infrastructure, science r&d), the more squares the better and the country's leader has to jerk off on top of it, and wherever his cum lands, thats where the funding from the budget will go, with bigger splooges representing more money and tiny drips less money allocated

I was there last month. It's a dump. They don't know how to paint, wash or repair their buildings.
Havana full of island niggers too. surprised me.

None whatsoever

Heightocracy.

chaotic (randomly chosen) transparent technocracy

Anything but (((democracy)))

Empire

Military Junta , like Pinochet

>one good emperor makes up for the dozen who brought his country to the knees of the Turk

>They don't know how to paint, wash or repair their buildings.
Yet they can keep a 55 chevy running for 50 years.

I'm just saying that Empire is the best goverment. Byzantium lasted for 1000 years bordering the worst barbaric tribes. Seems like a success to me.

...

Just about any governmet will work well so long as jewish banks are not part of the picture.

It's a double edged sword. Wasn't it also a Constantine who dismantled the Empire's armies and outposts leading to the Seljuk invasion to begin with.
I will give you the Byzantium had some of the greatest leaders of all time.

Anchary

Divine Monarchy

Depends on what goals you set for the government.

Not as far as I know of. He actually did what he could. Byzantium went downhill after the 4th crusade.

Before the crusade, Constantinople used to contain 1/3 of the known world's wealth. After the occupation, the Latins left the city in ruins and it never recovered.

Monarchy

Meritocratic Libertarianism.

Philosopher Kings

THIS

Hi Plato!

PCMR
A ever increasing higher resolution of governement with well designed components that do what they are supose to do.

Take input of data, crunch the numbers and output data that will result in a modification of the next input of data according to the will of the users within workable and sustainable parameters to ensure stability of the system which should benefit every parts of that system according to their usefulness in the said system.

"But that not a system user"

Yeah the perfect system doesn't exist yet, get over it.

Well... a well regulated capitalism system where the wealth flow back and forth seems to work pretty nicely if you ask me.

After all, this non sense is coming to you thanks to that system, mainly.

A system is a structure, and any structure, in the reality we are in, tend to crumble over time if not taken care off.
If the crumbling benefit someone, you can rest assured that they will see that no one try to fix it.

And you know what, fuck this shit. I'm X'ing this.

Then I read this Aussiefag
>Anything but (((democracy)))
Democracy is good, if and only if people are educated enough to handle it properly...
Would you say people are educated enough, generally speaking?
No. Absolutely not.

The one in wich i govern myself.

Ideally? A philosopher king.

Practically? Restrictive democracy with discriminatory laws that only allow the best members of society to vote.

The one that doesn't allow dancing niggers getting into the country and misleading words like "equality" in order to destroy serious societies.

I'm sure it didn't help but them getting their ass kicked by Ivan Asen just a decade before kind of shows they were already in decline and that something like the Fourth Crusade could of only happened if the Empire was weak.

limited republic with an elected monarch for life. the monarch and his council combine the powers of executive and judicial, while the parliament serves the will of the people and has the power to remove the monarch. citizenship is earned through merit. corporate model of government, citizenship grants you ownership of government, one share = one vote.

political parties are banned btw

the original vision of the founding fathers for a decentralized republic where the federal government was only responsible for national infrastructure projects and defense while the state and local governments made most of the decisions.

the founding father of america just so i'm clear

(wtf i love freemasons now)

As a cuban American who's been to Cuba, a tourist 99%

Only hotels have internet, universities only have an intranet.

T. Has cousin who's a Prof in Havana that explained it to me

>fathers

The 4th crusade was plotted by Alex, the rightful Emperor who was exiled to Venice.

The real downfall started at the battle of Manzikert

youtube.com/watch?v=rn85RHrShrI&index=25&list=PLleDaRccHSQBLTpMX4c1a00VYWt9DmFtI

That was the start of the end. It was Constantine X who I was talking about he let the military decline leading to the battle of Manzikert.

...

Castro forced race mixing on the populace. If you want to see white cubans you have to go to miami

Oh I see what you're talking about. Of course in 1000 years and like 80 Emperors some are bound to be corrupt or incompetent.

I don't know a lot of Byzantine history but I'm fairly certain four fifths of it is Generals trying to murder the Emperor and take the throne causing periods of instability.

Absolute monarchy. A small flat tax on incomes and imports to fund armed forces which also serve as police and courts all in one organization. Strongly encourages and rewards the following of certain cultural standards (namely strong families, care of nature and general nazi tier shit you guys like) via medal ceremonies, monetary assistance etc., however these cultural values aren't enforced per say, but you won't be a welcome member of any community if you don't stick close to them. The government only intervenes in the market when the market has proven itself entirely incompetent and has full power to dismantle enterprises that are abusing the free market. Also a white ethnostate obviously. Immigration allowed for people who look and act white and empathize with the states cultural values.

tl;dr minarchy ethnostate run by a monarchy. Also the monarch is me btw.

sounds based

Limited democracy based on military service.

Thanks friend, I spend a lot of time thinking over shit like this while grinding away my soul at work. I like to think I have come up with some good conclusions.

civil service should also be acceptable. not everyone is fit for military service, and a strong nation should only accept those best qualified for service. bureaucracy should be limited, but a functional government still requires its paper pushers

The only reason I didn't post a preference is because I didn't really know, but what you described sounds like heaven compared to the shit we live with now.

theocratic republican monarchy

fascism merely fills the void for now

the, and my Allah forgive me for uttering this word, leaf gets it.

Autocracy

Being ruled by an AI

>not augmenting and merging with AI to achieve a simulated digital immortality where you live a million lives in a million worlds
>not eventually ascending to a pure digital omnipresent existence

This.

A variety of diverse methods for redundancy in case of catastrophe.

so, national socialism with a big dumb paragraph?

>per say

yeah leave thinking about things to the professionals, just be useful when the time is right

constitutional monarchy

tread on me... a little

Constitutional Monarchy is what I've been leaning toward lately

absolute loyalty to the Emperor and his Galactic Crusade

...

At last!
Glory to the Emperor!
Now our foes shall learn what it means to have faith.

Constitutional fascism

Ha, that is what we have. Careful what you wish for. Then again, the constitution was created and can only be changed by royal assent, so in my opinion it is just a plain old monarchy with constitution icing.

>A cuban in pol/

forget

>A cuban with internet!

Just kiding men, i have been in La Isla that's why I said that.


Best goverment:

Every goverment it's ok considering two things.
>Time
>Place

Order,Freedom,Militarism and others... must be used when it's needed as they must change when it's nesesary as well in order to give the nation what it needs.

FOR THE AWOOMPER

One without a government

Monarchy, with the monarch chosen through extremely limited suffrage by a small aristocratic elite with an ethnic basis

Resourse based economy with pure science as the determining factor for decision making and no money or trade.

more like, I'll let you thread on me a little bit so that you can physically remove threats to society.

I guess technically I'm a social Darwinist

It depends on a lot of different factors. Anyone who says otherwise probably doesn't know what they're talking about. In a perfect world the best government would be no government, but the world we lived in is pretty flawed and probably always will be so that's not always going to be the best awnser.

>Not as far as I know of. He actually did what he could. Byzantium went downhill after the 4th crusade.

Manzikurt in 1075 started the decline, they would not have been sacked if they didn't slaughter all the Latin Christians in the city.

Anu forever bitches

>anarchist
>illiterate
Checks out.

>more like, I'll let you thread on me a little bit so that you can physically remove threats to society.
That's literally every form of government, moron.

Pirate Law.
If you rob us we maroon you on that island.
Simple and effective.