I've never seen an e-celeb so systematically and shamelessly grab shekels from unsuspecting redditors. Is Dr...

I've never seen an e-celeb so systematically and shamelessly grab shekels from unsuspecting redditors. Is Dr. Judeo Patreon, dare I say it, /ourdaddy/?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=uDZnSKpnQ8k[Embed]
youtube.com/watch?v=KqXZY3B-cGo[Embed]
youtube.com/watch?v=FID366y2gjo[Embed]
youtube.com/watch?v=ylI0uBIsq4Y
youtube.com/watch?v=TtXgqSQ5fQY
youtube.com/watch?v=RnTMp3wTlzc
twitter.com/AnonBabble

i cant believe how much u neckbeards (((donate))) to him

>inb4 YOU ARE NOT CAPITALIST

what is with all these peterson shill threads

is Sup Forums against the free market now?

the man is the only intellectual in decades to actually the convey the value of western civilization to young people. Right at the point when it is being over run by communism. fucking hypocrites

>posts videos of his teachings for free
>frequently offers coupons for his self help websites
>People appreciate whatever service they feel he has given to them
>Voluntarily give him money

WHAT THE FUCK? BAN THIS JEWISH FILTH!

>the value of western civilization is the individualism of yesteryear which leads directly to communism at the hands of brown hordes and jews

>the man is the only intellectual in decades to actually the convey the value of western civilization to young people.
you've got to be joking

People are shilling so hard against Peterson today he must have done something awesome, what did I miss?

lmao

I can't believe how angry you guys are over this. It's been weeks of these threads where you whine and complain about this man's paycheck.

Jesus christ. Marxism is a hell of a drug.

He's now selling worn yoga pants.

>Rant about cultural Marxists for half your day
>Never ask yourself "Who are the cultural Marxists?"
>"Who are the third wave feminists?"
>"Who are the social justice warriors?"
>"Who are the post modernists?"

Because he's entering the mainstream, acknowledging jews would ruin everything.

lol kill yourself shlomo. Peterson is anglo

Juden Peterstein knows that if he loses Sup Forums then his cult of personality will weaken.
That is why he has shills here 24/7 trying to promote.

He's trying to get you to get off your arse and understand how the world works before you lynch the Jews. Instead of lynching the Jews then letting the Chinese take over the moment your nation crumbles.

> subscribing to such a low-resolution view of the world that you literally think an entire group of people are out to get you.

>>Never ask yourself "Who are the cultural Marxists?"
As I said, I think we've found a few right here:

>posts content for free
>offers his books for free
>offers coupons that reduce his plan to zero
>but he takes donations

he does the left's work for free

I guess I'll just dump my Bucko Nationalism folder.

pic related

this is the most disingenuous characterization of his ideas I hae ever seen. He literally believes individualism is the antidote to communism

name another intellectual that has the reach peterson has developed

people like you are the reason why its borderline impossible to keep center right opinions mainstream. The sheer stupidity of you 1488 larpers is just beyond anything else currently visible yes even worse than anything the far left is currently doing. You are literally on a almost hourly basis shoot the entire trump/conservative and European right in the foot. And you are too fucking dumb to see it even when people constantly remind you just how fucking dumb you really are. Its truly unbelievable.

>Jordan "Blitzkrieg" Peterson

Individualism is a precursor to communism. He wants people to become color blind boomers, whose only pursuit in life is slaving for a roastie, raising children who will be indoctrinated by marxist propaganda, and wageslaving for the jews.

>Individualism is a precursor to communism

individualism...individual

communism....commune

your comment is a stupid as saying getting wet is a precursor to catching fire

Daily reminder: stop spamming this mentally ill boomer here. Take your cult back to plebbit where it belongs.
Peterson is a brainlet that doesn't understand basic biology or philosophy. This vid exposes his idiocy in excruciating detail:
youtube.com/watch?v=uDZnSKpnQ8k[Embed]

You're taking life advice from a self admitted mentally ill man that still doesn't have his shit together and is on drugs for depression.
youtube.com/watch?v=KqXZY3B-cGo[Embed]

Your hero admits to spontaneously crying for no reason since he was a child. Here he is crying like a mental patient.
youtube.com/watch?v=FID366y2gjo[Embed]

Peterson completely deconstructs Soviet era communism, frequently citing 'Gulag Archipelago' by Solzhenitsyn. He completely ignores Solzhenitsyn's book, '200 Years together' and the actors primarily responsible for the Russian Revolution. Here he is refusing to address a question on '200 years'
youtube.com/watch?v=ylI0uBIsq4Y

He has disavowed white identitarians and ethnonationalism but won't dare utter a word against Israel. Here he is telling everyone how great the jews are and how they're the most intelligent people on the planet.
youtube.com/watch?v=TtXgqSQ5fQY

Here Jordan Peterson speaks at a pro Israel event sponsored by The Mozuud Freedom Foundation, a pro Israeli group and The Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow, a phony progressive Muslim group that loves Israel.
youtube.com/watch?v=RnTMp3wTlzc

The thing is he is not scamming people, he is not pulling money out of peoples pockets, they give it to him, because they want to. Whatever he provides to them seems to be valuable enough to his "followers" that they want to repay him in the form of donations. This thread is on the same level as getting mad about "streamers" raking in lots of money from subscribers and donations. No doubt it is silly, but still none of your business.

Its a purity trial. You have a lot of idiots on the right who simply cannot abide their time and constantly smash the house of cards, ruining it for all and handing power away again.

Keep spamming this message.
It will make your agenda clear to everyone.

He is all over youtube recently and also making a fuck ton of money so they're attacking him for it.

The foundational principle of individualism is literally equality. Individualists and communists both agree on the goal, they just slightly disagree on the methods.

Its literally a crab bucket mentality.

...

Guys.

I can't do it.

...

...

>The foundational principle of individualism is literally equality.

The foundational principle of individualism is that human choice is a moral good. Nothing to do with equality.

It's quite simple. Refute anything in my post: protip, you can't because they are the words from your hero's mouth.

Daddies Cummies (◡ ◡ )

peterson is the road to single handedly revivify western culture and society without the need for genocide.

Being impervious to post moderism, marxism and communism is a superior solution than attacking an ethnicity that is correlated with the propagation of such ideas

You are a fucking moron with no clue how optics work in any public sphere or a leftwing retard trying to undermine.
Either way you are dumber than a bag of rocks.

>peterson is the road to single handedly revivify western culture and society
okiedokie

>optics

Yeah, they work like pic related

Haha, you're retarded. It's literally equality in the eyes of the law. It came about as a response to monarchism. Communism is just individualism taken to its natural conclusion.

Fucking idiot. Do you not understand that this is a controlled pendulum swing? They'll give you Bucko Nationalism for 10 years, while the non-whites breed and then finish you off. Also, we might have to die for the only democracy in the ME soon, at the behest of Alex Jones, Molymeme, Rogaine and Judeo Patreon.

>I WILL DIE FOR DADDY

I don't care about him and his video. As I already implied in my post, it could be anyone, even some slut pulling in shekels from desperate neckbeards on Twitch. As long as they give their money to her voluntarily I'd defend her too. Do I think they are pathetic worms for doing so? Yes - but I don't get to decide how they spend their money.

"Peterson is a brainlet that doesn't understand basic biology or philosophy. "
People who understand a subject make errors all the time. I'm not going to watch an 8 hour video by a guy who can't speak english.... i'll grant you that all the errors mentioned int he video are true errors. Even so, it doesn't imply your claim.

>Haha, you're retarded. It's literally equality in the eyes of the law.

No, that's not what individualism means.

He is a shameless cunt for donations but he is bringing people right so I won't shit on him to much.

he priced his rugs specifically not to take shekels from Sup Forums poorfags

OP is a fucking shareblue psyop shill, fuck off.

It means that you have natural rights, which do not have to recognized by a state, and that you have divine permission to act as if those rights are real. Governments were formed based on this concept, aka "all men are created equal." Individualism is classical liberalism.

>People who understand a subject make errors all the time.
the types of errors he makes are those of a person that doesn't understand the topic under discussion. he's literally a moron.

>but he is bringing people right
oh, dear.

>It means that you have natural rights, which do not have to recognized by a state, and that you have divine permission to act as if those rights are real.

That's not a foundational principle of individualism. That's one way to form a government that is in accord with individualism.

I.e. it is moral for people to have a certain degree of agency.... therefore it's immoral/evil for the state to try to rob people of that agency.

Still, it has nothing to do with equality except insofar as committing evil against one person is also evil when committed against another person.

the evolutionary foundation of individualism is efficiency only an individual can most efficiently make choices for himself. Western individualism create the best societies because the efficiency of a societies decisions that is made of individuals is an emergent property
In the sense that moral is defined as what is evolutionarily good for you this guy is right

It is fundamentally egalitarianism, since all individuals have the same DIVINE rights. No inidividual or group is legally or morally justified to transcend against the individual.

Okay, then we have several problems with the concept.

Is individualism, as espoused by our zionist subservient friends, a perverted form? Is it still evolutionary viable? Is it THE defining feature of Western Civilization? What are its limits?

you propose murder and genocide as a solution to the ideas (marxism, communism, post modernism) correlated and most probably caused by non white races. Its not necessary to kill those people when you can just kill their ideas, killing their ideas (as peterson is doing) is a sustainable solution to the same political ends. The 60s was caused by war and genocide, that shit doesn't work and we are too technologically powerful to want WWIII, it's been mutually assured destruction since the 50s

/thread

>since all individuals have the same DIVINE rights.
So, do you think the hammurabi's code is egalitarianism also?
All society's have a code that protects everybody. Even the lowest of the low in every society have SOME rights that they share with everyone.

You're a fucking mouthbreather. Jews have been around for thousands of years, and you haven't been able to kill their ideas. I'm not proposing genocide, or anything for that matter. But the truth is that this milquetoast shit has been tried and it has failed over and over. It's fucking retarded, and it needs to be cleansed from Sup Forums.

>have SOME rights that they share with everyone.
Some is the key word here. Under Western Egalitarian Individualism, all individuals are de jure equal.

>you propose murder and genocide as a solution to the ideas (marxism, communism, post modernism) correlated and most probably caused by non white races. Its not necessary to kill those people when you can just kill their ideas.
no one is proposing any such thing. and peterson is doing nothing but encouraging the tolerance of our dispossession. if legitimate criticism of peterson bothers you, go to plebbit. there you can enjoy opinions that are in complete alignment with your own without any type of pushback.

>all individuals are de jure equal.
That's not true.
Some people are allowed to drive, some aren't (you need a drivers license).
Doctors are allowed to speed when driving if they think somebody's life is in danger. Some people are allowed to drink, some aren't.
Cops are allowed to assault you in situations where a civilian wouldn't be.

peterson is already unprecedented in his success in publicly dismantling said ideas. Millions of people have learned to easily dismiss the ideas by watching his videos

so you don't propose a physical solution and you don't want an intellectual solution?
how do you think the west will defeat these things then?

New meme, fresh out the oven.

Sure, but no one is born with or without extra rights. As you go into concrete example, considerations are required in order to create a functioning society. But the foundational concept of individualism is equality under law.

Yet they're still open to zionism, and multi-racialism, while being opposed to white identity and ethnonationalism. They are basically boomers.

>you don't want an intellectual solution?
wrong
>how do you think the west will defeat these things then?
by making people of european descent aware that we will be dispossessed of our own countries and to act in our interests, a concept that peterson completely opposes for anyone but israel.

who?

>Sure, but no one is born with or without extra rights.

Or in other words: The differences should be expressions of choice, and ability.

>Dr. Judeo Patreon
Love it. Kudos to whoever came up with it. This and "soyim" are my new favorite

I haven't seen peterson explicitly deny dispossession or give opinions on israel in contradiction to his general points but even if he has the material peterson presents can only lead people to the solution you mention

>The differences should be expressions of choice, and ability.
But they're not, are they?

The ones i just pointed out are, aren't they?

>I haven't seen peterson explicitly deny dispossession or give opinions on israel
well, the evidence is right here in the thread. if you care enough, you'll find it easily.

>People are shilling so hard against Peterson today he must have done something awesome, what did I miss?

He redpilled millions of people on post modernism and marxist influence on society.
The jews know he either is already redpilled or eventually going to be redpilled on them too because he is a man of scientific facts.

Peterson needs to grab and save up on every dollar he can get his hands on because he will need it to buy security for himself and his family when that pill kicks in.

So obviously the shills don't want him to make any money at all.

i got no problems with this. he's basically giving advice of decency to young people while profiting from the idiots. there will be some smart people amongst his followers and there will be good effects from this. also, the money his soyim would've spent on avocados or crappufrappochino lattes might go to alternative education systems or towards fighting ideological indoctrination in the universities. why are you pissed that idiots choose to give them his shekels?
you should rather be pissed at some of his philosophical weaknesses or broadstroke characterization of the nuanced ideological systems he's criticizing (well, more nuanced than he gives them credit for anyway). in other words, attacking him for capitalizing on the situation doesn't do us any good, attacking him on philosophical points might sharpen him further and make him more useful

I think you're trying to be willy here by philosophically associating exceptions to the rule to concepts of inequality. Notice that the rights you just mentioned are essential to society. I don't think a CEO or celebrity has extra rights under the law based on merit. Now, don't bring up presidents and diplomats, who have extra rights because they serve a public purpose.

This is simply a case of the exception proving the rule.

>mfw OP started hiding Canadian flag, because everybody by now know how buttblasted he is

He delivers a product people are thirsty for. Let him make as much as people want to give him.

Yeah that's cool and all, but have you considered washing the dishes in your sink instead of letting them pile up?

>I don't think a CEO or celebrity has extra rights under the law based on merit.

Well, at beginning you needed to be a landowner in order to vote. This is in the constitution itself.
And until recently, you needed to have a certain amount of money to be able to invest in certain things.

You're the one being willy nilly when you talk about equality. Under communism, your status can never change no matter what you do. Under individualism, your choices determine your status and rights. Inequality exists in individualistic society's by design.

You're trying to equivocate on the word equality but it's nonsense.

>it is being over run by communism.

lol, pls.

He's selling self help snake oil

>is your room clean though?

>Well, at beginning you needed to be a landowner in order to vote. This is in the constitution itself.
Funny how individualism leads to more and more equality under the law. Kinda like a slippery slope that leads straight into equality for women, equality for the poor, and equality for other races.

>You're trying to equivocate on the word equality but it's nonsense.
I'm trying to prove that the foundational concepts that Locke spoke of are based on equality, and that they lead to communism.

Did you get your feelings hurt today OP? We can talk about it, you don't need to astroturf the place with anti-JP shitposts.

nice cherry picking, retard

You can't refute anything in my post, so you resort to insults. On plebbit, you can worship your hero without seeing any type of criticism. I suggest you go there, you'll feel safer.

>implying a fucking philosemite is gonna make us forget 2013, 2014 and 2015
You're getting gassed kike.

>Funny how individualism leads to more and more equality under the law.
Why do you say that?

Are you saying that BECAUSE we had an individualistic society, and now it's moving towards a communistic society, that therefore individualism implies communism?

Are you aware that countries change their government all the time? Any form of government you name, I can show examples where it changed to something else... and had an accompanying change in culture.

sure

> Believing anything a Canadian Jew says.

I remember that lecture in which he said

"you must train harder than the enemy that is trying to kill you. You will get all the rest you need in the grave." - Jordan B Peterson

I'm saying that the foundational concept of equality under law, which is in the philosophical documents upon which political individualism is based, will lead to communism, as showcased by your own examples, and by history. It is simply inevitable. Individualism is a leveling concept, which must cut down the highs in order to placate the lows.

>Nature's brutal perfection

what does that even mean?

i mean, the US is founded around the principle of equality...

Yes, but for every form of government, i can invent an equally bullshit hypothesis to say that THIS way of thinking leads to THAT way of thinking, and i can point to examples in history where it happened to evidence my case.

Philisophically, individualism is diametrically opposed to communism. Your statement that individualism is founded on equality is just not true.

It's founded on the value of free will.

Jordan "our last stand, until the last man" Peterson is not a jew.

It really is pathetic how these cucks flock to all the controlled opposition.

It's character assassination. Equality in freedom and in distribution of justice =/= equality of outcome

That the state ought to treat all people equally in spite the fact that they are unequal; you can’t deduce from this, a rule, that because the people are unequal, you ought to treat them unequally in order to make them equal, and that’s what social justice amounts to. It’s a demand that the state should treat different people differently in order to place them in the same position. The rule of equal treatment applies only to things the state has to do in any case, but to make, making people equal a goal of governmental policy, would force government to treat people very unequally indeed.

There is all the difference in the world between treating people equally and attempting to make them equal. While the first is the condition of a free society, the second means a new form of servitude.
-Friedrich Hayek

You really are a pathetic piece of shit who needs to get his face smashed in.

Exactly.

You cannot have a concept of individualism without the concept of equality. You simply cannot refute this central point. In order for the individual to reign supreme, other concepts must be discarded or be considered inferior. The concept of sovereignty cannot exist in the same space as the concept of individualism. Do you agree with this sentence?

We're trying not to get murdered and genocided you stupid faggot.

He's pretty obviously willing to sell out his integrity for money.

Always matter of fact, what he thinks is right what he thinks is wrong. But when people ask him about Trump's character traits he resorts to whataboutism.

>m-maybe trump lies a lot, b-but imagine if it were an evil calculative liar instead!

Easy T_D patreonbucks

Peterson is an accomplished Jungian psychiatrist, Psychology professor and opponent of the post modernist. He has helped thousands of otherwise directionless men & women clean up their act and gain mental fortitude. If people want to throw money at him so be it, he fucking deserves it. He is one of a handful of voices who are refuting the marxist reprobates and people are LISTENING TO HIM. Pick your battles, you fucking faggots.

>The concept of sovereignty cannot exist in the same space as the concept of individualism.
Individualism is a statement of personal sovereignty. A person has a moral claim to his own actions.
This doesn't preclude a country from having a right to self determine as well. There isn't a conflict between the two.

Englishmen should be able to decide the fate of england.... They should also be able to decide the fate of themselves.