Friendly reminder that age of consent laws have no basis in science and that there is nothing morally wrong with an...

Friendly reminder that age of consent laws have no basis in science and that there is nothing morally wrong with an adult having sex with a teenager. If you are old enough to know right from wrong and have sexually feelings then you can consent to sex.

The only reason age of consent law exists is because conservative Christian America wanted to help protect the virginity of young people until they were of marrying age. This has no merit in modern society and is perpetuated solely because it is equated falsely with child assault, even though girls were married before the age of 15 throughout most of human history.


That is all.

Other urls found in this thread:

dailywire.com/news/9185/democrat-ex-mayor-rapes-4-year-old-blames-child-michael-qazvini
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

She's pretty. Also tldr

Age of consent in Norway is 16. However, politicians and other public figures in their 40's or older who creep on someone 21 or younger risk getting a lot of trouble and probably termination of their career. Moral is more important than LAW.

Good one Pedoman

Disappointing GIF, I was expecting more.

Exactly. 16-21 year olds are still busy figuring out life.

The basis doesn't need to be "in science". The age of consent law is based on common sense retard.

>The only reason age of consent law exists is because conservative Christian America wanted to help protect the virginity of young people until they were of marrying age. This has no merit in modern society and is perpetuated solely because it is equated falsely with child assault

user the reason why AoC is so high in the US is because it gives the pedocriminals cover. They have been trying to normalize themselves for decades. This should also explain why other than a few gay republicans who get caught with 17 year olds, congress does not lower the AoC. They are interested in a much younger group only. Because society rightfully tells them it is immoral to rape and molest prepubescent children, they raise the AoC to make sex with teens illegal out of spite. They are selfish monsters who were selected solely on this basis by political donors because they are easy to control. It is not difficult to be a politician. Any idiot can sit on ass and collect a lifetime salary and health benefits. The reason more people don't do it is because you need huge monetary backing in our current world. To get that, you must be in their pedo club.

Paedophilia is degenerate as fuck. When the day of the rope comes, paedophiles and people with other, similarly degenerate fetishes will be at the front of the line.

9 is just fine Akmed. Get a goat three way going even.

it's morally wrong because you're taking girls off the market for the teenage boys. they need to have sex to develop properly. people our age have cars, apartments and money, so it's not fair to the high school boys in competition. you want to have a society filled with angry potential shooters?

This.

Who is this

That should drive those teenage boys to try hard to achieve that lifestyle so they then have access to teen girls

I'm surprised some pedoscum hadn't come in here with the standard
>muh ebepheboebphilia
or the old used up roastie v child false dichotomy argument yet.

Sure there are outliers running around with "developed" bodies at ages 12, yet are their minds developed for sexual relationships and child bearing?

Age of consent should be marriage. Courting and marriage meetings should begin when puberty does.

Premarital sex is immoral in any case.

Foot fetishists and furries go first

that's a nice fantasy but it takes years to get to that point, and sexual frustration makes it twice as difficult. women can't be trusted to make the right decision and date their own age. so we have to make the decision for them.

This. Would cut down degeneracy by a good amount.

Women under the age of consent can still date older men, they just can't admit they've had sex.

you're going to burn in hell - there's nothing between you and a child raping mudslime. kys

Age of consent is arbitrary number where it’s assumed that most people have reached sexual maturity and ability to consent
Which therefore means that most people are able to consent at an age younger than the AOC

...

With her i would survive on lone island
Rub dick against her so much making fire everywhere

I think 16 works as a pretty good age since most females will be developed enough to breed by that point. If I had married a girl when she was 12-13, I would have waited until her body was more developed to breed.

Quit normalizing pedophilia, you fucking cunts

too old desu

No, homophiles do.

Dating in their own age is probably against their best interests, though. Women should be looking for a man that can support them; they won't be able to get that from a guy their age (eg. 16 - 18). All you're doing is promoting the current "hook-up" culture by saying that "they need to have sex to develop properly". By using that argument, you're no better than those used up roasties that write articles titled "why you should have sex with at least 25 different men before you settle down".

If a man is in a good position in his life, i.e. has a stable, well-paying career, has developed mentally, and wants to settle down, what's wrong with him wanting to settle down with a 16-18yo?

Pubescent humans are not children.

I agree with this. If a child is showing interest in the opposite sex you should invite potential marriage partners over to your house and introduce them to each other. I would prefer to have my daughters wed to men 5-10 years older than them and my sons married to women 5-10 years younger. Marriage should be the place where sex is allowed. Sex with someone should place someone into the legal position of marriage, and should someone have sex outside of wedlock, they should face public humiliation each. It saddens me to see women in my age group chasing after love but conflating it with lust. I look into their eyes and see a lack of emotion, of a jadedness, of, "He's just talking to me to fuck me and then leave." The 1000 cock stare as some on the board call it.

>If a child
see

>not an argument
a statement of concrete cold fact

Age of consent here in Sweden is 15 years. I excpect it to be lowered after the upcoming islamic revolution.

I married my wife when she was 15. How does that make you feel?

Did you have sex when you were 16? I did, with people my age as well as people as old as 28.

The idea that this was somehow harmful or abusve to me is completely ludicrous

Can anyone read her lips?
What's her video about?

Female minds are more sensitive than ours. They get more easily traumatised than we do.

Disgusted, contemptuous and mildly superior - a little hungry, I could eat something. How does that make you feel?

they date older guys so they don't have to walk anymore, and so they get free alcohol and lots of dick. they don't want someone to support them, they want to go to college and fuck even more older guys. as men it's our responsibility to watch each other's back. we have to deny these little girls. don't worry about them getting "used up" because teenage boys barely know what they're doing with their pencil dicks.

...Look, I know the difference between pedo, hebe, and ephebophilia. Pubescense doesn't mean that the boy or girl is ready to have a family nor sex. There are also people that develope at different rates. 16< seems a bit too young for me to want my daughter married. But if I found a man suitable to marry my daughter I would encourage him to woo her so when they were to be wed at 16 (state law) then neither is being married to a complete stranger.

There is nothing immoral about having sex with someone under an arbitrarily chosen number.

Not an argument.

Sex with a teenager has nothing to do with pedophilia. Post-pubescent individuals do not have the bodies of children. Don't use terms if you don't know what they mean.

If the concern was the simple act of having sex then it would also be illegal for teenagers to have sex with anyone of any age, not just adults.

I feel vastly superior and sated because I'm eating right now.
Pubescent humans are not children. Referring to them as such is a misuse of language.
>Pubescense doesn't mean that the boy or girl is ready to have a family nor sex
It does if they were raised properly by responsible parents.

tiddies

You're promoting promiscuity and it's fucking disgusting. Sex should only be considered consensual in the context of marriage. Does your name echo?

BALTIC THREAD

the most promiscuous girls from my high school class had older boyfriends in their 20s. i distinctly remember a few of them becoming drug dealers.

You're fine with promiscuity so long ad they're sleeping around with underage boys, though.

What would you use then? Pubescenst?Tweens?

Shut the fuck up you dumb cunt. You're literally parroting the viewpoints of feminists by saying essentially saying "they should have as much sex as they can with people their own age! They won't get "used up" you sexist pig!".

You're endorsing this culture of promiscuity that has literally been proven to be the cause of the spike in divorce and unhappiness in both men and women.

Adolescents.

>teenagers
>pedophile

>british education

LARPers who have homicidal fantasies will also be put to the sword.

>Sex with a teenager has nothing to do with pedophilia. Post-pubescent individuals do not have the bodies of children. Don't use terms if you don't know what they mean.

This is what I said user. I was referring to our pedocriminal politicians.

Here is the story about Mayor Kennan victim blaming a 4 year old.

dailywire.com/news/9185/democrat-ex-mayor-rapes-4-year-old-blames-child-michael-qazvini

>teenager
>pedo

Pick one

they're more likely to have a steady relationship with someone their own age, who has the time to spend with them because he doesn't have a full time job. it doesn't matter if they're having sex if it's with one person who truly cares about them. when they start dating older guys, that's when they start getting passed around and "used up". i saw it happen so many times. and i also saw couples who dated through high school get married and have children together.

>This has no merit in modern society
And I declare bullshit. Benefits to being a virgin are:
1) not catching STDs
2) finding a partner that isn't a Chad or Stacey
3) not getting pregnant while unprepared and needing an abortion.
4) not having children from multiple men
5) not having child support payments to multiple women
6) not making life more difficult because you had a child before you had a stable home
7) not being a single parent

If you'll lie about something so obvious what else are you lying about?

We have genocidal fantasies, not homicidal. Get it right.

So you admit to being a LARPer?

This. It doesn't drive young men to get girls more, you have to remember these aren't fully grown men, right off the bat they're sexually frustrated. All depriving them of girls their age is going to do is make them even more sexually frustrated. There's a reason why kids swim in the kiddie pool and adults swim in the deep end. There's a reason why kids sit at the kiddie table and adults sit at the adult table.

Well yeh but gross

You did and look how did you turn out. A fucking leaf.

Women are property, first of their father then of their husband. Sex out of wedlock is literally an act of theft against the Father.

Fuck off kikeflag Jew.

>Christian America wanted to help protect the virginity of young people until they were of marrying age.
If they really thought it through, lowering the age of marriage would have been the answer. and it still is.
Though I don't see why there should be an "age of marriage" if the couple decides to be married, it's their decision.
I'm all for lowering the amount of sex that happens outside marriage.

Of course, all radical politics are LARPing - that doesn't mean they can't shift the Overton window.

This tbqh

>old enough to spittle, old enough to diddle

Dude, the age of marriage is super low with parent's consent. I think 13 or something

The only correct answers.

I think depending on the state, there is no age restriction with parental or judicial consent.

Females are most sexually attractive around 14; age 18 is an American idea to get cucked whites to make as few babies as possible

The problem is young girls being taken advantage of when their hormones are the highest, making them degenerative sluts who eventually suffer from depression, bipolar disorder, or DPD.

In other words - being treated like a cum rag by a bunch of old men can have lasting mental effects

Of course they do, they're based on male maturity age.

Source OP?

depends on state and country.
Here it's 18.
According to wiki:
>16 with permission from a court and both parents (only granted in exceptional circumstances)
I only know of one couple irl where the girl married at 17 and they had to go get court approval.
I personally probably wont sign any "government papers" regarding this matter as it's none of their business anyway.

I'll keep this in mind when talking about 12+

>The problem is young girls being taken advantage of
This is a byproduct of the true problem: lack of family protection. Most families in today's world are weak.

Is pic related mature? He is a Boomer. So you are saying the age of consent should be 60+ years old?

>my anecdotes can be extrapolated and applied to ALL cases
I've seen couples from school be together for years and married, too. I've also seen /more/ girls enter their first relationship, only to then go on and fuck a handful of guys in a year at age 14. The ones who come out unscathed and married are, sadly, the minority. They're the ones that were raised correctly, or didn't to their parents indoctrination to go out and fuck as much as possible.

In my case, the amount of girls that DON'T stay in their first relationship, and become enormous sluts, VASTLY outnumber the amount that stay with their first boyfriends. Whereas the girls I knew/knew of that dated older guys (5+ years older) were extremely happy and a lot of them are still together.

Your ideal is just a fantasy. What you described is not factual or occurring in schools in the west in any way. This hook-up culture has only gotten worse with the advent of smartphones and social media. Couple that with negligent parents that endorse the "sexual liberation" of their daughters and the concerted effort to destroy the nuclear family, and you're in for a bad time.

You bring up another issue. Which is state interference in familial relations.

The other day I saw online a 22 yr old guy asking advice about dating a 17 yr old. Anyone who has been 17 or 22 knows you have vastly different worlds at those ages even though it's only a few years difference. But if she was 22 and he was 27, same age difference but a little older, is not so unusual or incompatible. By that time both are fully immersed in the adult world. Let teenagers be teenagers and do dumb shit and fuck each other. They have the rest of their lives to be an adult.

go back to Sup Forums someone get this guy ip before it's too late

>Which is state interference in familial relations.
I agree. Though I haven't heard of any circumstances myself.

What are they going to do if a couple decides they're married, parents consent and one by (((law))) is "underaged"?
Break them up?

>just let degeneracy destroy your bloodline LMAO

That response... Kiddy diddlers aren't notorious for their wit.

>Let teenagers be teenagers and do dumb shit and fuck each other.

Stop promoting degeneracy. Sex should be within the confines of marriage. It speaks to a comitment of each person to one another, which is extremely important base to have for each individual. It also speaks to a certain self discipline.

OY VEY. JUST SIT DOWN AND WATCH MORE JEW MEDIA, SHALOM.

I was smart enough to marry a girl that wasn't a whore and produce upward of 5 children. Meanwhile Australians go to prison for child rape if they look at a pornstar with small breasts.

CIA is on its way

I wish I could be a congressman. Get to fuck hot ass lolis while making fucking BANK and adored by the public because they think you're a big boy with a big boy job and not another burger-flipping wagefaggot.

stop giving me attention get this guy before he does something to some kid

well yes i'm using anecdotes because you're not allowed to research the effects of illegal relationships across the board. but i think most people would agree, a fully grown man who seeks out teenage girls has a sexual deficiency, the Elvis effect, and it's not a real, caring relationship. she only thinks it is because she's young and gullible. men should be seeking women who don't need to be home by 10 p.m. also a real man respects the fact that she's someone's daughter and he almost certainly doesn't have permission to be with her.

first, pedo sickfucks need to die in a fire
>know right from wrong
many men, even at their thirties, still struggle to achieve this.
Also, even if I am going to let my daughter have premature sex, which heaven forbids what damage would be done on her sexual organ, her partner should be a boy of her age, not an adult.
If you want to feed the lamb to the wolf pack, do it with your daughter first.

It should for memeflaggers.

>Age of consent here in Sweden is 15 years. I expect it to be RAISED after the upcoming islamic PURGE
Fixed

"even though girls were married before the age of 15 throughout most of human history"

There's a reason we stopped doing a lot of shit that we used to do. Like, that doesn't help your argument, it means nothing and only proves that we've moved forward morally and you just want to move backwards.

Eh? You married a child of 15, that's weird, sad and more than a little perverted. I on the other hand married a pure and virtuous woman (emphasis on woman). Winning the affections of a stupid, naive child isn't an achievement, it's pathetic and creepy.

>There's a reason we stopped doing a lot of shit that we used to do
jews
> it means nothing and only proves that we've moved forward morally
really? is that why all the people who have hit puberty are sleeping and whoring around?
guess that's pretty moral

>15
>child
Nothing wrong with courting young.

I agree with your premise(AoC is bad) but not your conclusion (therefore girls should be sluts more). The AoC shouldn't exist because a girl is not owned by the State but her father. He can fuck her as long as he owns her, until he gives her to her husband. Anyone else doing her is doing rape. Her age doesn't matter.
If it's "common sense" why is it a modern invention?