Why are there so many climate change deniers specifically in the US?

Why are there so many climate change deniers specifically in the US?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/x64bWsVUPjo
youtu.be/6t5R5Bp_RXE
curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/41-our-solar-system/the-earth/orbit/83-is-the-distance-from-the-earth-to-the-sun-changing-advanced
theoutline.com/post/2202/climate-change-denial-should-be-a-crime
japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2017/12/29/reader-mail/climate-change-denial-criminal/
climatedepot.com/2017/09/01/mag-after-harvey-climate-change-denial-should-be-a-crime-denial-can-and-will-leave-people-dead/
thenation.com/article/donald-trumps-withdrawal-paris-accords-crime-humanity/
aeon.co/conversations/are-climate-change-deniers-the-equivalent-of-holocaust-deniers-105
newsbusters.org/blogs/business/aly-nielsen/2017/09/01/vice-editor-climate-change-denial-should-be-crime
newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652
m.youtube.com/watch?v=5vS1l2X_G9Q
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

because we are allowed to. We don't go to jail for wrong think

Its not so much as climate deniers, it's just we're not going to do anything different. Fucking deal with it and let technology and the free market figure out how to profit from it.

The US is a young country and, like a teenager, it believes some absolutely abhorrent bullshit. We'll grow out of this anti-science phase in another hundred years or so.

Because of corporate propaganda, tradition, and liberal politicians have based careers on it and they want to fuck over anything liberals do, because Jesus

Denying climate change isn't illegal in other countries, you'll just be seen as a clown.
Then why constantly deny it?

Edge lord detected

Guess USA and Europe should stop adopting people from shitholes and turning them into uppity consumers then. Also get rid of pensions/social security/welfare/gibs. It just creates debt which then requires ever more population and consumption to pay for later down the road. Also, leftists should kill themselves. Too many people, you know?

Right, I'm the edge lord, not you idiots who believe that you know better than scientific consensus because you're just so especially brilliant.

This is the only time I've ever seen a shill make a good point.

Well played Shlomo. Fuck off back to the oven anyway.

"Consensus" is politics.

Ah, so their data must be worthless and the predictions climate scientists make must not be useful. Because of your sentence there. What awesome logic.

Predictions haven't met with reality. Constantly changing thier science and terms for the discrepancies.

"Consensus" is politics.

>Predictions haven't met with reality.
That's just not the case. Prove it. Show me evidence that this is true, show me data.

>Constantly changing thier science and terms for the discrepancies.
What do you mean by this? Please, explain. It sounds like you're using empty rhetoric to disagree because you have no actual evidence.

What makes more sense?
>Some fags who are mad at the king for taking away basic rights get on a big boat and cross the globe and kill some feathered peeps and 90% of them get dead
OR
>The king wasn't really trying to be mean but he made these dudes go on a boat and discover the greatest thing ever and learned how to kill turkeys and eat mashed potatoes

That image is wrong to be split like this. Climate change hoax directly propagated by big oil to head off and control the legislative processes so they can limit their liability and comply with the phony 'climate protecting' limits they set on themselves.

Why do you think it's something that's propagandized everywhere? if big business didn't want their to be climate science, no media would talk about it and it would have problems trending in today's algorithms.

They thought up climate change to attack our economy and make us less competitive.

Go home merkel bot. She doesnt want to try anymore.
Try china.

What % of all climate science research do you think is paid for by "big oil"?

Why constantly go on and on and on and on about it?
Everything thing the left does is a forced meme. You are losing because nobody likes whiny faggots telling them what to do.

The sun is the primary driver of all climate cycles we see currently and in the past.

youtu.be/x64bWsVUPjo

youtu.be/6t5R5Bp_RXE

there are no sides. Left and Right are meaningless dividing labels used by the uniparty to divide the masses attention back in on themselves.

Even Donald Trump is a controlled actor. If he was an actual threat he would of been dead before the primaries was over. He is a pressure release valve used to dampen and pacify anger.

The scientific community is under the control of a couple feminists/marxist organizations. NASA found out recently that the orbit of the earth around the sun is getting smaller every day since the 40s. Admitting that global warming is a product of getting closer to the sun instead of fossil fuel burning would be a huge hit to the ego of the elites. Now, the closer we get to the sun the faster the orbit shrinks, there may be a critical point where the speed of that shrinking increases exponentially faster. This info will be suppressed because they'd rather die roasted by a solar flare than admitting Trump was right.
>500womenscientist NASA "switching Poles* solar tide
Follow the breadcrumbs the truth is out there

It's hard to imagine being as stupid as you.

>be a (((green))) party politician
>gee, I wish our (((party))) got more votes, I wonder how we can trick all the go... Convince our fellow countrymen to vote for us greens...
>I know! Maybe I'll promise to give those (((climate scientist))) fucking shits some more funds if they cook up some results that convince the masses to vote for us! No one dares to question the priests of our time, the incorruptible scientists with zero incentives!

I can't believe how many fucking idiots actually fell for it too.

gender science degree doesn't make you a scientist.

curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/41-our-solar-system/the-earth/orbit/83-is-the-distance-from-the-earth-to-the-sun-changing-advanced
>Calls others stupid
>Believes in politics-driven "climate change"
The state of ((you))

>If we assume that the Sun's rate of nuclear fusion today is the same as the average rate over those 10 billion years (a bold assumption, but it should give us a rough idea of the answer), then we're moving away from the Sun at the rate of ~1.5 cm (less than an inch) per year. I probably don't even need to mention that this is so small that we don't have to worry about freezing.
You can't even read your own link you moron. What the fuck is wrong with you?

Fuck off, I support right wing economic policy.
Good thing I am not "the left" then.

That is a nice, corporate approved thing to support. I'd publicly support it too with a gun to my head.

>Why are there so many climate change deniers specifically in the US?
Because politicians, scientists and the media use "man man global climate change" as an excuse to grab more money, more power and more rights from the people.

>1 post by this ID

But no way company owners would ever do the same, that's just impossible. Right? Only scientists who beg for research money, politicians who beg for campaign money, and media that beg for your attention could ever want to grab more money.

For a guy without labels you sound an awful lot like a commie.

I have certain rules I live by. My first rule I don't believe anything the government tells me. and I don't take very seriously the media, or the press, in this country.

-Geoge Carlin

>Denying climate change isn't illegal in other countries,
Not yet.

theoutline.com/post/2202/climate-change-denial-should-be-a-crime

japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2017/12/29/reader-mail/climate-change-denial-criminal/

climatedepot.com/2017/09/01/mag-after-harvey-climate-change-denial-should-be-a-crime-denial-can-and-will-leave-people-dead/

thenation.com/article/donald-trumps-withdrawal-paris-accords-crime-humanity/

aeon.co/conversations/are-climate-change-deniers-the-equivalent-of-holocaust-deniers-105

newsbusters.org/blogs/business/aly-nielsen/2017/09/01/vice-editor-climate-change-denial-should-be-crime

newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652

>you'll just be seen as a clown.
So the climate change believers will vilify and ridicule someone else for holding a different belief? Is that acceptable?

jews

>scientific consensus
No such thing.

American education. It’s the same reason many of them unironically think the earth is 6000 years old.

>But no way company owners would ever do the same, that's just impossible.
The climate change believers also vilify corporations (and capitalism for that matter), want to take power from, money from and control away corporations and give it to the government/themselves.

Bored people have nothing better to do then fight this Y2K boogeyman... i mean whatever alarmist are "fighting" these days.

No country is yet in the process of making it a crime. You've mostly just linked editorials and opinion pieces.

And you have the right to hold an opinion on climate change, just as you also have a right to hold the opinion of others being clowns.

Stop using technology. Stop using medicine.

Oh I guess that completely disproves what I said because

because the environmentalist movement was co-opted by foreign interests who do not want us to develop our energy resources

So we must believe them because their enemies lie too? What kind of logic is that?
>you have to choose one liar or the other!

Neither of those are scientific consensus. If they were there would be a single agreed upon product from both of those categories, yet there aren't.

Many are not brainwashed.

Why the fuck are you choosing the other then?

Are you retarded? Single agreed upon product for "technology" or "medicine"? What are you trying to say??

>No country is yet in the process of making it a crime.
Key word there, "yet."

> You've mostly just linked editorials and opinion pieces.
That's how it starts. Influencing public opinion. Putting feelers out.

>And you have the right to hold an opinion on climate change, just as you also have a right to hold the opinion of others being clowns.
The difference being, the politicians, the media and the "scientists" all band together to vilify and ridicule those that stand against them and at the same time deny the climate change skeptics the platform to refute them.

>Oh I guess that completely disproves what I said because
You are willing to put your faith in the media, the politicians and the "scientists" even though it's been proven time and time again that they don't have your best interests at heart.

I'm not.

If that's true, my Aquafresh sucking friend, I'd guess it must be because only Americans are able to understand the difference between climate change and climate jew.
No one actually thinks the climate doesn't change, we just don't think giving money to jews is an appropriate reaction.

Communism is a failed experiment to see if people could be controlled by fear and patriotism. America's crony capitalism is the flipside with the proles being lead around by their greed.

I'd be much happier if true capitalism could be had that is freed from the hands of the plutocrats and their increasingly algorithmic manipulation of our lives.

Mutt genetics mixed with Africa tier education

Because government insists it needs a new tax revenue. Dirty power plant opperators want to increase cost to open new plants while running on grandfathered regulations. Leftyfag doesn't understand socialism or crony capitalism.

Because muh carbon tax isn't real. One volcano explodes ad say goodbye to carbon credits.

>it's been proven time and time again that they don't have your best interests at heart.
It hasn't. I don't know why you keep saying this when you have no evidence. Do you know what the word "proof" means?

Even if ACG was real I support it since the primary victims will be niggers in Africa and leftists in coastal cities.
But it’s not. Specifically CO2 realease (the boogeyman) is undeniably a good thing for the environment.

I'm old enough to remember the threat of "Global Cooling", the threat of "Acid Rain" and the "Hole in the Ozone". I've become jaded by the inaccuracy of your scientific consensus. At this point I'm willing to believe that a new imaginary environmental threat pops up whenever America is undergoing significant growth. I do believe there are many real environmental concerns such as worldwide declining fish stock, lead poisoning and agricultural runoff creating aquatic dead zones. I'm not so much anti science as much as I am against the American worker funding leftist billionaires GRQ schemes.

Has nothing to do with denying climate change dumbass.

The issue is finding alternative resources that don't completely assfuck our economy and way of life. Liberals have provided no real solution to the problem. They simply point out the problem, and get mad at Republicans for not wanting to ride bicycles fucking everywhere.

>the threat of "Acid Rain"
Still exists.

>"Hole in the Ozone"
Closed because we stopped making CFCs. Do you not remember that part?

How certain are you it will start becoming illegal around the world? And what do you have to back this up with? A few people holding the opinion is pretty far from any of your claims.

Would you like some legislation protecting climate change deniers instead? Should politicians or scientists no longer be able to voice their opinions? What exactly are you trying to say?

You lay down some interesting takes, but I disagree. Life is better now than anytime ever before.

Nobody denies climate change or that humans have an impact on climate. Carbon is just one aspect of many when it comes to climate change and the fact that people focus solely on carbon and attribute all climate change to it is completely absurd, it isn't really know how much of any impact it has. The funny thing is global warming isn't even a bad thing, every upturn in human civilization has coincided with with a warming period and every down turn has coincided with a global cooling period. Global cooling is literally the worst fucking thing that can happen, it causes agricultural collapse and you can probably imagine what happens after that. The left is literally a death cult and they are the major supporters of this climate change bullshit. It is only a matter of time before they try and convince the general populace to endorse atmospheric seeding to reverse the course of global warming, most likely thrusting us into a mini ice age.

unironically because of libertarianism and judaism

>CFC use in the northern hemisphere causes a “hole” in a fluid medium over the South Pole
I can’t even imagine being this retarded.

Because the climate change crisis is a manufactured government/big media psyop designed to cover up the fact that we are all dying from the ozone layer being destroyed. Don't you see the suspicious timing for the start of the climate change scare? The people were waking up to the true menace of being irradiated to death unless we saved the ozone layer.

IT'S ALL A COVERUP!!!!!

WE ARE DYING FROM OZONE LAYER DEPLETION!!!!!

Wall Street will make a killing with carbon taxation securities.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=5vS1l2X_G9Q
What are you saying op? I haven't seen any evidence of global warming in the last 20 years they've been going on about it, I think it's a big elite sham to enforce more taxations upon the few

Which makes more sense - 20,000 years of ice core climate data or a politicized leftist talking point with no credible data behind it?