This might be a topic more suited for /x/ but whatever
I saw a video of weev saying nukes aren't real and it was so ridiculous that I couldn't tell if he was trolling or not. His reasoning was really dumb, but I hadn't heard that theory before so I looked into it and a surprising amount of people actually believe that nuclear bombs are a hoax.
I watched a few videos about it so far and it looks like there may have actually been some staged videos put out by the Civil Defense Authority in the 50s and 60s, but I don't see much of an argument aside from that.
I have a couple questions though:
Hypothetically, if nuclear bombs as we know it don't actually exist and all of this was just a ruse, why did the US and the Soviet Union spend so much time and energy trying to convince each other that they were building something that they both knew was fake?
Further, why would a world power take a rogue nation's claims about their own nuclear bomb development seriously if they aren't real? And why would a country like North Korea or Iran make that claim in the first place since a fake bomb can't be an effective deterrence strategy?
Lastly, if any of the recordings of nuclear detonations are real, how did the film stay intact from the radiation, and how were the light sensors able to adjust so quickly to account for such an enormous flash? Also wouldn't the EMP render any electronics useless anyway?
Maybe I'm giving this too much thought, but if anyone legitimately believes in this I'd like to hear what you have to say
Nukes are real you braindead faggot. Not only are there thousands of videos filmed during a time where video editing wasn't really a thing, there's also tons of other scientifically backed and other evidence such as seismograms whenever a major nuke went off. For example when the USSR detonated the Tsar, it registered as a magnitude 8.3 earthquake on all seismographs around the world and shattered windows as far away as Finland.
To be successfully detonated, the bomb MUST be geometrically constructed, placed on, under, or over a geometric position in relation to the Earth’s surface, and activated at a SPECIFIC TIME in relation to the geometrics of the solar system.
That means an all-out atomic war was impossibility.
Both sides could pre calculate well in advance the time and positions of an atomic attack , plus the fact that only certain geometric locations could be detonated any how.
A logical war cannot be considered under these circumstances.
This could be the explanation for the proliferation of conventional weapons in modern warfare.
That means Israel’s nuclear stock pile is useless.. It’s all scare mongering.
This is why Iran laughs it off about Israel accuses Iran of building a nuclear bomb. It’s all a bluff.
This technology is over 5000 years old and was known to the ancients. The musical of the spheres.
They have more devastating advanced technology at their disposal so why stick to the old fear mongering of nuclear bombs?
The answer is simple. Can you guess?
It’s because it’s taken decades to install the fear and propaganda into the unsuspecting public who never question anything and is easily fooled.
Jason Brooks
When did I say I believed it? I'm trying to figure out why people believe the theory despite all the historical evidence of nuclear testing
Landon Rivera
Cluesforum.info has a good discussion on this. What makes me doubt is knowing the psychopaths in charge, I find it hard to believe that they wouldn't have used them since WWII. WIth that said, if they don't have them, they have some very big thermal bombs. Also, the cold war was a complete hoax.
Juan Evans
I'm watching the video now, but why can it only be detonated at a specific place and time? Why wouldn't you be able to detonate it like a conventional weapon?
Lincoln Reyes
because you're literally reversing the atomic process in order to cause a detonation. It's not simple ignition, it's at the atomic level.
Grayson Parker
the only evidence you need is the fact that there hasn't been a war between counties with nukes.
Brody Johnson
Go back to godlikeproductions, boomer.
Luis Myers
in fact not a single country with nukes has ever been invaded
Connor Hughes
>Hypothetically, if nuclear bombs as we know it don't actually exist and all of this was just a ruse, why did the US and the Soviet Union spend so much time and energy trying to convince each other that they were building something that they both knew was fake? because secretly Russia and USA are competing brothers controlling entire world from opposite sides of the "world" like GEMINI the zodiac sign aka Left and Right hand of the body. Two superpowers on each side keep everyone else in check and at bay.
Michael Morgan
kek
Owen Barnes
have you seen it and proven it for yourself or you just repeating what a jew kike in a white robe told you, retard?
Parker Peterson
wait, you're serious. Are you the same peterstein guy?
Nathan Myers
because he's a fucking retard. case in point
Logan Diaz
>For example when the USSR detonated the Tsar, it registered as a magnitude 8.3 earthquake on all seismographs around the world and shattered windows as far away as Finland. doesn't prove that it was a nuke and not a large quantity of TNT! you need to research more, you dumb fuck before making such statements about fartographs
Cameron Myers
ITT: The death of Sup Forums. I can't wait till the flat earthers and transvestigation schizos show up.
Isaac Gutierrez
show me a small scale nuke reaction, get 1 microgram of plutonium and smash it with uranium bullet or a hammer and show me nuke explosion on small scale until then your word means shit and I say it was TNT
What a fucking stupid thread. We are able to measure radioactive particles in the air due to increased testing around nevada, the pacific, and the semipolansk range in kazakhstan
Jeremiah Adams
People smoke too much weed, get paranoid as fuck and come up with retarded theories like "hurrrr gorillas are just people in suits because they're hoaxing EVILution" and shit like this. It all comes down to the same logic: I ain't never seen it befo' so it's fake!
The most whacko conspiritards tend to either be legitimately mentally ill or just massive stoners.
I admit I heaven't read your post because I thought it'd go strait into GLP/x/ territory.
>how did the film stay intact from the radiation The cameras were probably placed far away from the blast site so that the little radiation that actually reached the film has no or little to no impact. The majority of radiation stayed within the initial fireball and the mushroom cloud that formed from ground material that has been sucked into it. The dust/shockwave pushed away from the explosion was only minimally irradiated.
>and how were the light sensors able to adjust so quickly to account for such an enormous flash? Likely some insanely high ISO film and the rest done during development. I mean, everything used to capture the explosions was insanely high-tech - they captured the development of the blast down to microseconds.
>Also wouldn't the EMP render any electronics useless anyway? Everything was solely analogue obviously.
Asher Harris
These retards probably think radiation is a satanic illuminatti hoax. I say they should all go inside the Chernobyl NPP's burnt out reactor and see for themselves.
Ryan Morris
moron! so why didn't they explode and only released high levels of radiation? larp some more faggot and watch a movie version, it'll give you a larger borner to suck on
Josiah Cooper
Nuclear energy released in criticality accidents is seldom explosive in character because, in the absence of intentional confinement such as one finds in nuclear weapons, the excess reactivity is relieved through more ordinary physical processes.
Luke Sullivan
the cameras they developed just for filming the nukes are incredible
Josiah Davis
this, if the russians put a uranium liner around the core instead of lead the yield would have doubled to 100 megatons, but that was too spooky
Caleb Fisher
Interesting that Man in the High Castle alludes to this.
Bentley Barnes
No I get that. I just don't understand how, in reference to the video, the detonation of a nuke requires that it be in a specific place at a specific time
Jason Cruz
You have to start a self sustained nuclear fission reaction. You have to get enough mass of this unstable material compacted so that neutrons that come form the decay of nuclei don't just fly out, but bounce around and break other nuclei. This is hard if you want to have a bomb that is safe. You have to compress a spherical core with very precisely timed explosives. Other wise, the core which you have inevitably chosen to be much smaller than the critical mass for safety, will not sustain a reaction.
Justin Harris
I'm just confused about the whole triangulation thing described in the video linked here
Bunch of nonsense. You don't need the sun to detonate a nuke.
Michael Morales
Ah, yes it is a trick. They Dont exist as we are told. Japan got carpet bombed not nukked. Verified by the burn injuries and deaths from civillians.
Oliver Jones
...
Daniel Flores
after watching some more of this guy, I can confirm he is a retarded spiritually type conspiratard.
Oliver Wright
Hi Share Blue! Hi Share Blue! Make others sound crazy when truth hits too close to jew agenda. Predictable every time.
Joshua Davis
Because some people are fucking stupid.
This isn't one of those cases where you need to sit down and put a lot of time and thought and effort into figuring out why a particular belief persists in spite of the lack of physical evidence supporting it. We're not in the "why do people find comfort in religious beliefs?" regime of philosophical debate, this is "why does this man keep sticking his dick in the light socket?" territory
Gavin Taylor
Huh? These what if threads are actuslly interesting. Its infinitely better than trump retards, eceleb generals and "what is white?" threads.
Austin Russell
sad but true
Justin Morgan
You mean the """burn injuries""" that left literally nothing but the carbon of the victims' bodies etched into their surroundings?
Jason Morris
Show-offs between nations is based on the same scientific principles that both sides follow, so if 1 side claims to have a nuclear bomb, its likely that the other side has scientists that kow exactly how it should work aswell. Bluff where both sides claim to have something that is technically possible but doesnt exist, is miniscule.
Nathan Mitchell
Hi shareblue!
Daniel Morris
Wait, there are Nuke Deniers too? Fucking kek, tell that to Polynesians, maybe they'll stop seeking redress to us.
Luis Foster
Fuck you and fuck ball earth theory
David Jackson
I'm married to a submariner. He's the best man I've ever met, and I trust him more than weev. Sorry senpai.
Ethan Rodriguez
High ISO is more sensitive to light, not less
Nathan Sanders
Could you post your tits for scientific reasons?
Jonathan Baker
congratulations moron, you know how to read.. but have you tested it yourself or you just spew shit that some kike told you?
Christian Richardson
>video editing not a thing Dude video editing was a thing since the very first silent movie
Lucas Thomas
Goddamn jews are ugly
Caleb Kelly
>(((weev))) Stopped reading right there.
Logan Reyes
You really want to see some hairy pink nipples?
Grayson Murphy
If it's scientific...
Lincoln Howard
Yup, realized after hitting submit that I got that mixed up.
>Volumetric cloud rendering in the mid 40s Yeah, sure man!
Brody James
There's something morbidly beautiful about nuclear blasts
Luke Sanders
1. You're asking a question assuming that nukes don't exist 2. Maybe because they do exist? 3. Because radiation is spread from fallout not the blast, I'm pretty sure there was still a flash although I never really took note, and I'm pretty sure cameras back then were analogue, not electronic.
Josiah Walker
Nukes arent real you can know this because they did operation plowshare. Plowshare used tnt it was basically a psyop to ingrain the idea of nukes into the mind of the public
Ethan Nguyen
explain the tsar bomba please
Grayson Murphy
>There's something morbidly beautiful about nuclear blasts >doesn't post best nuclear blast Castle Bravo best bravo.