Where did it all go wrong

where did it all go wrong

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutio_Antoniniana
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Jews.

Jews.

juden

Jews.

Jews

Battle of Actium.

We could have had Egyptian Priests hold yearly jew/nigger sacrifices to Set, but noooo.

jews

A small international rootless clique.

Juden.

Council of Trent.

Hitler and Mannerhiem not making it to the Urals.

Jews buying the Romans and invading the European land, culture, tradition, religion and spirit through Christianity. This is were things started to go very wrong

Americunts

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutio_Antoniniana

From Wiki:

The Constitutio Antoniniana (Latin for: "Constitution [or Edict] of Antoninus") (also called the Edict of Caracalla or the Antonine Constitution) was an edict issued in 212,[1] by the Roman Emperor Caracalla declaring that all free men in the Roman Empire were to be given theoretical Roman citizenship and that all free women in the Empire were to be given the same rights as Roman women.

Before 212, for the most part only inhabitants of Italy held full Roman citizenship. Colonies of Romans established in other provinces, Romans (or their descendants) living in provinces, the inhabitants of various cities throughout the Empire, and small numbers of local nobles (such as kings of client countries) held full citizenship also. Provincials, on the other hand, were usually non-citizens, although some held the Latin Right.

Reminder to disregard all posts from users with troll flags.

...

Fucking stupid meme. Have you seen Greeks lately?

Had fuck all effect, and the second half is fake news. Citizenship had virtually no effect by 212 and a massive percentage of the empire's population had it by that year. Already the distinction of importance was between Honestiores and Humiliores.

t. Dissertation

I think it probably starts with the Persian empire which causes the Greek empire. The Greek empire then causes the Roman empire. This empire allows the Christians to expand. Eventually you couldn't be pagan and people either became Christians or Jews. Then the Arabs and the Germans rebel against Roman Christian rule and form their own religions (Islam and Protestantism). Islam believes in submission and Protestantism believes in freedom--two extremes which are disastrous.

The freedom virus has infected the Western world and most of our problems come from too much freedom: Freedom to trade whatever. Freedom of markets to sell whatever. Freedom to fetishize whatever. Freedom to be degenerate. Freedom from Christianity. Freedom to move and migrate. Freedom to judge one another. Freedom to break with tradition. Freedom from civic responsibility. Freedom to rebel against authority. Freedom to be isolated individuals. Freedom of women to do as they please. Freedom to love whomever and race mix. nFreedom to become wealthy and decadent. Freedom to sell out future generations. Freedom of people to alter their bodies. Freedom of the rich to do as they please. Freedom to be homosexual and transsexual. Freedom to be corrupt and to corrupt others. Freedom to undermine and destroy your society. Freedom from structures that enforce tradition. Freedom of foreign religions to do as they please. Freedom of merchants to sell whatever they please. Freedom to abandon your tribe and be an individual. Freedom of Cultural Marxists to teach their poison. Freedom of capital to exploit and then replace labor. Freedom to consume whatever entertainment they please.

Nazism and Communism are just reactions to this freedom.

Hebrews.

hmm...

My true belief is that the rising of Ceaser to the rank of emperor (or was it only dictator?) is what truly destroyed the balance.

However, the early empire was kind of all right, wasn't it?
The crisis of the III century was when it all crumbled down showing that the empire was already over extended.

However still, the edict of carcalla literally was what ended the sense of Romanitas as it was.
Wasn't it after that that old style patrician/soldier/farmer/politician of the old age were replaced by cunning bastards? And the mos maiorum relegated to a dark corner?

Honestiores vs Humiliores kind of descends from optimates vs populares which kind of descends from patricians vs plebs vs socii.
And every time what I see is the Roman "idea" being deluted.

How wrong am I clever Brit?

Also, it seems to me that after 212 and the III century in general, Easterners were more accepted in a way that they were not before.

You're not to the point.