What age did you outgrow Libertarianism?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=DeiK0fdPv8Y
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

as soon as my wife and started talking about having children.

I really never had any full out libertarianism in my life.

16. Was libertarian just for a brief period of watching Peterson videos. Now I'm 18 and Fascist.

libertarianism as seen by communists, nazis, anarchists or libertarians?

Glad to say I've never fallen for that meme.

no meme. 16.

It's just simply obvious it's not how the world works or can even work in principle.

White nationalism seems to be making more sense everyday.

hurrr muh ethnostate

Don't know how old I was but it was when I realized in a world of Jews and degenerates liberty is too easily corrupted.

Wanting the least amount of government faggotry possible is bad... because?

>inb4 retarded hurrr durrr roads argument

How about neither the minimum nor maximum amount, just the OPTIMAL amount?

I won't deny the US Libertarian Party is a fucking joke filled with try hard attention seeking faggots. But I don't understand why Libertarian Ideology is bad. This country's creation was largely based in Libertarian ideology.

Obviously, we need roads, military, mail and some form of mediator and regulator in business and food matters. But I don't want these cocksuckers in anything where it isn't absolutely necessary.

Around 20

I understand some people don't use their liberty right but people should be free to make their own decisions. If someone wants to jump in front of a rollercoaster let them get the Darwin award.

That's a subjective thing that varies from person to person.

Uh Japan is literally a modern day example of an ethno state. And their civilization is booming. Maybe your just the one who's retarded.

At 16, when I discovered that individualism and collectivism aren't mutually exclusive and that hierarchy is good.

It's just divide & conquer shills from Leftypol.

this. To this day libertards cannot refute this

I hate kikes, niggers and socialists too but why do you want to give them more powerful weapons to terrorize normal people? That's what government is. That's why I want it as limited as possible and the fuck out of my life because it's just a weapon for whoever owns it.

never

And a centralized state with absolute power over all of its citizens is harder to corrupt?

How do you remove people from your state?

Just tag "national" on the front and you don't need to

Bought my first house. Obama voting liberal.
After a few weeks niggers move in across the street.
Welfare queen sits in front porch smoking Newport’s and drinking 40s at 7am while I’m going to work.
I come home from work she’s still on the porch.
This continues for weeks.
Each day I get more angry.
A few months I sell my house and move to a more white part of town.
Right wing death squads when?

i dont think i will ever outgrow it i was always like that i just want to be keep alone that doesn't mean i do not care of people in my country but it need to be my voluntary decision to help them for example i do not like that my tax money go to some Feminist organization or they go to Afrika i will rather give the money to people in my own Country

Never really got away from it, I just don't respect the party anymore.

Yes.

you never outgrow it
you are until the end
we could be 83 years old and still wont take shit from the establishment

take off your meme flag faggot.

Libertarianism was revealed to be the meme -ism it is during the 2016 primaries and election.
Libertarians are just edgy potheads, atheists, and globalists that are conscious enough to know that marxism is evil but too dumb to realize that globalism and marxism are the same goddam thing.

Holy shit.
Some nigger enjoying her day is enough to get you to move.. She's not even being violent.
Man you could have rented out that house.

When I was about 17, and moved out to the city, seeing non-whites in their autonomy, for the first time. It was then I realized the undeniable contrast between whites and all other people. It wasn’t until later that I was able to fully articulate corporate and monetary global neoliberalism and materialism, as the cause of the seemingly obvious and senseless disaster that is the placement of non-whites, in our white societies. That was when I took up the Swastika.

Nah, grew out of it in a few years. Now a full fledged national socialist fascist.

Considering a monarchy is based on birth rights which one do you think is going to win, faggot? You're advocating a roll of a dice based on a tiny gene pool full of inbreeding and excess. This might be the most retarded quote I've ever read.

Watch this Libertarian cringe, especially at 3:57 when Fat bearded man strips down to underwear.
s m h
youtube.com/watch?v=DeiK0fdPv8Y

And a democracy is hundreds of dice rolls just to enact a simple bill.

If only. It is as impossible and as false as the utopia of communism.

I'd rather take a large gang fight of idiots and shills than being some Limey faggot having to bow to a King.

some unknown future date

If you call communism an "utopia", then you don't really know why communism is bad and your argument against it is weak.
Communism is true hell, because its very premise of equality is wrong. Equality is a bad thing. A communist country - even if it had high standards of living - would always be a dystopia (the antonym of utopia).

>Japan
>booming

The country that sells more adult diapers than infant diapers

HAHAHAAHAHAHA

Utopia is impossible and unnatural. They are both impossible ideologies because they are both unnatural. Struggle and the hierarchy that arises out of it are the only possible outcomes of life.

kick em out. If they don't wanna leave. Gas em.

. . . [O]nly competition in the production of goods is a good thing. Competition in the production of bads, such as taxation and legislation, is not good. In fact, it is worse than bad. It is sheer evil. Kings coming into their position by virtue of birth might be harmless dilettantes or decent men (and if they are "madmen" they will be quickly restrained or, if need be, killed by close relatives concerned with the positions of the royal family, the dynasty). In sharp contrast, the selection of state rulers by means of popular elections makes it essentially impossible for a harmless or decent person to ever rise to the top. Presidents and prime ministers come into their position not owing to their status as natural aristocrats, as feudal kings once did, i.e., based on the recognition of their economic independence, outstanding professional achievement, morally impeccable personal life, wisdom and superior judgement and taste, but as a result of their capacity as morally uninhibited demagogues. Hence, democracy virtually assures that only dangerous men will rise to the top of state government.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe
A Short History of Man
pg. 119-120

22 or so, when I realized we don't live in a libertarian society.

>symbol of flag is literally a snake
>don't tread on me
>don't tread on my degenerate desires and temptations
>let me be a snake
>snakes are good rite only caused the fall of man and such lel

i believe in freedom and i dont want people forcing ppl to do things, but at the very least we need to tell the truth about degenerate activities and strongly encourage ppl to give that shit up. It's best if they do it on their own accord through knowledge of truth.

I believe in giving people truth, not forcing it down their throats. but yeah i don't really appreciate the libertarian flag or libertarianism in general. There's a vibe of it embracing degeneracy. I more broadly prefer the concept of freedom and most importantly truth.

Meme flag

When it became unpopular after The Tea Party movement failed.

>Hurrr Durrr I'm so retarded I'm advocating a political system literally the entire world revolted against in the 18th and 19th century and led to the largest genocide of white people in the 20th century

94

>failed

You just described the first leftists. And they did the same thing then that they do now: destroyed our culture and traditions and genocided whites.

That's not really an argument.

deportation
death if they struggle

That's like saying you will be a eunuch if you stick your dick in a car motor isn't an argument. It's a logical conclusion based upon historical evidence.

If you stick your dick in a running car motor, you will lose it. If you institute a monarchy, your country will collapse. I never thought I would encounter people more retarded than communists, yet here we are.

>If you institute a monarchy, your country will collapse.
That must be why Liechtenstein is in fucking ruins right now.

Nazi Germany was essentially a utopia before the war.

I still have libertarian leanings but I've never been dumb enough to believe a society with no government can exist. I'd love to live in a homogeneous nation whose authority didn't extend much beyond protecting the border militarily and economically. Let the tyranny of the majority control the rest. Kinda like Switzerland.

Unfortunately human nature means that many people will desire to exert their will on others. That means it's a political arms race within any nation. So in the end, my pragmatic political philosophy is that my authoritarian system that keeps the Left out of power is better than their authoritarian system which keeps me on the Right out of power.

So my fascism built on White nation states is preferable to their authoritarian Communism based on degeneracy and 1 world control.

Right, because monarchies have never been known to last.

Very few of them last, and the transition from one to another is usually an enormous sanguination.

The default state of Feudalism is war.

Trump was elected as a protectionist

Monarchic wars were not as bad as they are now.

how is christianity supposed to preserve the white race when it's clearly multi cultural in it's teachings?

Like it preserved us before...

libertarianism and fascism are not mutually exclusive, democracy is the most anti-libertarian political system out there.

Those are Modal libertarians or libertine libertarians, real libertarians are culturally conservative

23, the ultimate political redpill is to understand that ideology is just a tool to control stupid bydlo. Only thing that matters is what project, what goals a politician wants to achieve.

That only works for villages of 10 people. Shit doesn't work for bigass countries. Especially now.

Unlike the majority of us I was never a libertarian. I came here straight from tumblr socialist leftism. My personal redpill came when I realized that the people who I was going out of my way to defend hated me for being white and male. I realized that they didn't really want "justice" or "equality" they just wanted revenge.

> Implying WW1 wasn't a monarchic war and wasn't the worst war until WW2.
> Implying the world today world wasn't the product of millennia of monarchic warfare and misrule

I don't think most people waving around Gadsdens are actually Libertarians anymore, especially over the past year where it now is basically a sign of patriotism and whiteness in general.

I think it's quite opposite actually. Once you leave you're edgy teenage years you stope being so angsty and angry at colored people. You're hormones balance out and you act like a mature adult.

I get the impression your image implies feudalist warfare was between aristocracy primarily. That suggests knights and cavalry made up the bulk or entirety of feudal armies, and that peasants weren't levied, captured, or plundered by warfare waged primarily to capture land, peasants and material wealth. Obviously this is untrue. Not even Genghis Khan's army was pure cavalry, and the steppe nomads were mounted by default.

I got in it when I was 22 and got out of it when I was 22. Being ancap is pretty much retarded. I'm a socdem now or a classical liberal, centralist maybe.

When I was 14 and realized it addresses no social issues

Never went through a libertarian phase. Was a democrat until around 23, became an anarcho-syndicalist, then a green anarchist, then a post-left anarchist, and finally became natsoc.

I realized there are just some things governments do better. Far from most things though. I still think that if the evidence is out in any given policy suggestion one should err on the side of not fucking with people.

29

>before the french revolution, wars scarcely affected the masses

Do libertarians think that all South America and Africa need to become world superpower is free market and small government?

>was 16. real dumb.
>now 18. fully woke now.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
the absolute state of pol

honestly I used alt-lite rhetoric to explain my views for a little bit, but my political philosophy has always been one of hard authoritarianism for as long as i can remember.

Lost loser.

No, libertarianism would help but not cure the problems of South America and Africa. The problem with most of those countries is the people themselves.

>mfw when most of pol never left their edgy teenage years being angsty and angry at coloured people, so they have to convince themselves they've progressed beyond everyone who actually levelled out into a functioning human being

a lot of them literally do, yes

So, tbqh it's useless then?