Is becoming a liberalist the final red pill?

Is becoming a liberalist the final red pill?

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=u9PRwn2uexI
youtube.com/watch?v=Cjfp4BNmN1M
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Q predicted this

No. But it might become edgy again someday.

GTFO Sargoy!

sage

Fuck you collectivist.

Fuck you individualist scum!

Can you do everything for your country at the same time? No, that's because you're part of a COLLECTIVE. (One that should have 0% Asian/nonWhite).

Why do people still watch him, even after he lied about being a quadroon?

no
sage

Q predicted this

Ironic Euphemist here. No.

The final red pill is realizing that everything is a lie. Everything.

The final redpill gets snorted up the nose, a large schnoz that happens to be connected to what you discover, the eternal Jew who is behind every problem in our dimension.

Yes
m.youtube.com/watch?v=u9PRwn2uexI

As much a cutting off your nuts is redpilled, faggot.

>i-i-i'm not a cult leader
*embarrasses himself in debate
>f-fucking alt right snowflakes
*posts cuck porn
>if-if-if-if everyone just magically became a liberal then there'd be no problems
*stale content about feminists
>l-look at this feminist being stupid haha I agree with their political stance though..

No because it makes no fucking sense to make up a word for a political ideology that's almost exactly the same as another ideology and pretend it has a completely new meaning

t. libertarian

Source

is it true that Q
predickted this

Yep

What the fuck is a "Liberalist"? Something this moron came up with?

Why can't plebeians take the time to learn philosophical fucking terminology.

Why didn't Q predict this sooner? Oh wait
- he did

Libertarians turn fash, not the other way around

Sargon's logic:
Progressives are Activists, so I must create the liberalists group to become activists and fight back against the progressives even though I hate activists and activism

Also Sargon:
Non-White groups vote and act as collectivists, and the Alt-Right suggests Whites must become collectivists as well to avoid being taken over and taken advantage of by non-whites. Sargon responds to this with "But richud, what even IS white? You have to be radical thinking big brained individualists to fight back!"

It's a boomer tier blue pill.

kek that got me

It's late, go to sleep Sargon, your centrist jihad will never work

>I'm a neo-liberal, basic bitch social democrat.
>I also want to pretend I'm not.

Welcome to Liberalistism

No you dumb fuck NazBol is the FINAL RED PILL....

...

Space Chimps.

The Stephfather of Soy

I find it very odd that someone would lie about having a black grandfather.

...

>the blue suppository

must secretly have a cuck fetish
bet it turns him on to take care of another man's child

It's the best fence sitters can achieve

>start as civic nationalist
>become white nationalist
>go back to civic nationalist after charolettesville scared you
>become libertarian
>go back to white nationalism because it’s safe again
>become fascist
>become liberalist after watching the Richard Spencer/Sargon debate

Right wing SJWs literally cannot define white

trying to "be" anything is for idiots. you can't change the world soy-boy, let it all go.

Absolutely can define it with genetic clusters

how the fuck are you here, i thought they were actively exterminating you right now?

youtube.com/watch?v=Cjfp4BNmN1M
26:00
>Intersectional Liberalist
We need feminist memes to add to the mafia and vore memes

No one ever accused them of being efficient. Also, checked

No. It's a result of a persuasion technique called "matching and leading".

You "match" your target demographic's beliefs and feelings about a subject. Tell them shit they want to hear. That you're there for them to voice their concerns to a wider world, etc. You're their boy.

You then attempt to "lead" them down a cul de sac, where you hold most power and influence.
You fight off alternate voices that may lure your new army of followers away from you (along with their patreon bucks and validating follower/subscriber-numbers).

This is Sargon. He positioned himself in the gate between blue pilled SJWish thinking and red pilled alt-rightish thinking. Realizing that a great political migration was happening. Using his mix of red and pink pilling techniques he's able to scrape off of a healthy supply of followers as they pass through the gateway.
Using entertaining rip-downs of easy targets like radfems, soy boys, numales and other non-contentious-to-attack progressive faggotry.

It's an easy entry point for people starting the red pill journey, and it doesn't get Sargon banned from his money-making platforms.
But then he tries to lead people into this false "centrist/liberalist" dead-end lane.
Where the same SJW speech-restrictions start to apply themselves again.
And the same disingenuous style of debate and argument reigns supreme.

In 6 months to a year, there will be a new alt-rightish Sargon who routinely mocks and deconstructs Sargon's bullshit like he used to do to the SJWs.
Except, because of where Sargon has placed himself, that new guy will talk about the JQ and other issues Sargon (like Peterson) edges right up to the bleeding edge of, then suddenly and conspicuously diverts away from.

Sargon is already a has-been. He's not the "final" anything. Very likely he'll start chasing fights with other has-beens like Anita Sarkessian for easy groupie-points. Anything to avoid acknowledging the changing landscape around him.

>Very likely he'll start chasing fights with other has-beens like Anita Sarkessian for easy groupie-points
The fuck has Anita even been doing lately? Haven't heard anything since the vidcon fiasco. Furthermore "Liberalist" is steadily becoming more and more like feminism

>Those British gnashers

>that new guy will talk about the JQ and other issues Sargon (like Peterson) edges right up to the bleeding edge of, then suddenly and conspicuously diverts away from.

I don't see Peterson doing this.
Give 3 examples.