How do we solve the problem that is modern Women?

How do we solve the problem that is modern Women?

Robots. Women were a mistake. God is a retard for creating them. We can do better.

Post the baby

She is pregnant with it

Obviously a joke u autismosous

Ignore the shit ones. If they wanna be "stonk womyn who don't need no man" then let them shrivel up and die alone. It's a problem that fixes itself if you take the right course of action.

>Just a joke goyim

Like every pregnant woman makes a similar joke.

Is there such a thing as a strong woman that DOES need a man?

Put them into breeding Chambers like cattle.

>Woman realizes Nature considers her nothing beyond a uterus-on-legs.

Too late, though, now you're stuck with it, your health and life are effectively ruined. Thank you for playing The Game Of Life, you have lost.

I'm so sick of this bitch, ugly seamonkey with a above average body known for making a meme face and being opinionated.

All of them actually.

Natural selection. Women who hate giving birth tend not to pass on their genes.

Archive the post, let the child see its mothers tweets one day.

No shame in that. It's not like Sup Forums are dirty Muslims or anything.

>aborts baby
>doesn't carry shit genetics into next generation
Looks like its solving itself

1. Capital punishment for adultery.
2. Capital punishment for abort or infanticide.
3. No divorces unless both parties consent or one of parties committed crime against another.
4. Consider all sex between spouses voluntary, there's no spouse rape.

She's pretty much describing how men should feel about women.

Making her dry? What... her pussy? I don't think that's your retarded rat baby.

I hope it comes out gay and gets AIDs before he hits his teen years.

but she will gladly own a pet cat and treat her better than a child.

Bitch is in league with the pedo crowd. It won't be long now.

Their will always be ways to skate the system, unfortunately. If you can't abort, people will induce a miscarriage.

adultery by having 300 betas/happas finish on her

Some people keep killing other people despite laws, some people keep stealing from other people despite law.
Most of them get caught, punished and make example for majority, who stays within boundaries of law.

There's big difference between having something occur 2 in 3 cases, and 1 in 1000000 cases.

We can't solve it. They're all retarded, so...

here's a crazy idea
DON'T GET PREGNANT

robots.

give it 5-10 years at most and thots will become worthless compared to robot wives

Pregnant women always think like this. It's good for them to vent. It's not so good for them to have a community of crazy women to use as a backboard.

>advocates socialism
>Complains someone else is taking their food and water

The goddamn irony

Well SOMEBODY is having lots of babies.

It's simple.

We as men, become men again.

Women have only fallen into open degeneracy because men became lazy and passive. Men defered their societal responsibilities as men to the state and as a result, the state became the prime patriarchy and women eloped as a result. Because women will always gravitate towards where there real power is. Because that's what they crave above all else. Men with power. Power over resources, and other people.

The only solution is for men to act in unison, overturn the state and create new national states that focus on localised communities, with the family unit being the foundation. Forcing women back into the fold by relinquishing all wellfare and making familial cohesion an absolute necessity for survival once more.

Women aren't the root issue. Men are. The world wouldn't be in the state it's in today if men lived up to their responsibilities to themselves, their families, their communities and their nations.

Wrong.

Women are exactly as they are supposed to be.

They are supposed to be muses for men, pushing men to be the best men they can be. And that's exactly what they're trying to do by acting out as they are.

The status quo with women now has a purpose, and it's to teach us men how we need to be as men, women know this instinctively, their behaviour is a conscious effort to have us force them into submission but we can only do this if we understand the dynamics between men and women and revert back to our original modality of being, which is a pairing of meekness and ferocity. They are covertly trying to force us to become men again because they recognise that we are now as we should be en masse.

The problem is that currently men have no desire to be men, they don't want responsibility, they don't want to sacrifice, they want to play videogames 24/7 and fap to camgirls, giving the illusion of fulfillment and female approval.

If women are an issue in society, it's because men are an issue. It's a man's duty to make a woman fall in line and return to the fold if she elopes.

Only a cuck with absolutely no self-respect or potential as a man would claim that women are a mistake. Your inability to understand and handle them does not reflect objective reality.

Oh yeah, forgot important point: any public whiteknighting should also meet immediate capital punishment.
These retards are primary reason why everything went wrong.

I think men's passivity / laziness came first. Then "white knights" came second. Because they saw that women as a whole were unhappy with men and sought their approval by way of appeasement. White knights are oppotunists attempting to capitalise on an already existing issue, they're not the root issue itself.

avoid them, when they can't reap rewards from men thinking with their dicks they'll change

The only way they'll change is if men in unison became men again and take control of both family and society.

This can only happen if the state in its current form is abolished.

>The only solution is for men to act in unison, overturn the state and create new national states

it's easier to let the state die and avoid women

but you''re right men are partly to blame, but women are the majority of the electorate

>They are supposed to be muses for men, pushing men to be the best men they can be.

says who?

your post is beta/gynocentric as fuck and thhe very reason I ignore shitheads like you who will talk tall about manhood and mens duties but will abandon and sell out your fellow man for a piece of tail

I would say that men are wholely to blame, and that women are simply responding instinctually to the issues we've presented them with. That doesn't mean they hold no responsibility, of course they do, but their role is secondary, ours is primary. And only a man afraid of responsibility, well, a boy, would deny that.

Nature.

Men and women whether we like it or not have a symbiotic relationship. We need each other. We are the twin pillars of the family unit, and the family unit is the foundation of everything else.

A house divided cannot stand. Division only reaps destruction. Unity rewards continuity.

Shut the fuck up anarcho roastie. You make some good points but my god you're fucking obvious.

I will punch you real good behind the head when I fuck you. You'll see what a man I am.

i didn't know who this was, so i googled the name
seriously.. what a fucking mutt
sort it out america

Woman like this need to be sterilized

No need to sort it out. These people rarely breed, and when they do, they're such shitty fucking parents that their kids end up either killing themselves, grow up confused queers who end up castrating themselves and then killing themselves, or wind up in some worthless nigger gang before getting gunned down by some other fuckups for wearing the wrong colors or some dumb shit.

Hardly. Gynocentrism is the primary focus on women's wants and needs. It puts women before men, making women the leaders and men the followers. I'm not concerned about women's wants or needs. What I am concerned about is the continuity of civilisation, of race, of culture. And that continuity requires unity, which can only be apparent if we acknowledge individual roles and responsibility within circumstances that have arisen.

I am clearly advocating that men lead once more, rather than follow. That is the natural order of things. God > man > woman > child. If I was gynocentric, I would be pleading to men to listen to women and do what women want, that is not the case. I am calling for men to become men once more and force women back into the fold and serve men as they should. Not for men, but for the common good. Because as I said, that is the natural order of things.

Men lead, women follow. If there is any divergence from this dynamic in a society, that society falls, simple fact.

men can survive without society and families, women need such constructs to survive. For men to retake society there has to be a clear benefit therein. Not just for the objects sake.

Having kids made life more productive pragmatically in the past, more hands, more relatives, greater protection and mutual safety.

women assisted with this.

Now they are more of a detriment and often act counter to this

Roastie? I'm a 28 year old male.

Even if I was a roastie that would be besides the point because I'm spot on in my observations.

Yeah tell that to the courts buddy and the Cops when they drag you away after beating your ass cause she called them. If you want the status quo of Men being dominate over Women to return, you have to take Women's rights away. Women should've never been given the vite.

It might just not be the repeal of Obama care that's killing him but him being fat enough to make four people out of him.

>Nature.

very abstract concept

...

What you say would be correct if modern women weren't used up, STD ridden whores. That's not a fixable condition. Few men feel inspired to sacrifice anything for some dirty skank that has been jumping from one cock to the next a dozen times.

>What I am concerned about is the continuity of civilization, of race, of culture

which requires appeals to women, therefore gynocentric appeals

>I am calling for men to become men once more and force women

again requesting men divert attention and resources to women.

>Men lead, women follow. If there is any divergence from this dynamic in a society, that society falls, simple fact.

true fact. Too bad I think society needs to fall at this point.

>Not for men, but for the common good

I figured as much. collectivist crap. Society is a plantation where men sacrifice their freedoms for the benefit of others especially women. At a benefit, when there is no clear benefit why would you sacrifice?

Fuck this dumb cunt. Shes either a pedo herself or so desensitized by the pedos she hangs with that she thinks pedophilia is ok

??

what does any of that have to do with r9k

were talking about social order you fuck

There is an obvious benefit. Fulfillment as a male. Every male wants to lead. Every male wants a family (unless he's been demoralised by outside forces and / or has some kind of mental or emotional impairment and as such is a defective male). Even the most fervent MGTOW deeply craves these things, even if they don't overtly admit them.

I agree with your other three points though. But again, this issue is rooted in men's age-old mistake of defering responsibility to a higher authority. They became lazy and passive and allowed the state to interfere in daily life, and as a result women perceived the state as a higher patriarchy and also defered to it for their material fulfillment.

I already advocated the abolishment of the state twice, and the replacing of it with a national state established by the people for the people.

Another thing, your understanding of the male and female dynamic is flawed. Women are generally never satisfied. They can have a Millionaire alpha, but just down the street they can teade up to a Billionaire alpha. A woman with a prospective better option will try to monkey branch. It doesn't matter how much a man has done for her, it's never enough. Women, as a whole, lack loyalty and honor. Those are male constructs. Should women be able to destroy a man in the way that they do, simply because she wants a bew relationship or because she is tired of him?

Women vote based on feelings, to the detriment of their country. Politicians pander to Women's feelings to get votes.

Oh I agree largely. Even for me, most women are completely undesirable. But again, our lack of desire for them doesn't justify us relinquishing our responsibilities to our society and race.

Desire isn't required to start a family. Especially not today with the advent of artificial insemination. You don't even have to touch the prospective mother of your child to get her pregnant.

Women in current generations are too far gone. What we need to focus on now is creating the next generations and instilling them with a new set of values. Traditional values. This can only happen if we force today's women back into the fold, even if that is against their will.

>There is an obvious benefit. Fulfillment as a male

so how do you measure personal fulfillment?

>Every male wants to lead.
false

>Every male wants a family
false

>(unless he's been demoralised by outside forces and / or has some kind of mental or emotional impairment and as such is a defective male

thats just retard tier logic

>Even the most fervent MGTOW deeply craves these things

if so there wouldn't be mgtow

>They became lazy and passive and allowed the state to interfere in daily life

uhh no. they were betrayed by a government which allowed women the vote undeservingly after killing off a bunch of men in a world war

women see the role of government as a means of access to presumed infinite collective resources best used to protect her interests.

Men see the government as a expense to themselves to be used lightly and efficiently.

There's a difference between appealing to women and appeasing women. Gynocentrism only really applies when you appease women. White knights and what Sup Forums calls beta males are gynocentric, as opposed to what they call alpha males who aren't, who appeal to women more than beta males ever could.

So essentially you can appeal to women and benefit them to the extent to which is not appeasing them but rather for the greater good, for society, not for them. That is not gynocentrism. It's more like a reward system for doing what nature intended.

And the problem with your last point is that only weak men seek reward or benefit. Saying "there's no benefit in doing that" is a defeatist mindset that only a weak male can project. Strong men have the capacity to create circumstances that benefit or reward them no matter the situation.

This, a million times over men need women for a drive to Aspire to something but then women need a I'm man to live for if they are both working together for something then the marriage becomes dead that's why we're supposed to have children and we're supposed to serve our children

Impregnate them harder.

By making 8-12 threads a day asking the same stupid fucking question while using a meme flag
What’s a matter shit skin, didn’t find a rape victim last night

I am well aware of hypergamy and it's destructive nature. It's controllable though. You just have to craft a woman's social environment a certain way, essentially oppressing her to some degree and restricting her options. And that's exactly what I'm calling for. Men need to lead again. Men need to call the shots. Men need to force women back into the fold and disallow them from indulging in their more destructive instincts such as hypergamy. Duty > self-indulgence.

This is a fake Twitter? Or did she delete all her tweets?

what the fuck is this real?

Had she said that 10 yrs ago she would have been shunned by most. Obviously she is pandering to the feminist agenda.

>They are supposed to be muses for men, pushing men to be the best men they can be. And that's exactly what they're trying to do by acting out as they are.
And that's why men will build sexbots and overcome god's design of women. They've inspired us. We have seen what is good, we have seen what is bad, and we will make a better world.

There are two different kinds of fulfillment. Personal, individual fulfillment and instinctual, biological fulfillment.

Men all have practically the same biological and instinctual imperatives that are primary influences in their lives. The only exceptions being defective males who for whatever reason have diverged from the natural order of things, e.g. mental illness, chemical imbalance, physical impairment.

Men all want the same things instinctually. Those requirements for personal fulfillment are all the same across the board. It's only individual, personal fulfillment on a conscious level that is different.

If it's retard tier logic you should have a counter-arguement as opposed to simple ad hominems.

MGTOW are simply men that have no interest in pursuing relationships because of socio economic and political detriments that will likely occur as a result and that also have no interest in solving the root issues at hand because they see no immediate benefit, they want instant gratification, or as instant as they can get it. They are weak men. Deep down however, they want the same things other non-MGTOW men want, and this is why they have to identify as MGTOW and indulge in MGTOW media daily. Because that's the medium in which they bypass their biological imperatives and steer themselves away from taking risks that they'd likely take if MGTOW media didn't exist.

>chrissy teigen
tbf this cunt is actually dumber than your average roastie

I assumed you another delusional White Nationalist that was ignoring the underline cause of current societal ills. You're fucking woke to the true "Jew."

Thus is what I love Sup Forums. The races coming together and actually talking about solving societies problems.

The state was only allowed to rise to power the way it did because men allowed it to happen across western civilisation. They were demoralised by the war yes, but this is no excuse to shirk responsibility.

Men should've taken up arms and forced the abolishment of the state the second it even attempted to interfere in the social status quo.

Also, friendly reminder that wars only happen because the majority of MEN are complacent with it.

So again, the root of the issue is men and their lack of true responsibility, or misguided responsibility.

Sexbots are for cowards seeking instant gratification.

Anyone who uses a sexbot is just as bad as the women they're running from.

Probably beat the shit out of them and lock them in cages. They're awful. I hope that baby kills her she's gonna be a terrible mother.

>There's a difference between appealing to women and appeasing women.

a very slight difference in tone

>Gynocentrism only really applies when you appease women.

nein

White knights and what Sup Forums calls beta males are gynocentric

so are tradcons, who place women's needs at the center of man's success

>So essentially you can appeal to women and benefit them

gynocentric

>but rather for the greater good, for society, not for them

however you spin it this is sill gynocentric, society is an extension of women and their expectations of men

>Saying "there's no benefit in doing that" is a defeatist mindset

so playing russian roulette for free is defeatist eh?

its called cost benefit analyses

Strong men have the capacity to create circumstances that benefit or reward them no matter the situation.

correct, therefore they don't need women or society.

>only weak men seek reward or benefit.

yea we all get up early and go to work for no reward or benefit huh

Truth be told I'm far less concerned about race than I am about interpersonal issues between people.

Race is a secondary issue for the most part. Even with the JQ. Jews wouldn't be an issue if they didn't believe the things they believe, just as Muslims wouldn't be an issue if they didn't believe the things they believe.

Essentially, race isn't an issue whatsoever. Ideology is the primary issue, and how it inter-relates with relationships between people both within the individual and the aggregate.

If I had any money I would support the scientific community right now to develop artificial wombs in a large scale.
Women are intolerable.

Fixing western women with islam is like putting out a fire with a thermobaric explosion. Just nix feminism and call it a day.

MGTOW is a perfectly reasonable and rational response to how Gynocentric western society has become, and this is coming from a married man. All of your talking points are MGTOW talking points.

IMO, the more men that go MGTOW the better. When they see that enough men won't put up this bullshit, hopefully they'll change their ways. The only other option is complete societal breakdown, I'm talking Mad Max level shit. I don't want that.

MGTOW is no different from women
you all are bitching about issues like them

...

Ok I know what's going on here now.

Evidently you have no desire for responsibility or duty, likely because of some kind of self-esteem issue. Your only desire in life is to retreat into mindless self-indulgence and hedonism. Everything you're saying to me is screaming this.

My view is balanced objectively speaking. Yours is completely one-sided. "If it doesn't serve me and my interests, it's gynocentric."

There is no room for discussion here, you've already made your mind up and you're not looking to learn, you're looking to re-affirm your own biases.

Doesn't this whole board bitch about issues?

What's the difference between MGTOW and feminism? Multiple differences. The most important being that MGTOW doesn't rry to change or make laws. Discussing issues is not the same as trying to make those issues law.

women don't care if you go mgtow, so don't make an autistic brand about it
just go your own way and stop caring about them
is that so hard

Your not a real man arguments? Seriously dude? Do you know how many Men have been sent to their deaths with that sentiment? You're just a tradcon Gynocentric. If your live doesn't revolve around taking care of a woman, you're not worth anything. What a load of shit.

learn how to read for context, dumb sandnigger

thanks for your vital opinion, mega-blob

Wrong.

MGTOW is an understandable response to gynocentrism. But essentially at its core, MGTOW is cowardice and defeatism.

It doesn't provide solutions. It doesn't give men a collective purpose and a means to network with others on how to oppose the status quo, it simply tells men to run from these issues and retreat into their hobbies.

And as a result it LITERALLY adds to the problems it highlights. Because the more that men retreat from these issues, the more these issues will become prevalent. Because the more men run from women and the issues they're presenting them with, the more those women will resent men, and the more radical they will become.

It is basically a medium to which cowardly men are made to feel good about their cowardice. That's it.

The ONLY solution for western society is for men to take up arms, take back their civilisations, abolish the rogue states that have betrayed them for generations and FORCE women back into the fold, not for the sake of appeasement or any kind of bullshit sentiment but because that's the only way that the west will survive the next 50 years or so.

Also, last point, no amount of MGTOW will make women see the light, you have absolutely no clue about female nature if you really believe this. The more men run, the more women will hate them, because women HATE cowards. And that's how they perceive MGTOW. As cowards who are running from issues presented to them because they have no self-esteem.

>There is no room for discussion here
Exactly. We are sick of your "hurr durr man up and serve your alimony like a male!!1" bullshit.
You aren't going to convert anyone to your vagina worship cult.

Bro, Im not a MGTOW. Im married. I think they're right about a lot of their issues. I don't see anything wrong about bringing up or supporting their talking points because I can't refute so many of them. So much of it makes perfectly rational sense. Hypergamy, Gynocentrism, Male mother need, Male and female dynamics, female and male nature, voting rights, etc. This was all taboo and the only people that talked about and explored it were MGTOW.

not every woman is so fat that she can't move and has to be corraled, like ur mum

>Men all have practically the same biological and instinctual imperatives that are primary influences in their lives.

false some men prefer solitude and reading , thats why we have monks hermits, shamans, and such.

>the only exceptions being defective males who for whatever reason have diverged from the natural order of things,

these are your own biases here, you generalize the desires of men as beneficial or normal when they align with your expectations and presumptions.

>Men all want the same things instinctually

completely false. Some men sail boats others fly planes. You're generalizing hard, and almost demanding collectivist conformity to your own preference.

the philosophically astute will see this as you imposing your will onto others.

>If it's retard tier logic you should have a counter-arguement as opposed to simple ad hominems.

okay you're right, its retarded logic because it's based on easily proven false suppositions for example your notion/belief of a natural order we must adhere to, thereby rendering free will null and dehumanizing your fellow man.

>MGTOW are simply men that have no interest in pursuing relationships because of socio economic and political detriments that will likely occur as a result

accurate, there are the fiscal and emotional detriments also.

>have no interest in solving the root issues at hand

your schizophrenia medications are chanting at you
heed their demands

is that before or after you work off those 6000 lbs of bellyfat?

Yeah you have fun overthrowing the State. When your body is riddled with bullets or you're locked up in Gitmo, MGTOW will be fucking their sexbots.

I wish you the best of luck.

Wrong.

Wars only occur because individual men defer authority to the state and allow the state to warmonger.

Men are sent to their deaths in war because of the opposite of that sentiment.

And it's really fucking ironic that you keep saying I'm gynocentric when you're the one who keeps making this about women when I'm making this about the survival of western civilisation as a whole.

This is bigger than women, far bigger, but you can't see past them. That makes you the gynocentric. You're so obsessed with not serving women that you perceive doing anything outside of something of instant obvious benefit to yourself as gynocentric. You have been brainwashed by MGTOW.

Ideology is cancer.

>he's afraid of women!