Why do you hate capitalism?

Why do you hate capitalism?

Why do you hate me?

The boss makes 1000:1 on the workers but the managers do the smart work and the workers do the physical work. Bosses don't do shit.

I don't

You mean
Getting sold shit products designed to break.
Asked to do pointless things.
Work for a company that wants not only what you do but how you think.
Believe in fetishist bullshit fantasies about cans of sweet brown fizzy water.
No love it, bring it on

I used to be full commie until I realized capitalism wasn't the problem it's Jews.

>Bosses don't do shit
Bosses run the entire organization and are liable for nearly all the losses that could happen. They are the ones that have to make decisions in order for the company to function. They're at more risk than their employees, but they gain more reward.

Even if they inherited it, they had to acquire a certain level of knowledge needed to attain that type of skill for that position.

If the workers want more, then they should work their way up according to their ambition and they will eventually get there.

because its like a paywall for real life.

>Getting sold shit products designed to break.
Consumers decide that, they vote with their dollars.
>Asked to do pointless things.
Example please? Maybe without a minimum wage this would be more of a reality, but it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing considering that you at least are employed and have a shot at doing more/making more.
>Work for a company that wants not only what you do but how you think.
Are you talking about the consumer or the worker? Either way, how is that a bad thing? They're pandering to you.
>Believe in fetishist bullshit fantasies about cans of sweet brown fizzy water.
Again, vote with dollars.

it's the best.

Yeah but if there was no bosses it wouldn't be a problem. The companies would run fine. Managers do the work.

A manager is a boss.

If you're idea is so great then why don't you start a company to prove to the world your system is superior?
Are you advocating you send people with guns to to businesses because "my bossy wossy was not nice to mee!11!!1!"?

A manager is still a worker.

And so is a boss.

Ghostpolitics

>If you're idea is so great then why don't you start a company to prove to the world your system is superior?
It is superior. Look at Italy where they give incentives to cooperatives. They are better in Italy than privately run firms. In America banks don't give loans to cooperatives, they don't have investors, there are no incentives and they still have to compete with exploitation and sweatshops. It won't ever happen in America.

>Are you advocating you send people with guns to to businesses because "my bossy wossy was not nice to mee!11!!1!"?

The boss makes 1000:1 on the worker for doing nothing. Do you not see a problem with this? We can go over the ethical problems of capitalism but I think just telling people the money they are missing out on is enough.

A boss is not apart of the working class.

hate capitalism? oh gawd goy how could you say such a thing?

*squeaks angrily*

But they still work at their job like anyone else.

Fun fact both Capitalism and Communism are kike schemes to dominate our world.

Because im lazy and want to be supported with out having to work.

I don't but I also don't much care for it.

You don't get to define the working class.

A man builds a car, you buy it and sell it for more. (transfer of property)
A man builds a car, you buy it with a wage, and try to sell it for more. The wage is guaranteed, the worker creates what they create agreeing that the owner owns the product and they receive a wage. The workers time preference is different to the owners. The owner owns the car just like a buyer does.

This is also just as moral when a worker is paid more than what they actually produce in monetary value, like when they are being trained to one day produce more.

This is just as moral as when a worker is paid a wage for creating something whether it sells or not, a lot of time when you run a small business for example you have to pay wages and wait a month or two for potential cashflow a lot of the time using your own personally worked for and accumulated capital.

But the biggest part that this analysis of the left misses is what I revealed at the very start, if you make a car and sell it to me and then I sell it for more, that is two seperate voluntary interactions between two people at a time, the first has no claim to control the interaction in the 2nd, just as when a worker agrees to create something for a wage, after they are paid that interaction is done. If the owner of the good now sells it on for more its the same fucking thing. Savi?

The "working class" is the left end of this

Yeah but they apart of the working class. Dictators do work too.

>You don't get to define the working class.
Yes you do. You own a business. You aren't apart of the working class. It's the definition

also >ancap

Do you own a business? Also

>Attorney
>Chemist

Your class analysis is wrong.

"working class" is just a euphemism for dumb people

People for whom their body is their primary asset, instead of their brain

how?

>Pay people to work for you (not working class)
>Work for someone (working class

Is that hard?

You realize everyone who works and doesn't pay people to work for them is apart of the working class right which is the majority of people? For example Albert Einstein was apart of the working class (and a socialist).

...

Because I understand:
^ This. But I disagree with the moralistic aspect of the analysis, that this is all a power game and exploitation, I think when talking about right/wrong, justice/injustice of a "system" or social relations we have to look at actions and interactions not abstracts and generalization.

>Implying bosses don't work.

Go get a job.