Project: 100 Million Murdured

Just like the same rules of the project “It’s okay to be white”.
Post only that picture and nothing else. Watch the chaos ensue.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OI-9iMrWRrw
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Famine_(1879)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_(Ireland)
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

bump

It's a meme number. The actual number is about two thirds of that, mostly due to two people.

This is a good idea.

In a similar vein, while I know not everyone here likes Sargon, he had some throwaway comment a while back about people printing pictures of McCarthy and putting them up around universities, or just general places filled with SJWs/Neo-Marxists, and I honestly think that's worth doing.

Dying of starvation isn't murder. This is a bad idea.

needs to have somesort of Jewish overlay.

Kikes are going around claiming to have been only victims of some mysterious Communism.

I'm not making that up. Anne Applebaum's "Gulag" only mentions Jews as victims.

>Dying of starvation isn't murder. This is a bad idea.
no one has legit "died of starvation" across the world for over 400yrs.

It is when the famine is intentional, and there were plenty of people killed directly.

Use the lower number and put "at least" in front of it.

Good targets:

>Schools and Universities
>Work breakrooms
>Event Centers
>Grocery Stores

You forget Africa exists?

>famine is intentional

I didn't know weather control machines existed.

are you serious or being facetious?

So if I lock you in a closet and don't give you food that's not murder?

Farmers being forced into conditions like having to turn grain over to the state not being allowed to do certain things having their farms taken and run by the state who fucks them up

>The Holodomor was not intentional
>Ancap flag defending Marxism

>communism is a threat

literally no one identifies as a communist aside from a small minority of trust fund kids. whats the fucking point in this? spend your energy on something productive.

bingo. this shit is getting tiresome

But the confiscation of household food stores, prohibition of food imports, and prohibition on migration away from starving regions IS an intentional act.

Add a source for the number you mong

>Implying progressives are not neo-marxists.
>Implying Bernie Sanders (who would have won the democratic nomination if it weren't for the DNC doing shit to help Clinton) is not a marxist.

Not if I climb in the closet first and beg you to lock the door and throw away the key.

>government caused famine wasn't caused by the government.

>Famine isn't murder
Holodomor

Bernie isn't a Marxist.

watching the end result i can safely conclude that it was either not enough or the wrong people got killed

Please leave this board and never come back, magapede.

>Implying Marxism isn't a threat to life, liberty, humans and western civ.
Pro Tip: ropes are comfy around necks. Try it?

>are you serious or being facetious?
quite serious. do your own research. EVERY so called "famine" has been caused by politics.

I'll try to dig out a book that covers all this. Best part is it points out all the times when "crops failed" but nothing much happened except people downgraded their luxury foods or the govt borrowed MINOR amounts of money for food imports.

Even a minor war costs about 10X what a major famine offset costs.

Oh my fucking god yes.

Milton Friedman

you deserve to be publicly executed you commie fuck

after you my friendo

nice idea

>>Implying progressives are not neo-marxists.
what do you mean by "progressives?" i seriously don't even know what you're thought process is. Progressivism is the idea that societal development is an evolutionary process by which the most effective form of government or state organization naturally arises. in that regard marxists are progressive because they believe that communism is the next stage of liberalism/capitalism. The people who i assume you are referring to as "progressives" are not neo-marxists, whatever the fuck that even means. they believe that liberation is the ultimate virtue and that we are destined to liberate ourselves from all outside influences - identity, law, nature, consciousness itself in some cases. you have your terms all mixed up, just because someone disagrees with you that doesn't make them into everything that you disagree with

this place has devolved to the point where they're coming up with stale fox/cnn talking points believing they're being subversive in the process. "its okay to be white" was an actual transgressive slogan. this is something Sean Hannity says on a daily basis. Based.

>>Implying Marxism isn't a threat to life, liberty, humans and western civ.
its not a threat because it has no footing. no one is a fucking marxist anymore, just like no one is a real nazi, its just a buzzword to paint your enemy in a bad light.
the real problem is liberalism and i don't know why you people don't get this

That's okay. Watch them defend themselves saying "B-but we only murdered 70 million people..."

There was nowhere to run.

That country had suffered through two civil wars and spent a multitude of years going through some of the worst famines in their recorded history. You're delusional if you think it was an ethnic genocide of some sort.

> much murders
I am ok to kill twice note if it will improve the planet.

how many people has liberalism killed do you think?

I don't know

Bump.

Commies are complete scum and should be shamed into suicide before they carry out their fantasy of mass-murder.

Don't you want to kill 100m non-white americans?

if death tolls are a measure of an ideology's evilness, liberalism wins by a longshot

do you think the bengal famine can be listed under a "Capitalism death toll"? the iraq war, the 2001 afghanistan one? suicide in chinese manufactories? opioid abuse? deaths due to pollution?

>Anti-Communist posters in (((current year)))
As others have pointed out muh Communism isn't really a campaign that's going to resonate with Normies. I think it's probably better for us to continue in the vein of IOTBW and mbmc focusing on pro-white/anti-migrant messaging which is benign enough to be Normie friendly. No Normie thinks about Communism beyond "He the Soviets used to exist"

>shills already eating this up
looks like we've got ourselves a good idea here. Fire up the meme machine

Do you see anyone here arguing in favor of liberalism?

Fuck off, shill, there's no phase two.
This is just retarded, no one cares about commies dying.

...

most people who think communism is an actual problem are liberals

Inaccurate buzzwords don't change facts.

Marxists using liberty oriented language doesn't mean they aren't Marxists. When someone says that peoples' "right" to not be offended trumps peoples right to free speech, it's obvious they don't put liberty first.

You can literally trace a line through the development of ideas from the the Frankfurt School to the modern Progressive Left. Critical theory comes from the Frankfurt School. Intersectionality was popularized by a Marxist.

[citation needed]

>Implying the average western politician hasn't at best merely been paying lip service to liberalism for the last several decades.

Nobody hates Marxism more than Fascists.

Bump, why? Because you faggots have been lazy.

*tips menorah* hows that kike?

>do you think the bengal famine can be listed under a "Capitalism death toll"?
No
> the iraq war, the 2001 afghanistan one?
No
> suicide in chinese manufactories?
No
>opioid abuse?
No
>deaths due to pollution?
Yes

progressive policy has been shown to create more problems than it solves. the modern progressive movement in the u.s. began with FDR, who was most influenced by the original progressive, Mussolini.
Proggressives have more in common with marxists because they both believe (falsely) that they are some natural evolution bulshit. name one proggressive policy that has not created massivce debt or entrenched the beauracracy deeper. ill wait.

I'll get the popcorn

Because it's commonly thought on Sup Forums that Jews are against Cultural Marxism.

This is good

It's actually hilarious how Democrats are now supporting communism, they need to be shown their hypocrisy

muh cultural marxism. based, magapede!

You are so dumb it's hilarious

It's commonly thought in Sup Forums that Jews are the driving force behind cultural Marxism

That's my point. I'm arguing against cultural Marxism, this guys saying "It's not really a problem", and then calling me a Jew for insisting it is.

put a cd of this album with it
youtube.com/watch?v=OI-9iMrWRrw

...

>do you think the bengal famine can be listed under a "Capitalism death toll"?
>No
the english govt knew and refuse to help the area's (under their dominion btw). how is it different from holodomor? what about the irish ones?

> the iraq war, the 2001 afghanistan one?
>No
elaborate

> suicide in chinese manufactories?
>No
elaborate

>opioid abuse?
>No
big private for profit pharma sector that can adv it on tv (referring to the us market)

>Capitalists get famine
>the market deals with it
>Communist get famine
>tens of millions die
Yea theres just nothing we can do about it hmm.

It's more like a billion.

im not a progressive

How do we strike at the heart of Marxism? Communism is only one aspect and not many people know what Marx looks like. There has to be a way to redpill the normies to the crimes of Marx. And it has to be simple and effective.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Famine_(1879)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_(Ireland)
um ok then

This is a winner
Good job op
Then when these get torn down normie will turn on them more than they already are.

Lol watch them get called anti semitic

Or a later campaign after this showing the Jews in charge of the murder

It's a complete stretch to call either 1943 India, Afghanistan or Iraq "capitalist".
Chinese workers weren't killed. They killed themselves. Same for opioid abusers.
>Irish potato famine
While you can make that case, it's a 170 years ago and capitalism has since solved the problem of potato famines.
>but Africa
Niggers don't count. You need an IQ higher than 80 to make it work.

>Implying the UK was particularly good at doing liberalism during the time of the Irish famine
>Implying the UK caused the bengal famine, or that the USSR did not cause the Holodomor

>Implying we invaded Iraq or Afghanistan because of capitalism
>Implying capitalism is the same type of thing as Marxism (An ideology)

>Implying the Chinese practice capitalism outside of a small number of areas

>Implying Opioid abuse wasn't the result of bad interpretation of a limited set of data that was limited because expanding the data would have been unethical
The only way the opioid crisis could have been avoided would have been to run long-term tests that would have involved people with serious injuries not being on painkillers, in order to establish a baseline. That was obviously out of the question, so they just tried extrapolated the long-term effects based on the short-term effects, which gave an inaccurate picture. Capitalism had fuckall to do with it.

Fuck off work your pillpull kike
Try a red revolution in the us and we will end you all

>commie reaches down into imperialism to prove "capitalists" are incorrect
um ok then

Now this is an idea that I can get behind.

>communism has killed more people in less than a hundred years than all the wars combined in recorded human history.

Stalin, Khmer Rouge, Mao

>US literally broke away from the UK because they felt the UK weren't doing liberalism properly
>Marxists use imperialist UK as an example of how liberalism is bad

McCarthy did nothing wrong

If it is not ok to wear the swastika, it should not be okay to sport the hammer and sickle.

Commies in today's world have a century of embarrassment from communism being tried and failed yet they still support it, i think a lot of people make the mistake of thinking commies are reasoning to get there, when in fact 99% of them are just edgy 13 year olds.

I'm not completely sure of that , but if he had come along 10-20 years later and done what he did there'd be no question that he was completely correct.

...

thats how you change public opinion. reminding everyone communism killed a lot of people. no one knows this. its a bit of a redpill. i hope the sheeple will be open to this kind of knowledge.

I guess the gun grabbing and the UBI push has no relation with Marxist ideology.

At least the old socialists had a kind of aesthetic to them, and back then there weren't shitloads of examples of it being tried and failing. Marxists now are just pathetic.

I've been saying that for a while and I've been seeing those horseshit symbols everywhere recently.

Somehow schools also dont teach that Hitler was merely top3 when it comes to mass murderings of the last decade.

you'd guess right

>India
was under the UK at the time. do u even into history bruh?

>Afghanistan or Iraq
but the US is, isn't it?

>While you can make that case, it's a 170 years ago and capitalism has since solved the problem of potato famines.
but why you don't keep count of them?

>Implying the UK caused the bengal famine, or that the USSR did not cause the Holodomor
the UK knew and did jack shit

>Implying we invaded Iraq or Afghanistan because of capitalism
guess those pesky wmd are still there somewhere!


>Implying the Chinese practice capitalism outside of a small number of areas
unseen cost of capitalism. Their just capitalism externalities dumped on third worlders


>Implying Opioid abuse wasn't the result of bad interpretation of a limited set of data that was limited because expanding the data would have been unethical
guess here in eu we collect stats differently

To be fair there are non-marxist arguments for UBI. There's no GOOD arguments for having UBI right now, but that doesn't mean it's automatically Marxist. Theoretically increasing automazation could eventually lead to a point where UBI is a good idea, but anyone arguing for it now is either a retard or a Marxist (though I repeat myself).

Dumb normalfags won't recognize that symbol. It hsould be X murdered by socialism

>was under the UK at the time. do u even into history bruh?
I know. Did I say it wasn't? Calling a country under imperialist rule capitalist is dishonest.
>but the US is, isn't it?
Irrelevant. German deaths in WW2 aren't counted for communism because Russia was under soviet rule.

...

Minimalist kikes > Imax kikes