Now that ben garrison is a communist, who else do we even have left??

now that ben garrison is a communist, who else do we even have left??

if you're pro-capitalist you can't be a nationalist

kys

Capitalist doesn't mean no regulations.

>glove
>football
>field
>sky

That doesn't make sense. Of course you can be a nationalist. Are you retarded?

untruthful and homophillic pic related is the original

>forget to put pic related
>being this much of a brainlet

I'm confused. There are not enough labels.

And the most retarded statement of the year goes to this post.

unfortunately there is way too much truth in the OP edit

Looks like an edit fag. Sage

sage

This is just sad. That portrayal of Trump shows he's gone full cuck.

Wow. JIDF edit I see. Kill yourself, OP.

Um, guys...

>glove
>football
well you got me.

>all that comprehensive notes
Good one.

yeah and they were one of the few teams that didnt have any kneelers
and the coach thanked jesus

>sky is labeled
well I cant argue with that, this is authentic
he must be having a really bad day

Enough of these fucking shops. Where is the real Ben Garrison original?

is real. OP is a JIDF kike.

this one cant be real though, it doesn't have enough labels

no, hes right.
Capitalism is about exploiting the resources available for maximum personal profit.

You can not be both an individualist and a nationalist, a nationalist is by definition a collectivist, and if you are a collectivist more concerned with individual profits than the collectives well being you are being a pretty shitty collectivist.

>leftists once again copying the nazi memes

This people are so unfunny it's almost too funny.

What is this even supposed to mean?

>taking care of brownies
>maximum profit
did i just read that

i dont get what economic policies have to do with immigration policies

>everything is either black or white.

You realize you got about a thousand different shades in between there buddy?

I don't think you know what nationalist means.

>Glove
>Football
>Field
>Sky

nfl is a part of the new world orders grand master plan to implement the ideals of cultural marxism in order to weaken our society

be me, your average underachieving socialist. Wow drumpfldor's army lost the super bowl, better sit on pol and get mad when their cozying up watching the post niggerbowl riots.

>trump turning Pennsylvania red
Hmm...

I was just about to say "and also not owned by a kike"

but the Eagles owner is a kike

so...

Where are the labels???
How do I know that's supposed to be a football?
For all I know, that could be a metaphor for the strong grip of government by the way is holding it. As for the field, that could be the poor and down trodden. The sky is the shads of genders in New York, Trump's hometown, and the glove is actually a proctologist glove, indicating we're about to be checked for cancer in the worst way possible.

You cant be a communist if youve been starved to death or disappeared by the state.

Third Position

more like gay position

Ask me how I know youre a jew

>SKY

>FIELD


Mrs. Garrison BLOWN THE FUCK OUT LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO

>caring about profit over your people

>implying “your people “ won’t backstab you as soon it’s convinient

>Capitalism is about exploiting the resources available for maximum personal profit.

Actually capitalism about the private ownership of production and trade. Making money is not part of it. Being a nationalist is compatible with being a capitalist because a nationalist capitalist could use his wealth to better his country.

i guess a knight larper would know all about betrayals from within huh

>Glove
>football
>field
>sky

It's definitely an original fellas, JIDF would've cleared all of these critically important labels.

>Sky
>Field
I genuinely laughed out loud. This doesn't happen often.

>now that ben garrison is a communist,
>shilling this hard

Ah copying memes, is there anything more leftist then uncreative and cringey memes.

communism is the true red pill.

if you re not a communist than you are sucking rich peoples cock.

The sad part is that there's not even a reason to shill against Ben Garrison. Sup Forums knows he is a cuck civnat, and not a natsoc

>could use his wealth to better his country.
>could but wont

I think he's more fascisty

I know you're bait, but you realize where DJT's salary goes, right?

This is actually pretty funny.

If you're a communist then you are sucking Jewish elite cock.

>tfw you live in one of the blue counties

>Making money is not part of it
Prosperity is zero sum, you can not create more of it, you can only distribute it. Anything designed to create profit is automatically designed to steal wealth from somewhere else to do it.

There is no such thing as some intrinsically personal wealth, it is only your share of the resources under your control. If you live in a country, and have assets in that country, you have wealth, but that wealth is derived from the resources of the country.

communism is also stupid because its based on the idea of labor having inherent value. You can say there is value put into the man in the form of what he has consumed to live, and that the resulting work capable of being done has a value, but communism insists that the abstract act of labor itself, not a physical conversion of resource into work, has value.

It really doesn't, both systems are flawed because they are both about wealth. One wants to accumulate it, the other wants to distribute it. The concept of wealth itself must be abolished. There is no such thing as property, there is only control.

yeah it goes to his mcdonald’s bitch.
u don’t know him bro he doesn’t give any type of proof u fucking nazi bitch

True but it does aply to atheistic communism too

>thinks capitalism and communism are the 2 only legitimate economic stances
>tries to shift the accusation of being a jew onto someone else

A nation can be built on the idea of individual freedom and success

All being a real functioning nation requires is a common morality social ettiquite between citizens, and a mutual desire to defend yourselves (a military basically).

It doesn’t mean you have to let every gay guy in the country ram your arse you fucking idiot

>Prosperity is zero sum, you can not create more of it, you can only distribute it. Anything designed to create profit is automatically designed to steal wealth from somewhere else to do it.
This is incorrect and comes from a poor and oversimplied understanding of a free market.

Trading currencies is a zero sum game, a farmer and a fisherman trading produce so that each has more varied food, is not a zero sum game. Just use your brain retard

You can say that about anything.
>Taxes could go to the benefit of the people, but won't
>The means of production could go to the people, but won't (accurate)
>People could work their worth in society, but won't

Sage

The flag was supposed to be ironic in this regard

The point was supposed to be : why should I care about my “people” if they’re clearly do not care at all about me? What kind of insurance i have that they would have my back in my time of need?

I know my family and my friends would, what about the others?

It means open borders for cheap labor and free trade for cheap resources.

>prosperity is zero sum
You are retarded if you think this. You can argue about whether or not the world is any more or less prosperous than a thousand years ago (ridiculous to say that it is less) but you have no basis for this assertion. A windmill does not steal prosperity from anyone, unless you consider untapped grown-water or slightly higher wind speeds as "prosperity" that someone else is somehow entitled to. Yet, this same windmill can make your live incredibly better if you have no modern conveniences.

Also to use and add to example, the fisherman now has access to Vitamin C without the need of a plow, through the fruits of the farmer and the farmer has access to high Omega-3 from the fish without the need for a boat. Both of these people now have a better diet and are more prosperous because a trade, in its simplest sense, is fair. Who, in this example, had a decrease in prosperity?


All that aside, your reply is a red herring. Capitalism is compatible with nationalism and even if prosperity was zero-sum it would still be a matter of your nation stealing prosperity from another nation which isn't exactly against the core of nationalism.

Are you absolutely fucking retarded?

it doesn't even look like garrisons style, b+ for effort

off to the chambers with you bolshevik scum.

good thread comrades

whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat


he's a puppet either way. also clearly butt hurt about an imaginary game of hand-egg. hahha who cares.

The meme used by user is that all Ben Garrisons originals are actually edits. Upon seeing an original, it is customary to call it an edit and to ask for the originals.

Edit.
Real.

Not hard to figure it out either.

Correct.

If you're a capialist you can't be against immigration.

The most nationalist and isolationist countries are communists. In fact, the only two countries that don't participate in the global economy are Cuba and North Korea, both communist states.

If you're a capitalist you can't be a nationalist.

...

getting btfo'd while at the same time finding out you got shit photoshop is considered a good thread?

for something i saved off facebook and shit a thread for, yes lmao

how fucking far has Sup Forums driven itself off a cliff jesus christ what happened

...

Nationalist-Capitalist is an oxymoron. Why?

Nationalism: Putting the interests of your people and country first.
Capitalism: A market-based economic system where the economy is privately(wholly or mostly) run for the primary or sole purpose of generating profits.

Are these two interests always at odds? No. But eventually you will be make a choice between two opposing positions: the interests of my country first or the pursuit of profits. Eventually the two will be at odds. Example:

You want to make more money, so you pick:

a): continue hiring your countrymen to work your factory (Nationalist)
b):you import subhumans from the third world to work your factory (Capitalist)
c): you ship your industry overseas to be worked by chinks (Capitalist)

You always end up being either a nationalist or a Capitalist in the long run. You cannot be both.

>You cannot be both.
Because everyone is a fanatic extremist who cannot compromise between two convictions he holds, right? What you're saying is only true when focusing on single event, but does not reflect how people make decisions throughout their lifetimes. The capitalist might on one occasion just hire the useless son of a friend because he can't do a lot of damage, which would be neither capitalist nor nationalist, yet that doesn't magically change his convictions about both.

If you're losing money to help someone out with no further designs (like hiring Steve's son so that later you can make more money off of Steve, etc.), then you're not a capitalist.
If you help out Steve's son out of compassion with no further designs and then proceed to ship your industry overseas anyway, that just makes you a baseless hypocrite.

The decisions that you make define your belief system. If you care so much about money that you're willing to sacrifice the livelihoods of dozens/hundreds of people just so you can make more money, that is not compatible with helping out someone, you're just a dog.

You can be a capitalist that likes your country or a Nationalist who wants a market-economy, but National-Capitalists/Nationalist-Capitalist is fundamentally an oxymoron.

you are aware that the future we're headed towards is devoid of all totalitarianisms due to the powers that be losing their current economic powers (central planning, banking, mandatory ponzies)?

THIS

>"""scientific totalitarianism"""
>empiric evidence
topkek

>b-b-but muh trickle down xD

Commie shills, phahahaha

Why are you faggots replying to shills without Sage?
SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE

Who says they’re not?

Enough kool aid user.

There's no such thing as trickle down theory, it's just something retarded leftists use to show they know nothing about economics