Which of these would be preferable?
>A multiracial nation composed entirely of people with minimum 100 IQ and doesn't allow anyone in who has an IQ lower than that
>A whites-only ethnostate with people having IQs across the entire spectrum
Provide your reasoning. Seems to be vetting residents of your state based on IQ makes more sense than based on their skin color. There are plenty of subhuman whites.
Other urls found in this thread:
An ethnostate. Intelligence does not equate to communal bonding.
the ethnostate can always choose to select for the smartest among
Ethnostate.
You can't have a population with an IQ of at least 100.
If your IQ was more than 100, maybe you would understand
Trick question, a min IQ state would be devoid of non-whites.
Jews are moderately intelligent on average, but their character is notoriously horrible, so any claims about intelligence only give a part of the picture. Character is another quality to consider.
this
Ethnostate.
>A multiracial nation composed entirely of people with minimum 100 IQ
Well, at least all the niggers would be dead.
>>A whites-only ethnostate with people having IQs across the entire spectrum
THIS OBVIOUSLY.
It is not about intelligence, it is about homogeneity.
Ethnostate.
Strong cultural homogeny across the iq spectrum is a better way to high standards of living than a high iq "multicultural" society. That's a good way to internal conflict with people who know what they do.
I don't understand user both options are technically an ethnostate
>> Having to marry a smart ass ugly feminist while having to pay respect to a less-dumb nigger.
No thanks, user.
IQ this IQ that, you must be really dumb.
we can have both
> not all of us will make it brahh sad but true
Which would be best to form a state?
>cherry picking whites with 85 IQ average
>cherry picking indians with 100 IQ average
A whites-only ethnostate with people having IQs across the entire spectrum.
>A multiracial nation composed entirely of people with minimum 100 IQ and doesn't allow anyone in who has an IQ lower than that
Who will gather trash, clean toilets and repair roads?
The later, we'll always have a use for stupid people.
You still need the lower IQ people doing unskilled labor such as flipping burgers and mopping floors, so I would say the ethnostate.
What about a society completed based on ecelebs
Who cleans the toilets?
>HOT QUIZ
I think you mean 'Pop Quiz'. 'Pop quiz,hot shot' is also acceptable.
what is ''the entire spectrum''?
white only beacuse IQ will soon self-regulate itself.
Beta brainlets won't get to spread their genes and so on.
it's a sam hyde reference
Yes you can, if you use the world population to set the median, moron.
yes, but'll contain poos, kikes and asians.
>it's a sam hyde reference
Oh, okay.
>100 IQ and doesn't allow anyone in who has an IQ lower than that
Wouldn't be a lot of women, hope you like autistic fags who dress up like women due to extreme shortage.
I don't understand what's the point of stupid threads like this.
Don't you really have anything else to do, OP?
/nsg/ Made just for (you)
Get in here goyim
People have IQs across a spectrum idiot, what is a normal distribution . Holy fuck
I grew up around dumb, willfully ignorant white trailer trash. Bump that minimum IQ up to around 110, and I’d rather be in a country less than 50% white than put up with that shit.
Its amazing how little this board understands the concept of IQ because if any of you did you wouldnt be so obsessed with it. There are people with genius intellects that are homeless, clean toilets, flip burgers. IQ is not the be all, end all of attributes in what makes someone successful. Look at Trump, its fairly obvious he has a below average IQ, yet he has been very successful at life. He compensated by having a very narcissistic, alpha personality in which he used to domineer over people with the intellects, surrounding himself with these individuals, making himself successful and wealthy
I don't like jews or asians, though