Hi, Sup Forums I need your help. I need a tip for a redpilled book on the subject of immigration, white genocide etc. I have a friend who is fairly smart, but too kind-hearted for his own good and supports immigration. I explained to him why integration of niggers won't work (i.e. low intelligence etc.) and he looked somewhat open to my ideas, but I didn't have enough time. I will be leaving the country soon and it is a perfect time to redpill him for good. I'm looking for something well-sourced, grounded in scientific or historic data, no fringe bullshit idiocy and nothing overly extreme like Mein Kampf. He is not ready for a redpill of such calibre. I'm thinking something about Rhodesia or South Africa and what happened to the white settlers when blacks took over. A little fear-mongering never hurt anybody.
tl;dr looking for a redpilled scientific or historic book about niggers/immigration/white genocide
>But, as Mr. Wade reports, that’s exactly what happens. A computer given a random sampling of bits of DNA that are known to vary among humans—from among the millions of them—will cluster them into groups that correspond to the self-identified race or ethnicity of the subjects. This is not because the software assigns the computer that objective but because those are the clusters that provide the best statistical fit. If the subjects’ ancestors came from all over the inhabited world, the clusters that first emerge will identify the five major races: Asians, Caucasians, sub-Saharan Africans, Native Americans and the original inhabitants of Australia and Papua New Guinea. If the subjects all come from European ancestry, the clusters will instead correspond to Italians, Germans, French and the rest of Europe’s many ethnicities. Mr. Lewontin was not only wrong but spectacularly wrong. It appears that the most natural of all ways to classify humans genetically is by the racial and ethnic groups that humans have identified from time out of mind.
Ayden Allen
Tell him about SA, black IQ and obvious cultural differences and try to use the fact that great civilisations collapsed once they introduced multiculturalism and multiracialism. Use the ways of nature as well, wolf packs, etc.
Also tell him that if he won't go full 1488 i'll close that long ass Czechoslovak border myself
Xavier Miller
Thank you, this might be what I'm looking for. I'll look into that.
Coincidentally, both of us are Slovaks.
Liam Lopez
Ukáž mu Kotlebove prejavy lul
Ian Perez
Make sure he actually reads it. The evidence contained therein is very much scientifically valid (at least when it's talking about facts). The problem is that this reveals a few uncomfortable truths, so (((They))) threw a fit when the book came out. (Another redpill is actually to point out the reaction to the book once he's read it and seen that it's very scientific and generally sound in it's claims.
Jayden Nelson
Kotleba ma maximalny silovy level, mojho kamarata by taka davka cervenych tabletiek mohla zabit.
I understand it says intelligence is by and large rooted in genetics and can't be significantly improved by upringing. We had this nature vs. nurture debate and it looked to me that the realization that intelligence is genetic could change his mind.
Benjamin Cox
To az tak jemne? Ja som ho na zaciatku nemal rad ale po par prejavoch a po vypocuti Uhrika som presvedceny, ze chalani nie su (((opozícia))) ako Olano
Blake Johnson
REEEEEE FUCKING SLOVAKS GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY OUT OUT OUT
Gabriel Thomas
you retards seem to use science as a 'redpill' and jumping to unscientific ideas as the conclusive arguments. Like 'main kampf'
yeah icredible how that works, the easiest person to fool is yourself, and by using facts as a gateway to delusion, you aren't doing yourself a favor.
Tyler Richardson
Nemozes liberalovi pustat videjka o ciganskych parazitoch a zemiakovych velmociach. Cervenotabletkovanie je postupny proces.
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>t. Ngombe
Alexander Martin
The Strange Death of the West by Douglas Murray might work. It doesn't bring up how Arabs and blacks have low IQs, but it illustrates the problem with mass immigration into Europe and how it doesn't serve the interests of the common man
Jackson Scott
great argument
Dylan Wood
theres a difference between kind hearted and naive
Honestly if you got him to read both of these books, and then showed him scientific race differences, i'm sure his stance would change.
Andrew Turner
>reee bad slovaks >elects a Slovak PM
nicely done, čechouni
Benjamin Carter
Thank you, I'll take a look
You provided none, so you can't expect a counter-argument. Can't argue with a literal "REEE: The post".
True. I guess you can be kind hearted to the point of naivety.
Austin Gray
All the suggestions so far have been stupid, because people dont understand how fringe the things they believe in are in the real world.
Douglas Murray - The Strange Death of Europe
Is the best option.
Anthony Johnson
Ste z BA?
Blake Peterson
I provided a comment saying your strategy is shit, but i understand that its hard to defend it, when it has no logic behind it
Julian Evans
Nie.
Robert Fisher
It's not just intelligence. The book basically claims (with some very serious scientific weight) that each of the races is generally genetically distinct, and further points out that not only are basically all "white Europeans" very similar genetically, but also proves that there is hard evidence of evolution of up to 15% of the genome in the last 50k years.
It is like the slam dunk of race realism. It basically proves that humans are basically sub-species to some extent, and that this genetic difference not only changes external appearance, but even average mindset and levels of some emotions like empathy. I really don't think I can adequately praise this book, even the weakest speculation still has more evidence than your average SJW bullshit, and the author is very clearly not racist. The reaction to the book, which featured 150 scientists denouncing it despite not reading it is just the cherry on top.
Austin Allen
Great, it definitely sounds like what I'm looking for. I think I'll buy it. Thank you again.
Wyatt Martinez
>The thesis presented here assumes . . . that there is a genetic component to human social behavior; that this component, so critical to human survival, is subject to evolutionary change and has indeed evolved over time; that the evolution in social behavior has necessarily proceeded independently in the five major races and others; and that slight evolutionary differences in social behavior underlie the differences in social institutions prevalent among the major human populations.”
Isaiah Phillips
Murray's book was the first that came to mind that is still normie-friendly With normies you don't want it to be too controversial or racy, or you will alienate them and kill their interest. They must be introduced slowly
The central theme is the Jews, which I'm not sure if thats what you're for, but it's specifically about their role in immigration, white genocide, etc. So it provides a pretty good overview of those topics, but told within the context of Jewish efforts to advance them
