Is there real science behind this?

is there real science behind this?

Real science is a construct of the white supremacist patriarchy. Diversity is our strength.

obviously "proto Europeans" became depigmented

it's inaccurate to describe such people as "black", since black implies Sub Saharan African

The only thing they had in common was skin colour (probably to a limited degree)

It was known for a long time that fair skin in europeans is only like 6000 years old.

No.

omg eskimos have dark skin, they must be black

The reality of the situation is that he was most likely closer to Inuit or Middle Eastern in skin-tone. They explicitly said "Light to dark brown" and decided to use the most extreme end of their spectrum to make a political point. This was the darkest he could have possibly been.

He has no African traits, Melanin is not a 'Black' trait solely. They are using it as a way to further fetishize white genocide and Afro-Centrism.

It is a dangerous world when politics interferes with science.

Obviously.

Of course there's, but you know reality can be stretched to look like something that it was never supposed to be.

The truth is that guy is darker skinned than the caucasians of today.
The truth people don't want to look at is that race is not skin deep and the dark skin doesn't make the nigger.

Does cheddarman look like a nigger to you?
Do you want uppity niggers that are closer to the apes in their homeland's jungles than they are to cheddarman come telling that you are just like them?

He looks slightly Amerindian/Asian. I think he looks cool.

>THE first modern Briton, who lived around 300 generations ago, had "dark to black" skin, groundbreaking research revealed today.
(express.co.uk)

It states right in the article that no DNA evidence has been found.
So no.

yes, white skin in homo sapiens first evolved around 6k years ago in the northern black sea region. But only about 5% of native british people are decendants of the cheddar man type people anyway. Rest are decendants of later white settlers.

Nigger science

weren't most of the european countries invaded in some point for people of unknown origins and those people beated the natives and started their own civilizations? iirc that was the case in greece

>is there real science behind this?
Short answer?
No.

Long answer?
Check out the REAL portrait of jesus when you get the chance.

nigga that's rick james
get the fuck outta here

Just the priestly caste pushing the evolution lie

>is there real science behind this?

That guy lived in england, but there is no genetic link between him and modern english. he was from some ethnicity that the modern english wiped out completely.

At leas the English did one thing right.

not really

there is a chance that western hunter-gatherers were darker skinned that modern europeans, because this specimen and none of its contemporaries don't possess light skin genes, but this tone is an exaggeration by the reconstructionist for a better publicity.

Is there real science behind this?

>you were darker 300 generations ago than you were now
Holy shit, it's almost like evolution is a thing! What next? Fact that we had a common ancestor with dogs should mean that there is nothign wrong with bestiality?