How could he have won?

Was it possible for the Axis to win World War II? If so, then what could they have done differently?

...

liberating the destines of mankind and putting it back into their own hands. Limitless potential.

Not after they invaded Russia.

Not attack Russia and somehow manage to give Japan the bomb, assuming of course the Germans beat the U.S. to the punch.

Not let the British retreat

Wait for spring or summer to fight the Russians and Don't enact the Final Solution so early. Bodies thrown in the gas chambers are bodies not used to work in harvesting raw minerals and fuel the war machine.

by letting our enemies live, we lost because we killed them

they had about a 5% chance of winning knowing what we know today. The only thing that might have changed things would have been getting the V2 rocket and jet technology 2 years earlier. Other than that, they literally killed 5 to 1 ratio and still lost, just too many enemies.

Could one city in Germany do this today and chase Islam out of their city. Then another city do it, join the first and second City and clean the third?
Why can't you Doucelanders do ?

He could've been calmer, and more patient.
Attacking Poland before he had plans to win the rest of the war was a mistake. He should have waited more time, and taken over Poland once Britain and France were more passive.

As he started, Britain had a very Anti-Nazi PM and Churchill was going to fight to the last man, If he had waited longer and executed his plan after pacifying Britain it might've worked, but he had no way of defeating Britain at the time he attacked.

Another way would've been to annex Poland during Baldwin or Chamberlain's era, like Putin has done to Crimea, and wait until everyone had forgotten for the real invasion.

If it weren't for Pearl Harbor idk if America would've ever joined and start whoop'n ass.

Or maybe some jew joke idk...

Decent supply lines
Long range bombers
Better radar and radio tech
Relying less on the machine gun in squads

Ultimately he could have convinced British to surrender by focusing the early bombing on air fields and factories before the battle of Britain. Once they lost air superiority over the channel an invasion of Europe was eventually going to happen.

Thank the soviets for that statistic.

You cannot win a war with someone in charge who thinks this is worth producing.

Maybe not invade Poland, Austria
, Denmark, Norway, France, Czechoslovakia, Belgium, the Netherlands all within a shortish time span.

Hitler tried an insane land grab. If he had just taken Poland with the soviets and waited France would’ve made a desperate peace. “Why die for Danzig” was a common enough French talking point

I can think of one obvious way

by not being so aggressive.

they pulled the communism fallacy, ideas so good they have to be forced onto others!

they could have just let the ideas and success metastasis to other nations but instead ruined white identity forever.

Dunkirk, for one.

Better personal diplomacy with America, like others have said should've waited longer for war.

The other thing is that even tho they BTFO marxists on the home front there wasn't a huge urgent push for war with USSR. He could've waited, let USSR mobilize to invade Poland and join the rest of Britain, France etc who would've tried to BTFO the marxist menace.

Another good thing would is moussillini signed the Jerusalem Agreement with the Lehi. It would have made the African campaign much easier and result in the Italian army not losing so many men fucking up the Ethiopians and focus on the European front..

Not create like 3 fucking fronts with one being russia in winter

>being this dumb

Also, as early as 1942(still too late to stop Barbarossa) Hitler admitted that he had no idea how many more Tanks Russia had than Germany and that they were fucked right then. The audio has been played here several times last year.

>Wait for spring or summer to fight the Russians
Wait another year? Are you stupid or what? A real suggestion you could have made was for Mussolini to not open up a Balkan front with Greece so Barbarossa had to be delayed 2 months for Yugoslavia.
>final solution
>so early
>gas chambers

One can be that hitler put traitors in key position (he didnt know) like cannaris chief of the inteligence and hjalmar schacht minister of economy. They sabotaged hitler's war effort, cannaris giving hitler wrong reports of inteligence and helping the allies, reinhard almost catch him but was killed. Hjalmar sabotaged the war effort by not producing weapons fast enough, but hitler removed him and put albert speer in charge, so he did a very good job.
Another error can be that hitler adopted the total movilization too late.
But despited all of his error, he almost won in 1941-1942

By not attacking the Soviet Union, keeping pressure on the British, and getting the bomb before the Americans. It might have been enough leverage to force a settlement with the Allies. But I doubt it would have lasted a few decades.

If he had waited 10 years to start the war what would have happened?

Should have launched sea lion before focusing on soviets. 2 front wars r bad son

only if they had 20 A-bombs and a way to deliver the payload. when kikemasters gang up the entire world on you you're going to lose

Slaughter at Dunkirk
Tanks on Normandy beach like Rommel wanted
Then play D vs Russia until the other front is done.. wait till spring to attack.

Then of course assassinate all banking Jews everywhere in the world.

Actually communicate with Japan and get them to invade the Russian far east in conjunction with Barbarossa. Easy money. The Japs were more concerned with the Soviet Union on their borders than they were with America, but Hitlers surprise attack (japs didn't even get a warning) made them feel comfortable enough to sudoku into pearl harbor.

Germany was geopolitically weak. Time was not on Germany's side. It needed space and raw materials to rise to secure world power status. It needed an empire, as America, Britain, and USSR had conquered.

Everyone says wait to invade, but Hitler invaded so early so he could acquire the money and resources of the invaded nations. It was badly needed, Nazi Germany could not have thrived without them

could you imagine if the germans had the ability to make nuclear weapons

10 years? If the atomic bomb doesn't get invented who knows.

No france invasion
No russia invasion

Consolidate and negotiate. Help move jews to israel.

This, get the nukes first.

After one demonstration I guarantee everyone would back off

He fucking annihilated British forces and they fled France back to Britain and left the French to die. Churchill then had the nerve to fly to France and tell them they can't surrender after abandoning them. Which they then got slaughtered and surrendered.

Hitler waited for his foot infantry to catch up and let them escape. He could have crushed the Britians right then and there. He put them out of the war for a long time.

He invaded during the summer you fuck

>Nazi Germany could not have thrived without them
Thrive as in continue the economic policies during peace or as in continue to wage war? The first is absolutely false and the second is to a certain degree true.

And yer retarded

> (OP)
>By not attacking the Soviet Union
Why do all retards seem to think this is a good idea? Can you please tell me what good would come from that?
>keeping pressure on the British
And how do you propose such pressure when America is supplying Britain?
>and getting the bomb before the Americans
If you could back in 1933 and convince Hitler to start immediate work on nuclear fission then maybe yes.

If he wasn't Jewish, backed by jews, and worked with jews, and set up a whole country to die then moved to S. America.

Slaughter at Dunkirk
Push harder on Britain air battle - no breaks in assault
Send northern pincer into Moscow instead of falling back and wasting time
Go for the oil fields, not Stalingrad

That sews up Russia at least

Freemasonry is basically jewish and he was a mason.

...

...

>battle of Britain one week earlier
>not attack USSR

...

The same way the Trumps are setting up the US.

>Mason here
>yes it's very jewy

your hand gesture assumption is hilariously fake and gay though unless it's some Scottish rite shit I don't know about

>ps hitler rounded up masons and hated them

Avoid war with the French and English at all costs. Focus on crushing the USSR. Maintain friendly relations with USA, even if it means dissolving relationship with Japan.

Well, he might have won if he hadn't kept on acting like, well...Hitler. To list:
1)The Dunning-Kruger effect
2)Shooting the messenger
3)Complete refusal to take responsibility
4)Extreme vindictiveness, (the Nero Decree)
5)Laziness
6)Office politics out of control
7)An inability to prioritize
8)Poor time management
In short, Adolph Hitler was the classic boss from hell. It really is a miracle he held on as long as he did.

It's amazing what meth does to a person

He could have found the holy grail and become immortal

He shouldn't have let the British escape, he should have taken them prisoner - this would have prevented Britain being ready for an invasion in 1944 or forced them to peace.

He should have accepted that Polish, Ukrainian and other Eastern European Slavs as Europeans and not turned them against him. Germany did not need endless partisans constantly messing up the already strained supply lines.

He should have controlled Mussolini and have him invade the USSR through Crimea and head straight for the oilfields. This would have allowed the German military to focus on Moscow and Leningrad.

Not declare war on the US after the Japanese did Pearl Harbour. Instead he should have cut ties with Japan and denounced them (curry the US favour).

Not have death camps, just labour camps. If the prisoners were under the pretext that they weren't about to be genocide'ed regardless of what they did then they would have worked better in order to try and save their lives.

Get a Islamic revolt going on throughout the middle east and north africa in order to cause chaos among the Allies in the regions. This would have also cut one of the USSR's major routes for aid from the US.

Prep properly for winter. Even if in our timeline Germany had taken Moscow, their troops would have still been stationed there throughout the winter so they would have needed basic stuff like winter clothing regardless. Again, having more labour camps could have provided this source of clothing.

That's it off the top of my head.

First mistake was letting the British army off of mainland Europe in the hopes of peace with the UK.

Should have pushed to Moscow on the Eastern front, instead of getting bogged down fighting to capture other cities, and facing the Russian winter unprepared.

Shouldn't have wasted any resources trying to help Italy.

Shouldn't have declared war on the US after Pearl harbor, which gave America an excuse to enter the war in Europe and bolster the allies on the western front.

The war was winnable for Germany, Hitler just made too many mistakes. He was a brilliant politician and statesman, but he should have left the command of the war effort to his generals.

I hate to point out the obvious

Extremely difficult, but possible.

>CHADTiger

well for starters, dolphie could have capped himself in thirty seven instead of forty five!

would have saved a lot of white german lives and they wouldn't be in this niggerization they are today!

blacked in less than three years! pity! all because he waited too long to cap himself. what a pity! he could have saved the nation by that one unselfish act!

just sayin ...

Should have finished off the British at Dunkirk.

>Not have death camps, just labour camps. If the prisoners were under the pretext that they weren't about to be genocide'ed regardless of what they did then they would have worked better in order to try and save their lives.

user how did people survive death camps for years if they were sent there to die? How did no one know there were death camps until after the war? Why did no German memos mention the holocaust? Why did people confess to making lamp shades and soaps out of Jews only for that to be completely thrown out later on?

Just saying.

He shouldn't have declared war on America. It's an open question, with serious historians like Victor Davis Hanson thinking not, that the American public would have agreed to go to war in Europe after Pearl Harbor if the Germans didn't declare.

Don't backstab the soviet union and offer them east europe in return for a total military alliance (at the end they took east europe anyway) this would end the war quickly after we and the SU would invade and take over the UK
Even if USA would then enter the war good luck fighting against Japan Third Reich and Soviet Union at once ... they couldn't even win against germany alone

he did win, you just haven't realized it yet,

the future is in motion my friend

ask me how he did it

Japan wanted to add the Soviet Union into the Tripartite Pact of Germany, Italy and Japan, to push back Britain and America.
Foreign Minister of Germany had same idea, but Hitler didn't have it and began the war.
That was the big mistake of Japanese diplomacy at the Tripartite Pact.

By offering all of France to England and divide Africa with them. Avoid pushing west into Baguette land and focusing on Russia using it as another excuse to unify the germans in todays Poland. I think both Russia and Poland would have been better off today with germanic rule.
There was no european winners in that war, we all lost.

>don't invade russia
Normalfag-tier meme. Looked at in a vacuum Barbarossa seems like a foolish decision but it makes much more sense it context. Not even getting into the whole offensive plans controversy invading the Soviet Union was essential to eliminating a rapidly industrializing and militarizing potential enemy on your border and fulfilling Hitler's goal of European supremacy. Resources were also a primary concern since the British blockade had been in effect for more than a year and Germany was relying on Soviet trade deals for essential shipments of oil, food, and minerals; Hitler understandably did not want to be put in a position of dependence on Stalin, especially since he took advantage of it like anyone else would to stall deliveries and payments to the Germans whenever possible. There was no guarantee that these resources essential to keep the German war machine running would continue flowing in. It became more and more a better option to just simply invade and take them by force. And finally, the invasion date was the best possible choice. It was early enough to catch the Red Army still reeling from the purges and humiliation of the Winter War while the Wehrmacht was at the height of its success, and not too late to declare war against a better equipped and lead enemy. It wasn't a poor choice of season either, since invading earlier in the spring would lead to the Wehrmacht getting bogged down in the mud and the shortcomings of a later date are obvious.
Analysts and onlookers at the time were expecting something like Barbarossa to happen for these reasons. Ironically, it would probably be seen as a strategic mistake on Hitler's part if it never happened.

I believe that the holocaust happened, but to what extent is questionable.

>After one demonstration I guarantee everyone would back off

London, Moscow or DC would have sent a very very clear message.

If they had successfully warned the US about the Jew problem, all kinds of happy things would have happened.

Any of the following could have potentially turned the tide.
>Find out that the diplomat you sent you nationalist spain was a fucking traitor that was telling them NOT to join your alliance.
>Have no mercy for the British, don't stop at Dunkirk to give them an opportunity to flee.
>Don't behave honorably when it was time for the battle of Britain, unrestricted bombing from day 1, instead of thinking they'll come to their senses.
>Invest in more Panther tanks, instead of jerking off to Tigers.
>Invest in a newer generation of prop fighter early enough to maintain air superiority, instead of sinking precious resources into jets.
>Invest in more submarines, instead of prestige battleships.
>Don't declare war on the United States, Japan is going to be a shitter and not actually pressure Russia on the east.
>Don't help Italy, they're fucking useless. Wasting divisions in the balkans, and north Africa to help with their adventures will lead to failure on the eastern front.

nah, if they were that retarded to consider gigantic Soviet Union would fall in 3 months, nothing would help them

Outjew the jew by killing those fuckers before they have chance to enslave you with politics and foreign policies

>The clearest sign that someone doesn't know anything at all about WW2. Falling for the 'didn't wait till summer' meme.

The US IS the jew problem. You've been under kike control for most of your history

Japan shouldn't have attacked the US and Hitler shouldn't have invaded Russia.

Maybe then he would still have a chance. Still unlikely.

Winter Uniforms

lmfao no fucking way, what's he going to do? teleport his whole army into Siberia looking for the Reds? how does he subdue America? you think just because your grandpas were conservatives they would have accepted foreign rule from the fucking Germans who killed their dads?

V2 rockets and jet technology are one of the contributions for their loss.

The Germans would have been much better off with more fighter planes, more tanks(panthers and other 'economical' models, versus tigers which were too expensive for what they were.

Allied with Sweden and Finland to take Murmansk.

It wasn't possible. Q user predicted thus.

He should've finished us off at Dunkirk, instead of letting us retreat. One of the greatest mistakes in military history.

V2 + Nuke = Total Victory.

yes
>Kill everyone at dunkirk
>KEEP bombing only AIRFIELDS and PLANES in the battle for britain , the LUFTWAFFE started to bomb cities cause goering went mad after the brits hit berlin
>this would cause britain to surrender
>take controll of the whole italian army , don t let nigger generals make decisions NOT EVEN ONE DECISION
>take malta
>tell the japs to play it cool with the amerikikes and tell them to fucking attack the soviet union when barbarossa starts

the only thing is the nuke problem.. if the US GETS the nuke and decides to get involved it s over no matter what

You're naive to think that England and France would declare war on Russia over Poland. Poland was merely a sacrificial goat to create a casus belli against a resurgent Germany. France was afraid that Germany would seek revenge for the injustices of Versailles, and it was England's foreign policy for the last 150 years to ensure that no continental power could ever threaten them.

wouldnt they have been BTFO'd anyway if the yanks got nukes first?

He didn't loose >:)

Their waiting in Antarctica >:)

By actually killing the jews for starters

>Don't invade Greece to crush a revolution that would've easily fallen, wasting precious resources on a nothingburger
>Better cooperation with the Japanese in pinscering the Soviets
>forcing Mussolini to kill his stuipid fucking partisans and not letting them fester
>giving japan as a sacrificial lamb to the Americans since the japs were artistically playing with islands anyway.

He attacked in the spring you autist

The day is right also, if Hitler hadn't autistically obsessed with V2s and allowed their nuke program to proceed they could've bombed Moscow and literally made everyone surrender.

Not having America involved. You were never meant to win, friend. Nazi Germany was the closest thing to a perfect system the face of the Earth has seen since the days when gods walked the Earth. Had the Nazis won, they would have propelled themselves ever upward, but to what end? We already have gods, and the world is going to end soon. Had you uncovered the truth of all things, had you discovered the unifying force of nature, you would have made yourselves miserable. As fucked up as the world might seem, it's better that things turned out this way.

Nukes in WWII were not some magical weapon that would change the war instantly you still need air superiority to get the bomber to the final location
Hitler was against nuclear weapons because muuh nature muuh inhumane.... 5 more years of rocket science and a nuke program from the beginning we would have nuke equipped rockets and that would change everything

Or making nukes for the big train cannon that we had that could reach the enemy almost 200km away

If Franco would have lost. Germany would have invaded Iberia. Bongs may have jumped in. The war over Iberia would have been bloody.

If Germans won in Iberia and occupied it, they would have kept North Africa and the oil.

He saw you against tiny finland.

>what could they have done differently?

nothing.... it's in the past.

Not have the Enigma code be broken.

The single most important event in the entire war.