"There is no difference between the far left and far right. Muh horseshoe, muh both sides."

>"There is no difference between the far left and far right. Muh horseshoe, muh both sides."

Far left:
>Imperialism is bad.
>Exploiting people for profit is bad.
>Slave-wages are bad.
>People who commit genocide are bad.
>Wealth consolidation is bad.
>Destroying the Earth is bad.
>Police brutality is bad.
>Race discrimination is bad.
>Gender discrimination is bad.
>Sexual discrimination is bad.
>Exploitation of the developing world is bad.
>GENERALLY FUCKING PEOPLE OVER IS BAD.

Far right:
>Inequality is good.
>Slavery is good.
>Exploitation is good.
>Racism and sexism are good.
>Genocide is good.
>Police brutality is good.
>White supremacy is good.
>GENERALLY FUCKING PEOPLE OVER IS GOOD.

THAT IS THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE.

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/FrameGames/status/955617148952612869
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

lol the Far Right says literally none of those things, boy.

Lol, that's bullshit.

Also, right wing terrorists kill far more than Muslims.

>far left is promoting the hatred of white people the dispossesion of their native lands and complete political disenfranchisement
And you think the left is good?

far left:
>generally fucking over people who are not me is okay

far right:
>generally fucking over people who are not me is okay

>Hatred of white people.

Lol, what a fucking victim.

Also, screenshotting a known Nazi doesn't prove shit.

>Imperialism is bad.
>Exploiting people for profit is bad.
>Slave-wages are bad.
>People who commit genocide are bad.
>Wealth consolidation is bad.
>Destroying the Earth is bad.
>Police brutality is bad.
>Race discrimination is bad.
>Gender discrimination is bad.
>Sexual discrimination is bad.
>Exploitation of the developing world is bad.
>GENERALLY FUCKING PEOPLE OVER IS BAD.
>Far left
Except their far left socialist utopias are guilty of 66.67% of what they claim to be bad

So basically the choice is between a practicall and realistic political ideology or a hypocritical one (far left)

It’s Seems the choice is pretty clear then

...

You have a fucking Nazi flag.

Why should I take you seriously?

He's a Jew you cock.

Because Nazism is a religion of peace

Not an argument

Source.

Yes it is.

You just can't refute it.

How does it feel to be rejected by society?

Because unlike you, people who are alt right, nazis, etc are actually trying to preserve western civilization and the comforts you take for granted on a daily basis.

Leftists are fanatics who wish to impose their morality on people through force.

Prove it.

so hitler was a leftists?

He says it himself on his youtube channel virtually in every video.

On twitter here's just one example.
twitter.com/FrameGames/status/955617148952612869

Lol, define "western civilization."

Wrong!

Look it up. Since September 12, 2001, right wing extremists have killed more.

OP conformed retarded
Sage
/thread

Did Hitler not have Jews in his military?
It's called Stockholm Syndrome.

He was being generous. They are guilty of 100% of it. Honestly, both sides should unite and burn it all down.

>Starting at Sept 12 2001.

Hmmmm I wonder why you would do that? Did something happen on Sept 11 that you don't want to include?

One isolated incident means the good, wholesome Nazis dindu nuffin apparently.

"Far left:"
That's just low.
Left.
What?
Just like leftists of the past?
Left.
Depends.
Low.
Low.
Low.
Low.
Depends.
Wrong

"Far right:"
Low.
High, with a bump to the right or left, depending.
Depends.
High.
HIGH.
High.
HIGH.
Wrong

I don't know if you're trolling or not, but a lot of that was wrong. Ever heard of the political spectrum? I bet you still think fascism is far right, too. As a fascist I can tell you that if you do, you're wrong. It's very authorative, but it's not racist, sexist, or whatever you might've heard, either. The REAL definition lies in history. How other fascists did it, specifically Mussolini (BEFORE him and Hitler became pals). It's very in the center of the top, but I lie a very small bit to the right because I'm a free market fascist.

My point is that you're being mislead by a lot of things.

You look it up retard, those “statistics” include fucking bank robberies by random white people
These statistics are all massaged to give whites and right wing the broadest possible interpretation of “terrorism” to the point that it includes organized nonviolent crime and nonwhites the benefit of the strictest possible interpretation to the point that they have to be a bearded Arab who screamed I AM DOING THIS FOR ISLAM before murdering
It’s AMAZING that the stats are so close in this context. Funny how they never break it down by race either, because proportionally Muslims are such a tiny percentage of the population but they do a near majority of the “terrorism” (white people robbing banks, Muslims literally murdering for allah)

The reason the Far Right and Far Left are practically identical isn't because of "muh horse shit theory." It's because they're different denominations of the same religion. Nazis and Communists are the political equivalent of Catholics and Protestants or Sunnis and Shias.

>One isolated incident
That killed 3k people. Its amazing how many excuses you faggots will make to defend your ideologues. The "left" in Russia killed more than Hitler ever dreamed. B-but "muh Nazis"
fucking pathetic. At least the Nazis had a legitimate reason for existing.

>good vs bad
You faggots will never get it. It's about what is necessary. Nothing the left proposes will ever fix the problems they want fixed because those problems will never go away until we're lobotomizing people at birth.

Lol, pathetic. That propaganda considers the pulse shooting right wing terror, and why exclude 9/11? Also, is this per capital? World wide? Why am I even responding to obvious bait?

>3000 dead in one day
>"isolated incident."
Hey, fun fact, from 1970 to 1979 Leftists killed 5000 people through assassinations and bombings. In 1972 alone there were over 1000 individual terrorist bombings by leftists. But I'm sure the Right is worse.

>Isolated incident.
>Being this retarded.

Here are the numbers for deaths and injuries from islamic terroists since 2000:

2000 D:38 I:44
2001 D:4,687 I:13,500
2002 D:821 I:2,897
2003 D:418 I:2,321
2004 D:1,066 I:4,016
2005 D:348 I:1,857
2006 D:319 I:981
2007 D:621 I:1,730
2008 D:350 I:362
2009 D:58 I:87
2010 D:673 I:1,794
2011 D:717 I:1,757
2012 D:799 I:2423
2013 D:768 I:1,839
2014 D:2,120 I:1,046
2015 D:3,108 I:3,445
2016 D:1,413 I:2,959
2017 D:466 I:998

Now you post the numbers for "da ebil right wing nazis" and we'll see how they stack up.

Most of these measures are given perimeters that leave out the biggies. Like September 11th in this case. Then you have the ones often referenced that don't include San Bernadino. You have other studies that don't count certain attacks as extremist, rather workplace violence (such as the fort armybase one).
Literally lies, damn lies and statistics is their modus operandi. One lie- big fucking whopper lie- some bullshit study to prove themselves right

>cherrypicks 10% of good liberal shit
>cherrypicks 10% of the worst of conservatism
Nice try, Jamal

>Far right:
>>Inequality is good.

I'm not even right wing but the argument is; inequality is inevitable and fighting it with excessive redistribution and statism ultimately creates a worse situation for everyone and still has inequality with a political elite above the starving public.
That's the story of communism.

>Slavery is good.
Nobody is saying this but for memers on the chans. Even actual nazis want to get rid of the blacks, not enslave them - clearly slavery didn't work out the first time, why would it now?

>Exploitation is good.
>Racism and sexism are good.
>Genocide is good.
>Police brutality is good.

Said nobody.

>White supremacy is good.

If black identitarianism is good, then so is white identitarianism. Protip: you can oppose both.

>THAT IS THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE.

Back2Reddit