Is there a single piece of evidence showing that hitler knew about the holocaust?

is there a single piece of evidence showing that hitler knew about the holocaust?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jJ2X8UWHOjY
youtube.com/watch?v=gANk7iHci9A
youtube.com/watch?v=-Ju1w-iDR0o
youtube.com/watch?v=2a_cmbi3iIg
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.hr/2009/03/photographic-documentation-of-nazi.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

no?

No.

The holocaust didn't happen so it would be impossible for him to "know" about something that wasn't happening.

Nice try Moshie.

yes there is, you disgusting racists

No.

...

What holocaust?

Wannsee Conference

Yes inside that journal in the holocaust museum. The same journal that Zundel claims has been doctored and was not allowed to read properly in.

Hitler wasn't there.

Jews literally say "it was real in my mind".
How could he have known about something that didn't exist.

what is it?
a prominent polish politician stated some time ago that there is no evidence that Hitler knew about it, and that its quite possible that it was all Himmlers idea which he kept hidden from hitler.
Is there really no evidence? if there isint any why does everyone assume that it was Hitler who killed all the jews?

if it wasn't for Hitler there would be no Pissrael, they should sing his praises

Hitler can't know something that didn't happen

No, because there also isn't a single piece of evidence showing that the holocaust even ahppened.

Israel was founded at the end of world war 1. Why do people think Hitler founded Israel?

There is not.

also, apparently there is a reward of half a millionm £ for anyone who can prove that Hitler knew about the holocaust and noone did it.
really makes you think.

It really doesn't matter if it did ot not, the only prpblem is that you care.

Only purpose of holocaust is to create a psychology for political and economic gain, simply say you wont give any of the above and holocaust loses all value to Jews and non Jews same as any large loss of life anywhere in world.

Americans murdered millions of inmocemt children and women you don't see them all emo.

Some institution devoted to inspecting nazi crimes offers huge amount of money for such evidence

youtube.com/watch?v=jJ2X8UWHOjY

>Why do people think Hitler founded Israel?
Same reason for most mysteries in this world; Kikes.

Hitler used shoah soap to wash his one nutsack while having his cousin shit on his chest because he felt inferior because he wasn't blonde. This is a fact.

Daily Reminder that Hitler was a Jewish shill advancing the Israeli agenda

how do you guys know this?

You don't think he signed off on it?

I personally believe the holocaust did happen, but deservedly so. It wasn't fucking 6 million though.

maybe in your dreams, Durkadurkawitz

He said it was humane more humane than what was happening to the people of his race.

he said it about the holocaust? source?

From the Program of the NSDAP from 1932

is there a single piece of evidence showing that there was a holocaust?

The Holocau$t™ is the biggest con of the 20 Century, enabling so-called Jews to steal Palestine and blackmail the West for hundreds of billions of free money and a hundred billion or so of free weapons for Israel.

Is that you? Holy fuck you're handsome

In his last will and testament a bit subtle.

I have also made it quite plain that, if the nations of Europe are again to be regarded as mere shares to be bought and sold by these international conspirators in money and finance, then that race, Jewry, which is the real criminal of this murderous struggle, will be saddled with the responsibility. I further left no one in doubt that this time not only would millions of children of Europe's Aryan peoples die of hunger, not only would millions of grown men suffer death, and not only hundreds of thousands of women and children be burnt and bombed to death in the towns, without the real criminal having to atone for this guilt, even if by more humane means.

what if six million jews killed Hitler?

There is no proof that he did and that is what the OP is asking for. You would think he did but who knows?

do you keep records about stepping on cockroaches or swatting flies?
>no
then why are you worried about a bunch of worthless kikes?

Hitler was the first to suffer from Russian fake news.

...

...

Not evidence that Hitler knew about the holocaust. On the contrary

I learned, here no less, that there were actually other numbers also floated around at this same time. It doesn´t remove much value from this insane discovery (for newfags) but it should be included to avoid accusations of selective evidence seeking.

...

Explain?
>Jewry is saddled with responsibilty
>real criminal atone for the guilt by more human means than being burnt and bombed
seems pretty clear.

No direct documentation linking Adolf Hitler to the eradication of the Jews exists.

The closest thing that we have is second hand comments logged by people close to him. While it is also important to bear in mind Goebbels, Himmler and others seemed to have this sort of plan in the making behind closed doors a while prior.

Members of Hitlers inner circle had plans of their own, using situations to solidify their hold on power or presence.

In books written by those closest to Hitler we catch a better glimpse of the situation. It seems Adolf was strangely occupied with the actual war instead of the work camps, leaving others to manage them.

Pic related is one such quote supposedly spoken off hand by Hitler and then logged. It is also important to remember that the Soviets and Western powers tortured captured Nazi party member as well as ranking soldiers until they gave information that fit exactly what they wished to hear.

Hitler didn't like jews and he was the leader of the nazis. So he is to blame.

Hitler gassed a lot of jews by himself is it in Annie Frank diary

David Irving is in my opinion the best historian to ever research the second world war. He has only used actual documentation from all over the world in his work which he has studied in real archives, which was helped by him speaking and reading German.

Often this has led to him being attacked and in the UK he had his home and the majority of his work, research, archived documents taken by the government.

youtube.com/watch?v=gANk7iHci9A

youtube.com/watch?v=-Ju1w-iDR0o

>the holocaust
Do you mean The Jew Gassings (I'm not religious)?

>Adolf was strangely occupied with the actual war
Strangely occupied by fucking it up that is.

Yeah, I met Hitler. He hated Jews. AMA

jidf

Agent Hitler's objectives:
>roll up Germany for the globalists
>create a foundation myth for the multicult
>fuck off to Argentina

you should all read some history instead of just memeing stupidity

Read Faurisson instead of working for the JIDF

sadly David Irving's work has been repeatedly shown to be bad. Every book he ever published was criticised by real historians as factually inaccurate adn manipulative of the truth - this is long before he came out as a denier.

he was a Hitler fanboi from childhood, never trained as an historian, and has done his bes tto show Hitler ina good light for decades.

he first denounced the Hitler Diaries, without having read them, as an attack on Roper who he hated because roper had shown him up several times. then he read them, adn declared them genuine, because they show Hitler ina good light (and suggest Hitler did not know about The Final Solution) he was the last person still saying they were genuine when everyone else had established by good scholarship that they were fake.

he has no integrity. he misquotes, quotes out of context, adn simply fails to quote other passages of the same document if it contradicts his views.

he is not a good historian, never mind the best in any area of the subject.

read Richard Evans book "Telling Lies about Hitler" which shows what a real historian does, and tears Irving to shreds.

You want a book about the holocaust based on orginal german documents (thousands of them cited) try Hilberg. "Destruction of the European Jews"

he makes mistakes, he makes some claims that are since shown to be wrong (with further research) but that is a real historian writing a first draft of history, with careful documentary detail.

you make it sound like no one else does this - you are wrong.

He personally burned some Jews at the stake.

Read him.

Lies, distortions, and circle jerking with other revisionists to use their lies and distortions.

not good history.

so did he know about the holocaust or didnt he?
is there evidence?

Ok, I'm not a denier but this testimony is actual BS. wtf, I cant believe anyone would actually believe that shit. BURNED AT THE STAKE????

The whole "holocaust" narrative is based on cherry picked evidence, evidence taken out of context, ad hoc rationalization of evidence that doesn't fit in (Nazis only talking about gassing jews in euphmesisms etc)
Maybe what you say about David Irving is correct or maybe it isn't, but either way it doesn't prove Jews were gassed does it?

...

He was given large type reports of the Einsatzgruppen reports on killings in teh East - marked as having been seen by him. so he knew about the over a million jews killed by them.

I suspect that it was mostly done on a verbal order basis with exageration by underlings. although he had said that if he got into power he would hang every jew in Munich int he town square (children included) I think that by the time he was embroiled in the war he probably left it to Himmler to deal with the details of solving "the Jewish Problem."

The SS had a tradition of using verbal orders, and we have testimony of Heydrich giving orders to camp commanders claiming that they came via Himmler, but were directly from the Fuhrer.

it is quite possible that Hitler knew, but was not very much involved.

It's true Goy - cool it with the anti-semitism. Next thing you'll be telling me Nazi anus pump torture was fake.

Executing partisans was not illegal in war under the Hague convention.

No it isn't.

there is a large amount of evidence about the numbers calimed by the Einsatzgruppen. They were clearly deliberately targeting jews . they kept separate accounts of the number of jews killed, in "judenaktion" Accounts of the numbers of men, women and children, each category listed.

these are listed separately to the accounts of anti partisan actions, political prisoner killings, etc.

so for over a million killings we can be sure that these were deliberate killings of jews because they were jews.

Funny how in recent years the attention has been diverted away from the alleged Gas Chambers to the shootings on the Eastern Front. It's almost as if the gas chamber legend is falling apart

this is an account of a rumor from 1941.

context is important. Like the rumors about huge electric chairs, electrocution in pools of water, underground electrocution plates that then drop people into ovens to burn, or just heat up to cremate the bodies on the plate, the use of steam or vacuum pumps to kill people, and even death rays and atomic weapons - all these were speculation that was unconfirmed.

they knew people were being killed en mass, they just did not know how. there were also rumors about exhaust fumes and poison gas being used - those ones were correct.

no one post 1945, once the truth was known, has ever taken any of these rumors seriously. (indeed a lot of people did not take them seriously before that)

in b4 masturbation machines, taken from a novel written by a non jew who was never in the camps who lied about being a jew in the camps - again not something ever taken seriously by historians, and definitely not true.

So nobody ever took Jews being nuked seriously? What about the Judges at Nuremberg?
Why would there be rumors about such specific ways of killing unless they were not rumors but propaganda?
Why should we believe one piece of propaganda over all the others?
Why should we believe WW2 propaganda more than WW1 propaganda (German corpse factories etc)?

Of course he knew. Don't you know wars are pre-determined false flags to push an agenda?

Not hard evidence, hence why there's a huge prize for proving so.

There is a single document. An invitation to adress the jewish question. If enough historical researchers interpret into it in pizzagate manier the result would be that of today

...

youtube.com/watch?v=2a_cmbi3iIg

A lot, but the holocaust deniers don't learn history.

That's not Hitler fucktard. That's Himmler. And no Hitler wasn't present at that meeting in Posen either. Fuck off meme flag cunt.

true but when you are executing a few hundred partisans a month then listing tens of thousands of jews, including tens of thousands of children, in a separate list, there is something else going on.

the "oh the jews were all involved in the resistance movement" line just does not work. they killed whole villages. and the "that was revenge to deter partisans" line is also not good - that is collective punishment, clearly illegal, and even more clearly immoral.

it does not matter if it was legal or not - this was systematic extermination of the jews in those areas.

90,000 jews in the Crimea (over 95% of the pre war population - every last man woman and child) is not "anti partisan" action. It was listed as "JudenAktion"

specific targeting of jews.

Just imagine when global critical mass is reached where the Holohoax scam is exposed in its entirety...? Think about that. The entire International Jewish Mafia goes down with.it....all those fraudulent movies, all those fraudulent Jewish Intellectuals, all those fraudulent Jew first PACS operating around the world, repayments of all fraudulent reparations to all Jews and Jew International Organizations, the total obliteration of any credibility/trust between Non-Jews and Jews and on and on...The entire state of Israel will be based on a another giant Jewish Lie.

There was no "holocaust."
Get with the times.

Nobody said it's Hitler you retard. Even the youtube's video title is Heinrich Himmler. This is the most retarded strawman I've ever seen.

Also doesn't change the fact the 2nd strongest person in the German Reich admitted that it's happening. You can't refute an audio recording of him saying it.

Deniers BTFO

He's complete right.

>David Irving Is a bad historian, he did nothing in his life, stop listening to him
>Instead, listen to real historians, like this over here, that actually agree with me in that the Holocaust is false.
French intellectuals attacking the author and not the claim to disprove it as always.

Read the second document, the one on right. Do you see the underlined text? It says it's not the total estimation of the Holocaust.

The red cross even responded later it was an early estimation of present bodies, those who died before weren't accounted for.

Your own infographic refutes you, retard. Learn to read.

But his work was attacked and debunked. He was lying, changing dates, misrepresenting, etc.
He admitted it as well, for example the Dresden thingy.

hes a sephardic kike who nenefits from the holocaust industry, why do you gove ANYTHING to Jews?

Smack them, they are trash and are your enemy.

Dont fall for their psychological manipulation.

Still waiting for that hitler knew info. Stick to the OP topic. If you want a general holohoax thread then go make one.

This is a thread on whether Hitler knew about the Holocaust, not whether it happened or not you stupid fuck. Your answer to the OP's question, 'Did Hitler know about know about the Holocuast' was 'a lot'. As evidence you posted a speech from Himmler that Hitler wasn't present for. So get BTFO yourself meme flag cunt.

In Table Talk, Hitler appears to know about allegations that he is killing Jews but denies them

It's historical fact that the Nuremberg trials beat "confessions" out of prisoners, it was even spoken about on the U.S. senate floor.
But the most insidious way they forced "confessions" was by threatening to turn the family of the prisoner over to the Russians. Being turned over to the Bolsheviks would insure their deaths would b long, drawn-out, and very messy.

"The result of this war will be the complete annihilation of the Jews. . . the hour will come when the most evil universal enemy of all time will be finished, at least or a thousand years." - 10 days after Wannsee Konferenz

"This struggle will not end with the annihilation of Aryan mankind, but with the extermination of the Jewish people in Europe." - February 24, 1943

“Once I really am in power, my first and foremost task will be the annihilation of the Jews. As soon as I have the power to do so, I will have gallows built in rows — at the Marienplatz in Munich, for example — as many as traffic allows. Then the Jews will be hanged indiscriminately, and they will remain hanging until they stink; they will hang there as long as the principles of hygiene permit. As soon as they have been untied, the next batch will be strung up, and so on down the line, until the last Jew in Munich has been exterminated. Other cities will follow suit, precisely in this fashion, until all Germany has been completely cleansed of Jews. — Adolf Hitler, 1922. (Josef Hell, "Aufzeichnung," 1922, ZS 640, p. 5, Institut fuer Zeitgeschichte.)

>So nobody ever took Jews being nuked seriously? What about the Judges at Nuremberg?
Well if you read the transcript, including the next page which you conveniently do not show, those rumors are entirely dismissed by Speer, and the judges accept that dismissal - it was raised in order to dismiss it. No one was ever accused of the rumored crime, no one was ever sentenced for it.

it was raised at the trial in order to debunk it, and no one has ever raised the idea again - except deniers who quote it out of context.

>Why would there be rumors about such specific ways of killing unless they were not rumors but propaganda?

sorry, but that question does not make sense. for instance the rumor of the use of steam. What actually happened was there was an account of mass murder in a closed chamber in one of the camps. People went in alive, and came out dead. That much was known.

how did they do it? well, it was known they had used exhaust fumes in vans. and one eyewitness had seen vapor (steam, mist, condensation) rising from a roof vent (probably the warm breath of a thousand people hitting the cold air) so maybe it was Steam being used. Or it could be poison gas. or exhaust fumes

now deniers say "ah obviously lies and propaganda!" No just reasonable speculation.

same with electrocution - people went into a chamber and came out dead. Someone speculated "it could be electrocution" "But how would that work, you would have to electrocute them all at the same time?" "Oh if you fill it with water. or have a great big electric chair, or a huge plate in the floor with millions of volts through it... How do I know I am not an electrician?"

again reasonable, if possibly uninformed, speculation.

"If at the beginning of the war and during the war twelve or fifteen thousand of these Hebrew corrupters of the people had been held under poison gas, as happened to hundreds of thousands of our very best German workers in the field, the sacrifice of millions at the front would not have been in vain." (Kaes, Anton; Jay, Martín; Dimendberg, Edward. The Weimar Republic sourcebook. University of California Press. p. 806. ISBN 0-520-06775-4, requoting Mein Kampf page 766, Stalag Edition, Ostara Publications)

"I don't know whether my name will be held in honor in Germany in 200 or 300 years, but I'm absolutely certain that in 500 or 600 years the name Hitler will be universally glorified as the name of the man who once and for all eradicated the global pestilence that is Jewry." - as quoted in Max Domarus, "Hitler, Vol.1, part 1", pp. 300f.

No body, no crime. This was all they could find, and that included the mass graves of those that died of typhus, when the epidemic had gotten beyond cremating them.
There were not even 6 million Jews in all of occupied German territory, in the first place. Were they importing them?

Jews want nothing more than your suffering death and slavery everyone manipulated by their tricks is pitiful,

holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.hr/2009/03/photographic-documentation-of-nazi.html

There were more than 6 million Jews in the German sphere of influence.

Lets assume holocaust happened and my hated enemy was slaughtered, what?

>that one French guy shows up

Every time. Do you just constantly browse Sup Forums waiting for holocaust threads to get posted so you can show off your superior knowledge and first hand experience of how you witnessed the deaths of each of the 6 gorillion?

And there had been lots of science fiction tales of death rays and atomic weapons pre war - it is not surprising someone would fantasise about that.

the point is they found the gas chambers, and got eyewitness accounts, and realised that it was gas, or exhaust fumes, and no one ever since has ever raised the stem, electrocution of death ray stories again - once the truth was known.

>Why should we believe one piece of propaganda over all the others?

well because it was not propaganda originally - it is just you labelling it as that.

>Why should we believe WW2 propaganda more than WW1 propaganda (German corpse factories etc)?

because some of the stories that you call propaganda are supported by documentary evidence, archaeology, photographs, testimony and census data.

"Bezüglich der Judenfrage ist der Führer entschlossen, reinen Tisch zu machen. Er hat den Juden prophezeit, dass, wenn sie noch einmal einen Weltkrieg herbeiführen würden, sie dabei ihre Vernichtung erleben würden. Das ist keine Phrase gewesen. Der Weltkrieg ist da, die Vernichtung des Judentums muss die notwendige Folge sein. Diese Frage ist ohne jede Sentimentalität zu betrachten. Wir sind nicht dazu da, Mitleid mit den Juden, sondern nur Mitleid mit unserem deutschen Volk zu haben. Wenn das deutsche Volk jetzt wieder im Ostfeldzug an die 160 000 Tote geopfert hat, so werden die Urheber dieses blutigen Konfliktes dafür mit ihrem Leben bezahlen müssen."
[Quoted after Christian Gerlach, Krieg, Ernährung, Völkermord, page 117.]

translation:
"Regarding the Jewish question, the Führer is determined to make a clean sweep. He prophesied to the Jews that, if they were again to bring about a world war, they would experience their destruction therein. That was no catch-phrase. The world war is here, the destruction of Jewry must be the necessary consequence. This question is to be regarded without any sentimentality. We are not here to have pity with the Jews, but only to have pity with our German Volk. If the German Volk has now again sacrificed about 160 000 dead in the Eastern Campaign, the authors of this bloody conflict must pay for this with their lives."

>>that one French guy shows up
>Every time. Do you just constantly browse Sup Forums waiting for holocaust threads to get posted so you can show off your superior knowledge and first hand experience of how you witnessed the deaths of each of the 6 gorillion?

I hate this asshole, and the Irish one.

Both kikes most likely.