SLAUGHTERBOTS WHEN

>They were only attacking one half of the aisle of Congress

But they don't mention what side. What side would be more likely to harness this tech?

youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA

Other urls found in this thread:

prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-book-reveals-nanoweapons-more-problematic-than-nuclear-weapons-300434049.html
youtube.com/watch?v=w2itwFJCgFQ
youtube.com/watch?v=VxSs1kGZQqc
youtube.com/watch?v=dW6uHC7qXsM
m.youtube.com/watch?v=d6sz8bquB50&feature=youtu.be
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

soon

...

Those things are so easy to make it's scary. Issue is the coding,detection systems, location mapping etc. We're still far far far away from these becoming real, but I'd say within 30-40 years we could start seeing testing of these and possibly start seeing use of them on the battlefields within 50-70 years.

Testing these takes awhile too, as they'd have to be perfect, no fucking up aith something like this.

Also if they're controlled by a human it could be as soon as a decade. It would eliminate snipers by allowing someone to deliver a bullet with direct decision and able to maneuver under or over or besides objects and do a lot of things.

I personally think AI drone versions won't be here for a very long time. However a small drone the size of an apple, able to deliver a bullet is 100%a real possibility

yes op my pineal gland manifests quadcopters through my third eye also. it is inconvenient.

>The United States, China, and Russia are already locked in a new arms race to gain nanoweapons supremacy. Evidence suggests each major player is developing insect size drones, such as the United States Army's recently announced "fly drone," for surveillance and offensive missions.

>Millions of insect size drones...are projected to become the new weapons of mass destruction. But controlling millions of nanobots is difficult; once released, they may go beyond an adversary's boarders and kill indiscriminately.

prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-book-reveals-nanoweapons-more-problematic-than-nuclear-weapons-300434049.html

>boarders

youtube.com/watch?v=w2itwFJCgFQ
Its very possible right now, but youve gotta make it work first, im not doing it.

Oh no. How to stop a bunch of little flying robots the size of birds? Perhaps we should invest in some way of shooting them down. I know! We can call it "bird shot" and load it into shotguns!

Um, excuse me, but where are the women and PoC?

Specialist clients....

in the gender studies department, which is funny because the hard science programs are desperate for wimmin to look good.

How long till gungrabbers start campaigning against anti slaughterbot technology?
>NO CIVILIAN SHOULD HAVE AN ANTI DRONE EMP SHIELD!

>muh anti-drone EMP sheeuld will protek me frim rods of god
top kek retard

>We're still far far far away from these becoming real

it's highnoon

>rods of god being feasible.
Dude muricah doesnt even launch their gay little cuck rockets anymore. Theres no way they'd get that muh tungsten to drop on us. When people look at tech like this its only good for 3rd gem warfare not 4th

Fifth Trumpet: The Locusts from the Bottomless Pit

9 Then the fifth angel sounded: And I saw a star fallen from heaven to the earth. To him was given the key to the bottomless pit. 2 And he opened the bottomless pit, and smoke arose out of the pit like the smoke of a great furnace. So the sun and the air were darkened because of the smoke of the pit. 3 Then out of the smoke locusts came upon the earth. And to them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power. 4 They were commanded not to harm the grass of the earth, or any green thing, or any tree, but only those men who do not have the seal of God on their foreheads. 5 And they were not given authority to kill them, but to torment them for five months. Their torment was like the torment of a scorpion when it strikes a man. 6 In those days men will seek death and will not find it; they will desire to die, and death will flee from them.

7 The shape of the locusts was like horses prepared for battle. On their heads were crowns of something like gold, and their faces were like the faces of men. 8 They had hair like women’s hair, and their teeth were like lions’ teeth. 9 And they had breastplates like breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots with many horses running into battle. 10 They had tails like scorpions, and there were stings in their tails. Their power was to hurt men five months. 11 And they had as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name Apollyon.

>But they don't mention what side. What side would be more likely to harness this tech?
They would be used to save us from all the white supremacists

if you don't buy anything for 5 whole hours then the corporation sends a death drone and terminates you.

>please drink another verification can

The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human being to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.

Try 2-5 years from first wide scale field use you utter retard.

Overengineered. A regular shrapnel bomb is superior.

>doesn't know about swarmbots
>doesn't know about facial recognition
>doesn't know about AI
>doesn't know about better payloads than bullets

How about it would call in it's buddies if you did?
How about it would kill you if you succeeded?

70 years ago we just starting to use jet engines. We've already been using drones for 20+ years.

Directed evolution of the human body, hardened bone plates over the head, thickened dermis to make it impervious to syringes. Blood enzymes to denature harmful toxins. War drives innovation.

>What side would be more likely to harness this tech?
Obama averaged TWELVE HUNDRED DRONE STRIKES PER YEAR. Just sayin'.

I like how college professors are scared of these, they should be...

>emubomber

>I like how college professors are scared of these, they should be...
Curiously, they don't show any drone strikes on the lying fucking media. I guess they are tacitly admitting which side will be using them to silence the other. Let's see, which side already destroys people's lives for daring to disagree?

this why i always wear my metal head gear

Not too long before someone puts a gun on it, huh?

>> this would be the result of integrating tech we already have
>> we have the opportunity to prevent [this from being made]

No. If it can be done it will be. The cat is out of the bag.

Also the solution may be technology: Just put up an automatic drone killing gun around the perimeter of your house. Anything smaller than X violates your airspace then POW.

It would be good for assassins and good for state actors that don't want the bad press of dropping bombs.

First thing I see happening is cashless society. Then everything with a chip in it is logged as to who bought it.

I can see a real tightening of the paper trail of ownership of things. If something of yours is found to have committed a crime, you'll have to answer for it.

Maybe a mark either on your hand of forehead will identify you to prevent straw purchasing. Lol, not necessary. Thumbprint biometric scanning will suffice

>3:19
Is that Yvette Felarca?

A .450 diameter aluminum tube holding a 410 shotgun shell with a nail in the bottom resting against the primer, have the head of the shell projecting out an 1/8". Now attach it to a small drone and slam it into something and watch what happens.

...

Whoa. Royal Nonesuch is a Sup Forumslack

So, what's the point of producing more complicated military tech, or even HAVING a military when the enemy can just legally invade and start killing civilians?

pic related, it's the majinot line.

the germans just went around it.

This video is fiction, right?

Not for long

>This video is fiction, right?

Technically, yes AND no...

The video isn't real, those swarmbots don't exist yet.

But we already have all of the technology to make them. and it would be pretty simple to do so.

...

Can this be a memeball thread now?

Yeah, I'd say the way these drones are going is going to look like a tinkertoy version of skynet from terminator in a few years.

how is this scarier than a gun? lol. it's just shock value

When nazism has been demonized so much throughout history, anyone can commit an atrocity under the guise of nazism and get away with it.

Hey CIA... did you get my email?

>It would eliminate snipers by allowing someone to deliver a bullet with direct decision and able to maneuver under or over or besides objects and do a lot of things.
>I personally think AI drone versions won't be here for a very long time. However a small drone the size of an apple, able to deliver a bullet is 100%a real possibility

yeah, they don't even need to be firing anything, they can just act as noise / heat / movement locator / provide approximate locations of gunfire / close up looks

they don't need to be rediculously powerful or expensive either, just lots and lots of them parked in valleys, around bases, towns, roads etc listening / watching for movement.

the AI doesn't actually need to be that smart for total area denial / perimeter maintenance, if they're set up to track / follow / video / shoot at anything that moves within the area.

this is also an area where chemical / biological weapons may make a come back. they're banned because they're too generic, but something like a tiny .22 barrel with 10 / 20 rounds in it could still punch through windshields etc with tungsten bullets. the beauty of it is, the bullets don't need to mushroom to have an impact, if they're coat with some massively powerful tranquilizer: e.g. etorphine

they also don't need to hit faces / heads / hearts. anywhere will do.

even tho it takes time for the tranquilizer to act, it also takes quite a long time for people to bleed to death. and the person will be >heavily< fucked up rapidly by an elephant sized does of etorphine.

"Etorphine (M99) is a semi-synthetic opioid possessing an analgesic potency approximately 1,000–3,000 times that of morphine. Etorphine is available legally only for veterinary use and is strictly governed by law. It is often used to immobilize elephants and other large mammals. Veterinary-strength etorphine is fatal to humans. For this reason the package as supplied to vets always includes the human antidote as well as etorphine."

even if there are ways to get around them, having 500 of them constantly sitting around on top of buildings / roads / fields etc will massively retard any form of movement within the area

another use for them would be environment surveying on a battle field.

e.g. if you're trying to shoot something really far away, knowing the wind strength / direction for the entire area / gusts blowing through, will help with aiming.

they could easily be fitted with some sensors (cheaply) to monitor that and relay it back to the person with the rifle (or adjust the scope for them).

same applies to things like shelling. send them up front to see what's going on / wind speed & direction etc, where they're impacting.

even if they're not actively firing at something, the scout / wait and listen / watching potential of them is huge

Well, the main problem with drones in warfare is IFF.

IFF Software is pretty shit, to be honest.

pretty much this

>30-40 years away
I’m not going to go into detail about why you are wrong because I dont want to be responsible for anything. Not trying to be a dick I’ve just been seriously researching this for ~5 years now because the idea scared the shit out of me when I realized how easy it was to do even then. What you see in the video is fully possible today. I can whip up a fully functioning batch inside a month, minus the plastic explosives.

I’m not fucking larping when I say be very afraid of this. It’s been one of my top 3 fears ever since it occurred to me 5 years ago. If this ever becomes prominent(plz no, legit terrified of this possibility) I’ll bake some threads for the counter measures I’ve thought of.

it doesn't matter though so much as you know where they are and what they're doing.

so long as you know they're in a valley watching a road, so long as you don't go down there you'll be "sound as pound". or say if you're sending them upfront to check out a village, just get them to look at whatever is in that area; because none of your group will be.

there are also potential tricks to getting round the identify thing as closer ranges, e.g. hidden optical patterns

if you look into 'digimarc' for instance, it's a way of optically scrambling images very slightly so a computer can see the digital watermarking but a person can't.

it's used on printed UK currency and i suspect also US currency. if you try scanning printed currency and are using windoz, a warning will appear and the scan won't complete. it's the digimarc water mark hidden in the image.

"Based on these principles, Digimarc invented Digimarc Barcode, a machine-readable code that is imperceptible – nearly invisible and inaudible – to people. The company also provides Digimarc Discover software for detecting the information stored in the Digimarc Barcode. The technology can be used with several forms of content, including product packaging and other physical items, printed material including photographic images, and audio."

or adding encrypted radio / uv based beacons to the scouts that won't show up on longer ranged frequency scanners / ir scopes

check this out. it doesn't even need to be this high-tech.

help if i included the link eh....

youtube.com/watch?v=VxSs1kGZQqc

As if this was not a big enough fear of mine already...fuck

>If this ever becomes prominent(plz no, legit terrified of this possibility) I’ll bake some threads for the counter measures I’ve thought of.
C...Could you post a few now user? F...for a friend?
>MFW I... I'm totally not scared by this technology

I still say it would be easier and better to have drone pilots radio controlling the motherfuckers.

Less chance of IFF slipup.

And the US has a veritable wealth of people who are experience in playing video games with violence in them.

>And the US has a veritable wealth of people who are experience in playing video games with violence in them.

And you can ever have one person controlling like, a whole swarm, and dispatching targets individually....

Power density is still a problem though, unless you make them gas powered, or use a fuel cell or something.

Damn, I gotta find a way for ME to get paid for my ideas...

That’s way too much work and too expensive. At least now. I’m thinking more along the lines of what can be accomplished with relatively little technical skill and a few thousand $$$$. Cheap and effective is a dangerous combination.

It would depend very much on the particular implementation if this ever happened so it’ll have to wait until that day comes if it ever does. I’ve considered a few possible counters to my counters as well so I wouldn’t want to give anything up until I have to.

If these things were real I dont think I'd care. In fact I would deliberately shitpost just to get one to kill me.

Power density is not an issue.
> trust me said the random brainlet user
Seriously though, trust me.

>uses facial recognition to determine target
>equip mask

You are making incorrect assumptions about how these would be used in a real life attack. Again, not being a dick. There are just things you dudes are not considering. Very subtle yet simple differences between what the video shows and what would really happen.

fair enough user, regardless if you're larping or not if this tech ever does come into actual prominance I honestly expect a mixture of Sup Forums, /k/ and Sup Forums to have a massive list of countermeasures hopefully.

More people should be concerned about this.

Imagine a drone with a sniper rifle attachment hanging from the bottom capable of flying 400mph with high-speed cameras and lightning fast processors and rotors delivering headshot after headshot. You could take out an entire crowd of people before they realized it was even in the air

>And you can ever have one person controlling like, a whole swarm, and dispatching targets individually....

exactly. the person controlling them will likely just be telling the entire group whur to go what to do etc. also doesn't rly matter if they make iff slipups if they're literally just watching for movement etc; if you end up accidentally recording one of your own troops wandering round a field one night.

>Power density is still a problem though, unless you make them gas powered, or use a fuel cell or something.

ironically, solar panels may actually work semi-decently for them given that the vast majority of them, or prime place for them to go, would be the middle east, and they have lots of solar panels.

the reason it may work is they don't need to actually be moving / fully powered up for most of the time in a surveillance type mode. they could just fly a mile or few out / up front, park, then sit there for hours / days / weeks / months monitoring that area; recharging / relaying information (ad hoc / mesh network style).

i agree. i doubt its even all that necessary, but its definitely an interesting construction method. flat pack parts. also agree on the price. this will be a $1000 - 5000, buys loads of them thing. an f35 is almost $100 million; that's >20,000< potential tiny drones >per< f35. imagine trying to deal with that many of the cunts swarming / parked around town.

the technology to do a lot of this stuff definitely isn't expensive either. all you need approximate gunfire location is >a< microphone on there per drone, and to find the drone with the loudest bang nearby. direction determination just needs a few per drone. the ones from mobile phones will work. so... $10 - 20 max to add directional gunfire location + 3 grams of extra weight.

>Damn, I gotta find a way for ME to get paid for my ideas...

i've seen some pretty sweet jobs advertised in the US, problem is DOD + britbong.

>and they have lots of solar panels.

*sun light even

The bots only killed the idiots who joined some kind of activist group at Uni instead of getting a education
Based slaughterbots

youtube.com/watch?v=dW6uHC7qXsM

Thats the thing that scares me about this, I’m not even larping as some career researcher or anything that would be an authority on this. I’m just some dude with a relatively decent amount of technical skill(don’t even have a degree just good with tech in general) and enjoy strategizing for the hell of it. This however actually scared the shit out of me. It’s just modern guerilla warfare tech. Simple, cheap, dangerous.

If some user can come up with the idea on his own then you know (((they))) already thought of it as well. The difference is, while your sense of morality gave you pause, they fast-tracked it as visions of shekels danced in their heads. A possibility is an assurance when it comes to weaponizing technology.

> the technology to do a lot of this stuff definitely isn't expensive either. all you need approximate gunfire location is >a< microphone on there per drone, and to find the drone with the loudest bang nearby. direction determination just needs a few per drone. the ones from mobile phones will work. so... $10 - 20 max to add directional gunfire location + 3 grams of extra weight.

This gave me some ideas. But as I stated above I’m not discussing particulars here or anywhere else for that matter. You shouldn’t either. I’m just here to warn of the danger.

Ahhhhh no way.

>Power density is not an issue.

it is for batteries... they would have a flight time of mere minutes.

Gonna be able to shot down a miniaturized drone doing barrel rolls with a shotgun? You better be fucking Cyborg John Wayne if that’s the case.

You’re telling me things I already fear user. Anyway it’s not even (((them))) I fear with this tech. No further details.

>i've seen some pretty sweet jobs advertised in the US, problem is DOD + britbong.

Really? where, I've got some good Ideas, but they never call or email me back. not even to tell me no.

I’ll be more specific. Power density of batteries is not an issue.

suffering is normal you pussy. there are plenty of ways to address things like these drones.

Id love to do something like this but I have a history of drug use. But by all means hire the SJW cunt who’s going to leak as soon as she gets the chance. I’m a fucking patriot but I like weed so I can’t be trusted with classified info. Cool.

Ken, I’d love to watch user try shooting this even with a shot gun
m.youtube.com/watch?v=d6sz8bquB50&feature=youtu.be

No doubt, these are to scare middle America. But we’re used to mosquitoes and bugs... we’ll just swat them

I’d like to see you shoot one of these down, never mind a swarm.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=d6sz8bquB50&feature=youtu.be

i'll keep an eye out if you don't mind sponsoring a visa application.......

more cereally, they're usually code based ones to do with data mining, for the DOD. i think some of them were around the carolinas (always thought it was kind of hot having a city named 'charlotte' / tennessee / kentucky. $100k a year only open to full US citizens with some form of security clearance, for fairly obvious reasons.

also cereal about the visa......

Counters:
>Use nets of appropriate size.
>Jammers on all frequencies, including optical. Imagine automated lasers fixating on these drones.

Cons:
>The smaller the less battery life will be. So can't be used for extensive ops.

they're not stealth. once detected you can zap them. set up perimeters in dense areas and these insect drones can't get in. the tech involved will advance on both sides and the tech you have to cram into a tiny mobile battery operated space is going to be limited compared to what is fixed and of a much greater size and energy input. The processor on the anti-bot tech will be 100 times faster and the deterrent mechanisms will have no problem knocking these things out of the sky. for example they have moving parts by necessity and air input, etc. throw some fine particulates at it and it will shut down and drop to the ground instantly.

>No doubt, these are to scare middle America. But we’re used to mosquitoes and bugs... we’ll just swat them

indeedicus. but mosquitoes and bugs usually don't have stuff that'll totally paralyze you in 30 seconds (and to death not long after) in their sting and they have to land on ye to sting ye. a rly small .22 based dart gun could easily shoot a dart into a person, through a window, a hundred feet away.

like nigga just wear a helmet haha
like just cover yo head nigga

I don't have to shoot it down, my counter-drone gun will. it will have all of the same capabilities but as it's in a fixed location none of the weight and power restrictions. it will always be faster and stronger than your little faggot drone. that is the main reason these aren't a thing.

That outcome implies an initial flurry of attacks to motivate the development of deterrence.

there are ways round the fine particles thing + it'd be difficult to do on a huge (town / village / city sized) scale. but i think we're looking at different situations. i was thinking primarily of the use they'd be in the middle east; so its the odd, cheap drone getting broken as opposed to troops getting blown to bits. even though there are potential counter measures. we're talking about the middle east / pakistania here... still figuring out why toilet paper is a good idea. they ain't going to be developing any high tech laser turrets anytime soon.

Do you know what mustard gas is? You can literally drive into the center of any city right now and pump that shit into the air from a van and kill thousands of people without any effort. This has been accessible tech for 100 years, yet people don't do it.

also

>they're not stealth.

it's much, much easier to hide something from a radar the smaller it is. to the extent that things below a certain size won't even show up on it due the lack of reflection (wavelength size etc).

>full US citizens with some form of security clearance

Well, I post on Sup Forums, so I probably won't be able to get security clearance...

damn shame too, it seems only Americas enemies get hired. :(

>also cereal about the visa......

I'm not even sure I know how to sponser someone.

>it's much, much easier to hide something from a radar the smaller it is. to the extent that things below a certain size won't even show up on it due the lack of reflection (wavelength size etc).

isn't x-band radar something like 4-5 cm?