Is diversity truly a strength to a nation? Is diversity a good thing in general?

Is diversity truly a strength to a nation? Is diversity a good thing in general?
Explain

Other urls found in this thread:

academic.oup.com/esr/article/32/1/54/2404332
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/pdf
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jssr.12073/abstract
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296311002888
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

diversity is poison

no. humans are territorial and tribal by nature just look at how people are spread out in major cities, i.e. there's always a chinatown, a 'hood', little italy, so on and so forth.
People hate different people

no of course not
you should be able to tell that the slogan is orwellian and overtly absurd

>Is diversity truly a strength to a nation?
no
>Is diversity a good thing in general?
yes
>explain
stable environments create stable people.

no, because no white country wants to become like the americas

I find it contradictory when people say the strength of diversity is having different view points and opinions, but then these same people stress unity. Diversity can also act like a ball and chain so to speak. In USofA blacks make up 13% of the population...but we cater to them even though they are a minority. Isnt a Representative Democratic Republic suppose to be about the will of the majority? I just have a hard time seeing the positives of diversity.

no. diversity is bad thing in general. diversity may only work when there is one dominating merciless leader keeping everyone straight

True. We naturally gravitate to people that are ethnicly the same to us.

you will most probably still have constant civil wars for domination though

What do you mean?
interested

But doesnt diversity crete instability? Look how unstable the climate is in the United States do to all this diversity catering. A fucking movie (black panther) has the nation in uproar and if i say it has a overwhelmingly black cast..ill be ostracized

What book is this?

well it closely resembles, not by coincidence, the slogans ignorance is strength freedom is slavery from orwells book. A country is strong through its unity and common ground and common heritage shared by its people, while a toxic concoction of economic refugees who do not share principles and ideas and are estranged from one another living in their own secluded areas, destroys a country from within.

Altruism diminishes with the decline of homogeneity. Diversity is weakness.

It's perpetuated because of this exact reason. It makes the host nation weak to the parasites that consume it.

This is so concrete that we see it throughout the animal kingdom. An animal is willing to make more sacrifice to save it's own kind than to save other 'families' from predators. There's no reason to believe this nature is absent in humanity. In fact, we have studies to suggest otherwise.

academic.oup.com/esr/article/32/1/54/2404332
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/pdf
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jssr.12073/abstract
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296311002888

1/2

In the United States when drawing the congressional districts it is forbidden to do so in such a way that it would disrupt the voice of minority communities. They have to draw the lines such that black areas, latino areas, etc. are grouped well enough that they could actually elect someone from their community to represent them in congress.

Why is this? Because it was deemed unfair for these communities not to have someone to represent their interests. This is telling because by definition this means that the interests of the black, latino, etc. communities are NOT the interests of the white majority. There may be some overlap on particular issues, but as a whole it is recognized and protected by the government that different ethnic groups have different interests.

Diversity, therefore, is by its very nature subversive to the strength of a nation. Rather than a unified nation that can work towards a common goal, we have various groups drawn around ethnic lines all competing to have their interests promoted.

For latinos its immigration. Their countries are largely garbage with pitiful economies. They want to come to the USA, bring their entire extended family, and get a cut of America's vast wealth. To that end, their interests promote the erosion of immigration laws and amnesty for illegals, as well as general welfare. This is directly at odds with the interests of the white majority (outside the ruling class), who have their wages depressed or in some cases their opportunity outright removed.

Blacks being eternally in poverty want more welfare and government handouts. This is again against the interests of the white majority middle class because they are the ones who have to foot the bill for all this.

2/2

Other groups that are generally considered less problematic and are smaller in number still have interests counter to the majority. Indians and some east asians, mostly chinese for example, have interests in H1B1 visa abuse being allowed to continue, again counter to the interests of the native white population that are losing their jobs.

How can diversity make us stronger when it literally just injects conflict into the nation. In the time of colonialism and nationalism, and even before that in the time of monarchy, the people were unified because they were one people. What was good for one was good for all (with some exceptions based on class). This allowed people to be much more unified and the nation could dedicate itself to forwarding the objectives of the majority.

Now, with diversity it's endless squabbling internally. No unified goal. No trust in society. And all of that is before we even get into things like IQ or violent crime. Even if everyone was actually equally capable like the left likes to meme, diversity would still be cancer because of the competing interests of different groups. A nation of strangers cannot function long term. A nation must be of brothers, bound by a common culture, identity, and interests. Otherwise, it is doomed.

Diversity is a good thing as long as it's global. White countries for whites, black countries for blacks, and so on.
The globalists want to turn the entire world into the same boring shithole, with ugly skyscrapers and mutt-looking shits.

I unironically try to live my life by Aristotle's teachings. He was truly the ultimate philosopher.

A diversity of consistent culture, yes.

I think it is if I'm being honest.
What I see happening in the world today is the same thing I think happened before the last cataclysm that wiped out most of our species 13,000 or more years ago.
All you need to look at is racial breeding patterns, and where population growth is exploding in the world today.
>all creation myths across the world involve a "before time" when the world was great
>then some bad shit happened and almost everyone died
>after the cataclysm only caveman tier people exist because exponential birth rate
>meanwhile there's a small class of priests or shepherds that teach the lessons of civilization to the proto-humans
>they eventually die off and all that's left is the shitskins to repopulate the earth
We're in the before time right now lads, something will happen eventually, the west will fall, Africa will have 5 of the 10 biggest cities by 2100, none of those cities will be in US or Europe.
At some point in the distant future some nigger in a cave will be telling his son about the white people, and how they were able to fly, and even go to space, but they left the world a long time ago, back to the mythical land of MacAdon(alds)

Muslims and Niggers are not productive members of western society. without these groups the west would be more saver, more productive and the social systems would be close to collapse.

BESIDE KEBAB STANDS THERE IS NOT A SINGLE POSITIVE THING DEVERSITY GAVE US!

>Is diversity truly a strength to a nation? Is diversity a good thing in general?

No.