Which third position ideology is the best?

Which third position ideology is the best?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Maurras
twitter.com/AnonBabble

There are not intrinsically bad systems. Only bad leaders.

>implying any of them are good

...

>feld

>USA: Feminists completely destroyed my culture in less than a lifetime and now women fuck 20 different guys before marriage, guys fuck 20 different women before marriage, and both get divorced before their kids, if they have any, can even talk
>but only if they're white. black people just breed like rabbits.

Oh but never tell the truth
Then you might look bad

Monarchy

Ancap is retarded by default. Watch down the rabbit hole: mouse utopia for a redpill on that ideology and similair ones.

One is the western world's biggest threat
One is a failed ideology and is dead.
One was great in history and failed when it's resurrection was attempted and is dead.

Radical Centrism I suppose?

>jews
>truth

integralism. it has the potential to solve the grand narrative / imperialist problems of the academic left and right by focusing on localism. ie fascist federalism, like switzerland without so much democracy

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Maurras

owh, and a bundle of sticks wasn't just called fascii, but also faggot.

I'm in support of fascism of you fucking nigger.

Accurate

Technocratic monarchy with an immortal AI godking

based

Democracy is pure idiocy. How to destroy a country 101

Monarchy. Everything else is degenerate crapniggerdom.

>There are not intrinsically bad systems. Only bad leaders.

Found the leaf

There's an anecdote of a chad ancient Spartan replying by to an ancient soyboy entreating him to try democracy for Sparta, saying 'start with your own family'

I love this shit.

>You 're only mad because your entire civilization is being destroyed, your role in life has been destroyed and you are unable to feed your children. grow up!

It means he has experience with bad leaders

>""""""""""""""""""""""Democracy"""""""""""""""""""""""

Cultural Fascism.
Government has to reflect the natural inclinations, historic cultural norms, and traditions of the people. Fundamentally the state must be of the people.

Its true that an intelligent, cohesive, and civilized people could make any government work. Its a question of how well they work in practice. Obviously some systems of organization produce better outcomes than others.

Sure a computer could set policy with brutal efficiency. We're not at the point where this is possible yet, and you'd have to do an awful lot to ensure no hardware or software bugs ended up harming you in the long run.

Who alive is worthy of being King? The divine right is gone, blood lines were ended, or diluted to the point of being virtually lost. We have no living heroes that could rise up and earn the love of the people.

Gamergate taught us about the totalitarianism of the left's culture war and the impossibility of libertarian ideals under it. So long as kikes go around politically auditing subcultures for reactionary attitudes, people will stop rolling over and fight back and in the process intersect with MRA, anti immigrant nativism, working class woes under globalism, and the transformation of democracy into plutocracy

There is nothing wrong with being a fascist and fighting this liberal bourgeois dystopia of materialism, atomization, and guilt

It's the ball version of this poster

Strasserism. Hitlerism entitled collaboration with the army and the industrialists when such are not on our side in our day. Italian fascism blew. Nazbol and natsyn are too focused on planned economy. Strasserism is more about guild socialism and dirigisme, and has a middle class spirit

>The divine right is gone, blood lines were ended, or diluted to the point of being virtually lost.

Wrong! Wrong! Wrong! Peasant.

>add racial realism aspect to fascism
>suddenly its the best system of all

The differences between fascism and natsoc were already minimal (apart from the racial soul being the primary thing), but if we as fascists add in racial realism, suddenly we become even more similar to natsocs.

Though fascism in some sense is meritocracy. Less social welfare, more of the people is expected for them to be really strawng. Thus if racial realism is taken into account, it would most likely mean importing high IQ foreigners (those who are skilled), making conclaves for them (since races function best on their own and mixing doesnt work, as the science dictates is so), and then letting them participate in the economy.

Kinda what europe did with the jews for centuries, for its banking system, but now with other races too. Its obviously very dangerous because genetic variation in each birth will insure that the once high IQ foreigners, regress to their mean, thus must be removed in a way.

Whereas in natsoc there is no such problem at all, all of focussed on their own white race and self improvement of that.

omg, you talking about jews?
ok as atheistState im telling you that is not the problem


the problem is:
Rape in eu
and undocement refugess
And burning all eu with muslims
And tv wich FUCKING support it


As a middle east guy a JEW i tell you
You focus on the worng thing
If you want to say salam aleykom in more 50 years

so everything is fine keep hate the worng guy

(dont take me worng if someone belive in jewish god i wish to him to died the same with islam, and chrishtianty)

my opinion is that
eu is white , europe build with white
and shouldnt die by black.

please replay here
About my english
or about hate about jews/islam

Then who?
Tell me who would be King of America? There is no established American royalty. There is no long respected family of noble lineage. This isn't a country that can have a King unless appointed by God himself.
The people have it in their blood to be a Republic. The Fasces are one of our founding symbols and they adorn many of our national monuments.

Strasserism is communism lite,
Fascism is nat soc without racial purtiy
and National Socialism cares about racial divide and purity and the people

and to add to my post: with this importation approach one can leech off the right side of the bellcurve from other nations, other races, and improve your economic output, and general talent of the "nation". Obviously this is best in the short term, and many nations RIGHT NOW are using this method. (though more than half of them also import low IQ retards)

For this method to actually work in the long term is to have a strong, primary race controlling these high IQ conclaves. Also to make sure that they wont meddle in the politics, dont bring their families etc. Which is what most countries who tried this also failed quite a lot.

In the longer term natsoc and its racial purity focus will most likely win. There is no unnecessary pressure from weird groups, no need to maintain them so lots of focus can be had on the improvement of the own genepool.

So what makes a man worthy of being king?

>
For this method to actually work in the long term is to have a strong, primary race controlling these high IQ conclaves. Also to make sure that they wont meddle in the politics, dont bring their families etc
Gotta make sure to have a one (or no, depending on the demographics) child policy for those foreigners - if you're really insistant on having those in the first place, which I personally don't understand.

Monarchism isn't the worst system to be compared to or in line with. We would be unable to pick a king, but we could have an Emperor or something to that effect.

Well, Strasserism, Stalinism and Maoism is basically the same thing tuned for different countries/cultures. And i agree, that best would be a union of social-nationalistic states.

being able to control the many groups, peoples and industries under an iron boot, or some other trickery, into forcing them to carry your banner.

They all suck.

What doesn't suck then?

AIs always come to the objective conclusion that niggers and faggots should be removed so yes

The bellcurve of IQ man, any given race and nation is only capable of producing members alongside it. The problem is that innovation usually solely derives from those on the right side of the bellcurve. So in order to win in economics, in prestige and to improve your GDP, people thought that stealing other peoples high IQ people would improve their own economy. Which it does to some extent.

You see, once nukes were invented, the focus for competition in some way between nations changed from war, into economic war. Sanctions, tarifs, trade goods are all war chess pieces which you can use to destroy other nations. And a person whois IQ is near 160, and who has the proper education to use it, is worth a 100 thousand of your own citizens perhaps in some ways.

Cut the crap, sonny. If it was getting your children fed a problem ,the fascist critique would essentially be a anti-capitalist one. But in America most of fascists seem to be middle class fat guys playing video-games and bitching about feminazis, dreaming of the day of the retribution.

Clean up you room, bucko.

His proposition is probably recruiting top scientists from around the world to maintain technological superiority in the market.
I wouldn't say its necessary. If it was a matter of intellectual talent we could incentivize our population to pursue certain fields. Still there is something to be said about denying the enemy an asset, and people are valuable assets.

We could have an Emperor who came from a distinguished military background, but we run into a similar issue. The military doesn't hold the prestige today that it once did. The name and office wouldn't command the same respect with people today, especially since we have no tradition of having an Emperor in the first place.
The ideas that work best are ones that resonate with the population.

>implying we don't have an emperor god king

...

If we're talking theoretical, federal service / only citizens who put their lives on the line can vote.

But if we're talking realistic, i believe we have the best system as of now. Although of course there can be improvements. If Nazism was successful, i see it downgrading and entering a sort of stagnation similar to North Korea after Hitler died and there became a power vacuum.

So you claim might makes right? The strong are not guaranteed to be able to build mighty empires.

>another flavor of socialism is a third position from socialism and capitalism

>>implying we don't have an emperor god king

I can't decide if the wh40k "God Emperor" analogy for trump is accurate or inaccurate, since the god emperor of mankind was essentially imprisoned on his golden throne, and corrupt bureaucrats basically were running the empire as foolishly as possible, right into the ground.

Statocracy you mean?

that is more or less correct as to how I view it, though obviously you forget the fact that the bell curve doesnt allow for endless talent to be had among your own ranks and races...besides stealing the assets of other nations, and thus making them much worse (much much worse) is not a natsoc, or volkish thing to do you know. The fascists in a way allow for some psychopathic approach to the wholesomeness of other races, as we are willing to trample over their genepool, deprive them of governing, and industry heads to win ourselves.

might takes form in many ways, some military and bullying, but also good tradesman skill, bartering, economics etc.. Basically being able to be strong enough to make other people submit and to play by your rules would be in my view the requirement to be considered a king. Basically, if you can force other people to call you king, and to have fancy ceremonies for you. And you can do it over the longer term, I would consider you a king.

Our achievements are for our benefit. Exclusively.

Kinda, but more democratic, with people not wanting to do such a thing being able to live decent lives still, just that they don't have any say so. Its what they have in the starship troopers.

Third positions are for faggots.

He's a jew, he's a race traitor.

A bad system would be a system that needs a leader with god like features in order to work making the upholding of the systhem impossible and delusional

And that is why nobody takes meme flags seriously...

Monarchism -> Fascism -> National Socialism -> Nazbol -> Democracy

All his kids are married to jews actually

Aside from that being obviously wrong, yes (((Kushner))) is a problem

OGAS - Intergralism because capitalism/planned economics is a cancer.

iunderstandnoneofthoseideologies:thepic.jpg

as long the monarch is an AI I'm okay with it. Humans become jewified if they are monarchs. Look at the last French king.

damn straight, you remember that as you go in the chambers


shouldnt have touchy da vidya

>Intergralism
>'lets all be buddies ok? Now we can organise our society better! See? :D'
Are you 10?

>Implying my version of absolute monarchism would tolerate Jews and minorities.

It would be an ethnostate ruled by a Catholic king.

agreed

ops twitter faggot laughs but gaming was a serious instrument of societal control like porn and drugs, to think fucking with it at all wouldn't be dangerous or would be without consequences was a major miscalculation

How simple and naive can you be?

Thats what I would ask the meme flag.

Fourth political theory is the way, fuck outta here with this pozzed shit.

How much reddit can you space

wasn't that French faggot catholic too?

Falangeism. Franco and salazar were the only third positionist to survive world war two in Europe.

Here you go officer, record by flag for your online antisemitism monitoring. I'm English and live in London.

Strasserism. The middle way between fascism and communism. Ant capitalist and anti Marx. Just perfect.

>Techno anything

The problem with late monarchism was that they fell for the ‘tolerance’ meme. They also fell for liberalism and other cancerous ideas from the enlightenment era.

We must banish these ideas for good and things will go alright.

Have you ever heard of "ethnic complementarity"?
People are united on the principle of complementarity. Complementarity is an unconscious sympathy for one people and antipathy for others, i.e. positive and negative complementarity.

Within one ethnically, antipathy between different classes rarely arises.

Are you a paki LARPing tho?

...

/thread

...

What are you both Jews? Niggers? Mutts? If you are both white then you are traitors for trying to hold us back from saving our race.

Despite all my hatred for Dugin, he is right: all basic ideologies are outdated.

The question is: what should be the ideology of the future?
Eugenics or universalism?
Economics: capitalism, plan or technocracy?
Etc, etc, etc.

Too many questions, too little time

What? I'm a National Socialist too, fucko. I agree with you. And by the way, I'm a second generation American. My family is mostly Norwegian with some Irish in me as well.

>What? I'm a National Socialist too, fucko. I agree with you. And by the way, I'm a second generation American. My family is mostly Norwegian with some Irish in me as well.

So you are a mutt.

>ethnic complementarity
Only applies to small communities, large states organised by this principle are bound to fail.

Fuck you. Europe is Europe.

Clerical fascism, but Zamolxism instead of Christianity

actually, he went berserk on everyone that had the slightest disagreement with his state, and he built an palace so impractically large that visiting all the rooms could qualify as an olympic training regiment.

Give me one good reason why i should care about ethically purity instead racial

imma go with fascism thanks
because everything is indeed a problem

You're not even European. Learning the language means nothing. Fuck off.

I never implied that letting a bunch of deluded inbred mongrels rule a country was a good idea. I like the idea of a Roman structure more. The emperor would have to adopt his ideal candidate as an heir. I would also like to include the public in a vote, either in favour or against the appointed heir.

Kek, I’m 100% Dutch faggot. Far from mongrolised like you Anglos are.

USA before Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 were organized in a similar way.

>Zamolxism
cringe
Bow down to Jesus Christ ya dimwit

Well act like it then, you moron.

what about Calicgula? I agree Roman is better than dark ages, but this dude fucked the wife of some counsillor one room NEXT TO HIM. He also drowned and tortured people in sadistic sports games. That includes his loyalists such as the guard.