Oh look, Snopes did a "fact check" on Obama's spermhead

They declared it false, so I guess it's true.

archive.is/S1kvD

Other urls found in this thread:

newsmediawatchdog.com/single-post/2018/02/13/Bizarre-Former-President-Obamas-New-Official-Portrait-Appears-To-Feature-Sperm-Like-Cell-On-His-Forehead
smarthistory.org/kehinde-wiley-napoleon-leading-the-army-over-the-alps/
youtube.com/watch?v=tOcu-rJs8B0
dailycaller.com/2018/02/13/obamas-painter-has-long-predatory-peverse-history-of-sneaking-sperm-into-paintings/
youtube.com/watch?v=OJ2y7yetXdY
archive.is/S1kvD
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

They also directly called out chan:
>So, whence did the “Obama covered in sperm” notion originate? Look no further than the racist trolls inhabiting the Sup Forums message board, where the notion appears to have been birthed earlier that same day

Do you even know what sperm looks like, user? I'm guessing that you're so underage that you've never even seen the stuff. Probably your daddy's and uncle's sperm always stayed inside your asshole too.

Why are you so jealous of a man with a penis that is superior to yours?

what has to break inside of you to make you try this hard

>what has to break inside of you to make you try this hard
Not as many penises as you've had inside you, user.

Also, actually how mad are you (out of ten)?

What about the dick arm.

Faggot defending a massive load of cum on the past presidents face. Expected!

his rectum

Is that you, user? Maybe you've had more semen inside you than anyone even realized. What's it like being a retarded cum-rag doll?

I'm actually 103 years old. Try again faggot.

It's all in here, bruh:

newsmediawatchdog.com/single-post/2018/02/13/Bizarre-Former-President-Obamas-New-Official-Portrait-Appears-To-Feature-Sperm-Like-Cell-On-His-Forehead

Reason Snopes doesn't have a comment section is because it would be too easy to discredit their fake news

I like how they crop it just out of sight of the sperm.

>Global average 5.5
>Only 5% of the world's population above 5.5 but 80% below 5

That's not how averages work.

This would discredit their shit instantly.

Quick rundown on the sperm in Obama's face? I was here for the big hands discussion but I missed this.

These are the (((people))) who own snopes btw.

See

>That's not how averages work.
It is when there are some truly astonishing outliers on the high end of the scale. Don't be in denial, user.

He has a club foot in his portrait

I thought they got divorced after the dude hired a porn star as an escort using their ad revenue.

Thanks famalam

It'd list the outliers then.

Could u imagine a 3.8 inch penis. Thatd be like 1 inch with whiskey dick. I understand gringo fever in east asia bars now

Snopes needs to be burnt the fuck down

Here's another example for you.
Some black penises are astonishingly large and potent, user. Why do you think white women go after them so much.

Nice shopped pic, faggot.

the 1st photo they use cuts off the sperm
the 2nd photo they use is not even the portrait at all...it's just some random picture

Snopes just gets more brazenly dishonest every day, who actually still reads this garbage?

...

>brazilian
>huwhite

pls rename factually incorrect image that you are using to bait noble huwhite males.
thanks.

Replied before realizing her hair is defying reality

How's JIDF doing lately?

They were much more tolerable when they wrote about Bigfoot, Nessi and ayylmao's.

Oh and they conclude the article with a tweet from "Adrenochrome Harvester". Nice.

Well it's settled. They bullied Hannity and Snopes debunked spermgate, so pack it in...let's not actually fo journalism like ask kehinde if it's true or not.

...

If 9 out of 10 of an artist's paintings include sperm cells, and the 10th one has something that clearly looks like a sperm cell, it's probably a sperm cell.

When spreading this, the portrait by itself doesn't prove anything- we need to be showing images of the sperm in his many past works.

He who controls the defunct boomers
Controls
All of niggerdom

yea like in the 90s

>artist is known for putting sperm imagery in painting
>obvious sperm in painting

>look at this crop shot that doesn't even show the right area

See it's obviously false goyim.

We did it reddit!

so thats why north korea is so inclusive, they dont want others to make fun of their dicks

>Snopes needs to be burnt the fuck down

I got you user, more to come.

...

No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...

i've actually had people cite snopes at me.

i don't even.

...

Let snopes debunk this.

>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...

Its on his fucking head plain to see how do they think an article will convince me to not believe my eyes?

>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...
>No one else noticed that they use a tweet from "Adrenochrome harvester" as a source...

This is the reason why there's so many shills on Sup Forums. It's so powerful it shapes reality on a daily basis.

...

...

Yeah its definitely there, theres not excuse for that being drawn there he doesnt have a Weird mole or vein there.

What article?

wtf that's actually pretty cool
shit decision to include text, but the portrait itself is a lot of fun

Can I get a NEETbox? I have a job and make money but don't cook and eat shit fast food all the time because I'm a lazy piece of shit. I'll pay for it as long as I don't have to do any work.

Did they mention that the artist puts sperm in lots of his art, or did they only focus on the small amount of information that made them feel good and ignore the rest?

smarthistory.org/kehinde-wiley-napoleon-leading-the-army-over-the-alps/

Is this supposed to look like lazy shit?

They got that shit wrong too.

>tfw larger than average Congo
>tfw no gf
How can I find qt size queen gf who wants mildly autistic horse cock, Anons?

What do you think

>crop picture
>tell people it’s all lies don’t believe your eyes
Wow really

Why is it that so much black art has to be about trying to appropriate, imitate, mock or deride white (European) art? Everything black people seem to creatively make seems to always have some kind of butthurt sentiment about white people in it, as if they don't have any identity of their own outside of crying about "muh oppreshun" or whatever.

Here's another example:
youtube.com/watch?v=tOcu-rJs8B0

...

Is no one going to point out his two right feet? KEK!

false flag, it was actually ebaumsworld. again.

>not using the official version
If you use those shops people won’t believe you.
Here’s the original.

No, but I'll point out the obvious penis arm.

That bitch is some ugly mongrel spic.

Further proof that every nigga is on the down low.

LONDON
O
N
D
O
N

Because stealing is the only thing most niggers know how to do.

lol

You liberal faggots still cant meme worth shit. It was hur tern

>USA
>5'
I refuse to believe this

All these years and you still haven't fixed the shop

They trusted Sup Forums

>Snopes

THIS IS GREAT!

Stealthy merchants!

Will they correct this or make their "fact-checking" assessment just dispappear when they find out about the "artist's" past works?

Is his hair made of sperm too?

Daily Caller names the sperm.

The artist who painted former President Barack Obama for the National Portrait Gallery in the Smithsonian has a history of including depictions of sperm in his work, and has been described as “predatory” and “perverse” by The Village Voice.

Wiley “lures young men into his studio with the promise of power and glamour,” writer and art critic Jessica Dawson wrote. She called the behavior “predatory” and “perverse.” Dawson also points out the sexuality in several of his pieces and highlights that they often include sperm....

The portrait includes a vein on the side of Obama’s head that has caused internet buzz.
[Article illustrated with pic related.]
>dailycaller.com/2018/02/13/obamas-painter-has-long-predatory-peverse-history-of-sneaking-sperm-into-paintings/

They are fake news. The literal definition of it. All "fact checking" outlets are.

Have you guys watched the video where the Obongos reveal their portraits, looks like its the first time they see them and they struggle to find words to praise them.

post video

WE WUZ DIGITS

This video kinda sucks but I can't find the one I saw before that had Michelle talking as well.

youtube.com/watch?v=OJ2y7yetXdY

Also I can't be fucked going to Snopes but did their fact check involve any fact checks?

I like
archive link: archive.is/S1kvD

that vid triggers me, poc hates on our heritage & threatens racial genocide against the natives, funded by the SNP

thanks, over 9000 milliseconds in MSPaint

So they didn't even ask the artist? Fake news.

I don't think that's how you use whom.

What an embarrassment.

>depicting black women holding the severed heads of white people — tableaux some decried as “racist”
Oh NOW you want to put scare quotes around that word.
God I hate these sanctimonious fucks. Too many skulls, not enough claw hammers

...

I should have been more specific:
White.

Even in death, he had rhythm