Whole foods Co-founder CEO changes from liberal to libertarian. Lots of salty commies in the comments

Whole foods Co-founder CEO changes from liberal to libertarian. Lots of salty commies in the comments.

youtube.com/watch?v=0cbi1pCyzt8

>UPVOTE
UPVOTE
>UPVOTE
UPVOTE
>UPVOTE
UPVOTE

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/Conversations-Stalin-Milovan-Djilas/dp/0156225913
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

>(((libertarian)))

Trust me here. He will use a different word, but carry on with Democratic Party norms. TPTB are upset that Dems got caught being corrupt and pizzagating so they are trying to call themselves something different, but also well known. Libertarians have always pissed off the Dems because they won't do as the Dems say without question. So they have invaded the Libertarians so the next time they get caught, it will be a PR nightmare for the Libertarians. Also the fighting that Libertarians will need to do to keep Dems out will make Libertarians into Authoritarians which also helps with forcing party norms to the Authoritarian Right.

TLDR: Ignore the whole foods guy.

What do you have against libertarians?
You know why it isn't theft you retard? Because no one is taking anything from you, you voluntary agreed and you are paying for not having to take A HUGE RISK and all the oppurtunities your boss provides you you maggot.

Most of the value produced is merely attributed to the availability of trading for other things the market provides.

Good point but I think this guy is genuinely now a libertarian. Either that or he has really put on a show, because some of the stuff he said was like Sup Forums circa 2012-2015.

It is a show. They are experts at it. Their only goal is to stay out of Pic Related when the 14000+ sealed indictments are made public.

Not even a libtard but this is retarded... You choose to work and give away the surplus, you do not choose to give away tax. That is the definition of the word theft. Go fuck yourself leaf.

You know how they do that? They change definitions.
Racism now means prejudice + power
Theft now means surplus value but taxation is ok
Anarchy now means no hierarchies
etc.
This marxist takeover has been planned for a long time and look how well it worked, millions of brainwashed idiots in the western world.

capitalism is cancer.

The charges are going to be by individual, not by party.

I think you're a bit too much conspiratorial, I can believe an american socialist grew up to be a libertarian businessman, can you redpill me on the indictments?

...

...

Libertarianism is communist.

>Libertarianism is communist.
lol

Show me some libertarian cucks or gtfo

>t. missed the capitalism institution boat

fuck off, retard.

...

>lower taxes and regs on my fortune 500 company while keeping them for small business competitors
>keep all the other progressive shit
Modern libertarians are just kikes.

Try stepping on a snake in real life jackass.

If you mean the libertarian party then sure. I think liberty hangout said this, but the thing the libertarian movement suffered the most from is a leftist subversion, just like the us goverment.

...

Top kek.
>Be libertarian
>Believe in "live and let live"
Jesus christ the poster is an absolute faggot. I despide degeneracy, that's why I believe degenerates shouldn't be able to steal my money through taxes and I believe in covenant societies which can ban any ethnicity it wants.

Communists can't think that far ahead. Typical Commie think is
>Is MINE or is MINE NAO?
It's why they get so depressed after they run out of assets to seize and have to go back to being the means of production.

There needs to be somebody who can think like them (which is why I made this thread), become a market person, then explain to them in their terms why market is superior. Only problem is that the vid is half an hour.

Then you'll die.

Yeah that's just one of those crypto-Fascist "hoppean libertarians" recruiting for stormfront.

>b-b-but libertarians have always been right-wing totalitarians
>I-I s-swear classical liberals were a meme
>h-history is made up by (((them)))!

bump

...

I have had a lifelong interest in communist literature and I have often tried to be that guy. The problem I have found is that communists no longer read communist literature. They read pamphlets and blogs. They do not even understand what communism was in practical or theoretical terms. Lenin and Mao would probably sad.

On the rare occasion I have run into an educated communist, I have had some success. Most of them have been totally blindsided by the hook, "Communism is just neo-feudalism with a modern bureaucracy." It seems to intrigue them enough to ask more and give them the false sense of confidence that they can easily refute what seems to them an oddball claim. Perhaps they think they can convert me by clearing up some misconception. Then I discuss the economics of communism and feudalism on the ground, starting with communes. I move onto the supposed economic miracles of communist countries. This leaves them the opportunity to refute the idea by contrasting the stark differences between the nomenklatura and the feudal lords.

If you're read then you can work on the university types with your literature experience. As far as the common commie, like you said they aren't going to be well read so a different approach is required.

This CEO has practiced both ideologies and has come to this conclusion. So he can be pointed to as a sort of case study.

...

You may be interested in this book

amazon.com/Conversations-Stalin-Milovan-Djilas/dp/0156225913

I only read it recently, but it has given me the impression that the only (non-extreme) way to really shake the true believer types is to watch their heroes act against their own interests or behaving as hypocrites. Djilas was a very high ranked communist in Yugoslavia with a slavish admiration of Stalin. He describes meeting him as raptures initially. Later, as he watches Stalin partition Eastern Europe, he was forced to consider his own interests on behalf of Yugoslavia. The nail in the coffin was a sort of mini show trial where the leader of Bulgaria was accused of anti-communist activities for trying to form a customs union with Romania without Stalin's permission. Still, Djilas was a communist for more than a decade after that before defecting to the west.

It is certainly a powerful psychological method. Orchestrating the ordeal in a ordered way to destination is another thing. I'll check out the book.

bump

final bumpu

So did I a few years ago

And now I’m a white nationalist

>Be moderate liberal who supports limited deployment of socialist programs
>Life-long Democrat
>In the last few years have been gradually driven out by the rise of this borderless extreme-left outrage-culture-driven shit show that denies basic realities in favor of desperately circle-jerking around a communist utopian ideal that would destroy human civilization and doom any nation it fully deploys in to centuries of bloody tribal conflict
Sometimes, you just need to hang some people.

>taxes are only like 5% of your income bro
>the value productive enterprises steal from you is like 10 times your income
>you would be ten times richer if we prohibited profiting from productive investments
Commies are by far the most retarded, degenerate, ugly, pieces of trash this world has ever seen. I hope you realize that if you all got exterminated the next day, the world would see improvements in its sanity.

welcome aboard

are you larping to be this fucking retarded?

It's easy to dismiss the notion, but the modern far-left are basically left-libertarians. Some of them believe that an ungoverned, borderless environment would be a utopia of peaceful coexistence.

It's a weird parallel. That said, I dislike libertarianism at its heart. I only posted here because of the alienated-liberal relation. The regulation of an efficient, technocratic, and uncorrupt government system is important. The issue is we'll never have that.